Can you describe someone as luxurious?
Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?
We're pretty sure you can't, but we don't know what word you'd use. It's not hedonistic, that's different. We're just looking for the word that describes specifically a person, not a thing.
It's a bit like how you can't call someone who likes creamy things creamy.
word-usage word-choice word-request
New contributor
add a comment |
Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?
We're pretty sure you can't, but we don't know what word you'd use. It's not hedonistic, that's different. We're just looking for the word that describes specifically a person, not a thing.
It's a bit like how you can't call someone who likes creamy things creamy.
word-usage word-choice word-request
New contributor
1
I would tend to use, "a lover of luxury". Could you give some context in the form of an actual sentence that uses the word please. Then we can see what best fits.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
add a comment |
Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?
We're pretty sure you can't, but we don't know what word you'd use. It's not hedonistic, that's different. We're just looking for the word that describes specifically a person, not a thing.
It's a bit like how you can't call someone who likes creamy things creamy.
word-usage word-choice word-request
New contributor
Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?
We're pretty sure you can't, but we don't know what word you'd use. It's not hedonistic, that's different. We're just looking for the word that describes specifically a person, not a thing.
It's a bit like how you can't call someone who likes creamy things creamy.
word-usage word-choice word-request
word-usage word-choice word-request
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
J.R.♦
100k8129247
100k8129247
New contributor
asked Mar 19 at 21:31
James McAvoyJames McAvoy
461
461
New contributor
New contributor
1
I would tend to use, "a lover of luxury". Could you give some context in the form of an actual sentence that uses the word please. Then we can see what best fits.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
I would tend to use, "a lover of luxury". Could you give some context in the form of an actual sentence that uses the word please. Then we can see what best fits.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
1
1
I would tend to use, "a lover of luxury". Could you give some context in the form of an actual sentence that uses the word please. Then we can see what best fits.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
I would tend to use, "a lover of luxury". Could you give some context in the form of an actual sentence that uses the word please. Then we can see what best fits.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
I believe that I've occasionally seen this done, but I would call it poor writing. rather one might say:
She had luxurious tastes; her closet was full of mink coats and designer outfits.
or
He had luxurious habits; he always flew First Class and stayed in penthouse suites at five-star hotels.
So it is a person's tastes or habits or possessions that are luxurious, not the person directly.
New contributor
add a comment |
Maybe extravagant is the word you’re looking for. It can refer to someone’s tastes or spending habits or particular large purchases, but also the person themself:
3a : spending much more than necessary
has always been extravagant with her money
add a comment |
bon vivant - a person who devotes themselves to a sociable and luxurious lifestyle.
If you want to sound really cool (and pompous), combine bon vivant with billionaire, gallivanter, and playboy ;)
add a comment |
I believe decadent to be a good fit.
Decadent - noun~ a person who is luxuriously self-indulgent.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decadent
New contributor
add a comment |
sybarite
noun ( usually lowercase ) a person devoted to luxury and pleasure. an
inhabitant of Sybaris https://www.dictionary.com/browse/sybarite
Epicurean
A person devoted to sensual enjoyment, especially that derived from fine food and drink.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/epicurean
add a comment |
Hedonist or Hedonistic person from Hedonism-Hedonism is a school of thought that argues that the pursuit of pleasure and intrinsic goods are the primary or most important goals of human life. A hedonist strives to maximize net pleasure.
New contributor
You haven't read the question
– Tom
2 days ago
I don't agree with the premise of the question - Hedonistic is indeed a good fit (probably not the best) and should not have been discounted by the OP
– Mike Brockington
2 days ago
You can't say hedonism is a good fit for this context without first assuming that luxurious things bring pleasure to everyone in the same way. I agree with OP that hedonism IS different
– Tom
2 days ago
It's very possible to be a hedonist yet not care for or about luxurious things. Moreover, this answer dodges the main question.
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
You can sometimes use the concept of luxury to describe a person, but it is objectifying; the adjective 'luxurious' is used in the cliche 'luxurious blonde' which usually refers to hair, but can rarely also refer to a person with such hair or Iggy Pop's 'I felt the luxury of her'. This use doesn't mean that the person being described likes luxury, only that some aspect of that person is objectified as a luxury.
Did you mean we can use "luxurious" to describe a person?
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
@J.R. yes, that is what the answer says.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
The answer says: You can use "luxury" to describe a person, not: You can use "luxurious" to describe a person.
– J.R.♦
yesterday
@J.R. what level of comprehension are we supposed to be writing to? Giving the example of a cliche that uses the word to describe a person says that the word can be used to describe a person.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
1
This is a learner's forum. Most people reading our answers are not native English speakers. Some are almost fluent, and some are barely fluent. Many questions reveal how many are struggling with the language. For example, we had one just yesterday where someone was struggling with the difference between "I will make you laughing" vs. "I will make you laughed". Given that clientele, I think we should be meticulously clear to not create the erroneous impression that we can say, "She is a luxury person" if we mean "a luxurious person".
– J.R.♦
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
James McAvoy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201407%2fcan-you-describe-someone-as-luxurious%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I believe that I've occasionally seen this done, but I would call it poor writing. rather one might say:
She had luxurious tastes; her closet was full of mink coats and designer outfits.
or
He had luxurious habits; he always flew First Class and stayed in penthouse suites at five-star hotels.
So it is a person's tastes or habits or possessions that are luxurious, not the person directly.
New contributor
add a comment |
I believe that I've occasionally seen this done, but I would call it poor writing. rather one might say:
She had luxurious tastes; her closet was full of mink coats and designer outfits.
or
He had luxurious habits; he always flew First Class and stayed in penthouse suites at five-star hotels.
So it is a person's tastes or habits or possessions that are luxurious, not the person directly.
New contributor
add a comment |
I believe that I've occasionally seen this done, but I would call it poor writing. rather one might say:
She had luxurious tastes; her closet was full of mink coats and designer outfits.
or
He had luxurious habits; he always flew First Class and stayed in penthouse suites at five-star hotels.
So it is a person's tastes or habits or possessions that are luxurious, not the person directly.
New contributor
I believe that I've occasionally seen this done, but I would call it poor writing. rather one might say:
She had luxurious tastes; her closet was full of mink coats and designer outfits.
or
He had luxurious habits; he always flew First Class and stayed in penthouse suites at five-star hotels.
So it is a person's tastes or habits or possessions that are luxurious, not the person directly.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Mar 19 at 21:37
David SiegelDavid Siegel
1,23111
1,23111
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Maybe extravagant is the word you’re looking for. It can refer to someone’s tastes or spending habits or particular large purchases, but also the person themself:
3a : spending much more than necessary
has always been extravagant with her money
add a comment |
Maybe extravagant is the word you’re looking for. It can refer to someone’s tastes or spending habits or particular large purchases, but also the person themself:
3a : spending much more than necessary
has always been extravagant with her money
add a comment |
Maybe extravagant is the word you’re looking for. It can refer to someone’s tastes or spending habits or particular large purchases, but also the person themself:
3a : spending much more than necessary
has always been extravagant with her money
Maybe extravagant is the word you’re looking for. It can refer to someone’s tastes or spending habits or particular large purchases, but also the person themself:
3a : spending much more than necessary
has always been extravagant with her money
answered Mar 19 at 21:49
MixolydianMixolydian
4,086614
4,086614
add a comment |
add a comment |
bon vivant - a person who devotes themselves to a sociable and luxurious lifestyle.
If you want to sound really cool (and pompous), combine bon vivant with billionaire, gallivanter, and playboy ;)
add a comment |
bon vivant - a person who devotes themselves to a sociable and luxurious lifestyle.
If you want to sound really cool (and pompous), combine bon vivant with billionaire, gallivanter, and playboy ;)
add a comment |
bon vivant - a person who devotes themselves to a sociable and luxurious lifestyle.
If you want to sound really cool (and pompous), combine bon vivant with billionaire, gallivanter, and playboy ;)
bon vivant - a person who devotes themselves to a sociable and luxurious lifestyle.
If you want to sound really cool (and pompous), combine bon vivant with billionaire, gallivanter, and playboy ;)
answered Mar 19 at 21:50
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
1,874521
1,874521
add a comment |
add a comment |
I believe decadent to be a good fit.
Decadent - noun~ a person who is luxuriously self-indulgent.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decadent
New contributor
add a comment |
I believe decadent to be a good fit.
Decadent - noun~ a person who is luxuriously self-indulgent.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decadent
New contributor
add a comment |
I believe decadent to be a good fit.
Decadent - noun~ a person who is luxuriously self-indulgent.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decadent
New contributor
I believe decadent to be a good fit.
Decadent - noun~ a person who is luxuriously self-indulgent.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decadent
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
TomTom
1214
1214
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
sybarite
noun ( usually lowercase ) a person devoted to luxury and pleasure. an
inhabitant of Sybaris https://www.dictionary.com/browse/sybarite
Epicurean
A person devoted to sensual enjoyment, especially that derived from fine food and drink.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/epicurean
add a comment |
sybarite
noun ( usually lowercase ) a person devoted to luxury and pleasure. an
inhabitant of Sybaris https://www.dictionary.com/browse/sybarite
Epicurean
A person devoted to sensual enjoyment, especially that derived from fine food and drink.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/epicurean
add a comment |
sybarite
noun ( usually lowercase ) a person devoted to luxury and pleasure. an
inhabitant of Sybaris https://www.dictionary.com/browse/sybarite
Epicurean
A person devoted to sensual enjoyment, especially that derived from fine food and drink.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/epicurean
sybarite
noun ( usually lowercase ) a person devoted to luxury and pleasure. an
inhabitant of Sybaris https://www.dictionary.com/browse/sybarite
Epicurean
A person devoted to sensual enjoyment, especially that derived from fine food and drink.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/epicurean
answered 2 days ago
chasly from UKchasly from UK
2,588313
2,588313
add a comment |
add a comment |
Hedonist or Hedonistic person from Hedonism-Hedonism is a school of thought that argues that the pursuit of pleasure and intrinsic goods are the primary or most important goals of human life. A hedonist strives to maximize net pleasure.
New contributor
You haven't read the question
– Tom
2 days ago
I don't agree with the premise of the question - Hedonistic is indeed a good fit (probably not the best) and should not have been discounted by the OP
– Mike Brockington
2 days ago
You can't say hedonism is a good fit for this context without first assuming that luxurious things bring pleasure to everyone in the same way. I agree with OP that hedonism IS different
– Tom
2 days ago
It's very possible to be a hedonist yet not care for or about luxurious things. Moreover, this answer dodges the main question.
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
Hedonist or Hedonistic person from Hedonism-Hedonism is a school of thought that argues that the pursuit of pleasure and intrinsic goods are the primary or most important goals of human life. A hedonist strives to maximize net pleasure.
New contributor
You haven't read the question
– Tom
2 days ago
I don't agree with the premise of the question - Hedonistic is indeed a good fit (probably not the best) and should not have been discounted by the OP
– Mike Brockington
2 days ago
You can't say hedonism is a good fit for this context without first assuming that luxurious things bring pleasure to everyone in the same way. I agree with OP that hedonism IS different
– Tom
2 days ago
It's very possible to be a hedonist yet not care for or about luxurious things. Moreover, this answer dodges the main question.
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
Hedonist or Hedonistic person from Hedonism-Hedonism is a school of thought that argues that the pursuit of pleasure and intrinsic goods are the primary or most important goals of human life. A hedonist strives to maximize net pleasure.
New contributor
Hedonist or Hedonistic person from Hedonism-Hedonism is a school of thought that argues that the pursuit of pleasure and intrinsic goods are the primary or most important goals of human life. A hedonist strives to maximize net pleasure.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Neerajan SahaNeerajan Saha
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
You haven't read the question
– Tom
2 days ago
I don't agree with the premise of the question - Hedonistic is indeed a good fit (probably not the best) and should not have been discounted by the OP
– Mike Brockington
2 days ago
You can't say hedonism is a good fit for this context without first assuming that luxurious things bring pleasure to everyone in the same way. I agree with OP that hedonism IS different
– Tom
2 days ago
It's very possible to be a hedonist yet not care for or about luxurious things. Moreover, this answer dodges the main question.
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
You haven't read the question
– Tom
2 days ago
I don't agree with the premise of the question - Hedonistic is indeed a good fit (probably not the best) and should not have been discounted by the OP
– Mike Brockington
2 days ago
You can't say hedonism is a good fit for this context without first assuming that luxurious things bring pleasure to everyone in the same way. I agree with OP that hedonism IS different
– Tom
2 days ago
It's very possible to be a hedonist yet not care for or about luxurious things. Moreover, this answer dodges the main question.
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
You haven't read the question
– Tom
2 days ago
You haven't read the question
– Tom
2 days ago
I don't agree with the premise of the question - Hedonistic is indeed a good fit (probably not the best) and should not have been discounted by the OP
– Mike Brockington
2 days ago
I don't agree with the premise of the question - Hedonistic is indeed a good fit (probably not the best) and should not have been discounted by the OP
– Mike Brockington
2 days ago
You can't say hedonism is a good fit for this context without first assuming that luxurious things bring pleasure to everyone in the same way. I agree with OP that hedonism IS different
– Tom
2 days ago
You can't say hedonism is a good fit for this context without first assuming that luxurious things bring pleasure to everyone in the same way. I agree with OP that hedonism IS different
– Tom
2 days ago
It's very possible to be a hedonist yet not care for or about luxurious things. Moreover, this answer dodges the main question.
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
It's very possible to be a hedonist yet not care for or about luxurious things. Moreover, this answer dodges the main question.
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
You can sometimes use the concept of luxury to describe a person, but it is objectifying; the adjective 'luxurious' is used in the cliche 'luxurious blonde' which usually refers to hair, but can rarely also refer to a person with such hair or Iggy Pop's 'I felt the luxury of her'. This use doesn't mean that the person being described likes luxury, only that some aspect of that person is objectified as a luxury.
Did you mean we can use "luxurious" to describe a person?
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
@J.R. yes, that is what the answer says.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
The answer says: You can use "luxury" to describe a person, not: You can use "luxurious" to describe a person.
– J.R.♦
yesterday
@J.R. what level of comprehension are we supposed to be writing to? Giving the example of a cliche that uses the word to describe a person says that the word can be used to describe a person.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
1
This is a learner's forum. Most people reading our answers are not native English speakers. Some are almost fluent, and some are barely fluent. Many questions reveal how many are struggling with the language. For example, we had one just yesterday where someone was struggling with the difference between "I will make you laughing" vs. "I will make you laughed". Given that clientele, I think we should be meticulously clear to not create the erroneous impression that we can say, "She is a luxury person" if we mean "a luxurious person".
– J.R.♦
yesterday
add a comment |
You can sometimes use the concept of luxury to describe a person, but it is objectifying; the adjective 'luxurious' is used in the cliche 'luxurious blonde' which usually refers to hair, but can rarely also refer to a person with such hair or Iggy Pop's 'I felt the luxury of her'. This use doesn't mean that the person being described likes luxury, only that some aspect of that person is objectified as a luxury.
Did you mean we can use "luxurious" to describe a person?
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
@J.R. yes, that is what the answer says.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
The answer says: You can use "luxury" to describe a person, not: You can use "luxurious" to describe a person.
– J.R.♦
yesterday
@J.R. what level of comprehension are we supposed to be writing to? Giving the example of a cliche that uses the word to describe a person says that the word can be used to describe a person.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
1
This is a learner's forum. Most people reading our answers are not native English speakers. Some are almost fluent, and some are barely fluent. Many questions reveal how many are struggling with the language. For example, we had one just yesterday where someone was struggling with the difference between "I will make you laughing" vs. "I will make you laughed". Given that clientele, I think we should be meticulously clear to not create the erroneous impression that we can say, "She is a luxury person" if we mean "a luxurious person".
– J.R.♦
yesterday
add a comment |
You can sometimes use the concept of luxury to describe a person, but it is objectifying; the adjective 'luxurious' is used in the cliche 'luxurious blonde' which usually refers to hair, but can rarely also refer to a person with such hair or Iggy Pop's 'I felt the luxury of her'. This use doesn't mean that the person being described likes luxury, only that some aspect of that person is objectified as a luxury.
You can sometimes use the concept of luxury to describe a person, but it is objectifying; the adjective 'luxurious' is used in the cliche 'luxurious blonde' which usually refers to hair, but can rarely also refer to a person with such hair or Iggy Pop's 'I felt the luxury of her'. This use doesn't mean that the person being described likes luxury, only that some aspect of that person is objectified as a luxury.
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Pete KirkhamPete Kirkham
65447
65447
Did you mean we can use "luxurious" to describe a person?
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
@J.R. yes, that is what the answer says.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
The answer says: You can use "luxury" to describe a person, not: You can use "luxurious" to describe a person.
– J.R.♦
yesterday
@J.R. what level of comprehension are we supposed to be writing to? Giving the example of a cliche that uses the word to describe a person says that the word can be used to describe a person.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
1
This is a learner's forum. Most people reading our answers are not native English speakers. Some are almost fluent, and some are barely fluent. Many questions reveal how many are struggling with the language. For example, we had one just yesterday where someone was struggling with the difference between "I will make you laughing" vs. "I will make you laughed". Given that clientele, I think we should be meticulously clear to not create the erroneous impression that we can say, "She is a luxury person" if we mean "a luxurious person".
– J.R.♦
yesterday
add a comment |
Did you mean we can use "luxurious" to describe a person?
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
@J.R. yes, that is what the answer says.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
The answer says: You can use "luxury" to describe a person, not: You can use "luxurious" to describe a person.
– J.R.♦
yesterday
@J.R. what level of comprehension are we supposed to be writing to? Giving the example of a cliche that uses the word to describe a person says that the word can be used to describe a person.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
1
This is a learner's forum. Most people reading our answers are not native English speakers. Some are almost fluent, and some are barely fluent. Many questions reveal how many are struggling with the language. For example, we had one just yesterday where someone was struggling with the difference between "I will make you laughing" vs. "I will make you laughed". Given that clientele, I think we should be meticulously clear to not create the erroneous impression that we can say, "She is a luxury person" if we mean "a luxurious person".
– J.R.♦
yesterday
Did you mean we can use "luxurious" to describe a person?
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
Did you mean we can use "luxurious" to describe a person?
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
@J.R. yes, that is what the answer says.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
@J.R. yes, that is what the answer says.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
The answer says: You can use "luxury" to describe a person, not: You can use "luxurious" to describe a person.
– J.R.♦
yesterday
The answer says: You can use "luxury" to describe a person, not: You can use "luxurious" to describe a person.
– J.R.♦
yesterday
@J.R. what level of comprehension are we supposed to be writing to? Giving the example of a cliche that uses the word to describe a person says that the word can be used to describe a person.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
@J.R. what level of comprehension are we supposed to be writing to? Giving the example of a cliche that uses the word to describe a person says that the word can be used to describe a person.
– Pete Kirkham
yesterday
1
1
This is a learner's forum. Most people reading our answers are not native English speakers. Some are almost fluent, and some are barely fluent. Many questions reveal how many are struggling with the language. For example, we had one just yesterday where someone was struggling with the difference between "I will make you laughing" vs. "I will make you laughed". Given that clientele, I think we should be meticulously clear to not create the erroneous impression that we can say, "She is a luxury person" if we mean "a luxurious person".
– J.R.♦
yesterday
This is a learner's forum. Most people reading our answers are not native English speakers. Some are almost fluent, and some are barely fluent. Many questions reveal how many are struggling with the language. For example, we had one just yesterday where someone was struggling with the difference between "I will make you laughing" vs. "I will make you laughed". Given that clientele, I think we should be meticulously clear to not create the erroneous impression that we can say, "She is a luxury person" if we mean "a luxurious person".
– J.R.♦
yesterday
add a comment |
James McAvoy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James McAvoy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James McAvoy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James McAvoy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201407%2fcan-you-describe-someone-as-luxurious%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I would tend to use, "a lover of luxury". Could you give some context in the form of an actual sentence that uses the word please. Then we can see what best fits.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago