Simplest Way to Find Volume of Solid of Revolution Around Given Line












4












$begingroup$


Question



I would like to know the simplest way to find the volume of the solid of revolution created by rotating the parabola $y=x^2$ around the line $y=x$ (the shape shown in blue below). I am currently taking AP BC Calculus as a junior in high school, so a method that uses those concepts would be ideal, but if it is far simpler to use some higher math, I will look into it :)



enter image description here



The following is what I have tried using a variation of the disk method. I believe that is correct, but, as the reader can see, it is very complex.



My Method



To employ the disk method, first, derive a function for the radius of the solid as a function of $x$ along $y=x$. Then, square it and multiply by $pi$. Lastly, integrate on the interval $[0,sqrt{2}]$.



Begin by constructing a line perpendicular to $y=x$ that intersects $y=x$ (occationally $f(x)$) and $y=x^2$ (occationally $g(x)$) at $(x_2,y_2)$ and $(x_1,y_1)$, respectively (as shown below).



enter image description here



$$d=sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}tag{1}$$
Use the distance formula to find the distance between these points.



$$begin{align}
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x+2x_2}\
y &=x
end{align}$$

$$x=-x+2x_2$$
$$2x=2x_2$$
$$x_2=xtag{2}$$





$$begin{align}
y_2&=f(x_2)\
&=xtag{3}
end{align}$$





$$begin{align}
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x_1+2x_2}\
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x_1+2x}\
y &={x_1}^2
end{align}$$

$${x_1}^2=-x_1+2x$$
$$0=1{x_1}^2+1x_1+-2x$$
$$begin{align}
x_1&=frac{-1+sqrt{1^2-4(1)(-2x)}}{2(1)}\
&=frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}tag{4}
end{align}$$





$$begin{align}
y_1&=g(x_1)\
&=bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2tag{5}
end{align}$$

Find the variables in the distance formula as functions of $x$ (Eqns. 2-5 with derivations listed above them, respectively).



$$begin{align}
d&=sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2Bigg)^2}tag{6}
end{align}$$



Plug Eqns. 2-5 into the distance formula.



$$begin{align}
d&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{(1+8x)-2sqrt{1+8x}+1}{4}bigg)Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{2+8x-2sqrt{1+8x}}{4}bigg)Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{2x}{2}-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{2x}{2}-frac{1+4x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{2x-sqrt{1+8x}+1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{2x-1-4x+sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{1+2x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{-1-2x+sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{2Bigg(frac{1+2x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{2Bigg(frac{1+4x^2+(1+8x)+4x-2sqrt{1+8x}-4xsqrt{1+8x}}{4}Bigg)}\
&=sqrt{frac{4x^2+12x-(4x+2)sqrt{1+8x}+2}{2}}\
&=sqrt{2x^2+6x-(2x+1)sqrt{1+8x}+1}tag{7}
end{align}$$



Simplify Eqn. 6.



$$begin{align}
r&=sqrt{2bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)^2+6bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)-bigg(2bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)+1bigg)sqrt{1+8bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)}+1}\
&=sqrt{2bigg(frac{x^2}{2}bigg)+6bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)-bigg(2bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)+1bigg)sqrt{1+8bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)}+1}\
&=sqrt{x^2+3sqrt{2}x-big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+1}tag{8}
end{align}$$



Dilate Eqn. 7 by $sqrt{2}$ in the x-direction to make the distance between the functions x-intercepts equal to the distance between the two intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$. Simplify to give Eqn. 8. Note that the graph of Eqn. 8 from $[0,sqrt{2}]$ (below in green) compares to the reflection over the x-axis of the final equation for a parabola rotated 45 degrees given by Ennar (below in red), as it should.



enter image description here
Graph from Desmos.



Integration by parts work (for below):
$$color{red}{intbig(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}$$
$$
begin{array}{|c|}
hline
mathbf{u=sqrt{2}x+1}, mathbf{dv=sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}\
hline
begin{array}{c|c}
frac{du}{dx}=sqrt{2} & int dv=intsqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx\
mathbf{du=sqrt{2} dx} & v=intsqrt{w} frac{dw}{4sqrt{2}}\
& v=frac{1}{4sqrt{2}}intsqrt{w} dw\
& v=frac{1}{4sqrt{2}}timesfrac{w^frac{3}{2}}{frac{3}{2}}\
& v=frac{2}{12sqrt{2}}w^frac{3}{2}\
& mathbf{v=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}}\
end{array}\
hline
end{array}
$$



$$begin{align}
&=uv-int v du\
&=big(sqrt{2}x+1big)bigg(frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}bigg)-int bigg(frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}bigg)big(sqrt{2} dxbig)\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{6}int big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2} dx\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{6}int w^frac{3}{2} frac{dw}{4sqrt{2}}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{24sqrt{2}}int w^frac{3}{2} dw\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{24sqrt{2}}timesfrac{w^frac{5}{2}}{frac{5}{2}}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{2}{120sqrt{2}}w^frac{5}{2}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{5}{2}\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(10big(sqrt{2}x+1big)-big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)big)\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(10sqrt{2}x+10-1-4sqrt{2}xbig)\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(6sqrt{2}x+9big)\
end{align}$$





Work:
$$begin{align}
V&=int_0^sqrt{2}pisqrt{x^2+3sqrt{2}x-big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+1}^2 dx\
&=int_0^sqrt{2}pi x^2+3pi sqrt{2}x-pi big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+pi dx\
&=int_0^sqrt{2}pi x^2 dx+int_0^sqrt{2}3pi sqrt{2}x dx-int_0^sqrt{2}pi big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx+int_0^sqrt{2}pi dx\
&=piint_0^sqrt{2}x^2 dx+3pi sqrt{2}int_0^sqrt{2}x dx-pi color{red}{int_0^sqrt{2}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}+piint_0^sqrt{2}dx\
&=pibigg[frac{x^3}{3}bigg]_0^sqrt{2}+3pi sqrt{2} bigg[frac{x^2}{2}bigg]_0^sqrt{2}-pi bigg[frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(6sqrt{2}x+9big)bigg]_0^sqrt{2}+pi[x]_0^sqrt{2}\
&=pibigg[frac{2sqrt{2}}{3}-frac{0}{3}bigg]+3pisqrt{2}bigg[frac{2}{2}-frac{0}{2}bigg]-pibigg[frac{(9)^frac{3}{2}(21)}{60sqrt{2}}-frac{(1)^frac{3}{2}(9)}{60sqrt{2}}bigg]+pibig[sqrt{2}-0big]\
&=pibigg[frac{2sqrt{2}}{3}bigg]+3pisqrt{2}[1]-pibigg[frac{558}{60sqrt{2}}bigg]+pibig[sqrt{2}big]\
&=frac{2}{3}pisqrt{2}+3pisqrt{2}-frac{93}{20}pisqrt{2}+pisqrt{2}\
&=pisqrt{2}bigg(frac{40}{60}+frac{180}{60}-frac{279}{60}+frac{60}{60}bigg)\
&=pisqrt{2}bigg(frac{1}{60}bigg)\
&=frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}
end{align}$$



Using the disk method, integrate $pi r^2$ from $[0,sqrt{2}]$ with Eqn. 8 plugged in for $r$ with respect to $x$.



TL;DR



Frankly, the question does not seem that complicated, and the answer of $frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}$ is definitely pretty simple. I have to believe that there is a more concise way of solving this problem.



All thoughts/answers welcome, thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't want to sound discouraging, but this looks like more of an essay or an article than a question.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Dec 17 '18 at 22:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Not at all! Generally, I’ve been told on SE to show things that I have already tried. So I figure that, even though this is long, it helps people understand where I am and what I’m thinking. Maybe that’s just me...
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Dec 17 '18 at 22:36
















4












$begingroup$


Question



I would like to know the simplest way to find the volume of the solid of revolution created by rotating the parabola $y=x^2$ around the line $y=x$ (the shape shown in blue below). I am currently taking AP BC Calculus as a junior in high school, so a method that uses those concepts would be ideal, but if it is far simpler to use some higher math, I will look into it :)



enter image description here



The following is what I have tried using a variation of the disk method. I believe that is correct, but, as the reader can see, it is very complex.



My Method



To employ the disk method, first, derive a function for the radius of the solid as a function of $x$ along $y=x$. Then, square it and multiply by $pi$. Lastly, integrate on the interval $[0,sqrt{2}]$.



Begin by constructing a line perpendicular to $y=x$ that intersects $y=x$ (occationally $f(x)$) and $y=x^2$ (occationally $g(x)$) at $(x_2,y_2)$ and $(x_1,y_1)$, respectively (as shown below).



enter image description here



$$d=sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}tag{1}$$
Use the distance formula to find the distance between these points.



$$begin{align}
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x+2x_2}\
y &=x
end{align}$$

$$x=-x+2x_2$$
$$2x=2x_2$$
$$x_2=xtag{2}$$





$$begin{align}
y_2&=f(x_2)\
&=xtag{3}
end{align}$$





$$begin{align}
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x_1+2x_2}\
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x_1+2x}\
y &={x_1}^2
end{align}$$

$${x_1}^2=-x_1+2x$$
$$0=1{x_1}^2+1x_1+-2x$$
$$begin{align}
x_1&=frac{-1+sqrt{1^2-4(1)(-2x)}}{2(1)}\
&=frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}tag{4}
end{align}$$





$$begin{align}
y_1&=g(x_1)\
&=bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2tag{5}
end{align}$$

Find the variables in the distance formula as functions of $x$ (Eqns. 2-5 with derivations listed above them, respectively).



$$begin{align}
d&=sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2Bigg)^2}tag{6}
end{align}$$



Plug Eqns. 2-5 into the distance formula.



$$begin{align}
d&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{(1+8x)-2sqrt{1+8x}+1}{4}bigg)Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{2+8x-2sqrt{1+8x}}{4}bigg)Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{2x}{2}-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{2x}{2}-frac{1+4x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{2x-sqrt{1+8x}+1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{2x-1-4x+sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{1+2x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{-1-2x+sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{2Bigg(frac{1+2x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{2Bigg(frac{1+4x^2+(1+8x)+4x-2sqrt{1+8x}-4xsqrt{1+8x}}{4}Bigg)}\
&=sqrt{frac{4x^2+12x-(4x+2)sqrt{1+8x}+2}{2}}\
&=sqrt{2x^2+6x-(2x+1)sqrt{1+8x}+1}tag{7}
end{align}$$



Simplify Eqn. 6.



$$begin{align}
r&=sqrt{2bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)^2+6bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)-bigg(2bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)+1bigg)sqrt{1+8bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)}+1}\
&=sqrt{2bigg(frac{x^2}{2}bigg)+6bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)-bigg(2bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)+1bigg)sqrt{1+8bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)}+1}\
&=sqrt{x^2+3sqrt{2}x-big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+1}tag{8}
end{align}$$



Dilate Eqn. 7 by $sqrt{2}$ in the x-direction to make the distance between the functions x-intercepts equal to the distance between the two intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$. Simplify to give Eqn. 8. Note that the graph of Eqn. 8 from $[0,sqrt{2}]$ (below in green) compares to the reflection over the x-axis of the final equation for a parabola rotated 45 degrees given by Ennar (below in red), as it should.



enter image description here
Graph from Desmos.



Integration by parts work (for below):
$$color{red}{intbig(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}$$
$$
begin{array}{|c|}
hline
mathbf{u=sqrt{2}x+1}, mathbf{dv=sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}\
hline
begin{array}{c|c}
frac{du}{dx}=sqrt{2} & int dv=intsqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx\
mathbf{du=sqrt{2} dx} & v=intsqrt{w} frac{dw}{4sqrt{2}}\
& v=frac{1}{4sqrt{2}}intsqrt{w} dw\
& v=frac{1}{4sqrt{2}}timesfrac{w^frac{3}{2}}{frac{3}{2}}\
& v=frac{2}{12sqrt{2}}w^frac{3}{2}\
& mathbf{v=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}}\
end{array}\
hline
end{array}
$$



$$begin{align}
&=uv-int v du\
&=big(sqrt{2}x+1big)bigg(frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}bigg)-int bigg(frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}bigg)big(sqrt{2} dxbig)\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{6}int big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2} dx\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{6}int w^frac{3}{2} frac{dw}{4sqrt{2}}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{24sqrt{2}}int w^frac{3}{2} dw\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{24sqrt{2}}timesfrac{w^frac{5}{2}}{frac{5}{2}}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{2}{120sqrt{2}}w^frac{5}{2}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{5}{2}\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(10big(sqrt{2}x+1big)-big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)big)\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(10sqrt{2}x+10-1-4sqrt{2}xbig)\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(6sqrt{2}x+9big)\
end{align}$$





Work:
$$begin{align}
V&=int_0^sqrt{2}pisqrt{x^2+3sqrt{2}x-big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+1}^2 dx\
&=int_0^sqrt{2}pi x^2+3pi sqrt{2}x-pi big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+pi dx\
&=int_0^sqrt{2}pi x^2 dx+int_0^sqrt{2}3pi sqrt{2}x dx-int_0^sqrt{2}pi big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx+int_0^sqrt{2}pi dx\
&=piint_0^sqrt{2}x^2 dx+3pi sqrt{2}int_0^sqrt{2}x dx-pi color{red}{int_0^sqrt{2}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}+piint_0^sqrt{2}dx\
&=pibigg[frac{x^3}{3}bigg]_0^sqrt{2}+3pi sqrt{2} bigg[frac{x^2}{2}bigg]_0^sqrt{2}-pi bigg[frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(6sqrt{2}x+9big)bigg]_0^sqrt{2}+pi[x]_0^sqrt{2}\
&=pibigg[frac{2sqrt{2}}{3}-frac{0}{3}bigg]+3pisqrt{2}bigg[frac{2}{2}-frac{0}{2}bigg]-pibigg[frac{(9)^frac{3}{2}(21)}{60sqrt{2}}-frac{(1)^frac{3}{2}(9)}{60sqrt{2}}bigg]+pibig[sqrt{2}-0big]\
&=pibigg[frac{2sqrt{2}}{3}bigg]+3pisqrt{2}[1]-pibigg[frac{558}{60sqrt{2}}bigg]+pibig[sqrt{2}big]\
&=frac{2}{3}pisqrt{2}+3pisqrt{2}-frac{93}{20}pisqrt{2}+pisqrt{2}\
&=pisqrt{2}bigg(frac{40}{60}+frac{180}{60}-frac{279}{60}+frac{60}{60}bigg)\
&=pisqrt{2}bigg(frac{1}{60}bigg)\
&=frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}
end{align}$$



Using the disk method, integrate $pi r^2$ from $[0,sqrt{2}]$ with Eqn. 8 plugged in for $r$ with respect to $x$.



TL;DR



Frankly, the question does not seem that complicated, and the answer of $frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}$ is definitely pretty simple. I have to believe that there is a more concise way of solving this problem.



All thoughts/answers welcome, thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't want to sound discouraging, but this looks like more of an essay or an article than a question.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Dec 17 '18 at 22:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Not at all! Generally, I’ve been told on SE to show things that I have already tried. So I figure that, even though this is long, it helps people understand where I am and what I’m thinking. Maybe that’s just me...
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Dec 17 '18 at 22:36














4












4








4





$begingroup$


Question



I would like to know the simplest way to find the volume of the solid of revolution created by rotating the parabola $y=x^2$ around the line $y=x$ (the shape shown in blue below). I am currently taking AP BC Calculus as a junior in high school, so a method that uses those concepts would be ideal, but if it is far simpler to use some higher math, I will look into it :)



enter image description here



The following is what I have tried using a variation of the disk method. I believe that is correct, but, as the reader can see, it is very complex.



My Method



To employ the disk method, first, derive a function for the radius of the solid as a function of $x$ along $y=x$. Then, square it and multiply by $pi$. Lastly, integrate on the interval $[0,sqrt{2}]$.



Begin by constructing a line perpendicular to $y=x$ that intersects $y=x$ (occationally $f(x)$) and $y=x^2$ (occationally $g(x)$) at $(x_2,y_2)$ and $(x_1,y_1)$, respectively (as shown below).



enter image description here



$$d=sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}tag{1}$$
Use the distance formula to find the distance between these points.



$$begin{align}
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x+2x_2}\
y &=x
end{align}$$

$$x=-x+2x_2$$
$$2x=2x_2$$
$$x_2=xtag{2}$$





$$begin{align}
y_2&=f(x_2)\
&=xtag{3}
end{align}$$





$$begin{align}
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x_1+2x_2}\
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x_1+2x}\
y &={x_1}^2
end{align}$$

$${x_1}^2=-x_1+2x$$
$$0=1{x_1}^2+1x_1+-2x$$
$$begin{align}
x_1&=frac{-1+sqrt{1^2-4(1)(-2x)}}{2(1)}\
&=frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}tag{4}
end{align}$$





$$begin{align}
y_1&=g(x_1)\
&=bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2tag{5}
end{align}$$

Find the variables in the distance formula as functions of $x$ (Eqns. 2-5 with derivations listed above them, respectively).



$$begin{align}
d&=sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2Bigg)^2}tag{6}
end{align}$$



Plug Eqns. 2-5 into the distance formula.



$$begin{align}
d&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{(1+8x)-2sqrt{1+8x}+1}{4}bigg)Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{2+8x-2sqrt{1+8x}}{4}bigg)Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{2x}{2}-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{2x}{2}-frac{1+4x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{2x-sqrt{1+8x}+1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{2x-1-4x+sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{1+2x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{-1-2x+sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{2Bigg(frac{1+2x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{2Bigg(frac{1+4x^2+(1+8x)+4x-2sqrt{1+8x}-4xsqrt{1+8x}}{4}Bigg)}\
&=sqrt{frac{4x^2+12x-(4x+2)sqrt{1+8x}+2}{2}}\
&=sqrt{2x^2+6x-(2x+1)sqrt{1+8x}+1}tag{7}
end{align}$$



Simplify Eqn. 6.



$$begin{align}
r&=sqrt{2bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)^2+6bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)-bigg(2bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)+1bigg)sqrt{1+8bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)}+1}\
&=sqrt{2bigg(frac{x^2}{2}bigg)+6bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)-bigg(2bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)+1bigg)sqrt{1+8bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)}+1}\
&=sqrt{x^2+3sqrt{2}x-big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+1}tag{8}
end{align}$$



Dilate Eqn. 7 by $sqrt{2}$ in the x-direction to make the distance between the functions x-intercepts equal to the distance between the two intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$. Simplify to give Eqn. 8. Note that the graph of Eqn. 8 from $[0,sqrt{2}]$ (below in green) compares to the reflection over the x-axis of the final equation for a parabola rotated 45 degrees given by Ennar (below in red), as it should.



enter image description here
Graph from Desmos.



Integration by parts work (for below):
$$color{red}{intbig(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}$$
$$
begin{array}{|c|}
hline
mathbf{u=sqrt{2}x+1}, mathbf{dv=sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}\
hline
begin{array}{c|c}
frac{du}{dx}=sqrt{2} & int dv=intsqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx\
mathbf{du=sqrt{2} dx} & v=intsqrt{w} frac{dw}{4sqrt{2}}\
& v=frac{1}{4sqrt{2}}intsqrt{w} dw\
& v=frac{1}{4sqrt{2}}timesfrac{w^frac{3}{2}}{frac{3}{2}}\
& v=frac{2}{12sqrt{2}}w^frac{3}{2}\
& mathbf{v=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}}\
end{array}\
hline
end{array}
$$



$$begin{align}
&=uv-int v du\
&=big(sqrt{2}x+1big)bigg(frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}bigg)-int bigg(frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}bigg)big(sqrt{2} dxbig)\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{6}int big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2} dx\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{6}int w^frac{3}{2} frac{dw}{4sqrt{2}}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{24sqrt{2}}int w^frac{3}{2} dw\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{24sqrt{2}}timesfrac{w^frac{5}{2}}{frac{5}{2}}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{2}{120sqrt{2}}w^frac{5}{2}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{5}{2}\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(10big(sqrt{2}x+1big)-big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)big)\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(10sqrt{2}x+10-1-4sqrt{2}xbig)\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(6sqrt{2}x+9big)\
end{align}$$





Work:
$$begin{align}
V&=int_0^sqrt{2}pisqrt{x^2+3sqrt{2}x-big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+1}^2 dx\
&=int_0^sqrt{2}pi x^2+3pi sqrt{2}x-pi big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+pi dx\
&=int_0^sqrt{2}pi x^2 dx+int_0^sqrt{2}3pi sqrt{2}x dx-int_0^sqrt{2}pi big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx+int_0^sqrt{2}pi dx\
&=piint_0^sqrt{2}x^2 dx+3pi sqrt{2}int_0^sqrt{2}x dx-pi color{red}{int_0^sqrt{2}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}+piint_0^sqrt{2}dx\
&=pibigg[frac{x^3}{3}bigg]_0^sqrt{2}+3pi sqrt{2} bigg[frac{x^2}{2}bigg]_0^sqrt{2}-pi bigg[frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(6sqrt{2}x+9big)bigg]_0^sqrt{2}+pi[x]_0^sqrt{2}\
&=pibigg[frac{2sqrt{2}}{3}-frac{0}{3}bigg]+3pisqrt{2}bigg[frac{2}{2}-frac{0}{2}bigg]-pibigg[frac{(9)^frac{3}{2}(21)}{60sqrt{2}}-frac{(1)^frac{3}{2}(9)}{60sqrt{2}}bigg]+pibig[sqrt{2}-0big]\
&=pibigg[frac{2sqrt{2}}{3}bigg]+3pisqrt{2}[1]-pibigg[frac{558}{60sqrt{2}}bigg]+pibig[sqrt{2}big]\
&=frac{2}{3}pisqrt{2}+3pisqrt{2}-frac{93}{20}pisqrt{2}+pisqrt{2}\
&=pisqrt{2}bigg(frac{40}{60}+frac{180}{60}-frac{279}{60}+frac{60}{60}bigg)\
&=pisqrt{2}bigg(frac{1}{60}bigg)\
&=frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}
end{align}$$



Using the disk method, integrate $pi r^2$ from $[0,sqrt{2}]$ with Eqn. 8 plugged in for $r$ with respect to $x$.



TL;DR



Frankly, the question does not seem that complicated, and the answer of $frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}$ is definitely pretty simple. I have to believe that there is a more concise way of solving this problem.



All thoughts/answers welcome, thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Question



I would like to know the simplest way to find the volume of the solid of revolution created by rotating the parabola $y=x^2$ around the line $y=x$ (the shape shown in blue below). I am currently taking AP BC Calculus as a junior in high school, so a method that uses those concepts would be ideal, but if it is far simpler to use some higher math, I will look into it :)



enter image description here



The following is what I have tried using a variation of the disk method. I believe that is correct, but, as the reader can see, it is very complex.



My Method



To employ the disk method, first, derive a function for the radius of the solid as a function of $x$ along $y=x$. Then, square it and multiply by $pi$. Lastly, integrate on the interval $[0,sqrt{2}]$.



Begin by constructing a line perpendicular to $y=x$ that intersects $y=x$ (occationally $f(x)$) and $y=x^2$ (occationally $g(x)$) at $(x_2,y_2)$ and $(x_1,y_1)$, respectively (as shown below).



enter image description here



$$d=sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}tag{1}$$
Use the distance formula to find the distance between these points.



$$begin{align}
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x+2x_2}\
y &=x
end{align}$$

$$x=-x+2x_2$$
$$2x=2x_2$$
$$x_2=xtag{2}$$





$$begin{align}
y_2&=f(x_2)\
&=xtag{3}
end{align}$$





$$begin{align}
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x_1+2x_2}\
color{gray}{y} &color{gray}{=} color{gray}{-x_1+2x}\
y &={x_1}^2
end{align}$$

$${x_1}^2=-x_1+2x$$
$$0=1{x_1}^2+1x_1+-2x$$
$$begin{align}
x_1&=frac{-1+sqrt{1^2-4(1)(-2x)}}{2(1)}\
&=frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}tag{4}
end{align}$$





$$begin{align}
y_1&=g(x_1)\
&=bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2tag{5}
end{align}$$

Find the variables in the distance formula as functions of $x$ (Eqns. 2-5 with derivations listed above them, respectively).



$$begin{align}
d&=sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2Bigg)^2}tag{6}
end{align}$$



Plug Eqns. 2-5 into the distance formula.



$$begin{align}
d&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}bigg)^2Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{(1+8x)-2sqrt{1+8x}+1}{4}bigg)Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(x-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(x-bigg(frac{2+8x-2sqrt{1+8x}}{4}bigg)Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{2x}{2}-frac{sqrt{1+8x}-1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{2x}{2}-frac{1+4x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{2x-sqrt{1+8x}+1}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{2x-1-4x+sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{Bigg(frac{1+2x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2+Bigg(frac{-1-2x+sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{2Bigg(frac{1+2x-sqrt{1+8x}}{2}Bigg)^2}\
&=sqrt{2Bigg(frac{1+4x^2+(1+8x)+4x-2sqrt{1+8x}-4xsqrt{1+8x}}{4}Bigg)}\
&=sqrt{frac{4x^2+12x-(4x+2)sqrt{1+8x}+2}{2}}\
&=sqrt{2x^2+6x-(2x+1)sqrt{1+8x}+1}tag{7}
end{align}$$



Simplify Eqn. 6.



$$begin{align}
r&=sqrt{2bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)^2+6bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)-bigg(2bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)+1bigg)sqrt{1+8bigg(frac{x}{sqrt{2}}bigg)}+1}\
&=sqrt{2bigg(frac{x^2}{2}bigg)+6bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)-bigg(2bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)+1bigg)sqrt{1+8bigg(frac{sqrt{2}x}{2}bigg)}+1}\
&=sqrt{x^2+3sqrt{2}x-big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+1}tag{8}
end{align}$$



Dilate Eqn. 7 by $sqrt{2}$ in the x-direction to make the distance between the functions x-intercepts equal to the distance between the two intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$. Simplify to give Eqn. 8. Note that the graph of Eqn. 8 from $[0,sqrt{2}]$ (below in green) compares to the reflection over the x-axis of the final equation for a parabola rotated 45 degrees given by Ennar (below in red), as it should.



enter image description here
Graph from Desmos.



Integration by parts work (for below):
$$color{red}{intbig(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}$$
$$
begin{array}{|c|}
hline
mathbf{u=sqrt{2}x+1}, mathbf{dv=sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}\
hline
begin{array}{c|c}
frac{du}{dx}=sqrt{2} & int dv=intsqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx\
mathbf{du=sqrt{2} dx} & v=intsqrt{w} frac{dw}{4sqrt{2}}\
& v=frac{1}{4sqrt{2}}intsqrt{w} dw\
& v=frac{1}{4sqrt{2}}timesfrac{w^frac{3}{2}}{frac{3}{2}}\
& v=frac{2}{12sqrt{2}}w^frac{3}{2}\
& mathbf{v=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}}\
end{array}\
hline
end{array}
$$



$$begin{align}
&=uv-int v du\
&=big(sqrt{2}x+1big)bigg(frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}bigg)-int bigg(frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}bigg)big(sqrt{2} dxbig)\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{6}int big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2} dx\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{6}int w^frac{3}{2} frac{dw}{4sqrt{2}}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{24sqrt{2}}int w^frac{3}{2} dw\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{24sqrt{2}}timesfrac{w^frac{5}{2}}{frac{5}{2}}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{2}{120sqrt{2}}w^frac{5}{2}\
&=frac{1}{6sqrt{2}}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}-frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{5}{2}\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(10big(sqrt{2}x+1big)-big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)big)\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(10sqrt{2}x+10-1-4sqrt{2}xbig)\
&=frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(6sqrt{2}x+9big)\
end{align}$$





Work:
$$begin{align}
V&=int_0^sqrt{2}pisqrt{x^2+3sqrt{2}x-big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+1}^2 dx\
&=int_0^sqrt{2}pi x^2+3pi sqrt{2}x-pi big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x}+pi dx\
&=int_0^sqrt{2}pi x^2 dx+int_0^sqrt{2}3pi sqrt{2}x dx-int_0^sqrt{2}pi big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx+int_0^sqrt{2}pi dx\
&=piint_0^sqrt{2}x^2 dx+3pi sqrt{2}int_0^sqrt{2}x dx-pi color{red}{int_0^sqrt{2}big(sqrt{2}x+1big)sqrt{1+4sqrt{2}x} dx}+piint_0^sqrt{2}dx\
&=pibigg[frac{x^3}{3}bigg]_0^sqrt{2}+3pi sqrt{2} bigg[frac{x^2}{2}bigg]_0^sqrt{2}-pi bigg[frac{1}{60sqrt{2}}big(1+4sqrt{2}xbig)^frac{3}{2}big(6sqrt{2}x+9big)bigg]_0^sqrt{2}+pi[x]_0^sqrt{2}\
&=pibigg[frac{2sqrt{2}}{3}-frac{0}{3}bigg]+3pisqrt{2}bigg[frac{2}{2}-frac{0}{2}bigg]-pibigg[frac{(9)^frac{3}{2}(21)}{60sqrt{2}}-frac{(1)^frac{3}{2}(9)}{60sqrt{2}}bigg]+pibig[sqrt{2}-0big]\
&=pibigg[frac{2sqrt{2}}{3}bigg]+3pisqrt{2}[1]-pibigg[frac{558}{60sqrt{2}}bigg]+pibig[sqrt{2}big]\
&=frac{2}{3}pisqrt{2}+3pisqrt{2}-frac{93}{20}pisqrt{2}+pisqrt{2}\
&=pisqrt{2}bigg(frac{40}{60}+frac{180}{60}-frac{279}{60}+frac{60}{60}bigg)\
&=pisqrt{2}bigg(frac{1}{60}bigg)\
&=frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}
end{align}$$



Using the disk method, integrate $pi r^2$ from $[0,sqrt{2}]$ with Eqn. 8 plugged in for $r$ with respect to $x$.



TL;DR



Frankly, the question does not seem that complicated, and the answer of $frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}$ is definitely pretty simple. I have to believe that there is a more concise way of solving this problem.



All thoughts/answers welcome, thanks!







calculus integration volume solid-of-revolution






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 17 '18 at 21:33









Shady PuckShady Puck

1285




1285












  • $begingroup$
    I don't want to sound discouraging, but this looks like more of an essay or an article than a question.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Dec 17 '18 at 22:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Not at all! Generally, I’ve been told on SE to show things that I have already tried. So I figure that, even though this is long, it helps people understand where I am and what I’m thinking. Maybe that’s just me...
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Dec 17 '18 at 22:36


















  • $begingroup$
    I don't want to sound discouraging, but this looks like more of an essay or an article than a question.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Dec 17 '18 at 22:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Not at all! Generally, I’ve been told on SE to show things that I have already tried. So I figure that, even though this is long, it helps people understand where I am and what I’m thinking. Maybe that’s just me...
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Dec 17 '18 at 22:36
















$begingroup$
I don't want to sound discouraging, but this looks like more of an essay or an article than a question.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Dec 17 '18 at 22:17




$begingroup$
I don't want to sound discouraging, but this looks like more of an essay or an article than a question.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Dec 17 '18 at 22:17




1




1




$begingroup$
@mathreadler Not at all! Generally, I’ve been told on SE to show things that I have already tried. So I figure that, even though this is long, it helps people understand where I am and what I’m thinking. Maybe that’s just me...
$endgroup$
– Shady Puck
Dec 17 '18 at 22:36




$begingroup$
@mathreadler Not at all! Generally, I’ve been told on SE to show things that I have already tried. So I figure that, even though this is long, it helps people understand where I am and what I’m thinking. Maybe that’s just me...
$endgroup$
– Shady Puck
Dec 17 '18 at 22:36










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

For $0 < x < 1,$ consider the line segment from $(x,x^2)$ to $(x,x).$
Rotated around the line $y = x,$ this produces a finite conical "hat" with
slant height $x - x^2$ and base radius $(x - x^2)/sqrt2,$
so it has surface area
$pi(x - x^2)^2/sqrt2.$



The solid is composed of a nested stack of these conical "hats."
The volume element between the "hat" at $x$ and the "hat" at
$x + dx$ is $fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx,$ so we integrate
$$
int_0^1 fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx
= fracpi{sqrt2}left[frac{x^5}5 - frac{x^4}2 + frac{x^3}3right]_0^1
= frac{pisqrt2}{60}.
$$








share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I suppose if your starting point did not take into account just how amazing and robust the subject of Calculus is, you should put on a dunce cap! (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – CopyPasteIt
    Dec 19 '18 at 12:11










  • $begingroup$
    An incredibly simple and efficient method. Thank you very much! I just applied this method to the problem of the more general case ($y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$). It made finding my final answer a breeze. +1 & accepted! One question: Do you mean the lateral area of the cone instead of the surface area? Because that's what your math seemed to say and what made more sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Jan 1 at 19:37












  • $begingroup$
    The lateral area is what I meant; another way to describe it is what is left after you remove the circular bottom surface area from a finite right circular cone.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Jan 1 at 20:16



















1












$begingroup$

Yes, using the disk method and you wind up having to contend with some unwieldy calculations. Use cylindrical shells to make your life easier. Here are some equations/algebra that will be needed:



The distance between the line $y = x + c$ and the line $y =x$ is equal to $frac{|c|}{sqrt 2}$.



If both $y = x + c$ and $y = x^2$ are true, then



$tag 1 x^2 -x -c = 0$



Using the quadratic formula,



$$tag 2 x_0 = frac{1 - sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} text{ and } x_1 = frac{1 + sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} $$



The distance between $(x_0, x_0+c)$ and $(x_1, x_1+c)$ is given by $sqrt {2},sqrt {1+4c}$.



Letting $c$ vary, it ranges from $0$ to $-frac{1}{4}$. Using a change of variable, set $u = -frac{c}{sqrt 2}$, so that



$tag 3 u text{ varies from } 0 text{ to } frac{sqrt 2}{8}$



You are a few steps away from setting up your



$$quad int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} du$$



integral.



I worked it out using Wolfram and the volume is $0.074048dots$, which is equal to $frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}$.



Integral Answer (use cursor as a 'spoiler'):




$$quad 2 pi ,sqrt 2 int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} u sqrt{1 + 4sqrt2 ,u} ;du$$







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is a great adaptation of the shell method! I found this very useful, and it helped confirm my equation for the general case, $y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$. (+1) Truly a very clever procedure, except that I feel I have to accept the one by @DavidK based on its exceptional simplicity. Still, this was very helpful. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Jan 1 at 19:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ShadyPuck And thank you for the question - the work that you put into it was an inspiration to look at it from other angles.
    $endgroup$
    – CopyPasteIt
    Jan 1 at 19:50



















1












$begingroup$

How about using the rotation matrix $begin{pmatrix}cosfrac{pi}4&-sinfrac{pi}4\sinfrac{pi}4&cosfrac{pi}4end{pmatrix}$ to rotate $(x,y)$, and then you can integrate along $x$.



Then I get the equation $y^2+x^2-sqrt2 x+sqrt2 y+2xy=0$.



To solve for y we can use the quadratic formula: $y=frac{-(2x+sqrt2)pmsqrt{2+8sqrt2 x}}2=frac{-2x-sqrt2pmsqrt2 sqrt{1+4sqrt2x}}2$.



So now we need to integrate. We need $piint_0^{sqrt2}y^2operatorname dx$ and this can be done by integrating by parts, as you noted.



I used an integral calculator (too lazy) to check this and your answer appears to be correct.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044474%2fsimplest-way-to-find-volume-of-solid-of-revolution-around-given-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    For $0 < x < 1,$ consider the line segment from $(x,x^2)$ to $(x,x).$
    Rotated around the line $y = x,$ this produces a finite conical "hat" with
    slant height $x - x^2$ and base radius $(x - x^2)/sqrt2,$
    so it has surface area
    $pi(x - x^2)^2/sqrt2.$



    The solid is composed of a nested stack of these conical "hats."
    The volume element between the "hat" at $x$ and the "hat" at
    $x + dx$ is $fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx,$ so we integrate
    $$
    int_0^1 fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx
    = fracpi{sqrt2}left[frac{x^5}5 - frac{x^4}2 + frac{x^3}3right]_0^1
    = frac{pisqrt2}{60}.
    $$








    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I suppose if your starting point did not take into account just how amazing and robust the subject of Calculus is, you should put on a dunce cap! (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – CopyPasteIt
      Dec 19 '18 at 12:11










    • $begingroup$
      An incredibly simple and efficient method. Thank you very much! I just applied this method to the problem of the more general case ($y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$). It made finding my final answer a breeze. +1 & accepted! One question: Do you mean the lateral area of the cone instead of the surface area? Because that's what your math seemed to say and what made more sense.
      $endgroup$
      – Shady Puck
      Jan 1 at 19:37












    • $begingroup$
      The lateral area is what I meant; another way to describe it is what is left after you remove the circular bottom surface area from a finite right circular cone.
      $endgroup$
      – David K
      Jan 1 at 20:16
















    2












    $begingroup$

    For $0 < x < 1,$ consider the line segment from $(x,x^2)$ to $(x,x).$
    Rotated around the line $y = x,$ this produces a finite conical "hat" with
    slant height $x - x^2$ and base radius $(x - x^2)/sqrt2,$
    so it has surface area
    $pi(x - x^2)^2/sqrt2.$



    The solid is composed of a nested stack of these conical "hats."
    The volume element between the "hat" at $x$ and the "hat" at
    $x + dx$ is $fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx,$ so we integrate
    $$
    int_0^1 fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx
    = fracpi{sqrt2}left[frac{x^5}5 - frac{x^4}2 + frac{x^3}3right]_0^1
    = frac{pisqrt2}{60}.
    $$








    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I suppose if your starting point did not take into account just how amazing and robust the subject of Calculus is, you should put on a dunce cap! (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – CopyPasteIt
      Dec 19 '18 at 12:11










    • $begingroup$
      An incredibly simple and efficient method. Thank you very much! I just applied this method to the problem of the more general case ($y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$). It made finding my final answer a breeze. +1 & accepted! One question: Do you mean the lateral area of the cone instead of the surface area? Because that's what your math seemed to say and what made more sense.
      $endgroup$
      – Shady Puck
      Jan 1 at 19:37












    • $begingroup$
      The lateral area is what I meant; another way to describe it is what is left after you remove the circular bottom surface area from a finite right circular cone.
      $endgroup$
      – David K
      Jan 1 at 20:16














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    For $0 < x < 1,$ consider the line segment from $(x,x^2)$ to $(x,x).$
    Rotated around the line $y = x,$ this produces a finite conical "hat" with
    slant height $x - x^2$ and base radius $(x - x^2)/sqrt2,$
    so it has surface area
    $pi(x - x^2)^2/sqrt2.$



    The solid is composed of a nested stack of these conical "hats."
    The volume element between the "hat" at $x$ and the "hat" at
    $x + dx$ is $fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx,$ so we integrate
    $$
    int_0^1 fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx
    = fracpi{sqrt2}left[frac{x^5}5 - frac{x^4}2 + frac{x^3}3right]_0^1
    = frac{pisqrt2}{60}.
    $$








    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    For $0 < x < 1,$ consider the line segment from $(x,x^2)$ to $(x,x).$
    Rotated around the line $y = x,$ this produces a finite conical "hat" with
    slant height $x - x^2$ and base radius $(x - x^2)/sqrt2,$
    so it has surface area
    $pi(x - x^2)^2/sqrt2.$



    The solid is composed of a nested stack of these conical "hats."
    The volume element between the "hat" at $x$ and the "hat" at
    $x + dx$ is $fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx,$ so we integrate
    $$
    int_0^1 fracpi{sqrt2}(x - x^2)^2 dx
    = fracpi{sqrt2}left[frac{x^5}5 - frac{x^4}2 + frac{x^3}3right]_0^1
    = frac{pisqrt2}{60}.
    $$









    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 19 '18 at 3:47









    David KDavid K

    55.3k344120




    55.3k344120












    • $begingroup$
      I suppose if your starting point did not take into account just how amazing and robust the subject of Calculus is, you should put on a dunce cap! (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – CopyPasteIt
      Dec 19 '18 at 12:11










    • $begingroup$
      An incredibly simple and efficient method. Thank you very much! I just applied this method to the problem of the more general case ($y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$). It made finding my final answer a breeze. +1 & accepted! One question: Do you mean the lateral area of the cone instead of the surface area? Because that's what your math seemed to say and what made more sense.
      $endgroup$
      – Shady Puck
      Jan 1 at 19:37












    • $begingroup$
      The lateral area is what I meant; another way to describe it is what is left after you remove the circular bottom surface area from a finite right circular cone.
      $endgroup$
      – David K
      Jan 1 at 20:16


















    • $begingroup$
      I suppose if your starting point did not take into account just how amazing and robust the subject of Calculus is, you should put on a dunce cap! (+1)
      $endgroup$
      – CopyPasteIt
      Dec 19 '18 at 12:11










    • $begingroup$
      An incredibly simple and efficient method. Thank you very much! I just applied this method to the problem of the more general case ($y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$). It made finding my final answer a breeze. +1 & accepted! One question: Do you mean the lateral area of the cone instead of the surface area? Because that's what your math seemed to say and what made more sense.
      $endgroup$
      – Shady Puck
      Jan 1 at 19:37












    • $begingroup$
      The lateral area is what I meant; another way to describe it is what is left after you remove the circular bottom surface area from a finite right circular cone.
      $endgroup$
      – David K
      Jan 1 at 20:16
















    $begingroup$
    I suppose if your starting point did not take into account just how amazing and robust the subject of Calculus is, you should put on a dunce cap! (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – CopyPasteIt
    Dec 19 '18 at 12:11




    $begingroup$
    I suppose if your starting point did not take into account just how amazing and robust the subject of Calculus is, you should put on a dunce cap! (+1)
    $endgroup$
    – CopyPasteIt
    Dec 19 '18 at 12:11












    $begingroup$
    An incredibly simple and efficient method. Thank you very much! I just applied this method to the problem of the more general case ($y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$). It made finding my final answer a breeze. +1 & accepted! One question: Do you mean the lateral area of the cone instead of the surface area? Because that's what your math seemed to say and what made more sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Jan 1 at 19:37






    $begingroup$
    An incredibly simple and efficient method. Thank you very much! I just applied this method to the problem of the more general case ($y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$). It made finding my final answer a breeze. +1 & accepted! One question: Do you mean the lateral area of the cone instead of the surface area? Because that's what your math seemed to say and what made more sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Jan 1 at 19:37














    $begingroup$
    The lateral area is what I meant; another way to describe it is what is left after you remove the circular bottom surface area from a finite right circular cone.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Jan 1 at 20:16




    $begingroup$
    The lateral area is what I meant; another way to describe it is what is left after you remove the circular bottom surface area from a finite right circular cone.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Jan 1 at 20:16











    1












    $begingroup$

    Yes, using the disk method and you wind up having to contend with some unwieldy calculations. Use cylindrical shells to make your life easier. Here are some equations/algebra that will be needed:



    The distance between the line $y = x + c$ and the line $y =x$ is equal to $frac{|c|}{sqrt 2}$.



    If both $y = x + c$ and $y = x^2$ are true, then



    $tag 1 x^2 -x -c = 0$



    Using the quadratic formula,



    $$tag 2 x_0 = frac{1 - sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} text{ and } x_1 = frac{1 + sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} $$



    The distance between $(x_0, x_0+c)$ and $(x_1, x_1+c)$ is given by $sqrt {2},sqrt {1+4c}$.



    Letting $c$ vary, it ranges from $0$ to $-frac{1}{4}$. Using a change of variable, set $u = -frac{c}{sqrt 2}$, so that



    $tag 3 u text{ varies from } 0 text{ to } frac{sqrt 2}{8}$



    You are a few steps away from setting up your



    $$quad int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} du$$



    integral.



    I worked it out using Wolfram and the volume is $0.074048dots$, which is equal to $frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}$.



    Integral Answer (use cursor as a 'spoiler'):




    $$quad 2 pi ,sqrt 2 int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} u sqrt{1 + 4sqrt2 ,u} ;du$$







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This is a great adaptation of the shell method! I found this very useful, and it helped confirm my equation for the general case, $y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$. (+1) Truly a very clever procedure, except that I feel I have to accept the one by @DavidK based on its exceptional simplicity. Still, this was very helpful. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Shady Puck
      Jan 1 at 19:41






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ShadyPuck And thank you for the question - the work that you put into it was an inspiration to look at it from other angles.
      $endgroup$
      – CopyPasteIt
      Jan 1 at 19:50
















    1












    $begingroup$

    Yes, using the disk method and you wind up having to contend with some unwieldy calculations. Use cylindrical shells to make your life easier. Here are some equations/algebra that will be needed:



    The distance between the line $y = x + c$ and the line $y =x$ is equal to $frac{|c|}{sqrt 2}$.



    If both $y = x + c$ and $y = x^2$ are true, then



    $tag 1 x^2 -x -c = 0$



    Using the quadratic formula,



    $$tag 2 x_0 = frac{1 - sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} text{ and } x_1 = frac{1 + sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} $$



    The distance between $(x_0, x_0+c)$ and $(x_1, x_1+c)$ is given by $sqrt {2},sqrt {1+4c}$.



    Letting $c$ vary, it ranges from $0$ to $-frac{1}{4}$. Using a change of variable, set $u = -frac{c}{sqrt 2}$, so that



    $tag 3 u text{ varies from } 0 text{ to } frac{sqrt 2}{8}$



    You are a few steps away from setting up your



    $$quad int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} du$$



    integral.



    I worked it out using Wolfram and the volume is $0.074048dots$, which is equal to $frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}$.



    Integral Answer (use cursor as a 'spoiler'):




    $$quad 2 pi ,sqrt 2 int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} u sqrt{1 + 4sqrt2 ,u} ;du$$







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This is a great adaptation of the shell method! I found this very useful, and it helped confirm my equation for the general case, $y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$. (+1) Truly a very clever procedure, except that I feel I have to accept the one by @DavidK based on its exceptional simplicity. Still, this was very helpful. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Shady Puck
      Jan 1 at 19:41






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ShadyPuck And thank you for the question - the work that you put into it was an inspiration to look at it from other angles.
      $endgroup$
      – CopyPasteIt
      Jan 1 at 19:50














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Yes, using the disk method and you wind up having to contend with some unwieldy calculations. Use cylindrical shells to make your life easier. Here are some equations/algebra that will be needed:



    The distance between the line $y = x + c$ and the line $y =x$ is equal to $frac{|c|}{sqrt 2}$.



    If both $y = x + c$ and $y = x^2$ are true, then



    $tag 1 x^2 -x -c = 0$



    Using the quadratic formula,



    $$tag 2 x_0 = frac{1 - sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} text{ and } x_1 = frac{1 + sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} $$



    The distance between $(x_0, x_0+c)$ and $(x_1, x_1+c)$ is given by $sqrt {2},sqrt {1+4c}$.



    Letting $c$ vary, it ranges from $0$ to $-frac{1}{4}$. Using a change of variable, set $u = -frac{c}{sqrt 2}$, so that



    $tag 3 u text{ varies from } 0 text{ to } frac{sqrt 2}{8}$



    You are a few steps away from setting up your



    $$quad int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} du$$



    integral.



    I worked it out using Wolfram and the volume is $0.074048dots$, which is equal to $frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}$.



    Integral Answer (use cursor as a 'spoiler'):




    $$quad 2 pi ,sqrt 2 int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} u sqrt{1 + 4sqrt2 ,u} ;du$$







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Yes, using the disk method and you wind up having to contend with some unwieldy calculations. Use cylindrical shells to make your life easier. Here are some equations/algebra that will be needed:



    The distance between the line $y = x + c$ and the line $y =x$ is equal to $frac{|c|}{sqrt 2}$.



    If both $y = x + c$ and $y = x^2$ are true, then



    $tag 1 x^2 -x -c = 0$



    Using the quadratic formula,



    $$tag 2 x_0 = frac{1 - sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} text{ and } x_1 = frac{1 + sqrt{1 + 4c}}{2} $$



    The distance between $(x_0, x_0+c)$ and $(x_1, x_1+c)$ is given by $sqrt {2},sqrt {1+4c}$.



    Letting $c$ vary, it ranges from $0$ to $-frac{1}{4}$. Using a change of variable, set $u = -frac{c}{sqrt 2}$, so that



    $tag 3 u text{ varies from } 0 text{ to } frac{sqrt 2}{8}$



    You are a few steps away from setting up your



    $$quad int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} du$$



    integral.



    I worked it out using Wolfram and the volume is $0.074048dots$, which is equal to $frac{pisqrt{2}}{60}$.



    Integral Answer (use cursor as a 'spoiler'):




    $$quad 2 pi ,sqrt 2 int_{u=0}^{frac{sqrt 2}{8}} u sqrt{1 + 4sqrt2 ,u} ;du$$








    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 18 '18 at 17:02

























    answered Dec 18 '18 at 15:37









    CopyPasteItCopyPasteIt

    4,2231728




    4,2231728












    • $begingroup$
      This is a great adaptation of the shell method! I found this very useful, and it helped confirm my equation for the general case, $y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$. (+1) Truly a very clever procedure, except that I feel I have to accept the one by @DavidK based on its exceptional simplicity. Still, this was very helpful. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Shady Puck
      Jan 1 at 19:41






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ShadyPuck And thank you for the question - the work that you put into it was an inspiration to look at it from other angles.
      $endgroup$
      – CopyPasteIt
      Jan 1 at 19:50


















    • $begingroup$
      This is a great adaptation of the shell method! I found this very useful, and it helped confirm my equation for the general case, $y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$. (+1) Truly a very clever procedure, except that I feel I have to accept the one by @DavidK based on its exceptional simplicity. Still, this was very helpful. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Shady Puck
      Jan 1 at 19:41






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ShadyPuck And thank you for the question - the work that you put into it was an inspiration to look at it from other angles.
      $endgroup$
      – CopyPasteIt
      Jan 1 at 19:50
















    $begingroup$
    This is a great adaptation of the shell method! I found this very useful, and it helped confirm my equation for the general case, $y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$. (+1) Truly a very clever procedure, except that I feel I have to accept the one by @DavidK based on its exceptional simplicity. Still, this was very helpful. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Jan 1 at 19:41




    $begingroup$
    This is a great adaptation of the shell method! I found this very useful, and it helped confirm my equation for the general case, $y=ax^2$ rotated about $y=bx$. (+1) Truly a very clever procedure, except that I feel I have to accept the one by @DavidK based on its exceptional simplicity. Still, this was very helpful. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Shady Puck
    Jan 1 at 19:41




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @ShadyPuck And thank you for the question - the work that you put into it was an inspiration to look at it from other angles.
    $endgroup$
    – CopyPasteIt
    Jan 1 at 19:50




    $begingroup$
    @ShadyPuck And thank you for the question - the work that you put into it was an inspiration to look at it from other angles.
    $endgroup$
    – CopyPasteIt
    Jan 1 at 19:50











    1












    $begingroup$

    How about using the rotation matrix $begin{pmatrix}cosfrac{pi}4&-sinfrac{pi}4\sinfrac{pi}4&cosfrac{pi}4end{pmatrix}$ to rotate $(x,y)$, and then you can integrate along $x$.



    Then I get the equation $y^2+x^2-sqrt2 x+sqrt2 y+2xy=0$.



    To solve for y we can use the quadratic formula: $y=frac{-(2x+sqrt2)pmsqrt{2+8sqrt2 x}}2=frac{-2x-sqrt2pmsqrt2 sqrt{1+4sqrt2x}}2$.



    So now we need to integrate. We need $piint_0^{sqrt2}y^2operatorname dx$ and this can be done by integrating by parts, as you noted.



    I used an integral calculator (too lazy) to check this and your answer appears to be correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      How about using the rotation matrix $begin{pmatrix}cosfrac{pi}4&-sinfrac{pi}4\sinfrac{pi}4&cosfrac{pi}4end{pmatrix}$ to rotate $(x,y)$, and then you can integrate along $x$.



      Then I get the equation $y^2+x^2-sqrt2 x+sqrt2 y+2xy=0$.



      To solve for y we can use the quadratic formula: $y=frac{-(2x+sqrt2)pmsqrt{2+8sqrt2 x}}2=frac{-2x-sqrt2pmsqrt2 sqrt{1+4sqrt2x}}2$.



      So now we need to integrate. We need $piint_0^{sqrt2}y^2operatorname dx$ and this can be done by integrating by parts, as you noted.



      I used an integral calculator (too lazy) to check this and your answer appears to be correct.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        How about using the rotation matrix $begin{pmatrix}cosfrac{pi}4&-sinfrac{pi}4\sinfrac{pi}4&cosfrac{pi}4end{pmatrix}$ to rotate $(x,y)$, and then you can integrate along $x$.



        Then I get the equation $y^2+x^2-sqrt2 x+sqrt2 y+2xy=0$.



        To solve for y we can use the quadratic formula: $y=frac{-(2x+sqrt2)pmsqrt{2+8sqrt2 x}}2=frac{-2x-sqrt2pmsqrt2 sqrt{1+4sqrt2x}}2$.



        So now we need to integrate. We need $piint_0^{sqrt2}y^2operatorname dx$ and this can be done by integrating by parts, as you noted.



        I used an integral calculator (too lazy) to check this and your answer appears to be correct.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        How about using the rotation matrix $begin{pmatrix}cosfrac{pi}4&-sinfrac{pi}4\sinfrac{pi}4&cosfrac{pi}4end{pmatrix}$ to rotate $(x,y)$, and then you can integrate along $x$.



        Then I get the equation $y^2+x^2-sqrt2 x+sqrt2 y+2xy=0$.



        To solve for y we can use the quadratic formula: $y=frac{-(2x+sqrt2)pmsqrt{2+8sqrt2 x}}2=frac{-2x-sqrt2pmsqrt2 sqrt{1+4sqrt2x}}2$.



        So now we need to integrate. We need $piint_0^{sqrt2}y^2operatorname dx$ and this can be done by integrating by parts, as you noted.



        I used an integral calculator (too lazy) to check this and your answer appears to be correct.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 19 '18 at 1:59

























        answered Dec 17 '18 at 22:05









        Chris CusterChris Custer

        14.2k3827




        14.2k3827






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044474%2fsimplest-way-to-find-volume-of-solid-of-revolution-around-given-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...