Proof related to vectors: collinear points, position vectors
$begingroup$
I'm wondering if the following sentence is correct:
"Given 3 collinear points (A,B,C) and the relative distances (m and n), the position vector OC of the central point is mOA+nOB."
EDIT: mAB+nAB=AB --> m+n=1.
Thank you so much for your time.
vectors education
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm wondering if the following sentence is correct:
"Given 3 collinear points (A,B,C) and the relative distances (m and n), the position vector OC of the central point is mOA+nOB."
EDIT: mAB+nAB=AB --> m+n=1.
Thank you so much for your time.
vectors education
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
When you say "relative distances", do you mean that $m+n=1$? Either way, make sure that your prediction handles the limiting case where $m=0$ and $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Culter
Dec 20 '18 at 9:57
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, yes you are right. I edited my question. Thank you for the revision.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 9:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm wondering if the following sentence is correct:
"Given 3 collinear points (A,B,C) and the relative distances (m and n), the position vector OC of the central point is mOA+nOB."
EDIT: mAB+nAB=AB --> m+n=1.
Thank you so much for your time.
vectors education
$endgroup$
I'm wondering if the following sentence is correct:
"Given 3 collinear points (A,B,C) and the relative distances (m and n), the position vector OC of the central point is mOA+nOB."
EDIT: mAB+nAB=AB --> m+n=1.
Thank you so much for your time.
vectors education
vectors education
edited Dec 20 '18 at 9:59
Gennaro Arguzzi
asked Dec 20 '18 at 9:50
Gennaro ArguzziGennaro Arguzzi
361314
361314
$begingroup$
When you say "relative distances", do you mean that $m+n=1$? Either way, make sure that your prediction handles the limiting case where $m=0$ and $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Culter
Dec 20 '18 at 9:57
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, yes you are right. I edited my question. Thank you for the revision.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 9:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you say "relative distances", do you mean that $m+n=1$? Either way, make sure that your prediction handles the limiting case where $m=0$ and $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Culter
Dec 20 '18 at 9:57
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, yes you are right. I edited my question. Thank you for the revision.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 9:59
$begingroup$
When you say "relative distances", do you mean that $m+n=1$? Either way, make sure that your prediction handles the limiting case where $m=0$ and $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Culter
Dec 20 '18 at 9:57
$begingroup$
When you say "relative distances", do you mean that $m+n=1$? Either way, make sure that your prediction handles the limiting case where $m=0$ and $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Culter
Dec 20 '18 at 9:57
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, yes you are right. I edited my question. Thank you for the revision.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 9:59
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, yes you are right. I edited my question. Thank you for the revision.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 9:59
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You have $m$ and $n$ reversed. The correct expression is:
begin{align}
OC &= OA + mAB \
&=OA+m(OB-OA) \
&=(1-m)OA + mOB\
&=nOA+mOB
end{align}
If you can’t remember where the $m$ and $n$ go in this equation, it’s easy to check the cases $m=0$ and $m=1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hello @bubba, both your and ChrisCulter answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're right, except that you have $m$ and $n$ backwards. When $m=0$, we want to get $C=A$, so the correct expression is $C=nA+mB$. This equation expresses $C$ as an affine combination of $A$ and $B$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, both your and bubba answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047352%2fproof-related-to-vectors-collinear-points-position-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You have $m$ and $n$ reversed. The correct expression is:
begin{align}
OC &= OA + mAB \
&=OA+m(OB-OA) \
&=(1-m)OA + mOB\
&=nOA+mOB
end{align}
If you can’t remember where the $m$ and $n$ go in this equation, it’s easy to check the cases $m=0$ and $m=1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hello @bubba, both your and ChrisCulter answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have $m$ and $n$ reversed. The correct expression is:
begin{align}
OC &= OA + mAB \
&=OA+m(OB-OA) \
&=(1-m)OA + mOB\
&=nOA+mOB
end{align}
If you can’t remember where the $m$ and $n$ go in this equation, it’s easy to check the cases $m=0$ and $m=1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hello @bubba, both your and ChrisCulter answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have $m$ and $n$ reversed. The correct expression is:
begin{align}
OC &= OA + mAB \
&=OA+m(OB-OA) \
&=(1-m)OA + mOB\
&=nOA+mOB
end{align}
If you can’t remember where the $m$ and $n$ go in this equation, it’s easy to check the cases $m=0$ and $m=1$.
$endgroup$
You have $m$ and $n$ reversed. The correct expression is:
begin{align}
OC &= OA + mAB \
&=OA+m(OB-OA) \
&=(1-m)OA + mOB\
&=nOA+mOB
end{align}
If you can’t remember where the $m$ and $n$ go in this equation, it’s easy to check the cases $m=0$ and $m=1$.
edited Dec 20 '18 at 10:26
answered Dec 20 '18 at 10:20
bubbabubba
30.8k33188
30.8k33188
$begingroup$
Hello @bubba, both your and ChrisCulter answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hello @bubba, both your and ChrisCulter answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Hello @bubba, both your and ChrisCulter answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Hello @bubba, both your and ChrisCulter answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're right, except that you have $m$ and $n$ backwards. When $m=0$, we want to get $C=A$, so the correct expression is $C=nA+mB$. This equation expresses $C$ as an affine combination of $A$ and $B$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, both your and bubba answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're right, except that you have $m$ and $n$ backwards. When $m=0$, we want to get $C=A$, so the correct expression is $C=nA+mB$. This equation expresses $C$ as an affine combination of $A$ and $B$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, both your and bubba answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're right, except that you have $m$ and $n$ backwards. When $m=0$, we want to get $C=A$, so the correct expression is $C=nA+mB$. This equation expresses $C$ as an affine combination of $A$ and $B$.
$endgroup$
You're right, except that you have $m$ and $n$ backwards. When $m=0$, we want to get $C=A$, so the correct expression is $C=nA+mB$. This equation expresses $C$ as an affine combination of $A$ and $B$.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 10:16
Chris CulterChris Culter
21.5k43888
21.5k43888
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, both your and bubba answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, both your and bubba answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, both your and bubba answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, both your and bubba answers are excellent, so I voted up them without privileging any.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 16:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047352%2fproof-related-to-vectors-collinear-points-position-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
When you say "relative distances", do you mean that $m+n=1$? Either way, make sure that your prediction handles the limiting case where $m=0$ and $n=1$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Culter
Dec 20 '18 at 9:57
$begingroup$
Hello @ChrisCulter, yes you are right. I edited my question. Thank you for the revision.
$endgroup$
– Gennaro Arguzzi
Dec 20 '18 at 9:59