What is the process for cleansing a very negative action?












3















Several years ago I did something that was totally legal, but very much against my upbringing, my world-view, and my ethics. It was a spur of the moment thing and I have regretted it massively ever since. However, it has haunted me mentally (and to an extent physically, due to tension) ever since.



I might add, this event didn't hurt anyone else.



What can I do from a Buddhist perspective, to completely cancel out this action and its resultant negative thought-stream once and for all?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Eugene is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    3















    Several years ago I did something that was totally legal, but very much against my upbringing, my world-view, and my ethics. It was a spur of the moment thing and I have regretted it massively ever since. However, it has haunted me mentally (and to an extent physically, due to tension) ever since.



    I might add, this event didn't hurt anyone else.



    What can I do from a Buddhist perspective, to completely cancel out this action and its resultant negative thought-stream once and for all?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Eugene is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      3












      3








      3


      1






      Several years ago I did something that was totally legal, but very much against my upbringing, my world-view, and my ethics. It was a spur of the moment thing and I have regretted it massively ever since. However, it has haunted me mentally (and to an extent physically, due to tension) ever since.



      I might add, this event didn't hurt anyone else.



      What can I do from a Buddhist perspective, to completely cancel out this action and its resultant negative thought-stream once and for all?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Eugene is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Several years ago I did something that was totally legal, but very much against my upbringing, my world-view, and my ethics. It was a spur of the moment thing and I have regretted it massively ever since. However, it has haunted me mentally (and to an extent physically, due to tension) ever since.



      I might add, this event didn't hurt anyone else.



      What can I do from a Buddhist perspective, to completely cancel out this action and its resultant negative thought-stream once and for all?







      personal-practice karma suffering






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Eugene is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Eugene is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 3 at 12:28









      Peter Mortensen

      1112




      1112






      New contributor




      Eugene is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Mar 31 at 21:23









      EugeneEugene

      161




      161




      New contributor




      Eugene is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Eugene is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Eugene is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Nyom Eugene,



          it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



          All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



          The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Samana Johann is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




























            1














            The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



            Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

              – Eugene
              Apr 1 at 14:07





















            0














            I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            user15082 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.










            We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.










            • 3





              Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

              – Lanka
              Apr 1 at 17:06













            • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

              – Jess STJ
              Apr 3 at 2:41











            • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

              – user15082
              Apr 3 at 3:20











            • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

              – GVCOJims
              yesterday





















            0














            According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




            The Buddha said to Sangarava:



            “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
            believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
            practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



            “Yes, Master Gotama.”



            “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



            “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
            day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
            during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
            I practice purification by water.”




            “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

            unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

            There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

            and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




            When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



            “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
            Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
            for life.”




            According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




            "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
            water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
            salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



            "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
            the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
            to drink."



            "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
            Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
            salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



            "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
            Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
            to drink."



            "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
            one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
            where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
            is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
            for a moment.



            'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
            hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
            the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
            painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
            discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
            trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



            'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
            experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
            for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
            developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
            [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
            developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
            the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
            is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
            for a moment.




            The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.






            share|improve this answer


























            • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

              – Eugene
              2 days ago












            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "565"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Eugene is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31747%2fwhat-is-the-process-for-cleansing-a-very-negative-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes








            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Nyom Eugene,



            it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



            All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



            The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Samana Johann is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

























              1














              Nyom Eugene,



              it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



              All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



              The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Samana Johann is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                1












                1








                1







                Nyom Eugene,



                it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



                All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



                The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.






                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Samana Johann is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.










                Nyom Eugene,



                it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



                All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



                The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.







                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Samana Johann is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Apr 1 at 0:05





















                New contributor




                Samana Johann is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered Mar 31 at 23:36









                Samana JohannSamana Johann

                112




                112




                New contributor




                Samana Johann is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                Samana Johann is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                Samana Johann is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                    1














                    The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



                    Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 1 at 14:07


















                    1














                    The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



                    Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 1 at 14:07
















                    1












                    1








                    1







                    The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



                    Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.






                    share|improve this answer















                    The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



                    Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 1 at 2:52

























                    answered Apr 1 at 2:46









                    DhammadhatuDhammadhatu

                    25.7k11044




                    25.7k11044













                    • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 1 at 14:07





















                    • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 1 at 14:07



















                    Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                    – Eugene
                    Apr 1 at 14:07







                    Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                    – Eugene
                    Apr 1 at 14:07













                    0














                    I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    user15082 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.










                    We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.










                    • 3





                      Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                      – Lanka
                      Apr 1 at 17:06













                    • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                      – Jess STJ
                      Apr 3 at 2:41











                    • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                      – user15082
                      Apr 3 at 3:20











                    • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                      – GVCOJims
                      yesterday


















                    0














                    I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    user15082 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.










                    We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.










                    • 3





                      Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                      – Lanka
                      Apr 1 at 17:06













                    • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                      – Jess STJ
                      Apr 3 at 2:41











                    • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                      – user15082
                      Apr 3 at 3:20











                    • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                      – GVCOJims
                      yesterday
















                    0












                    0








                    0







                    I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    user15082 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.










                    I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.







                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    user15082 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer






                    New contributor




                    user15082 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered Apr 1 at 4:04









                    user15082user15082

                    11




                    11




                    New contributor




                    user15082 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    user15082 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    user15082 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.



                    We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.




                    We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.









                    • 3





                      Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                      – Lanka
                      Apr 1 at 17:06













                    • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                      – Jess STJ
                      Apr 3 at 2:41











                    • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                      – user15082
                      Apr 3 at 3:20











                    • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                      – GVCOJims
                      yesterday
















                    • 3





                      Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                      – Lanka
                      Apr 1 at 17:06













                    • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                      – Jess STJ
                      Apr 3 at 2:41











                    • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                      – user15082
                      Apr 3 at 3:20











                    • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                      – GVCOJims
                      yesterday










                    3




                    3





                    Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                    – Lanka
                    Apr 1 at 17:06







                    Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                    – Lanka
                    Apr 1 at 17:06















                    Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                    – Jess STJ
                    Apr 3 at 2:41





                    Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                    – Jess STJ
                    Apr 3 at 2:41













                    My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                    – user15082
                    Apr 3 at 3:20





                    My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                    – user15082
                    Apr 3 at 3:20













                    I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                    – GVCOJims
                    yesterday







                    I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                    – GVCOJims
                    yesterday













                    0














                    According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




                    The Buddha said to Sangarava:



                    “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
                    believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
                    practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



                    “Yes, Master Gotama.”



                    “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



                    “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
                    day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
                    during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
                    I practice purification by water.”




                    “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

                    unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

                    There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

                    and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




                    When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



                    “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
                    Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
                    for life.”




                    According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




                    "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
                    water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
                    the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
                    to drink."



                    "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
                    Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
                    Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
                    to drink."



                    "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
                    one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
                    where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
                    hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
                    the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
                    painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
                    discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
                    trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
                    experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
                    developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
                    [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
                    developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
                    the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.




                    The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                      – Eugene
                      2 days ago
















                    0














                    According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




                    The Buddha said to Sangarava:



                    “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
                    believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
                    practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



                    “Yes, Master Gotama.”



                    “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



                    “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
                    day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
                    during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
                    I practice purification by water.”




                    “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

                    unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

                    There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

                    and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




                    When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



                    “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
                    Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
                    for life.”




                    According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




                    "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
                    water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
                    the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
                    to drink."



                    "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
                    Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
                    Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
                    to drink."



                    "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
                    one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
                    where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
                    hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
                    the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
                    painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
                    discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
                    trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
                    experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
                    developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
                    [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
                    developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
                    the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.




                    The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                      – Eugene
                      2 days ago














                    0












                    0








                    0







                    According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




                    The Buddha said to Sangarava:



                    “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
                    believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
                    practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



                    “Yes, Master Gotama.”



                    “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



                    “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
                    day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
                    during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
                    I practice purification by water.”




                    “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

                    unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

                    There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

                    and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




                    When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



                    “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
                    Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
                    for life.”




                    According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




                    "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
                    water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
                    the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
                    to drink."



                    "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
                    Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
                    Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
                    to drink."



                    "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
                    one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
                    where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
                    hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
                    the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
                    painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
                    discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
                    trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
                    experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
                    developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
                    [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
                    developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
                    the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.




                    The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.






                    share|improve this answer















                    According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




                    The Buddha said to Sangarava:



                    “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
                    believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
                    practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



                    “Yes, Master Gotama.”



                    “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



                    “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
                    day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
                    during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
                    I practice purification by water.”




                    “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

                    unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

                    There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

                    and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




                    When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



                    “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
                    Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
                    for life.”




                    According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




                    "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
                    water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
                    the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
                    to drink."



                    "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
                    Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
                    Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
                    to drink."



                    "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
                    one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
                    where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
                    hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
                    the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
                    painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
                    discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
                    trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
                    experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
                    developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
                    [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
                    developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
                    the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.




                    The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 3 at 16:05

























                    answered Apr 3 at 14:58









                    ruben2020ruben2020

                    15.9k31243




                    15.9k31243













                    • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                      – Eugene
                      2 days ago



















                    • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                      – Eugene
                      2 days ago

















                    An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                    – Eugene
                    2 days ago





                    An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                    – Eugene
                    2 days ago










                    Eugene is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Eugene is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Eugene is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Eugene is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Buddhism Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31747%2fwhat-is-the-process-for-cleansing-a-very-negative-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...