Equation for arc with decaying radius











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Hoping for some insight into the equation and mechanics of an arc with a decaying radius.



Say at 0 degrees / 0 rad, the radius is 1. But by 90 degrees / π/2 rad the radius is 1/2. During that sweep from 0 --> 90 degrees, the radius is decaying at a constant rate.



As I was thinking about this, I was surprised -- though I shouldn't be -- that the arc would "balloon out" a bit on its way to 1/2r from 1r. And I dig this, and would like to understand the equation that would graph this.



Attached is a sketch of what I'm attempting to graph:



enter image description here



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Suggest write $pi/2$ radians-- $1/2pi$ might be confused with $1/(2pi).$
    – coffeemath
    Nov 19 at 15:34










  • Thanks - been awhile since I worked with radians, updating...
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 15:35















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Hoping for some insight into the equation and mechanics of an arc with a decaying radius.



Say at 0 degrees / 0 rad, the radius is 1. But by 90 degrees / π/2 rad the radius is 1/2. During that sweep from 0 --> 90 degrees, the radius is decaying at a constant rate.



As I was thinking about this, I was surprised -- though I shouldn't be -- that the arc would "balloon out" a bit on its way to 1/2r from 1r. And I dig this, and would like to understand the equation that would graph this.



Attached is a sketch of what I'm attempting to graph:



enter image description here



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Suggest write $pi/2$ radians-- $1/2pi$ might be confused with $1/(2pi).$
    – coffeemath
    Nov 19 at 15:34










  • Thanks - been awhile since I worked with radians, updating...
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 15:35













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Hoping for some insight into the equation and mechanics of an arc with a decaying radius.



Say at 0 degrees / 0 rad, the radius is 1. But by 90 degrees / π/2 rad the radius is 1/2. During that sweep from 0 --> 90 degrees, the radius is decaying at a constant rate.



As I was thinking about this, I was surprised -- though I shouldn't be -- that the arc would "balloon out" a bit on its way to 1/2r from 1r. And I dig this, and would like to understand the equation that would graph this.



Attached is a sketch of what I'm attempting to graph:



enter image description here



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question















Hoping for some insight into the equation and mechanics of an arc with a decaying radius.



Say at 0 degrees / 0 rad, the radius is 1. But by 90 degrees / π/2 rad the radius is 1/2. During that sweep from 0 --> 90 degrees, the radius is decaying at a constant rate.



As I was thinking about this, I was surprised -- though I shouldn't be -- that the arc would "balloon out" a bit on its way to 1/2r from 1r. And I dig this, and would like to understand the equation that would graph this.



Attached is a sketch of what I'm attempting to graph:



enter image description here



Thanks.







geometry polar-coordinates arc-length






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 19 at 15:36

























asked Nov 19 at 15:20









ghukill

1084




1084








  • 1




    Suggest write $pi/2$ radians-- $1/2pi$ might be confused with $1/(2pi).$
    – coffeemath
    Nov 19 at 15:34










  • Thanks - been awhile since I worked with radians, updating...
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 15:35














  • 1




    Suggest write $pi/2$ radians-- $1/2pi$ might be confused with $1/(2pi).$
    – coffeemath
    Nov 19 at 15:34










  • Thanks - been awhile since I worked with radians, updating...
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 15:35








1




1




Suggest write $pi/2$ radians-- $1/2pi$ might be confused with $1/(2pi).$
– coffeemath
Nov 19 at 15:34




Suggest write $pi/2$ radians-- $1/2pi$ might be confused with $1/(2pi).$
– coffeemath
Nov 19 at 15:34












Thanks - been awhile since I worked with radians, updating...
– ghukill
Nov 19 at 15:35




Thanks - been awhile since I worked with radians, updating...
– ghukill
Nov 19 at 15:35










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










What you have constructed is a spiral of Archimedes.



There are a couple of minor differences between the usual construction of the spiral of Archimedes and yours.
One difference is that in the usual spiral equations, we have the radius increasing as the angle increases, whereas you have it decreasing.
If that were the only difference between the two constructions, you would get a mirror image.
But another difference is that the usual convention is that the angle increases in a counterclockwise direction, whereas you have gone clockwise.
So that cancels the mirror-image effect.



Other things that are different in the usual convention is that the "zero" angle is conventionally pointing in the horizontal direction to the right rather than vertically, and the radius is usually zero at the zero angle.



The combined result of all these differences compared to the "standard" construction is that the "standard" construction, which would have the polar equation
$r = frac1pitheta$ (with $theta$ in radians) ends up making a spiral just like yours but rotated $90$ degrees counterclockwise.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • You have made my day, thank you. I found value in the other answer as well, but the connection to a pre-existing thing / story / example was extremely helpful. And the equation. Thanks again.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:19


















up vote
0
down vote













You should look into polar coordinates. If you have a point at angle $theta$ from the $Ox^to$ axis, and at distance $r$ from the center at the coordinate system, it has polar coordinates $(r, theta)$.



In your case, $r$ is a function of $theta$: $r(theta) = 1 - frac{1}{pi}theta$.



Note at angle 0, $r(0) = 1$, and at angle 90 degrees, $r(frac{pi}{2}) = 1 - frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}$.



In polar coordinates, it is easy to transfer from polar to Cartesian coordinates $(x, y)$:



$$x = rcos(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)cos(theta)$$
$$y = rsin(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sin(theta)$$



The above is a good parametric description of the curve. If you want an equation that relates $x$ and $y$, you need to go a step further.



Lets limit the curve to the first quadrant ($0 leq theta leq frac{pi}{2}$) to avoid dealing with multiple $y$ points on the same $x$. In that case, we can easily express $sin(theta) = sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)}$. Then



$$y = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)} =
(1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)
sqrt{1 - Bigg(frac{x}{1 - frac{1}{pi}theta}Bigg)^2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks, this is very helpful! I selected the other answer as it will be immediately helpful to me, but I look forward to pouring over this a bit as well.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:20











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005062%2fequation-for-arc-with-decaying-radius%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










What you have constructed is a spiral of Archimedes.



There are a couple of minor differences between the usual construction of the spiral of Archimedes and yours.
One difference is that in the usual spiral equations, we have the radius increasing as the angle increases, whereas you have it decreasing.
If that were the only difference between the two constructions, you would get a mirror image.
But another difference is that the usual convention is that the angle increases in a counterclockwise direction, whereas you have gone clockwise.
So that cancels the mirror-image effect.



Other things that are different in the usual convention is that the "zero" angle is conventionally pointing in the horizontal direction to the right rather than vertically, and the radius is usually zero at the zero angle.



The combined result of all these differences compared to the "standard" construction is that the "standard" construction, which would have the polar equation
$r = frac1pitheta$ (with $theta$ in radians) ends up making a spiral just like yours but rotated $90$ degrees counterclockwise.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • You have made my day, thank you. I found value in the other answer as well, but the connection to a pre-existing thing / story / example was extremely helpful. And the equation. Thanks again.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:19















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










What you have constructed is a spiral of Archimedes.



There are a couple of minor differences between the usual construction of the spiral of Archimedes and yours.
One difference is that in the usual spiral equations, we have the radius increasing as the angle increases, whereas you have it decreasing.
If that were the only difference between the two constructions, you would get a mirror image.
But another difference is that the usual convention is that the angle increases in a counterclockwise direction, whereas you have gone clockwise.
So that cancels the mirror-image effect.



Other things that are different in the usual convention is that the "zero" angle is conventionally pointing in the horizontal direction to the right rather than vertically, and the radius is usually zero at the zero angle.



The combined result of all these differences compared to the "standard" construction is that the "standard" construction, which would have the polar equation
$r = frac1pitheta$ (with $theta$ in radians) ends up making a spiral just like yours but rotated $90$ degrees counterclockwise.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • You have made my day, thank you. I found value in the other answer as well, but the connection to a pre-existing thing / story / example was extremely helpful. And the equation. Thanks again.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:19













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






What you have constructed is a spiral of Archimedes.



There are a couple of minor differences between the usual construction of the spiral of Archimedes and yours.
One difference is that in the usual spiral equations, we have the radius increasing as the angle increases, whereas you have it decreasing.
If that were the only difference between the two constructions, you would get a mirror image.
But another difference is that the usual convention is that the angle increases in a counterclockwise direction, whereas you have gone clockwise.
So that cancels the mirror-image effect.



Other things that are different in the usual convention is that the "zero" angle is conventionally pointing in the horizontal direction to the right rather than vertically, and the radius is usually zero at the zero angle.



The combined result of all these differences compared to the "standard" construction is that the "standard" construction, which would have the polar equation
$r = frac1pitheta$ (with $theta$ in radians) ends up making a spiral just like yours but rotated $90$ degrees counterclockwise.






share|cite|improve this answer












What you have constructed is a spiral of Archimedes.



There are a couple of minor differences between the usual construction of the spiral of Archimedes and yours.
One difference is that in the usual spiral equations, we have the radius increasing as the angle increases, whereas you have it decreasing.
If that were the only difference between the two constructions, you would get a mirror image.
But another difference is that the usual convention is that the angle increases in a counterclockwise direction, whereas you have gone clockwise.
So that cancels the mirror-image effect.



Other things that are different in the usual convention is that the "zero" angle is conventionally pointing in the horizontal direction to the right rather than vertically, and the radius is usually zero at the zero angle.



The combined result of all these differences compared to the "standard" construction is that the "standard" construction, which would have the polar equation
$r = frac1pitheta$ (with $theta$ in radians) ends up making a spiral just like yours but rotated $90$ degrees counterclockwise.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 19 at 16:05









David K

52k340114




52k340114












  • You have made my day, thank you. I found value in the other answer as well, but the connection to a pre-existing thing / story / example was extremely helpful. And the equation. Thanks again.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:19


















  • You have made my day, thank you. I found value in the other answer as well, but the connection to a pre-existing thing / story / example was extremely helpful. And the equation. Thanks again.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:19
















You have made my day, thank you. I found value in the other answer as well, but the connection to a pre-existing thing / story / example was extremely helpful. And the equation. Thanks again.
– ghukill
Nov 19 at 16:19




You have made my day, thank you. I found value in the other answer as well, but the connection to a pre-existing thing / story / example was extremely helpful. And the equation. Thanks again.
– ghukill
Nov 19 at 16:19










up vote
0
down vote













You should look into polar coordinates. If you have a point at angle $theta$ from the $Ox^to$ axis, and at distance $r$ from the center at the coordinate system, it has polar coordinates $(r, theta)$.



In your case, $r$ is a function of $theta$: $r(theta) = 1 - frac{1}{pi}theta$.



Note at angle 0, $r(0) = 1$, and at angle 90 degrees, $r(frac{pi}{2}) = 1 - frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}$.



In polar coordinates, it is easy to transfer from polar to Cartesian coordinates $(x, y)$:



$$x = rcos(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)cos(theta)$$
$$y = rsin(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sin(theta)$$



The above is a good parametric description of the curve. If you want an equation that relates $x$ and $y$, you need to go a step further.



Lets limit the curve to the first quadrant ($0 leq theta leq frac{pi}{2}$) to avoid dealing with multiple $y$ points on the same $x$. In that case, we can easily express $sin(theta) = sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)}$. Then



$$y = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)} =
(1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)
sqrt{1 - Bigg(frac{x}{1 - frac{1}{pi}theta}Bigg)^2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks, this is very helpful! I selected the other answer as it will be immediately helpful to me, but I look forward to pouring over this a bit as well.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:20















up vote
0
down vote













You should look into polar coordinates. If you have a point at angle $theta$ from the $Ox^to$ axis, and at distance $r$ from the center at the coordinate system, it has polar coordinates $(r, theta)$.



In your case, $r$ is a function of $theta$: $r(theta) = 1 - frac{1}{pi}theta$.



Note at angle 0, $r(0) = 1$, and at angle 90 degrees, $r(frac{pi}{2}) = 1 - frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}$.



In polar coordinates, it is easy to transfer from polar to Cartesian coordinates $(x, y)$:



$$x = rcos(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)cos(theta)$$
$$y = rsin(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sin(theta)$$



The above is a good parametric description of the curve. If you want an equation that relates $x$ and $y$, you need to go a step further.



Lets limit the curve to the first quadrant ($0 leq theta leq frac{pi}{2}$) to avoid dealing with multiple $y$ points on the same $x$. In that case, we can easily express $sin(theta) = sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)}$. Then



$$y = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)} =
(1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)
sqrt{1 - Bigg(frac{x}{1 - frac{1}{pi}theta}Bigg)^2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks, this is very helpful! I selected the other answer as it will be immediately helpful to me, but I look forward to pouring over this a bit as well.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:20













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









You should look into polar coordinates. If you have a point at angle $theta$ from the $Ox^to$ axis, and at distance $r$ from the center at the coordinate system, it has polar coordinates $(r, theta)$.



In your case, $r$ is a function of $theta$: $r(theta) = 1 - frac{1}{pi}theta$.



Note at angle 0, $r(0) = 1$, and at angle 90 degrees, $r(frac{pi}{2}) = 1 - frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}$.



In polar coordinates, it is easy to transfer from polar to Cartesian coordinates $(x, y)$:



$$x = rcos(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)cos(theta)$$
$$y = rsin(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sin(theta)$$



The above is a good parametric description of the curve. If you want an equation that relates $x$ and $y$, you need to go a step further.



Lets limit the curve to the first quadrant ($0 leq theta leq frac{pi}{2}$) to avoid dealing with multiple $y$ points on the same $x$. In that case, we can easily express $sin(theta) = sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)}$. Then



$$y = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)} =
(1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)
sqrt{1 - Bigg(frac{x}{1 - frac{1}{pi}theta}Bigg)^2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer












You should look into polar coordinates. If you have a point at angle $theta$ from the $Ox^to$ axis, and at distance $r$ from the center at the coordinate system, it has polar coordinates $(r, theta)$.



In your case, $r$ is a function of $theta$: $r(theta) = 1 - frac{1}{pi}theta$.



Note at angle 0, $r(0) = 1$, and at angle 90 degrees, $r(frac{pi}{2}) = 1 - frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}$.



In polar coordinates, it is easy to transfer from polar to Cartesian coordinates $(x, y)$:



$$x = rcos(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)cos(theta)$$
$$y = rsin(theta) = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sin(theta)$$



The above is a good parametric description of the curve. If you want an equation that relates $x$ and $y$, you need to go a step further.



Lets limit the curve to the first quadrant ($0 leq theta leq frac{pi}{2}$) to avoid dealing with multiple $y$ points on the same $x$. In that case, we can easily express $sin(theta) = sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)}$. Then



$$y = (1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)sqrt{1 - cos^2(theta)} =
(1 - frac{1}{pi}theta)
sqrt{1 - Bigg(frac{x}{1 - frac{1}{pi}theta}Bigg)^2}$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 19 at 15:40









Todor Markov

6126




6126












  • Thanks, this is very helpful! I selected the other answer as it will be immediately helpful to me, but I look forward to pouring over this a bit as well.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:20


















  • Thanks, this is very helpful! I selected the other answer as it will be immediately helpful to me, but I look forward to pouring over this a bit as well.
    – ghukill
    Nov 19 at 16:20
















Thanks, this is very helpful! I selected the other answer as it will be immediately helpful to me, but I look forward to pouring over this a bit as well.
– ghukill
Nov 19 at 16:20




Thanks, this is very helpful! I selected the other answer as it will be immediately helpful to me, but I look forward to pouring over this a bit as well.
– ghukill
Nov 19 at 16:20


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005062%2fequation-for-arc-with-decaying-radius%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...