Can a multiclassed Wizard/Sorcerer use the Twinned Spell metamagic option on Simulacrum?











up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1












Consider a Wizard 13/Sorcerer 7 multiclass, who happens to have the Twinned Spell metamagic option:




When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but ray of frost and chromatic orb are.




Now this character casts simulacrum:




  1. Can a Sorcerer use Twinned Spell to create 2 duplicates of himself
    (or someone else)?


  2. Can a Sorcerer use Twinned Spell to create 1 duplicate for 2
    different targets at the same time?











share|improve this question
























  • This question is VERY related to this one.
    – AntiDrondert
    yesterday






  • 3




    @BlueMoon93 Agree, theoretical application of Twinned Spell to Simulacrum is possible with Wiz-13/Sorc-7 multiclass, no Wish is needed.
    – AntiDrondert
    yesterday








  • 1




    I edited the question to focus on the Twinned/Simulacrum aspect
    – Alex Millette
    yesterday










  • Since the MC option and the wish option are two very different questions and the latter already has an answer elsewhere I have edited this to only focus on the MC.
    – Rubiksmoose
    yesterday






  • 1




    Yes it does, although I'm probably more concerned about that matter about Twinned Wish now, But this is of course for another question.
    – Alex Millette
    yesterday















up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1












Consider a Wizard 13/Sorcerer 7 multiclass, who happens to have the Twinned Spell metamagic option:




When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but ray of frost and chromatic orb are.




Now this character casts simulacrum:




  1. Can a Sorcerer use Twinned Spell to create 2 duplicates of himself
    (or someone else)?


  2. Can a Sorcerer use Twinned Spell to create 1 duplicate for 2
    different targets at the same time?











share|improve this question
























  • This question is VERY related to this one.
    – AntiDrondert
    yesterday






  • 3




    @BlueMoon93 Agree, theoretical application of Twinned Spell to Simulacrum is possible with Wiz-13/Sorc-7 multiclass, no Wish is needed.
    – AntiDrondert
    yesterday








  • 1




    I edited the question to focus on the Twinned/Simulacrum aspect
    – Alex Millette
    yesterday










  • Since the MC option and the wish option are two very different questions and the latter already has an answer elsewhere I have edited this to only focus on the MC.
    – Rubiksmoose
    yesterday






  • 1




    Yes it does, although I'm probably more concerned about that matter about Twinned Wish now, But this is of course for another question.
    – Alex Millette
    yesterday













up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1






1





Consider a Wizard 13/Sorcerer 7 multiclass, who happens to have the Twinned Spell metamagic option:




When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but ray of frost and chromatic orb are.




Now this character casts simulacrum:




  1. Can a Sorcerer use Twinned Spell to create 2 duplicates of himself
    (or someone else)?


  2. Can a Sorcerer use Twinned Spell to create 1 duplicate for 2
    different targets at the same time?











share|improve this question















Consider a Wizard 13/Sorcerer 7 multiclass, who happens to have the Twinned Spell metamagic option:




When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but ray of frost and chromatic orb are.




Now this character casts simulacrum:




  1. Can a Sorcerer use Twinned Spell to create 2 duplicates of himself
    (or someone else)?


  2. Can a Sorcerer use Twinned Spell to create 1 duplicate for 2
    different targets at the same time?








dnd-5e spells wizard sorcerer metamagic






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









V2Blast

18.7k251116




18.7k251116










asked yesterday









Alex Millette

2,1441332




2,1441332












  • This question is VERY related to this one.
    – AntiDrondert
    yesterday






  • 3




    @BlueMoon93 Agree, theoretical application of Twinned Spell to Simulacrum is possible with Wiz-13/Sorc-7 multiclass, no Wish is needed.
    – AntiDrondert
    yesterday








  • 1




    I edited the question to focus on the Twinned/Simulacrum aspect
    – Alex Millette
    yesterday










  • Since the MC option and the wish option are two very different questions and the latter already has an answer elsewhere I have edited this to only focus on the MC.
    – Rubiksmoose
    yesterday






  • 1




    Yes it does, although I'm probably more concerned about that matter about Twinned Wish now, But this is of course for another question.
    – Alex Millette
    yesterday


















  • This question is VERY related to this one.
    – AntiDrondert
    yesterday






  • 3




    @BlueMoon93 Agree, theoretical application of Twinned Spell to Simulacrum is possible with Wiz-13/Sorc-7 multiclass, no Wish is needed.
    – AntiDrondert
    yesterday








  • 1




    I edited the question to focus on the Twinned/Simulacrum aspect
    – Alex Millette
    yesterday










  • Since the MC option and the wish option are two very different questions and the latter already has an answer elsewhere I have edited this to only focus on the MC.
    – Rubiksmoose
    yesterday






  • 1




    Yes it does, although I'm probably more concerned about that matter about Twinned Wish now, But this is of course for another question.
    – Alex Millette
    yesterday
















This question is VERY related to this one.
– AntiDrondert
yesterday




This question is VERY related to this one.
– AntiDrondert
yesterday




3




3




@BlueMoon93 Agree, theoretical application of Twinned Spell to Simulacrum is possible with Wiz-13/Sorc-7 multiclass, no Wish is needed.
– AntiDrondert
yesterday






@BlueMoon93 Agree, theoretical application of Twinned Spell to Simulacrum is possible with Wiz-13/Sorc-7 multiclass, no Wish is needed.
– AntiDrondert
yesterday






1




1




I edited the question to focus on the Twinned/Simulacrum aspect
– Alex Millette
yesterday




I edited the question to focus on the Twinned/Simulacrum aspect
– Alex Millette
yesterday












Since the MC option and the wish option are two very different questions and the latter already has an answer elsewhere I have edited this to only focus on the MC.
– Rubiksmoose
yesterday




Since the MC option and the wish option are two very different questions and the latter already has an answer elsewhere I have edited this to only focus on the MC.
– Rubiksmoose
yesterday




1




1




Yes it does, although I'm probably more concerned about that matter about Twinned Wish now, But this is of course for another question.
– Alex Millette
yesterday




Yes it does, although I'm probably more concerned about that matter about Twinned Wish now, But this is of course for another question.
– Alex Millette
yesterday










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
24
down vote













Yes, Simulacrum can be twinned



It creates one duplicate each of two creatures.



Just to take the first line of the Simulacrum spell:




You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell.




The target is one beast or humanoid within range touch.



There's nothing logically stopping this from working. Simulacrum doesn't target self or more than one creature.





And to pull out a line of the Twinned Spell feature:




[snip] ... target a second creature in range ... [snip]




If you had two people (one of which could be yourself) within the range of "touch" for 12 hours and you have the sorcery points (you'll need seven), then you should be able to twin the spell and create two duplicates: one of each creature.



Also as a restriction of Twinned Spell, a twinned simulacrum can not be used to create two duplicates of the same creature.



So, to answer your questions succinctly:




  1. No, a twinned simulacrum must target different creatures.

  2. Yes.






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    8
    down vote













    You can twin Simulacrum, and create a duplicate of a target, and a duplicate of a second target.



    Simulacrum falls under Twinned Spell requirements, and now targets 2 creatures. It's the same as if you had cast Simulacrum twice, with different targets, except the first duplicate does not disappear.






    share|improve this answer






























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Probably not for the twin Simulacrum



      Simulacrum isn't a creature until after the spell takes effect.




      You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is
      within range for the entire casting time of the spell. The duplicate
      is a creature
      , partially real and formed from ice or snow, and it can
      take actions and otherwise be affected as a normal creature. (SRD, p. 180)




      What the sorcerer is casting the spell on is a bunch of objects, not a creature, that become a creature.




      (snow or ice in quantities sufficient to made a life-­‐‑size copy of the duplicated creature; some hair, fingernail clippings, or other piece of that creature’s body placed inside the snow or ice; and powdered ruby worth 1,500 gp, sprinkled over the duplicate and consumed by the spell) (SRD p. 180)




      Twin needs to be cast on a creature, specifically, per the rules you cited. With that in mind ...



      Maybe you can (what is being touched?)



      With a range of touch, it is unclear whether or not that which is to be duplicated must be touched or not. If yes, then provided that sufficient material is present, then the sorcerer is "touching" a creature and thus makes two duplicates of that creature. (thanks to @AlexMillette for that point)



      I can see the ruling going either way, so discuss with your DM. The issue to resolve is "what it is that the caster is touching in order to create the simulacrum? The pile of material, or the creature to be duplicated?"



      As an aside, regarding "touching" for touch spells and abilities, how the touch is to be executed isn't precisely defined. (A JCrawford tweet).






      share|improve this answer























      • "You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell." This seems to imply that the "Touch" range refers to the targeted original, which is certainly a creature.
        – Alex Millette
        yesterday










      • I see his point, although I highly doubt it was intended in this way. The range is "touch" and the creature to be duplicated has to stay within that range for the duration of the cast. This begs the question as to how do you craft a snowman while groping your victim? I think it is another example of horrible wording, or trying to copy a previous version.
        – Slagmoth
        yesterday










      • @AlexMillette Interesting point, so I folded that in. Good catch.
        – KorvinStarmast
        yesterday










      • I get a feeling these should be two separate answers... whether the components or the original creature should be considered the target completely changes which answer you get.
        – Erik
        yesterday










      • @Erik I appreciate your point, but I find more appealing the 5e approach of ruling over rules when the text doesn't specify;
        – KorvinStarmast
        yesterday











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137093%2fcan-a-multiclassed-wizard-sorcerer-use-the-twinned-spell-metamagic-option-on-sim%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      24
      down vote













      Yes, Simulacrum can be twinned



      It creates one duplicate each of two creatures.



      Just to take the first line of the Simulacrum spell:




      You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell.




      The target is one beast or humanoid within range touch.



      There's nothing logically stopping this from working. Simulacrum doesn't target self or more than one creature.





      And to pull out a line of the Twinned Spell feature:




      [snip] ... target a second creature in range ... [snip]




      If you had two people (one of which could be yourself) within the range of "touch" for 12 hours and you have the sorcery points (you'll need seven), then you should be able to twin the spell and create two duplicates: one of each creature.



      Also as a restriction of Twinned Spell, a twinned simulacrum can not be used to create two duplicates of the same creature.



      So, to answer your questions succinctly:




      1. No, a twinned simulacrum must target different creatures.

      2. Yes.






      share|improve this answer



























        up vote
        24
        down vote













        Yes, Simulacrum can be twinned



        It creates one duplicate each of two creatures.



        Just to take the first line of the Simulacrum spell:




        You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell.




        The target is one beast or humanoid within range touch.



        There's nothing logically stopping this from working. Simulacrum doesn't target self or more than one creature.





        And to pull out a line of the Twinned Spell feature:




        [snip] ... target a second creature in range ... [snip]




        If you had two people (one of which could be yourself) within the range of "touch" for 12 hours and you have the sorcery points (you'll need seven), then you should be able to twin the spell and create two duplicates: one of each creature.



        Also as a restriction of Twinned Spell, a twinned simulacrum can not be used to create two duplicates of the same creature.



        So, to answer your questions succinctly:




        1. No, a twinned simulacrum must target different creatures.

        2. Yes.






        share|improve this answer

























          up vote
          24
          down vote










          up vote
          24
          down vote









          Yes, Simulacrum can be twinned



          It creates one duplicate each of two creatures.



          Just to take the first line of the Simulacrum spell:




          You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell.




          The target is one beast or humanoid within range touch.



          There's nothing logically stopping this from working. Simulacrum doesn't target self or more than one creature.





          And to pull out a line of the Twinned Spell feature:




          [snip] ... target a second creature in range ... [snip]




          If you had two people (one of which could be yourself) within the range of "touch" for 12 hours and you have the sorcery points (you'll need seven), then you should be able to twin the spell and create two duplicates: one of each creature.



          Also as a restriction of Twinned Spell, a twinned simulacrum can not be used to create two duplicates of the same creature.



          So, to answer your questions succinctly:




          1. No, a twinned simulacrum must target different creatures.

          2. Yes.






          share|improve this answer














          Yes, Simulacrum can be twinned



          It creates one duplicate each of two creatures.



          Just to take the first line of the Simulacrum spell:




          You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell.




          The target is one beast or humanoid within range touch.



          There's nothing logically stopping this from working. Simulacrum doesn't target self or more than one creature.





          And to pull out a line of the Twinned Spell feature:




          [snip] ... target a second creature in range ... [snip]




          If you had two people (one of which could be yourself) within the range of "touch" for 12 hours and you have the sorcery points (you'll need seven), then you should be able to twin the spell and create two duplicates: one of each creature.



          Also as a restriction of Twinned Spell, a twinned simulacrum can not be used to create two duplicates of the same creature.



          So, to answer your questions succinctly:




          1. No, a twinned simulacrum must target different creatures.

          2. Yes.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 17 hours ago









          Rubiksmoose

          46.2k6232353




          46.2k6232353










          answered yesterday









          goodguy5

          6,41412362




          6,41412362
























              up vote
              8
              down vote













              You can twin Simulacrum, and create a duplicate of a target, and a duplicate of a second target.



              Simulacrum falls under Twinned Spell requirements, and now targets 2 creatures. It's the same as if you had cast Simulacrum twice, with different targets, except the first duplicate does not disappear.






              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                8
                down vote













                You can twin Simulacrum, and create a duplicate of a target, and a duplicate of a second target.



                Simulacrum falls under Twinned Spell requirements, and now targets 2 creatures. It's the same as if you had cast Simulacrum twice, with different targets, except the first duplicate does not disappear.






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  8
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  8
                  down vote









                  You can twin Simulacrum, and create a duplicate of a target, and a duplicate of a second target.



                  Simulacrum falls under Twinned Spell requirements, and now targets 2 creatures. It's the same as if you had cast Simulacrum twice, with different targets, except the first duplicate does not disappear.






                  share|improve this answer














                  You can twin Simulacrum, and create a duplicate of a target, and a duplicate of a second target.



                  Simulacrum falls under Twinned Spell requirements, and now targets 2 creatures. It's the same as if you had cast Simulacrum twice, with different targets, except the first duplicate does not disappear.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited yesterday

























                  answered yesterday









                  BlueMoon93

                  12.4k965131




                  12.4k965131






















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      Probably not for the twin Simulacrum



                      Simulacrum isn't a creature until after the spell takes effect.




                      You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is
                      within range for the entire casting time of the spell. The duplicate
                      is a creature
                      , partially real and formed from ice or snow, and it can
                      take actions and otherwise be affected as a normal creature. (SRD, p. 180)




                      What the sorcerer is casting the spell on is a bunch of objects, not a creature, that become a creature.




                      (snow or ice in quantities sufficient to made a life-­‐‑size copy of the duplicated creature; some hair, fingernail clippings, or other piece of that creature’s body placed inside the snow or ice; and powdered ruby worth 1,500 gp, sprinkled over the duplicate and consumed by the spell) (SRD p. 180)




                      Twin needs to be cast on a creature, specifically, per the rules you cited. With that in mind ...



                      Maybe you can (what is being touched?)



                      With a range of touch, it is unclear whether or not that which is to be duplicated must be touched or not. If yes, then provided that sufficient material is present, then the sorcerer is "touching" a creature and thus makes two duplicates of that creature. (thanks to @AlexMillette for that point)



                      I can see the ruling going either way, so discuss with your DM. The issue to resolve is "what it is that the caster is touching in order to create the simulacrum? The pile of material, or the creature to be duplicated?"



                      As an aside, regarding "touching" for touch spells and abilities, how the touch is to be executed isn't precisely defined. (A JCrawford tweet).






                      share|improve this answer























                      • "You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell." This seems to imply that the "Touch" range refers to the targeted original, which is certainly a creature.
                        – Alex Millette
                        yesterday










                      • I see his point, although I highly doubt it was intended in this way. The range is "touch" and the creature to be duplicated has to stay within that range for the duration of the cast. This begs the question as to how do you craft a snowman while groping your victim? I think it is another example of horrible wording, or trying to copy a previous version.
                        – Slagmoth
                        yesterday










                      • @AlexMillette Interesting point, so I folded that in. Good catch.
                        – KorvinStarmast
                        yesterday










                      • I get a feeling these should be two separate answers... whether the components or the original creature should be considered the target completely changes which answer you get.
                        – Erik
                        yesterday










                      • @Erik I appreciate your point, but I find more appealing the 5e approach of ruling over rules when the text doesn't specify;
                        – KorvinStarmast
                        yesterday















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      Probably not for the twin Simulacrum



                      Simulacrum isn't a creature until after the spell takes effect.




                      You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is
                      within range for the entire casting time of the spell. The duplicate
                      is a creature
                      , partially real and formed from ice or snow, and it can
                      take actions and otherwise be affected as a normal creature. (SRD, p. 180)




                      What the sorcerer is casting the spell on is a bunch of objects, not a creature, that become a creature.




                      (snow or ice in quantities sufficient to made a life-­‐‑size copy of the duplicated creature; some hair, fingernail clippings, or other piece of that creature’s body placed inside the snow or ice; and powdered ruby worth 1,500 gp, sprinkled over the duplicate and consumed by the spell) (SRD p. 180)




                      Twin needs to be cast on a creature, specifically, per the rules you cited. With that in mind ...



                      Maybe you can (what is being touched?)



                      With a range of touch, it is unclear whether or not that which is to be duplicated must be touched or not. If yes, then provided that sufficient material is present, then the sorcerer is "touching" a creature and thus makes two duplicates of that creature. (thanks to @AlexMillette for that point)



                      I can see the ruling going either way, so discuss with your DM. The issue to resolve is "what it is that the caster is touching in order to create the simulacrum? The pile of material, or the creature to be duplicated?"



                      As an aside, regarding "touching" for touch spells and abilities, how the touch is to be executed isn't precisely defined. (A JCrawford tweet).






                      share|improve this answer























                      • "You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell." This seems to imply that the "Touch" range refers to the targeted original, which is certainly a creature.
                        – Alex Millette
                        yesterday










                      • I see his point, although I highly doubt it was intended in this way. The range is "touch" and the creature to be duplicated has to stay within that range for the duration of the cast. This begs the question as to how do you craft a snowman while groping your victim? I think it is another example of horrible wording, or trying to copy a previous version.
                        – Slagmoth
                        yesterday










                      • @AlexMillette Interesting point, so I folded that in. Good catch.
                        – KorvinStarmast
                        yesterday










                      • I get a feeling these should be two separate answers... whether the components or the original creature should be considered the target completely changes which answer you get.
                        – Erik
                        yesterday










                      • @Erik I appreciate your point, but I find more appealing the 5e approach of ruling over rules when the text doesn't specify;
                        – KorvinStarmast
                        yesterday













                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote









                      Probably not for the twin Simulacrum



                      Simulacrum isn't a creature until after the spell takes effect.




                      You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is
                      within range for the entire casting time of the spell. The duplicate
                      is a creature
                      , partially real and formed from ice or snow, and it can
                      take actions and otherwise be affected as a normal creature. (SRD, p. 180)




                      What the sorcerer is casting the spell on is a bunch of objects, not a creature, that become a creature.




                      (snow or ice in quantities sufficient to made a life-­‐‑size copy of the duplicated creature; some hair, fingernail clippings, or other piece of that creature’s body placed inside the snow or ice; and powdered ruby worth 1,500 gp, sprinkled over the duplicate and consumed by the spell) (SRD p. 180)




                      Twin needs to be cast on a creature, specifically, per the rules you cited. With that in mind ...



                      Maybe you can (what is being touched?)



                      With a range of touch, it is unclear whether or not that which is to be duplicated must be touched or not. If yes, then provided that sufficient material is present, then the sorcerer is "touching" a creature and thus makes two duplicates of that creature. (thanks to @AlexMillette for that point)



                      I can see the ruling going either way, so discuss with your DM. The issue to resolve is "what it is that the caster is touching in order to create the simulacrum? The pile of material, or the creature to be duplicated?"



                      As an aside, regarding "touching" for touch spells and abilities, how the touch is to be executed isn't precisely defined. (A JCrawford tweet).






                      share|improve this answer














                      Probably not for the twin Simulacrum



                      Simulacrum isn't a creature until after the spell takes effect.




                      You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is
                      within range for the entire casting time of the spell. The duplicate
                      is a creature
                      , partially real and formed from ice or snow, and it can
                      take actions and otherwise be affected as a normal creature. (SRD, p. 180)




                      What the sorcerer is casting the spell on is a bunch of objects, not a creature, that become a creature.




                      (snow or ice in quantities sufficient to made a life-­‐‑size copy of the duplicated creature; some hair, fingernail clippings, or other piece of that creature’s body placed inside the snow or ice; and powdered ruby worth 1,500 gp, sprinkled over the duplicate and consumed by the spell) (SRD p. 180)




                      Twin needs to be cast on a creature, specifically, per the rules you cited. With that in mind ...



                      Maybe you can (what is being touched?)



                      With a range of touch, it is unclear whether or not that which is to be duplicated must be touched or not. If yes, then provided that sufficient material is present, then the sorcerer is "touching" a creature and thus makes two duplicates of that creature. (thanks to @AlexMillette for that point)



                      I can see the ruling going either way, so discuss with your DM. The issue to resolve is "what it is that the caster is touching in order to create the simulacrum? The pile of material, or the creature to be duplicated?"



                      As an aside, regarding "touching" for touch spells and abilities, how the touch is to be executed isn't precisely defined. (A JCrawford tweet).







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited yesterday

























                      answered yesterday









                      KorvinStarmast

                      73k17227400




                      73k17227400












                      • "You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell." This seems to imply that the "Touch" range refers to the targeted original, which is certainly a creature.
                        – Alex Millette
                        yesterday










                      • I see his point, although I highly doubt it was intended in this way. The range is "touch" and the creature to be duplicated has to stay within that range for the duration of the cast. This begs the question as to how do you craft a snowman while groping your victim? I think it is another example of horrible wording, or trying to copy a previous version.
                        – Slagmoth
                        yesterday










                      • @AlexMillette Interesting point, so I folded that in. Good catch.
                        – KorvinStarmast
                        yesterday










                      • I get a feeling these should be two separate answers... whether the components or the original creature should be considered the target completely changes which answer you get.
                        – Erik
                        yesterday










                      • @Erik I appreciate your point, but I find more appealing the 5e approach of ruling over rules when the text doesn't specify;
                        – KorvinStarmast
                        yesterday


















                      • "You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell." This seems to imply that the "Touch" range refers to the targeted original, which is certainly a creature.
                        – Alex Millette
                        yesterday










                      • I see his point, although I highly doubt it was intended in this way. The range is "touch" and the creature to be duplicated has to stay within that range for the duration of the cast. This begs the question as to how do you craft a snowman while groping your victim? I think it is another example of horrible wording, or trying to copy a previous version.
                        – Slagmoth
                        yesterday










                      • @AlexMillette Interesting point, so I folded that in. Good catch.
                        – KorvinStarmast
                        yesterday










                      • I get a feeling these should be two separate answers... whether the components or the original creature should be considered the target completely changes which answer you get.
                        – Erik
                        yesterday










                      • @Erik I appreciate your point, but I find more appealing the 5e approach of ruling over rules when the text doesn't specify;
                        – KorvinStarmast
                        yesterday
















                      "You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell." This seems to imply that the "Touch" range refers to the targeted original, which is certainly a creature.
                      – Alex Millette
                      yesterday




                      "You shape an illusory duplicate of one beast or humanoid that is within range for the entire casting time of the spell." This seems to imply that the "Touch" range refers to the targeted original, which is certainly a creature.
                      – Alex Millette
                      yesterday












                      I see his point, although I highly doubt it was intended in this way. The range is "touch" and the creature to be duplicated has to stay within that range for the duration of the cast. This begs the question as to how do you craft a snowman while groping your victim? I think it is another example of horrible wording, or trying to copy a previous version.
                      – Slagmoth
                      yesterday




                      I see his point, although I highly doubt it was intended in this way. The range is "touch" and the creature to be duplicated has to stay within that range for the duration of the cast. This begs the question as to how do you craft a snowman while groping your victim? I think it is another example of horrible wording, or trying to copy a previous version.
                      – Slagmoth
                      yesterday












                      @AlexMillette Interesting point, so I folded that in. Good catch.
                      – KorvinStarmast
                      yesterday




                      @AlexMillette Interesting point, so I folded that in. Good catch.
                      – KorvinStarmast
                      yesterday












                      I get a feeling these should be two separate answers... whether the components or the original creature should be considered the target completely changes which answer you get.
                      – Erik
                      yesterday




                      I get a feeling these should be two separate answers... whether the components or the original creature should be considered the target completely changes which answer you get.
                      – Erik
                      yesterday












                      @Erik I appreciate your point, but I find more appealing the 5e approach of ruling over rules when the text doesn't specify;
                      – KorvinStarmast
                      yesterday




                      @Erik I appreciate your point, but I find more appealing the 5e approach of ruling over rules when the text doesn't specify;
                      – KorvinStarmast
                      yesterday


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137093%2fcan-a-multiclassed-wizard-sorcerer-use-the-twinned-spell-metamagic-option-on-sim%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Puebla de Zaragoza

                      Musa