What is “exterior” about an exterior product?
This is a question about terminology. What is "inner" about an inner product, or "outer" about an outer product?
terminology
add a comment |
This is a question about terminology. What is "inner" about an inner product, or "outer" about an outer product?
terminology
add a comment |
This is a question about terminology. What is "inner" about an inner product, or "outer" about an outer product?
terminology
This is a question about terminology. What is "inner" about an inner product, or "outer" about an outer product?
terminology
terminology
asked 2 hours ago
Tobin Fricke
1,457818
1,457818
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Consider the case n=3. The interior product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives in the span of the other. The outer product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives outside the span of the other.
This terminology can be traced back to one of the earlier German texts on linear algebra but I can't quite recall the name. I'll come back if I recall it.
EDIT: Found my source. Take a look at section 1.2 of this.
add a comment |
This terminology (or rather its literal German translation) was introduced by Grassmann.
I named the former product exterior, the latter interior, reflecting that the former was nonzero only when involving independent directions, the latter only when involving a shared, i.e., partly common one.
H. Grassmann, Die lineale Ausdehnungslehre [archive.org] (1844) x-xi.
NB the words in the original text translated in the above excerpt to exterior and interior are respectively äussere and innere, but can also be translated respectively to outer and inner, and now all four terms have distinct meanings in this context.
For more detail, see the answer to essentially the same question on MathOverflow, from where the above translation was lifted (which motivated setting this answer as a community wiki answer):
Etymology of "exterior" in "exterior calculus".
add a comment |
The exterior (= outer) product takes values in a "higher" dimensional space: if $V$ has dimension $n$ and $v, w in V$ then $v wedge w in Lambda^2(V)$ and that space has dimension $binom{n}{2}$, which is bigger than $n$ when $n > 3$. In Euclidean space, the wedge product of two vectors is represented by a parallelogram with the original vectors as its edges.
The inner/outer terminology goes back to Grassmann.
add a comment |
Well if I take the inner product of two vectors I go from the full vector space down to the base field over which it's defined so its internal in that regard. As for the outer product I think of this in terms of matrix multiplication, if we reverse the inner product $x^Ty$ to $xy^T$ for column vectors in a space of dimension $n$ instead we end up with a matrix which is a larger vector space than the original space with $n^2$ dimensions. Metaphorically I think of this as identifying a vector space with a subspace of a larger space, and the rest of that space is "outer space" in the same way the Earth is in a much larger universe.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049967%2fwhat-is-exterior-about-an-exterior-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Consider the case n=3. The interior product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives in the span of the other. The outer product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives outside the span of the other.
This terminology can be traced back to one of the earlier German texts on linear algebra but I can't quite recall the name. I'll come back if I recall it.
EDIT: Found my source. Take a look at section 1.2 of this.
add a comment |
Consider the case n=3. The interior product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives in the span of the other. The outer product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives outside the span of the other.
This terminology can be traced back to one of the earlier German texts on linear algebra but I can't quite recall the name. I'll come back if I recall it.
EDIT: Found my source. Take a look at section 1.2 of this.
add a comment |
Consider the case n=3. The interior product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives in the span of the other. The outer product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives outside the span of the other.
This terminology can be traced back to one of the earlier German texts on linear algebra but I can't quite recall the name. I'll come back if I recall it.
EDIT: Found my source. Take a look at section 1.2 of this.
Consider the case n=3. The interior product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives in the span of the other. The outer product of two vectors is non-zero when one lives outside the span of the other.
This terminology can be traced back to one of the earlier German texts on linear algebra but I can't quite recall the name. I'll come back if I recall it.
EDIT: Found my source. Take a look at section 1.2 of this.
answered 1 hour ago
Wraith1995
598315
598315
add a comment |
add a comment |
This terminology (or rather its literal German translation) was introduced by Grassmann.
I named the former product exterior, the latter interior, reflecting that the former was nonzero only when involving independent directions, the latter only when involving a shared, i.e., partly common one.
H. Grassmann, Die lineale Ausdehnungslehre [archive.org] (1844) x-xi.
NB the words in the original text translated in the above excerpt to exterior and interior are respectively äussere and innere, but can also be translated respectively to outer and inner, and now all four terms have distinct meanings in this context.
For more detail, see the answer to essentially the same question on MathOverflow, from where the above translation was lifted (which motivated setting this answer as a community wiki answer):
Etymology of "exterior" in "exterior calculus".
add a comment |
This terminology (or rather its literal German translation) was introduced by Grassmann.
I named the former product exterior, the latter interior, reflecting that the former was nonzero only when involving independent directions, the latter only when involving a shared, i.e., partly common one.
H. Grassmann, Die lineale Ausdehnungslehre [archive.org] (1844) x-xi.
NB the words in the original text translated in the above excerpt to exterior and interior are respectively äussere and innere, but can also be translated respectively to outer and inner, and now all four terms have distinct meanings in this context.
For more detail, see the answer to essentially the same question on MathOverflow, from where the above translation was lifted (which motivated setting this answer as a community wiki answer):
Etymology of "exterior" in "exterior calculus".
add a comment |
This terminology (or rather its literal German translation) was introduced by Grassmann.
I named the former product exterior, the latter interior, reflecting that the former was nonzero only when involving independent directions, the latter only when involving a shared, i.e., partly common one.
H. Grassmann, Die lineale Ausdehnungslehre [archive.org] (1844) x-xi.
NB the words in the original text translated in the above excerpt to exterior and interior are respectively äussere and innere, but can also be translated respectively to outer and inner, and now all four terms have distinct meanings in this context.
For more detail, see the answer to essentially the same question on MathOverflow, from where the above translation was lifted (which motivated setting this answer as a community wiki answer):
Etymology of "exterior" in "exterior calculus".
This terminology (or rather its literal German translation) was introduced by Grassmann.
I named the former product exterior, the latter interior, reflecting that the former was nonzero only when involving independent directions, the latter only when involving a shared, i.e., partly common one.
H. Grassmann, Die lineale Ausdehnungslehre [archive.org] (1844) x-xi.
NB the words in the original text translated in the above excerpt to exterior and interior are respectively äussere and innere, but can also be translated respectively to outer and inner, and now all four terms have distinct meanings in this context.
For more detail, see the answer to essentially the same question on MathOverflow, from where the above translation was lifted (which motivated setting this answer as a community wiki answer):
Etymology of "exterior" in "exterior calculus".
edited 1 hour ago
community wiki
2 revs
Travis
add a comment |
add a comment |
The exterior (= outer) product takes values in a "higher" dimensional space: if $V$ has dimension $n$ and $v, w in V$ then $v wedge w in Lambda^2(V)$ and that space has dimension $binom{n}{2}$, which is bigger than $n$ when $n > 3$. In Euclidean space, the wedge product of two vectors is represented by a parallelogram with the original vectors as its edges.
The inner/outer terminology goes back to Grassmann.
add a comment |
The exterior (= outer) product takes values in a "higher" dimensional space: if $V$ has dimension $n$ and $v, w in V$ then $v wedge w in Lambda^2(V)$ and that space has dimension $binom{n}{2}$, which is bigger than $n$ when $n > 3$. In Euclidean space, the wedge product of two vectors is represented by a parallelogram with the original vectors as its edges.
The inner/outer terminology goes back to Grassmann.
add a comment |
The exterior (= outer) product takes values in a "higher" dimensional space: if $V$ has dimension $n$ and $v, w in V$ then $v wedge w in Lambda^2(V)$ and that space has dimension $binom{n}{2}$, which is bigger than $n$ when $n > 3$. In Euclidean space, the wedge product of two vectors is represented by a parallelogram with the original vectors as its edges.
The inner/outer terminology goes back to Grassmann.
The exterior (= outer) product takes values in a "higher" dimensional space: if $V$ has dimension $n$ and $v, w in V$ then $v wedge w in Lambda^2(V)$ and that space has dimension $binom{n}{2}$, which is bigger than $n$ when $n > 3$. In Euclidean space, the wedge product of two vectors is represented by a parallelogram with the original vectors as its edges.
The inner/outer terminology goes back to Grassmann.
answered 1 hour ago
KCd
16.5k4075
16.5k4075
add a comment |
add a comment |
Well if I take the inner product of two vectors I go from the full vector space down to the base field over which it's defined so its internal in that regard. As for the outer product I think of this in terms of matrix multiplication, if we reverse the inner product $x^Ty$ to $xy^T$ for column vectors in a space of dimension $n$ instead we end up with a matrix which is a larger vector space than the original space with $n^2$ dimensions. Metaphorically I think of this as identifying a vector space with a subspace of a larger space, and the rest of that space is "outer space" in the same way the Earth is in a much larger universe.
add a comment |
Well if I take the inner product of two vectors I go from the full vector space down to the base field over which it's defined so its internal in that regard. As for the outer product I think of this in terms of matrix multiplication, if we reverse the inner product $x^Ty$ to $xy^T$ for column vectors in a space of dimension $n$ instead we end up with a matrix which is a larger vector space than the original space with $n^2$ dimensions. Metaphorically I think of this as identifying a vector space with a subspace of a larger space, and the rest of that space is "outer space" in the same way the Earth is in a much larger universe.
add a comment |
Well if I take the inner product of two vectors I go from the full vector space down to the base field over which it's defined so its internal in that regard. As for the outer product I think of this in terms of matrix multiplication, if we reverse the inner product $x^Ty$ to $xy^T$ for column vectors in a space of dimension $n$ instead we end up with a matrix which is a larger vector space than the original space with $n^2$ dimensions. Metaphorically I think of this as identifying a vector space with a subspace of a larger space, and the rest of that space is "outer space" in the same way the Earth is in a much larger universe.
Well if I take the inner product of two vectors I go from the full vector space down to the base field over which it's defined so its internal in that regard. As for the outer product I think of this in terms of matrix multiplication, if we reverse the inner product $x^Ty$ to $xy^T$ for column vectors in a space of dimension $n$ instead we end up with a matrix which is a larger vector space than the original space with $n^2$ dimensions. Metaphorically I think of this as identifying a vector space with a subspace of a larger space, and the rest of that space is "outer space" in the same way the Earth is in a much larger universe.
answered 1 hour ago
CyclotomicField
2,1821313
2,1821313
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049967%2fwhat-is-exterior-about-an-exterior-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown