About the Lebesgue points of a product of functions












1












$begingroup$


We say that a measurable function $g:mathbb R to mathbb R$ has a Lebesgue point at $x in mathbb R$ if



$$ frac1{2s}int_{x-s}^{x+s} |g(y)-g(x)| , dy to 0 quad text{as } s to 0.$$



If $g$ is continuous, then every $x in mathbb R$ is a Lebesgue point of $g$. The Lebesgue differentiation theorem states that a (locally) Lebesgue integrable function has Lebesgue points almost everywhere. The function given by



$$ g(x) = sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^kchi_{(2^{-k-1},2^{-k}]} $$



is an example of a function that does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.



Now suppose that $g: mathbb R to mathbb R$ and $h: mathbb R to mathbb R$ have Lebesgue points at every $x in mathbb R$. Is it possible that the product $gh$ has non-Lebesgue points?






real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Since $gh$ is not-necessary locally-integrable, the question does not make sense. (Take $h=g = sqrt{x}^{-1}$, then $h$ and $g$ are locally-integrable, but not $gh$.)
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Nov 30 '18 at 13:29












  • $begingroup$
    @p4sch Note that $sqrt{x}^{-1}$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – cob
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:18










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 If $g=h=0$, then $gh=0$ has a Lebesgue point at every $x in mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – cob
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:21










  • $begingroup$
    @cob hm I thought you had said "must $gh$ have non-Lebesgue points"
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:38










  • $begingroup$
    If $(q_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}$, we can define $h(x) = g(x) = sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n} (max {sqrt{|q_n}|,1})^{-1} sqrt{|x-q_n|}^{-1}$. This function is locally-integrable, but $hcdot g$ is not locally-integrable in any point of $mathbb{R}$.
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Nov 30 '18 at 15:03


















1












$begingroup$


We say that a measurable function $g:mathbb R to mathbb R$ has a Lebesgue point at $x in mathbb R$ if



$$ frac1{2s}int_{x-s}^{x+s} |g(y)-g(x)| , dy to 0 quad text{as } s to 0.$$



If $g$ is continuous, then every $x in mathbb R$ is a Lebesgue point of $g$. The Lebesgue differentiation theorem states that a (locally) Lebesgue integrable function has Lebesgue points almost everywhere. The function given by



$$ g(x) = sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^kchi_{(2^{-k-1},2^{-k}]} $$



is an example of a function that does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.



Now suppose that $g: mathbb R to mathbb R$ and $h: mathbb R to mathbb R$ have Lebesgue points at every $x in mathbb R$. Is it possible that the product $gh$ has non-Lebesgue points?






real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Since $gh$ is not-necessary locally-integrable, the question does not make sense. (Take $h=g = sqrt{x}^{-1}$, then $h$ and $g$ are locally-integrable, but not $gh$.)
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Nov 30 '18 at 13:29












  • $begingroup$
    @p4sch Note that $sqrt{x}^{-1}$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – cob
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:18










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 If $g=h=0$, then $gh=0$ has a Lebesgue point at every $x in mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – cob
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:21










  • $begingroup$
    @cob hm I thought you had said "must $gh$ have non-Lebesgue points"
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:38










  • $begingroup$
    If $(q_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}$, we can define $h(x) = g(x) = sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n} (max {sqrt{|q_n}|,1})^{-1} sqrt{|x-q_n|}^{-1}$. This function is locally-integrable, but $hcdot g$ is not locally-integrable in any point of $mathbb{R}$.
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Nov 30 '18 at 15:03
















1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


We say that a measurable function $g:mathbb R to mathbb R$ has a Lebesgue point at $x in mathbb R$ if



$$ frac1{2s}int_{x-s}^{x+s} |g(y)-g(x)| , dy to 0 quad text{as } s to 0.$$



If $g$ is continuous, then every $x in mathbb R$ is a Lebesgue point of $g$. The Lebesgue differentiation theorem states that a (locally) Lebesgue integrable function has Lebesgue points almost everywhere. The function given by



$$ g(x) = sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^kchi_{(2^{-k-1},2^{-k}]} $$



is an example of a function that does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.



Now suppose that $g: mathbb R to mathbb R$ and $h: mathbb R to mathbb R$ have Lebesgue points at every $x in mathbb R$. Is it possible that the product $gh$ has non-Lebesgue points?






real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




We say that a measurable function $g:mathbb R to mathbb R$ has a Lebesgue point at $x in mathbb R$ if



$$ frac1{2s}int_{x-s}^{x+s} |g(y)-g(x)| , dy to 0 quad text{as } s to 0.$$



If $g$ is continuous, then every $x in mathbb R$ is a Lebesgue point of $g$. The Lebesgue differentiation theorem states that a (locally) Lebesgue integrable function has Lebesgue points almost everywhere. The function given by



$$ g(x) = sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^kchi_{(2^{-k-1},2^{-k}]} $$



is an example of a function that does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.



Now suppose that $g: mathbb R to mathbb R$ and $h: mathbb R to mathbb R$ have Lebesgue points at every $x in mathbb R$. Is it possible that the product $gh$ has non-Lebesgue points?






real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral




real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 30 '18 at 13:03









cobcob

1063




1063












  • $begingroup$
    Since $gh$ is not-necessary locally-integrable, the question does not make sense. (Take $h=g = sqrt{x}^{-1}$, then $h$ and $g$ are locally-integrable, but not $gh$.)
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Nov 30 '18 at 13:29












  • $begingroup$
    @p4sch Note that $sqrt{x}^{-1}$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – cob
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:18










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 If $g=h=0$, then $gh=0$ has a Lebesgue point at every $x in mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – cob
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:21










  • $begingroup$
    @cob hm I thought you had said "must $gh$ have non-Lebesgue points"
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:38










  • $begingroup$
    If $(q_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}$, we can define $h(x) = g(x) = sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n} (max {sqrt{|q_n}|,1})^{-1} sqrt{|x-q_n|}^{-1}$. This function is locally-integrable, but $hcdot g$ is not locally-integrable in any point of $mathbb{R}$.
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Nov 30 '18 at 15:03




















  • $begingroup$
    Since $gh$ is not-necessary locally-integrable, the question does not make sense. (Take $h=g = sqrt{x}^{-1}$, then $h$ and $g$ are locally-integrable, but not $gh$.)
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Nov 30 '18 at 13:29












  • $begingroup$
    @p4sch Note that $sqrt{x}^{-1}$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – cob
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:18










  • $begingroup$
    @mathworker21 If $g=h=0$, then $gh=0$ has a Lebesgue point at every $x in mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – cob
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:21










  • $begingroup$
    @cob hm I thought you had said "must $gh$ have non-Lebesgue points"
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Nov 30 '18 at 14:38










  • $begingroup$
    If $(q_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}$, we can define $h(x) = g(x) = sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n} (max {sqrt{|q_n}|,1})^{-1} sqrt{|x-q_n|}^{-1}$. This function is locally-integrable, but $hcdot g$ is not locally-integrable in any point of $mathbb{R}$.
    $endgroup$
    – p4sch
    Nov 30 '18 at 15:03


















$begingroup$
Since $gh$ is not-necessary locally-integrable, the question does not make sense. (Take $h=g = sqrt{x}^{-1}$, then $h$ and $g$ are locally-integrable, but not $gh$.)
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Nov 30 '18 at 13:29






$begingroup$
Since $gh$ is not-necessary locally-integrable, the question does not make sense. (Take $h=g = sqrt{x}^{-1}$, then $h$ and $g$ are locally-integrable, but not $gh$.)
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Nov 30 '18 at 13:29














$begingroup$
@p4sch Note that $sqrt{x}^{-1}$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.
$endgroup$
– cob
Nov 30 '18 at 14:18




$begingroup$
@p4sch Note that $sqrt{x}^{-1}$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$.
$endgroup$
– cob
Nov 30 '18 at 14:18












$begingroup$
@mathworker21 If $g=h=0$, then $gh=0$ has a Lebesgue point at every $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– cob
Nov 30 '18 at 14:21




$begingroup$
@mathworker21 If $g=h=0$, then $gh=0$ has a Lebesgue point at every $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– cob
Nov 30 '18 at 14:21












$begingroup$
@cob hm I thought you had said "must $gh$ have non-Lebesgue points"
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Nov 30 '18 at 14:38




$begingroup$
@cob hm I thought you had said "must $gh$ have non-Lebesgue points"
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Nov 30 '18 at 14:38












$begingroup$
If $(q_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}$, we can define $h(x) = g(x) = sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n} (max {sqrt{|q_n}|,1})^{-1} sqrt{|x-q_n|}^{-1}$. This function is locally-integrable, but $hcdot g$ is not locally-integrable in any point of $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Nov 30 '18 at 15:03






$begingroup$
If $(q_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is an enumeration of $mathbb{Q}$, we can define $h(x) = g(x) = sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n} (max {sqrt{|q_n}|,1})^{-1} sqrt{|x-q_n|}^{-1}$. This function is locally-integrable, but $hcdot g$ is not locally-integrable in any point of $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Nov 30 '18 at 15:03












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Take $$g(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{k/2} chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}.$$ It is easy to see that every $x neq 0$ is a Lebesgue point of $g$. At $x=0$ we have $$frac1{2^{-n+1}}int_{-2^{-n}}^{2^{-n}} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy = 2^{n-1}sum_{k=n}^infty 2^{-3k/2} = 2^{-n/2-1}sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{-3k/2}$$ which goes to $0$ as $n to infty$. This also implies $$frac1{2s}int_{-s}^{s} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy to 0 quad text{as $s to 0$}$$ and therefore $0$ is also a Lebesgue point of $g$.



However, $$g^2(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^k chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}$$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$, which can be seen by adapting the exponents in the above calculation. In fact, $g^2$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$ even after redefining $g^2(0)$. Also note that $g^2$ is integrable at $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020066%2fabout-the-lebesgue-points-of-a-product-of-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Take $$g(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{k/2} chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}.$$ It is easy to see that every $x neq 0$ is a Lebesgue point of $g$. At $x=0$ we have $$frac1{2^{-n+1}}int_{-2^{-n}}^{2^{-n}} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy = 2^{n-1}sum_{k=n}^infty 2^{-3k/2} = 2^{-n/2-1}sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{-3k/2}$$ which goes to $0$ as $n to infty$. This also implies $$frac1{2s}int_{-s}^{s} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy to 0 quad text{as $s to 0$}$$ and therefore $0$ is also a Lebesgue point of $g$.



    However, $$g^2(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^k chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}$$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$, which can be seen by adapting the exponents in the above calculation. In fact, $g^2$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$ even after redefining $g^2(0)$. Also note that $g^2$ is integrable at $0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Take $$g(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{k/2} chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}.$$ It is easy to see that every $x neq 0$ is a Lebesgue point of $g$. At $x=0$ we have $$frac1{2^{-n+1}}int_{-2^{-n}}^{2^{-n}} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy = 2^{n-1}sum_{k=n}^infty 2^{-3k/2} = 2^{-n/2-1}sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{-3k/2}$$ which goes to $0$ as $n to infty$. This also implies $$frac1{2s}int_{-s}^{s} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy to 0 quad text{as $s to 0$}$$ and therefore $0$ is also a Lebesgue point of $g$.



      However, $$g^2(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^k chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}$$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$, which can be seen by adapting the exponents in the above calculation. In fact, $g^2$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$ even after redefining $g^2(0)$. Also note that $g^2$ is integrable at $0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Take $$g(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{k/2} chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}.$$ It is easy to see that every $x neq 0$ is a Lebesgue point of $g$. At $x=0$ we have $$frac1{2^{-n+1}}int_{-2^{-n}}^{2^{-n}} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy = 2^{n-1}sum_{k=n}^infty 2^{-3k/2} = 2^{-n/2-1}sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{-3k/2}$$ which goes to $0$ as $n to infty$. This also implies $$frac1{2s}int_{-s}^{s} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy to 0 quad text{as $s to 0$}$$ and therefore $0$ is also a Lebesgue point of $g$.



        However, $$g^2(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^k chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}$$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$, which can be seen by adapting the exponents in the above calculation. In fact, $g^2$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$ even after redefining $g^2(0)$. Also note that $g^2$ is integrable at $0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Take $$g(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{k/2} chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}.$$ It is easy to see that every $x neq 0$ is a Lebesgue point of $g$. At $x=0$ we have $$frac1{2^{-n+1}}int_{-2^{-n}}^{2^{-n}} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy = 2^{n-1}sum_{k=n}^infty 2^{-3k/2} = 2^{-n/2-1}sum_{k=0}^infty 2^{-3k/2}$$ which goes to $0$ as $n to infty$. This also implies $$frac1{2s}int_{-s}^{s} |g(y)-g(0)| , dy to 0 quad text{as $s to 0$}$$ and therefore $0$ is also a Lebesgue point of $g$.



        However, $$g^2(x)=sum_{k=0}^infty 2^k chi_{[2^{-k}-4^{-k},2^{-k}]}$$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$, which can be seen by adapting the exponents in the above calculation. In fact, $g^2$ does not have a Lebesgue point at $0$ even after redefining $g^2(0)$. Also note that $g^2$ is integrable at $0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 30 '18 at 17:47









        cobcob

        1063




        1063






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020066%2fabout-the-lebesgue-points-of-a-product-of-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Image
            Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
            Read more

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
            Read more

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

            Image
            1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
            Read more