Biblatex APA style does not support editor types?
I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:
How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?
Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex
I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA
to biblatex
. At that point the editortype
is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.
How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?
documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mwe.bib}
@Book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}
addbibresource{mwe.bib}
NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
Results:
biblatex apa-style
add a comment |
I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:
How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?
Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex
I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA
to biblatex
. At that point the editortype
is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.
How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?
documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mwe.bib}
@Book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}
addbibresource{mwe.bib}
NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
Results:
biblatex apa-style
add a comment |
I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:
How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?
Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex
I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA
to biblatex
. At that point the editortype
is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.
How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?
documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mwe.bib}
@Book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}
addbibresource{mwe.bib}
NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
Results:
biblatex apa-style
I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:
How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?
Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex
I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA
to biblatex
. At that point the editortype
is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.
How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?
documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{mwe.bib}
@Book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}
addbibresource{mwe.bib}
NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
Results:
biblatex apa-style
biblatex apa-style
edited Dec 21 '18 at 19:48
moewe
88.2k9110338
88.2k9110338
asked Dec 21 '18 at 17:35
lightkeeperlightkeeper
453
453
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The bibstrings that biblatex-apa
uses for editortype
are called type<editortype>
and type<editortype>s
, so you have to define those as well.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
typeillustrator = {illustrator},
typeillustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa
uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume
and typeseries
for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume
or series
because those names are already taken).
It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa
to try the standard <editorype>
bibstring when type<editortype>
is undefined.
With
renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
iffieldundef{#1type}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{bibcpstring{editors}}
{bibcpstring{editor}}}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}
it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator
and typeillustrators
.
The string cbyillustrator
is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago
as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.
Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio
to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa
from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.
I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
– lightkeeper
Dec 21 '18 at 18:15
@lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something liketypethefield{editortype}
. I triedtypeillustrator
which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look forthefield{editortype}
, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look inapa.bbx
. I searched fortype
(there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
– moewe
Dec 21 '18 at 19:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466884%2fbiblatex-apa-style-does-not-support-editor-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The bibstrings that biblatex-apa
uses for editortype
are called type<editortype>
and type<editortype>s
, so you have to define those as well.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
typeillustrator = {illustrator},
typeillustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa
uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume
and typeseries
for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume
or series
because those names are already taken).
It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa
to try the standard <editorype>
bibstring when type<editortype>
is undefined.
With
renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
iffieldundef{#1type}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{bibcpstring{editors}}
{bibcpstring{editor}}}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}
it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator
and typeillustrators
.
The string cbyillustrator
is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago
as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.
Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio
to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa
from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.
I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
– lightkeeper
Dec 21 '18 at 18:15
@lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something liketypethefield{editortype}
. I triedtypeillustrator
which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look forthefield{editortype}
, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look inapa.bbx
. I searched fortype
(there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
– moewe
Dec 21 '18 at 19:47
add a comment |
The bibstrings that biblatex-apa
uses for editortype
are called type<editortype>
and type<editortype>s
, so you have to define those as well.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
typeillustrator = {illustrator},
typeillustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa
uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume
and typeseries
for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume
or series
because those names are already taken).
It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa
to try the standard <editorype>
bibstring when type<editortype>
is undefined.
With
renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
iffieldundef{#1type}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{bibcpstring{editors}}
{bibcpstring{editor}}}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}
it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator
and typeillustrators
.
The string cbyillustrator
is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago
as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.
Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio
to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa
from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.
I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
– lightkeeper
Dec 21 '18 at 18:15
@lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something liketypethefield{editortype}
. I triedtypeillustrator
which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look forthefield{editortype}
, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look inapa.bbx
. I searched fortype
(there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
– moewe
Dec 21 '18 at 19:47
add a comment |
The bibstrings that biblatex-apa
uses for editortype
are called type<editortype>
and type<editortype>s
, so you have to define those as well.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
typeillustrator = {illustrator},
typeillustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa
uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume
and typeseries
for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume
or series
because those names are already taken).
It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa
to try the standard <editorype>
bibstring when type<editortype>
is undefined.
With
renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
iffieldundef{#1type}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{bibcpstring{editors}}
{bibcpstring{editor}}}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}
it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator
and typeillustrators
.
The string cbyillustrator
is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago
as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.
Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio
to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa
from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.
The bibstrings that biblatex-apa
uses for editortype
are called type<editortype>
and type<editortype>s
, so you have to define those as well.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}
NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
typeillustrator = {illustrator},
typeillustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
@book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa
uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume
and typeseries
for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume
or series
because those names are already taken).
It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa
to try the standard <editorype>
bibstring when type<editortype>
is undefined.
With
renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
iffieldundef{#1type}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{bibcpstring{editors}}
{bibcpstring{editor}}}
{ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
{ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
{bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
{bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}
it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator
and typeillustrators
.
The string cbyillustrator
is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago
as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.
Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio
to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa
from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.
edited Dec 22 '18 at 9:19
answered Dec 21 '18 at 17:46
moewemoewe
88.2k9110338
88.2k9110338
I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
– lightkeeper
Dec 21 '18 at 18:15
@lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something liketypethefield{editortype}
. I triedtypeillustrator
which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look forthefield{editortype}
, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look inapa.bbx
. I searched fortype
(there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
– moewe
Dec 21 '18 at 19:47
add a comment |
I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
– lightkeeper
Dec 21 '18 at 18:15
@lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something liketypethefield{editortype}
. I triedtypeillustrator
which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look forthefield{editortype}
, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look inapa.bbx
. I searched fortype
(there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
– moewe
Dec 21 '18 at 19:47
I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
– lightkeeper
Dec 21 '18 at 18:15
I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
– lightkeeper
Dec 21 '18 at 18:15
@lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like
typethefield{editortype}
. I tried typeillustrator
which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefield{editortype}
, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx
. I searched for type
(there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.– moewe
Dec 21 '18 at 19:47
@lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like
typethefield{editortype}
. I tried typeillustrator
which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefield{editortype}
, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx
. I searched for type
(there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.– moewe
Dec 21 '18 at 19:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466884%2fbiblatex-apa-style-does-not-support-editor-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown