Biblatex APA style does not support editor types?












3















I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:



How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?



Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex



I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA to biblatex. At that point the editortype is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.



How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?



documentclass{article}
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}

usepackage{filecontents}

begin{filecontents}{mwe.bib}
@Book{jones1886illustrations,
author = {Jones, Howard},
title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text},
year = {1886},
editor = {Jones, N. E.},
editortype = {illustrator},
location = {Circleville, OH},
}
end{filecontents}

addbibresource{mwe.bib}

NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}

DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
illustrator = {illustrator},
illustrators = {illustrators},
byillustrator = {illustrated by},
cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
}


begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}


Results:



MWE results










share|improve this question





























    3















    I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:



    How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?



    Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex



    I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA to biblatex. At that point the editortype is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.



    How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}

    usepackage{filecontents}

    begin{filecontents}{mwe.bib}
    @Book{jones1886illustrations,
    author = {Jones, Howard},
    title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text},
    year = {1886},
    editor = {Jones, N. E.},
    editortype = {illustrator},
    location = {Circleville, OH},
    }
    end{filecontents}

    addbibresource{mwe.bib}

    NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
    NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
    NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
    NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}

    DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
    illustrator = {illustrator},
    illustrators = {illustrators},
    byillustrator = {illustrated by},
    cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
    }


    begin{document}
    nocite{*}
    printbibliography
    end{document}


    Results:



    MWE results










    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3








      I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:



      How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?



      Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex



      I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA to biblatex. At that point the editortype is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.



      How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}

      usepackage{filecontents}

      begin{filecontents}{mwe.bib}
      @Book{jones1886illustrations,
      author = {Jones, Howard},
      title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text},
      year = {1886},
      editor = {Jones, N. E.},
      editortype = {illustrator},
      location = {Circleville, OH},
      }
      end{filecontents}

      addbibresource{mwe.bib}

      NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
      NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
      NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
      NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}

      DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
      illustrator = {illustrator},
      illustrators = {illustrators},
      byillustrator = {illustrated by},
      cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
      }


      begin{document}
      nocite{*}
      printbibliography
      end{document}


      Results:



      MWE results










      share|improve this question
















      I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:



      How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?



      Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex



      I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA to biblatex. At that point the editortype is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.



      How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}

      usepackage{filecontents}

      begin{filecontents}{mwe.bib}
      @Book{jones1886illustrations,
      author = {Jones, Howard},
      title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text},
      year = {1886},
      editor = {Jones, N. E.},
      editortype = {illustrator},
      location = {Circleville, OH},
      }
      end{filecontents}

      addbibresource{mwe.bib}

      NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
      NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
      NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
      NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}

      DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
      illustrator = {illustrator},
      illustrators = {illustrators},
      byillustrator = {illustrated by},
      cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
      }


      begin{document}
      nocite{*}
      printbibliography
      end{document}


      Results:



      MWE results







      biblatex apa-style






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 21 '18 at 19:48









      moewe

      88.2k9110338




      88.2k9110338










      asked Dec 21 '18 at 17:35









      lightkeeperlightkeeper

      453




      453






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}

          NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
          NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}

          DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
          illustrator = {illustrator},
          illustrators = {illustrators},
          typeillustrator = {illustrator},
          typeillustrators = {illustrators},
          byillustrator = {illustrated by},
          cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
          }

          usepackage{filecontents}
          begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
          @book{jones1886illustrations,
          author = {Jones, Howard},
          title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
          year = {1886},
          editor = {Jones, N. E.},
          editortype = {illustrator},
          location = {Circleville, OH},
          }
          end{filecontents}
          addbibresource{jobname.bib}

          begin{document}
          nocite{*}
          printbibliography
          end{document}


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.





          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
          iffieldundef{#1type}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {bibcpstring{editors}}
          {bibcpstring{editor}}}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.





          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.





          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.






          share|improve this answer


























          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.

            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15











          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefield{editortype}. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefield{editortype}, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.

            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466884%2fbiblatex-apa-style-does-not-support-editor-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}

          NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
          NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}

          DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
          illustrator = {illustrator},
          illustrators = {illustrators},
          typeillustrator = {illustrator},
          typeillustrators = {illustrators},
          byillustrator = {illustrated by},
          cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
          }

          usepackage{filecontents}
          begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
          @book{jones1886illustrations,
          author = {Jones, Howard},
          title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
          year = {1886},
          editor = {Jones, N. E.},
          editortype = {illustrator},
          location = {Circleville, OH},
          }
          end{filecontents}
          addbibresource{jobname.bib}

          begin{document}
          nocite{*}
          printbibliography
          end{document}


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.





          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
          iffieldundef{#1type}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {bibcpstring{editors}}
          {bibcpstring{editor}}}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.





          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.





          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.






          share|improve this answer


























          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.

            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15











          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefield{editortype}. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefield{editortype}, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.

            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47
















          5














          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}

          NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
          NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}

          DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
          illustrator = {illustrator},
          illustrators = {illustrators},
          typeillustrator = {illustrator},
          typeillustrators = {illustrators},
          byillustrator = {illustrated by},
          cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
          }

          usepackage{filecontents}
          begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
          @book{jones1886illustrations,
          author = {Jones, Howard},
          title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
          year = {1886},
          editor = {Jones, N. E.},
          editortype = {illustrator},
          location = {Circleville, OH},
          }
          end{filecontents}
          addbibresource{jobname.bib}

          begin{document}
          nocite{*}
          printbibliography
          end{document}


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.





          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
          iffieldundef{#1type}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {bibcpstring{editors}}
          {bibcpstring{editor}}}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.





          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.





          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.






          share|improve this answer


























          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.

            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15











          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefield{editortype}. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefield{editortype}, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.

            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47














          5












          5








          5







          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}

          NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
          NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}

          DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
          illustrator = {illustrator},
          illustrators = {illustrators},
          typeillustrator = {illustrator},
          typeillustrators = {illustrators},
          byillustrator = {illustrated by},
          cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
          }

          usepackage{filecontents}
          begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
          @book{jones1886illustrations,
          author = {Jones, Howard},
          title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
          year = {1886},
          editor = {Jones, N. E.},
          editortype = {illustrator},
          location = {Circleville, OH},
          }
          end{filecontents}
          addbibresource{jobname.bib}

          begin{document}
          nocite{*}
          printbibliography
          end{document}


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.





          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
          iffieldundef{#1type}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {bibcpstring{editors}}
          {bibcpstring{editor}}}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.





          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.





          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.






          share|improve this answer















          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]{biblatex}

          NewBibliographyString{illustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{illustrators}
          NewBibliographyString{byillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{cbyillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrator}
          NewBibliographyString{typeillustrators}

          DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{%
          illustrator = {illustrator},
          illustrators = {illustrators},
          typeillustrator = {illustrator},
          typeillustrators = {illustrators},
          byillustrator = {illustrated by},
          cbyillustrator = {illustradddot},
          }

          usepackage{filecontents}
          begin{filecontents}{jobname.bib}
          @book{jones1886illustrations,
          author = {Jones, Howard},
          title = {Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of {Ohio} with text},
          year = {1886},
          editor = {Jones, N. E.},
          editortype = {illustrator},
          location = {Circleville, OH},
          }
          end{filecontents}
          addbibresource{jobname.bib}

          begin{document}
          nocite{*}
          printbibliography
          end{document}


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.





          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*{apaeditorstrg}[1]{%
          iffieldundef{#1type}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {bibcpstring{editors}}
          {bibcpstring{editor}}}
          {ifthenelse{value{#1}>1ORifandothers{#1}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}s}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}s}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}s}}}
          {ifbibstring{typethefield{#1type}}
          {bibcpstring{typethefield{#1type}}}
          {bibcpstring{thefield{#1type}}}}}}


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.





          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.





          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 22 '18 at 9:19

























          answered Dec 21 '18 at 17:46









          moewemoewe

          88.2k9110338




          88.2k9110338













          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.

            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15











          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefield{editortype}. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefield{editortype}, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.

            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47



















          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.

            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15











          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefield{editortype}. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefield{editortype}, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.

            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47

















          I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.

          – lightkeeper
          Dec 21 '18 at 18:15





          I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.

          – lightkeeper
          Dec 21 '18 at 18:15













          @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefield{editortype}. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefield{editortype}, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.

          – moewe
          Dec 21 '18 at 19:47





          @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefield{editortype}. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefield{editortype}, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.

          – moewe
          Dec 21 '18 at 19:47


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466884%2fbiblatex-apa-style-does-not-support-editor-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa