How can I deduce the hypotenuse from the information given?












4














I'm going into Machine Learning and am currently brushing up on some Calculus on Coursera. Everything was going smoothly until I got to this word problem:




A ladder rests against a wall. The top of the ladder touches the wall at height $12$ meters. The length of the ladder is $4$ meters longer than the distance from the base of the ladder to the wall. Find the length of the ladder.




I am confused as to how to deduce the hypotenuse from the information given above. And have sat here trying different things with no success. What am I missing?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I added the "algebra-precalculus" tag to your post. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:47










  • Draw a picture with the ladder. Label the sides of the triangle formed by the ladder, the wall, and the floor. If you call the base x, the ladder is x+4. Then use the Pythagorean theorem.
    – Joel Pereira
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:47
















4














I'm going into Machine Learning and am currently brushing up on some Calculus on Coursera. Everything was going smoothly until I got to this word problem:




A ladder rests against a wall. The top of the ladder touches the wall at height $12$ meters. The length of the ladder is $4$ meters longer than the distance from the base of the ladder to the wall. Find the length of the ladder.




I am confused as to how to deduce the hypotenuse from the information given above. And have sat here trying different things with no success. What am I missing?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I added the "algebra-precalculus" tag to your post. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:47










  • Draw a picture with the ladder. Label the sides of the triangle formed by the ladder, the wall, and the floor. If you call the base x, the ladder is x+4. Then use the Pythagorean theorem.
    – Joel Pereira
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:47














4












4








4


2





I'm going into Machine Learning and am currently brushing up on some Calculus on Coursera. Everything was going smoothly until I got to this word problem:




A ladder rests against a wall. The top of the ladder touches the wall at height $12$ meters. The length of the ladder is $4$ meters longer than the distance from the base of the ladder to the wall. Find the length of the ladder.




I am confused as to how to deduce the hypotenuse from the information given above. And have sat here trying different things with no success. What am I missing?










share|cite|improve this question















I'm going into Machine Learning and am currently brushing up on some Calculus on Coursera. Everything was going smoothly until I got to this word problem:




A ladder rests against a wall. The top of the ladder touches the wall at height $12$ meters. The length of the ladder is $4$ meters longer than the distance from the base of the ladder to the wall. Find the length of the ladder.




I am confused as to how to deduce the hypotenuse from the information given above. And have sat here trying different things with no success. What am I missing?







calculus algebra-precalculus trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 4:12









Key Flex

7,52441232




7,52441232










asked Dec 10 '18 at 2:38









Edward Severinsen

18815




18815












  • I added the "algebra-precalculus" tag to your post. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:47










  • Draw a picture with the ladder. Label the sides of the triangle formed by the ladder, the wall, and the floor. If you call the base x, the ladder is x+4. Then use the Pythagorean theorem.
    – Joel Pereira
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:47


















  • I added the "algebra-precalculus" tag to your post. Cheers!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:47










  • Draw a picture with the ladder. Label the sides of the triangle formed by the ladder, the wall, and the floor. If you call the base x, the ladder is x+4. Then use the Pythagorean theorem.
    – Joel Pereira
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:47
















I added the "algebra-precalculus" tag to your post. Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
Dec 10 '18 at 2:47




I added the "algebra-precalculus" tag to your post. Cheers!
– Robert Lewis
Dec 10 '18 at 2:47












Draw a picture with the ladder. Label the sides of the triangle formed by the ladder, the wall, and the floor. If you call the base x, the ladder is x+4. Then use the Pythagorean theorem.
– Joel Pereira
Dec 10 '18 at 2:47




Draw a picture with the ladder. Label the sides of the triangle formed by the ladder, the wall, and the floor. If you call the base x, the ladder is x+4. Then use the Pythagorean theorem.
– Joel Pereira
Dec 10 '18 at 2:47










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














Let $d$ be the distance from the ladder to the wall, and $l$ the length of the ladder.
Then



$l = d + 4; tag 1$



since the wall is mos' likely perpendicular to the ground, we may deploy the Pythagorean theorem and write



$l^2 = (12)^2 + d^2; tag 2$



substituting (1) into (2) yields



$(d + 4)^2 = 144 + d^2, tag 3$



$d^2 + 8d + 16 = 144 + d^2, tag 4$



$8d + 16 = 144 Longrightarrow 8d = 128 Longrightarrow d = 16M Longrightarrow l = 20M. tag 5$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Oh my. I distributed the 2 exponent to d and 4 individually instead of multiplying the expression by itself. Not the first time this has gotten me.
    – Edward Severinsen
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:49






  • 1




    @EdwardSeverinsen: we're all learners, my friend!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:50






  • 6




    No, the answer should be "at that angle, the ladder doesn't rest at the wall" ;-)
    – DonQuiKong
    Dec 10 '18 at 9:51






  • 1




    @DonQuiKong I wouldn't get on it, that's for sure!
    – JTPenguin
    Dec 10 '18 at 11:48



















13














enter image description here



Given the length of the wall as $12$.



Take the length of the base as $x$.



Since the length of the ladder $l$ is $4$ meters greater than the base, we have $l = x+4$



Now according to the pythagorean theorem we have,



$begin{align}
(x+4)^2 &= 12^2 + x^2 \
x^2 + 16 + 8x &= 144 + x^2 \
8x &= 128 \
x & = 16
end{align}$



So, the length of the ladder $l = x+4 = 16+4 = 20$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 4




    Nice graphic, +1!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:52






  • 2




    @RobertLewis Thanks!
    – Key Flex
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:57






  • 1




    Just as a note 4 times greater than the base is ambiguous and could imply it is x * 4 and not x + 4.
    – Felix Guo
    Dec 10 '18 at 7:36






  • 2




    @FelixGuo "4 times greater" isn't ambiguous at all: it can only mean $xtimes 4$ and never $x+4$. It was just a mistake, which has now been corrected.
    – David Richerby
    Dec 10 '18 at 14:47











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033356%2fhow-can-i-deduce-the-hypotenuse-from-the-information-given%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














Let $d$ be the distance from the ladder to the wall, and $l$ the length of the ladder.
Then



$l = d + 4; tag 1$



since the wall is mos' likely perpendicular to the ground, we may deploy the Pythagorean theorem and write



$l^2 = (12)^2 + d^2; tag 2$



substituting (1) into (2) yields



$(d + 4)^2 = 144 + d^2, tag 3$



$d^2 + 8d + 16 = 144 + d^2, tag 4$



$8d + 16 = 144 Longrightarrow 8d = 128 Longrightarrow d = 16M Longrightarrow l = 20M. tag 5$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Oh my. I distributed the 2 exponent to d and 4 individually instead of multiplying the expression by itself. Not the first time this has gotten me.
    – Edward Severinsen
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:49






  • 1




    @EdwardSeverinsen: we're all learners, my friend!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:50






  • 6




    No, the answer should be "at that angle, the ladder doesn't rest at the wall" ;-)
    – DonQuiKong
    Dec 10 '18 at 9:51






  • 1




    @DonQuiKong I wouldn't get on it, that's for sure!
    – JTPenguin
    Dec 10 '18 at 11:48
















6














Let $d$ be the distance from the ladder to the wall, and $l$ the length of the ladder.
Then



$l = d + 4; tag 1$



since the wall is mos' likely perpendicular to the ground, we may deploy the Pythagorean theorem and write



$l^2 = (12)^2 + d^2; tag 2$



substituting (1) into (2) yields



$(d + 4)^2 = 144 + d^2, tag 3$



$d^2 + 8d + 16 = 144 + d^2, tag 4$



$8d + 16 = 144 Longrightarrow 8d = 128 Longrightarrow d = 16M Longrightarrow l = 20M. tag 5$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Oh my. I distributed the 2 exponent to d and 4 individually instead of multiplying the expression by itself. Not the first time this has gotten me.
    – Edward Severinsen
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:49






  • 1




    @EdwardSeverinsen: we're all learners, my friend!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:50






  • 6




    No, the answer should be "at that angle, the ladder doesn't rest at the wall" ;-)
    – DonQuiKong
    Dec 10 '18 at 9:51






  • 1




    @DonQuiKong I wouldn't get on it, that's for sure!
    – JTPenguin
    Dec 10 '18 at 11:48














6












6








6






Let $d$ be the distance from the ladder to the wall, and $l$ the length of the ladder.
Then



$l = d + 4; tag 1$



since the wall is mos' likely perpendicular to the ground, we may deploy the Pythagorean theorem and write



$l^2 = (12)^2 + d^2; tag 2$



substituting (1) into (2) yields



$(d + 4)^2 = 144 + d^2, tag 3$



$d^2 + 8d + 16 = 144 + d^2, tag 4$



$8d + 16 = 144 Longrightarrow 8d = 128 Longrightarrow d = 16M Longrightarrow l = 20M. tag 5$






share|cite|improve this answer












Let $d$ be the distance from the ladder to the wall, and $l$ the length of the ladder.
Then



$l = d + 4; tag 1$



since the wall is mos' likely perpendicular to the ground, we may deploy the Pythagorean theorem and write



$l^2 = (12)^2 + d^2; tag 2$



substituting (1) into (2) yields



$(d + 4)^2 = 144 + d^2, tag 3$



$d^2 + 8d + 16 = 144 + d^2, tag 4$



$8d + 16 = 144 Longrightarrow 8d = 128 Longrightarrow d = 16M Longrightarrow l = 20M. tag 5$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 10 '18 at 2:46









Robert Lewis

43.7k22963




43.7k22963








  • 2




    Oh my. I distributed the 2 exponent to d and 4 individually instead of multiplying the expression by itself. Not the first time this has gotten me.
    – Edward Severinsen
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:49






  • 1




    @EdwardSeverinsen: we're all learners, my friend!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:50






  • 6




    No, the answer should be "at that angle, the ladder doesn't rest at the wall" ;-)
    – DonQuiKong
    Dec 10 '18 at 9:51






  • 1




    @DonQuiKong I wouldn't get on it, that's for sure!
    – JTPenguin
    Dec 10 '18 at 11:48














  • 2




    Oh my. I distributed the 2 exponent to d and 4 individually instead of multiplying the expression by itself. Not the first time this has gotten me.
    – Edward Severinsen
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:49






  • 1




    @EdwardSeverinsen: we're all learners, my friend!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:50






  • 6




    No, the answer should be "at that angle, the ladder doesn't rest at the wall" ;-)
    – DonQuiKong
    Dec 10 '18 at 9:51






  • 1




    @DonQuiKong I wouldn't get on it, that's for sure!
    – JTPenguin
    Dec 10 '18 at 11:48








2




2




Oh my. I distributed the 2 exponent to d and 4 individually instead of multiplying the expression by itself. Not the first time this has gotten me.
– Edward Severinsen
Dec 10 '18 at 2:49




Oh my. I distributed the 2 exponent to d and 4 individually instead of multiplying the expression by itself. Not the first time this has gotten me.
– Edward Severinsen
Dec 10 '18 at 2:49




1




1




@EdwardSeverinsen: we're all learners, my friend!
– Robert Lewis
Dec 10 '18 at 2:50




@EdwardSeverinsen: we're all learners, my friend!
– Robert Lewis
Dec 10 '18 at 2:50




6




6




No, the answer should be "at that angle, the ladder doesn't rest at the wall" ;-)
– DonQuiKong
Dec 10 '18 at 9:51




No, the answer should be "at that angle, the ladder doesn't rest at the wall" ;-)
– DonQuiKong
Dec 10 '18 at 9:51




1




1




@DonQuiKong I wouldn't get on it, that's for sure!
– JTPenguin
Dec 10 '18 at 11:48




@DonQuiKong I wouldn't get on it, that's for sure!
– JTPenguin
Dec 10 '18 at 11:48











13














enter image description here



Given the length of the wall as $12$.



Take the length of the base as $x$.



Since the length of the ladder $l$ is $4$ meters greater than the base, we have $l = x+4$



Now according to the pythagorean theorem we have,



$begin{align}
(x+4)^2 &= 12^2 + x^2 \
x^2 + 16 + 8x &= 144 + x^2 \
8x &= 128 \
x & = 16
end{align}$



So, the length of the ladder $l = x+4 = 16+4 = 20$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 4




    Nice graphic, +1!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:52






  • 2




    @RobertLewis Thanks!
    – Key Flex
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:57






  • 1




    Just as a note 4 times greater than the base is ambiguous and could imply it is x * 4 and not x + 4.
    – Felix Guo
    Dec 10 '18 at 7:36






  • 2




    @FelixGuo "4 times greater" isn't ambiguous at all: it can only mean $xtimes 4$ and never $x+4$. It was just a mistake, which has now been corrected.
    – David Richerby
    Dec 10 '18 at 14:47
















13














enter image description here



Given the length of the wall as $12$.



Take the length of the base as $x$.



Since the length of the ladder $l$ is $4$ meters greater than the base, we have $l = x+4$



Now according to the pythagorean theorem we have,



$begin{align}
(x+4)^2 &= 12^2 + x^2 \
x^2 + 16 + 8x &= 144 + x^2 \
8x &= 128 \
x & = 16
end{align}$



So, the length of the ladder $l = x+4 = 16+4 = 20$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 4




    Nice graphic, +1!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:52






  • 2




    @RobertLewis Thanks!
    – Key Flex
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:57






  • 1




    Just as a note 4 times greater than the base is ambiguous and could imply it is x * 4 and not x + 4.
    – Felix Guo
    Dec 10 '18 at 7:36






  • 2




    @FelixGuo "4 times greater" isn't ambiguous at all: it can only mean $xtimes 4$ and never $x+4$. It was just a mistake, which has now been corrected.
    – David Richerby
    Dec 10 '18 at 14:47














13












13








13






enter image description here



Given the length of the wall as $12$.



Take the length of the base as $x$.



Since the length of the ladder $l$ is $4$ meters greater than the base, we have $l = x+4$



Now according to the pythagorean theorem we have,



$begin{align}
(x+4)^2 &= 12^2 + x^2 \
x^2 + 16 + 8x &= 144 + x^2 \
8x &= 128 \
x & = 16
end{align}$



So, the length of the ladder $l = x+4 = 16+4 = 20$






share|cite|improve this answer














enter image description here



Given the length of the wall as $12$.



Take the length of the base as $x$.



Since the length of the ladder $l$ is $4$ meters greater than the base, we have $l = x+4$



Now according to the pythagorean theorem we have,



$begin{align}
(x+4)^2 &= 12^2 + x^2 \
x^2 + 16 + 8x &= 144 + x^2 \
8x &= 128 \
x & = 16
end{align}$



So, the length of the ladder $l = x+4 = 16+4 = 20$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 10 '18 at 8:17









SQB

1,73211026




1,73211026










answered Dec 10 '18 at 2:49









Key Flex

7,52441232




7,52441232








  • 4




    Nice graphic, +1!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:52






  • 2




    @RobertLewis Thanks!
    – Key Flex
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:57






  • 1




    Just as a note 4 times greater than the base is ambiguous and could imply it is x * 4 and not x + 4.
    – Felix Guo
    Dec 10 '18 at 7:36






  • 2




    @FelixGuo "4 times greater" isn't ambiguous at all: it can only mean $xtimes 4$ and never $x+4$. It was just a mistake, which has now been corrected.
    – David Richerby
    Dec 10 '18 at 14:47














  • 4




    Nice graphic, +1!
    – Robert Lewis
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:52






  • 2




    @RobertLewis Thanks!
    – Key Flex
    Dec 10 '18 at 2:57






  • 1




    Just as a note 4 times greater than the base is ambiguous and could imply it is x * 4 and not x + 4.
    – Felix Guo
    Dec 10 '18 at 7:36






  • 2




    @FelixGuo "4 times greater" isn't ambiguous at all: it can only mean $xtimes 4$ and never $x+4$. It was just a mistake, which has now been corrected.
    – David Richerby
    Dec 10 '18 at 14:47








4




4




Nice graphic, +1!
– Robert Lewis
Dec 10 '18 at 2:52




Nice graphic, +1!
– Robert Lewis
Dec 10 '18 at 2:52




2




2




@RobertLewis Thanks!
– Key Flex
Dec 10 '18 at 2:57




@RobertLewis Thanks!
– Key Flex
Dec 10 '18 at 2:57




1




1




Just as a note 4 times greater than the base is ambiguous and could imply it is x * 4 and not x + 4.
– Felix Guo
Dec 10 '18 at 7:36




Just as a note 4 times greater than the base is ambiguous and could imply it is x * 4 and not x + 4.
– Felix Guo
Dec 10 '18 at 7:36




2




2




@FelixGuo "4 times greater" isn't ambiguous at all: it can only mean $xtimes 4$ and never $x+4$. It was just a mistake, which has now been corrected.
– David Richerby
Dec 10 '18 at 14:47




@FelixGuo "4 times greater" isn't ambiguous at all: it can only mean $xtimes 4$ and never $x+4$. It was just a mistake, which has now been corrected.
– David Richerby
Dec 10 '18 at 14:47


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033356%2fhow-can-i-deduce-the-hypotenuse-from-the-information-given%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...