Show that $f$ is a continuous function.












0














Let $X$ be a metric space and $(a_n)$ a Cauchy sequence in $X.$



Let $f(x) = lim_{nto infty}d(a_n,x)$ (the limit exists since $d(a_n,x)$ is a Cauchy sequence and hence convergent). We want to show that $f(x)$ is continous.



For $x,yin X$ consider
$$|f(x)-f(y)|leq |f(x)-d(a_n,x)|+|d(a_n,x)-d(a_n,y)|+|f(y)-d(a_n,y)|$$
then for large enough $n$ we can make
$$|f(x)-d(a_n,x)|<epsilon/3, |f(y)-d(a_n,y)|<epsilon/3.$$
And since $|d(a_n,x)-d(a_n,y)|<d(x,y)$
we have that



$$|f(x)-f(y)|<2epsilon/3+d(x,y)$$
If we choose $delta = epsilon/3$ then we are done.



Is this proof correct?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Are you assuming the metric space is complete?
    – Nicholas Roberts
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:41










  • No information is given about this.
    – Hello_World
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:43










  • Nevermind, thats not needed. I notice now that $d(a_n, x)$ will simply be a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb{R}$ and hence convergent.
    – Nicholas Roberts
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:47
















0














Let $X$ be a metric space and $(a_n)$ a Cauchy sequence in $X.$



Let $f(x) = lim_{nto infty}d(a_n,x)$ (the limit exists since $d(a_n,x)$ is a Cauchy sequence and hence convergent). We want to show that $f(x)$ is continous.



For $x,yin X$ consider
$$|f(x)-f(y)|leq |f(x)-d(a_n,x)|+|d(a_n,x)-d(a_n,y)|+|f(y)-d(a_n,y)|$$
then for large enough $n$ we can make
$$|f(x)-d(a_n,x)|<epsilon/3, |f(y)-d(a_n,y)|<epsilon/3.$$
And since $|d(a_n,x)-d(a_n,y)|<d(x,y)$
we have that



$$|f(x)-f(y)|<2epsilon/3+d(x,y)$$
If we choose $delta = epsilon/3$ then we are done.



Is this proof correct?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Are you assuming the metric space is complete?
    – Nicholas Roberts
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:41










  • No information is given about this.
    – Hello_World
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:43










  • Nevermind, thats not needed. I notice now that $d(a_n, x)$ will simply be a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb{R}$ and hence convergent.
    – Nicholas Roberts
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:47














0












0








0







Let $X$ be a metric space and $(a_n)$ a Cauchy sequence in $X.$



Let $f(x) = lim_{nto infty}d(a_n,x)$ (the limit exists since $d(a_n,x)$ is a Cauchy sequence and hence convergent). We want to show that $f(x)$ is continous.



For $x,yin X$ consider
$$|f(x)-f(y)|leq |f(x)-d(a_n,x)|+|d(a_n,x)-d(a_n,y)|+|f(y)-d(a_n,y)|$$
then for large enough $n$ we can make
$$|f(x)-d(a_n,x)|<epsilon/3, |f(y)-d(a_n,y)|<epsilon/3.$$
And since $|d(a_n,x)-d(a_n,y)|<d(x,y)$
we have that



$$|f(x)-f(y)|<2epsilon/3+d(x,y)$$
If we choose $delta = epsilon/3$ then we are done.



Is this proof correct?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $X$ be a metric space and $(a_n)$ a Cauchy sequence in $X.$



Let $f(x) = lim_{nto infty}d(a_n,x)$ (the limit exists since $d(a_n,x)$ is a Cauchy sequence and hence convergent). We want to show that $f(x)$ is continous.



For $x,yin X$ consider
$$|f(x)-f(y)|leq |f(x)-d(a_n,x)|+|d(a_n,x)-d(a_n,y)|+|f(y)-d(a_n,y)|$$
then for large enough $n$ we can make
$$|f(x)-d(a_n,x)|<epsilon/3, |f(y)-d(a_n,y)|<epsilon/3.$$
And since $|d(a_n,x)-d(a_n,y)|<d(x,y)$
we have that



$$|f(x)-f(y)|<2epsilon/3+d(x,y)$$
If we choose $delta = epsilon/3$ then we are done.



Is this proof correct?







real-analysis functional-analysis epsilon-delta






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:37









Hello_World

3,87621630




3,87621630












  • Are you assuming the metric space is complete?
    – Nicholas Roberts
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:41










  • No information is given about this.
    – Hello_World
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:43










  • Nevermind, thats not needed. I notice now that $d(a_n, x)$ will simply be a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb{R}$ and hence convergent.
    – Nicholas Roberts
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:47


















  • Are you assuming the metric space is complete?
    – Nicholas Roberts
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:41










  • No information is given about this.
    – Hello_World
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:43










  • Nevermind, thats not needed. I notice now that $d(a_n, x)$ will simply be a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb{R}$ and hence convergent.
    – Nicholas Roberts
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:47
















Are you assuming the metric space is complete?
– Nicholas Roberts
Nov 25 '18 at 17:41




Are you assuming the metric space is complete?
– Nicholas Roberts
Nov 25 '18 at 17:41












No information is given about this.
– Hello_World
Nov 25 '18 at 17:43




No information is given about this.
– Hello_World
Nov 25 '18 at 17:43












Nevermind, thats not needed. I notice now that $d(a_n, x)$ will simply be a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb{R}$ and hence convergent.
– Nicholas Roberts
Nov 25 '18 at 17:47




Nevermind, thats not needed. I notice now that $d(a_n, x)$ will simply be a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb{R}$ and hence convergent.
– Nicholas Roberts
Nov 25 '18 at 17:47










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














There is a faster way:
$$
|,f(x)-f(y)|=lim_{ntoinfty}|d(x,a_n)-d(y,a_n)|le d(x,y).
$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Do you think $inf_{xin X} f(x)=0?$
    – Hello_World
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:54











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013134%2fshow-that-f-is-a-continuous-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














There is a faster way:
$$
|,f(x)-f(y)|=lim_{ntoinfty}|d(x,a_n)-d(y,a_n)|le d(x,y).
$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Do you think $inf_{xin X} f(x)=0?$
    – Hello_World
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:54
















1














There is a faster way:
$$
|,f(x)-f(y)|=lim_{ntoinfty}|d(x,a_n)-d(y,a_n)|le d(x,y).
$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Do you think $inf_{xin X} f(x)=0?$
    – Hello_World
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:54














1












1








1






There is a faster way:
$$
|,f(x)-f(y)|=lim_{ntoinfty}|d(x,a_n)-d(y,a_n)|le d(x,y).
$$






share|cite|improve this answer












There is a faster way:
$$
|,f(x)-f(y)|=lim_{ntoinfty}|d(x,a_n)-d(y,a_n)|le d(x,y).
$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 25 '18 at 17:40









Yiorgos S. Smyrlis

62.6k1383163




62.6k1383163












  • Do you think $inf_{xin X} f(x)=0?$
    – Hello_World
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:54


















  • Do you think $inf_{xin X} f(x)=0?$
    – Hello_World
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:54
















Do you think $inf_{xin X} f(x)=0?$
– Hello_World
Nov 25 '18 at 17:54




Do you think $inf_{xin X} f(x)=0?$
– Hello_World
Nov 25 '18 at 17:54


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013134%2fshow-that-f-is-a-continuous-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa