Matries inequality with norms
-1
Let $P$ and $C neq0$ a $q times q$ matrices. I want to prove that there exists a positive constants $alpha$ such under some assumptions under $P$ we have the inequality
$${left| {Pleft( {I - C} right)x} right|_{{{mathbb{R}}^q}}} leqslant alpha {left| {PCx} right|_{{{mathbb{R}}^q}}}$$ for all $x$ in $mathbb{R}$
whith $I$ is the identity matrix.
Thank you.
matrices inequality operator-theory normed-spaces functional-inequalities
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:31
Gustave
705211
|
show 3 more comments
-1
Let $P$ and $C neq0$ a $q times q$ matrices. I want to prove that there exists a positive constants $alpha$ such under some assumptions under $P$ we have the inequality
$${left| {Pleft( {I - C} right)x} right|_{{{mathbb{R}}^q}}} leqslant alpha {left| {PCx} right|_{{{mathbb{R}}^q}}}$$ for all $x$ in $mathbb{R}$
whith $I$ is the identity matrix.
Thank you.
matrices inequality operator-theory normed-spaces functional-inequalities
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:31
Gustave
705211
Why do you expect such an inequality to hold? Could you give us a bit more context?
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:36
I need this inequality to prove the controllability of some system of PDE. I have to get rid of the R.H.S of the inequality.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:38
I would suggest that you post a question about the actual system of PDE. As your question stands, it is difficult to know what kind of conditions on $P$ we should be looking for.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:41
1
Your inequality will be true for some $alpha > 0$ if and only if $ker(P(I - C)) subseteq ker(PC)$. I don't believe that $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$ will be a sufficient condition to guarantee this.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:34
1
For instance: your condition cannot hold for $$ C = pmatrix{1&0\0&1}, quad P = pmatrix{1&0\0&0} $$ even though we have $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:45
|
show 3 more comments
-1
-1
-1
Let $P$ and $C neq0$ a $q times q$ matrices. I want to prove that there exists a positive constants $alpha$ such under some assumptions under $P$ we have the inequality
$${left| {Pleft( {I - C} right)x} right|_{{{mathbb{R}}^q}}} leqslant alpha {left| {PCx} right|_{{{mathbb{R}}^q}}}$$ for all $x$ in $mathbb{R}$
whith $I$ is the identity matrix.
Thank you.
matrices inequality operator-theory normed-spaces functional-inequalities
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:31
Gustave
705211
Let $P$ and $C neq0$ a $q times q$ matrices. I want to prove that there exists a positive constants $alpha$ such under some assumptions under $P$ we have the inequality
$${left| {Pleft( {I - C} right)x} right|_{{{mathbb{R}}^q}}} leqslant alpha {left| {PCx} right|_{{{mathbb{R}}^q}}}$$ for all $x$ in $mathbb{R}$
whith $I$ is the identity matrix.
Thank you.
matrices inequality operator-theory normed-spaces functional-inequalities
matrices inequality operator-theory normed-spaces functional-inequalities
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:31
Gustave
705211
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:31
Gustave
705211
edited Nov 25 '18 at 17:42
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:31
Gustave
705211
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:31
Gustave
705211
asked Nov 25 '18 at 17:31
Gustave
705211
705211
Why do you expect such an inequality to hold? Could you give us a bit more context?
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:36
I need this inequality to prove the controllability of some system of PDE. I have to get rid of the R.H.S of the inequality.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:38
I would suggest that you post a question about the actual system of PDE. As your question stands, it is difficult to know what kind of conditions on $P$ we should be looking for.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:41
1
Your inequality will be true for some $alpha > 0$ if and only if $ker(P(I - C)) subseteq ker(PC)$. I don't believe that $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$ will be a sufficient condition to guarantee this.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:34
1
For instance: your condition cannot hold for $$ C = pmatrix{1&0\0&1}, quad P = pmatrix{1&0\0&0} $$ even though we have $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:45
|
show 3 more comments
Why do you expect such an inequality to hold? Could you give us a bit more context?
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:36
I need this inequality to prove the controllability of some system of PDE. I have to get rid of the R.H.S of the inequality.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:38
I would suggest that you post a question about the actual system of PDE. As your question stands, it is difficult to know what kind of conditions on $P$ we should be looking for.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:41
1
Your inequality will be true for some $alpha > 0$ if and only if $ker(P(I - C)) subseteq ker(PC)$. I don't believe that $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$ will be a sufficient condition to guarantee this.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:34
1
For instance: your condition cannot hold for $$ C = pmatrix{1&0\0&1}, quad P = pmatrix{1&0\0&0} $$ even though we have $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:45
Why do you expect such an inequality to hold? Could you give us a bit more context?
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:36
Why do you expect such an inequality to hold? Could you give us a bit more context?
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:36
I need this inequality to prove the controllability of some system of PDE. I have to get rid of the R.H.S of the inequality.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:38
I need this inequality to prove the controllability of some system of PDE. I have to get rid of the R.H.S of the inequality.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:38
I would suggest that you post a question about the actual system of PDE. As your question stands, it is difficult to know what kind of conditions on $P$ we should be looking for.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:41
I would suggest that you post a question about the actual system of PDE. As your question stands, it is difficult to know what kind of conditions on $P$ we should be looking for.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:41
1
1
Your inequality will be true for some $alpha > 0$ if and only if $ker(P(I - C)) subseteq ker(PC)$. I don't believe that $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$ will be a sufficient condition to guarantee this.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:34
Your inequality will be true for some $alpha > 0$ if and only if $ker(P(I - C)) subseteq ker(PC)$. I don't believe that $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$ will be a sufficient condition to guarantee this.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:34
1
1
For instance: your condition cannot hold for $$ C = pmatrix{1&0\0&1}, quad P = pmatrix{1&0\0&0} $$ even though we have $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:45
For instance: your condition cannot hold for $$ C = pmatrix{1&0\0&1}, quad P = pmatrix{1&0\0&0} $$ even though we have $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:45
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
0
If $P=I$ and $C=0$, then there is no such positive constant, so that the inequality holds.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 17:34
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
62.6k1383163
Thank tou for the remark, yes, the inequality does'nt hold for any $P$, I want to find some conditions on $P$ so that the inequality is satisfied.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:37
I have changed the statement. Thank you for the remark.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013126%2fmatries-inequality-with-norms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
0
If $P=I$ and $C=0$, then there is no such positive constant, so that the inequality holds.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 17:34
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
62.6k1383163
Thank tou for the remark, yes, the inequality does'nt hold for any $P$, I want to find some conditions on $P$ so that the inequality is satisfied.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:37
I have changed the statement. Thank you for the remark.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:43
add a comment |
0
If $P=I$ and $C=0$, then there is no such positive constant, so that the inequality holds.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 17:34
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
62.6k1383163
Thank tou for the remark, yes, the inequality does'nt hold for any $P$, I want to find some conditions on $P$ so that the inequality is satisfied.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:37
I have changed the statement. Thank you for the remark.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:43
add a comment |
0
0
0
If $P=I$ and $C=0$, then there is no such positive constant, so that the inequality holds.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 17:34
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
62.6k1383163
If $P=I$ and $C=0$, then there is no such positive constant, so that the inequality holds.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 17:34
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
62.6k1383163
answered Nov 25 '18 at 17:34
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
62.6k1383163
answered Nov 25 '18 at 17:34
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
62.6k1383163
answered Nov 25 '18 at 17:34
Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
62.6k1383163
62.6k1383163
Thank tou for the remark, yes, the inequality does'nt hold for any $P$, I want to find some conditions on $P$ so that the inequality is satisfied.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:37
I have changed the statement. Thank you for the remark.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:43
add a comment |
Thank tou for the remark, yes, the inequality does'nt hold for any $P$, I want to find some conditions on $P$ so that the inequality is satisfied.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:37
I have changed the statement. Thank you for the remark.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:43
Thank tou for the remark, yes, the inequality does'nt hold for any $P$, I want to find some conditions on $P$ so that the inequality is satisfied.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:37
Thank tou for the remark, yes, the inequality does'nt hold for any $P$, I want to find some conditions on $P$ so that the inequality is satisfied.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:37
I have changed the statement. Thank you for the remark.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:43
I have changed the statement. Thank you for the remark.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:43
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013126%2fmatries-inequality-with-norms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why do you expect such an inequality to hold? Could you give us a bit more context?
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:36
I need this inequality to prove the controllability of some system of PDE. I have to get rid of the R.H.S of the inequality.
– Gustave
Nov 25 '18 at 17:38
I would suggest that you post a question about the actual system of PDE. As your question stands, it is difficult to know what kind of conditions on $P$ we should be looking for.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 17:41
1
Your inequality will be true for some $alpha > 0$ if and only if $ker(P(I - C)) subseteq ker(PC)$. I don't believe that $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$ will be a sufficient condition to guarantee this.
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:34
1
For instance: your condition cannot hold for $$ C = pmatrix{1&0\0&1}, quad P = pmatrix{1&0\0&0} $$ even though we have $ker(C) subseteq ker(P)$
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 25 '18 at 19:45