How to prove that semidirect product of $Z_{13}$ and $Z_3$ is non Abelian for a non-trivial homomorphism












2












$begingroup$


The semidirect product of $Z_{13}$ and $Z_3$ is given here Finding presentation of group of order 39
as ${x,y | x^{13} = y^3 = 1, yxy^{-1} = x^3}$. I understand how this is arrived at but to show that this group is non abelian, if I take $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ and look at
$(x_1,y_1).(x_2,y_2) = (x_1 phi_{y_1} (x_2),y_1y_2) = (x_1y_1x_2y_1^{-1},y_1y_2) = (x_1x_2^3,y_1y_2)$
$(x_2,y_2).(x_1,y_1) = (x_2 phi_{y_2} (x_1),y_2y_1) = (x_2y_2x_1y_2^{-1},y_2y_1) = (x_2x_1^3,y_2y_1)$
$y_1y_2 = y_2y_1$ because $y_1,y_2 in Z_3$
$x_1x_2^{3}neq x_2x_1^3 iff x_2x_1x_1^2 neq x_1x_2x_2^2 iff x_1neq x_2 because x_1x_2 = x_2x_1 because x_1,x_2 in Z_{13}$

But this means $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_1,y_2)$ commute? I am doing something simple wrong here. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.






abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups semidirect-product







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    No, it's all correct. If $x_1ne x_2$, then $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ don't commute, hence the group is not commutative.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:54












  • $begingroup$
    @Berci But if $x_1 = x_2$ and $y_1 neq y_2$, it should still not commute, right? But it does above.
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A group is abelian if all pairs of elements commute. A group is not abelian if some pair of elements does not commute.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:02


















2












$begingroup$


The semidirect product of $Z_{13}$ and $Z_3$ is given here Finding presentation of group of order 39
as ${x,y | x^{13} = y^3 = 1, yxy^{-1} = x^3}$. I understand how this is arrived at but to show that this group is non abelian, if I take $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ and look at
$(x_1,y_1).(x_2,y_2) = (x_1 phi_{y_1} (x_2),y_1y_2) = (x_1y_1x_2y_1^{-1},y_1y_2) = (x_1x_2^3,y_1y_2)$
$(x_2,y_2).(x_1,y_1) = (x_2 phi_{y_2} (x_1),y_2y_1) = (x_2y_2x_1y_2^{-1},y_2y_1) = (x_2x_1^3,y_2y_1)$
$y_1y_2 = y_2y_1$ because $y_1,y_2 in Z_3$
$x_1x_2^{3}neq x_2x_1^3 iff x_2x_1x_1^2 neq x_1x_2x_2^2 iff x_1neq x_2 because x_1x_2 = x_2x_1 because x_1,x_2 in Z_{13}$

But this means $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_1,y_2)$ commute? I am doing something simple wrong here. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.






abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups semidirect-product







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    No, it's all correct. If $x_1ne x_2$, then $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ don't commute, hence the group is not commutative.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:54












  • $begingroup$
    @Berci But if $x_1 = x_2$ and $y_1 neq y_2$, it should still not commute, right? But it does above.
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A group is abelian if all pairs of elements commute. A group is not abelian if some pair of elements does not commute.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:02
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


The semidirect product of $Z_{13}$ and $Z_3$ is given here Finding presentation of group of order 39
as ${x,y | x^{13} = y^3 = 1, yxy^{-1} = x^3}$. I understand how this is arrived at but to show that this group is non abelian, if I take $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ and look at
$(x_1,y_1).(x_2,y_2) = (x_1 phi_{y_1} (x_2),y_1y_2) = (x_1y_1x_2y_1^{-1},y_1y_2) = (x_1x_2^3,y_1y_2)$
$(x_2,y_2).(x_1,y_1) = (x_2 phi_{y_2} (x_1),y_2y_1) = (x_2y_2x_1y_2^{-1},y_2y_1) = (x_2x_1^3,y_2y_1)$
$y_1y_2 = y_2y_1$ because $y_1,y_2 in Z_3$
$x_1x_2^{3}neq x_2x_1^3 iff x_2x_1x_1^2 neq x_1x_2x_2^2 iff x_1neq x_2 because x_1x_2 = x_2x_1 because x_1,x_2 in Z_{13}$

But this means $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_1,y_2)$ commute? I am doing something simple wrong here. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.






abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups semidirect-product







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The semidirect product of $Z_{13}$ and $Z_3$ is given here Finding presentation of group of order 39
as ${x,y | x^{13} = y^3 = 1, yxy^{-1} = x^3}$. I understand how this is arrived at but to show that this group is non abelian, if I take $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ and look at
$(x_1,y_1).(x_2,y_2) = (x_1 phi_{y_1} (x_2),y_1y_2) = (x_1y_1x_2y_1^{-1},y_1y_2) = (x_1x_2^3,y_1y_2)$
$(x_2,y_2).(x_1,y_1) = (x_2 phi_{y_2} (x_1),y_2y_1) = (x_2y_2x_1y_2^{-1},y_2y_1) = (x_2x_1^3,y_2y_1)$
$y_1y_2 = y_2y_1$ because $y_1,y_2 in Z_3$
$x_1x_2^{3}neq x_2x_1^3 iff x_2x_1x_1^2 neq x_1x_2x_2^2 iff x_1neq x_2 because x_1x_2 = x_2x_1 because x_1,x_2 in Z_{13}$

But this means $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_1,y_2)$ commute? I am doing something simple wrong here. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.






abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups semidirect-product




abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups semidirect-product






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '18 at 22:38









Servaes

23.3k33893




23.3k33893










asked Dec 2 '18 at 21:46









manifoldedmanifolded

615




615












  • $begingroup$
    No, it's all correct. If $x_1ne x_2$, then $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ don't commute, hence the group is not commutative.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:54












  • $begingroup$
    @Berci But if $x_1 = x_2$ and $y_1 neq y_2$, it should still not commute, right? But it does above.
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A group is abelian if all pairs of elements commute. A group is not abelian if some pair of elements does not commute.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:02




















  • $begingroup$
    No, it's all correct. If $x_1ne x_2$, then $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ don't commute, hence the group is not commutative.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:54












  • $begingroup$
    @Berci But if $x_1 = x_2$ and $y_1 neq y_2$, it should still not commute, right? But it does above.
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A group is abelian if all pairs of elements commute. A group is not abelian if some pair of elements does not commute.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:02


















$begingroup$
No, it's all correct. If $x_1ne x_2$, then $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ don't commute, hence the group is not commutative.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 2 '18 at 21:54






$begingroup$
No, it's all correct. If $x_1ne x_2$, then $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ don't commute, hence the group is not commutative.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 2 '18 at 21:54














$begingroup$
@Berci But if $x_1 = x_2$ and $y_1 neq y_2$, it should still not commute, right? But it does above.
$endgroup$
– manifolded
Dec 2 '18 at 22:01




$begingroup$
@Berci But if $x_1 = x_2$ and $y_1 neq y_2$, it should still not commute, right? But it does above.
$endgroup$
– manifolded
Dec 2 '18 at 22:01




1




1




$begingroup$
A group is abelian if all pairs of elements commute. A group is not abelian if some pair of elements does not commute.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Dec 2 '18 at 22:02






$begingroup$
A group is abelian if all pairs of elements commute. A group is not abelian if some pair of elements does not commute.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Dec 2 '18 at 22:02












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Your equivalences show that if $x_1neq x_2$ then $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ do not commute, whatever $y_1,y_2inBbb{Z}_3$ are. So the semidirect product contains elements that do not commute. This means the semidirect product is not abelian.



Note that a group that is not abelian may still contain elements that do commute with eachother. For example, any element in any group commutes with all its own powers, because $gcdot g^k=g^{k+1}=g^kcdot g$. A concrete example is $S_3$; here we have
$$(1 2)(1 3)neq(1 3)(1 2),$$
so this group is not abelian. But still
$$(1 2 3)(1 3 2)=(1 3 2)(1 2 3).$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a ton! Not sure why I forgot that, haha.
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:37











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023254%2fhow-to-prove-that-semidirect-product-of-z-13-and-z-3-is-non-abelian-for-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Your equivalences show that if $x_1neq x_2$ then $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ do not commute, whatever $y_1,y_2inBbb{Z}_3$ are. So the semidirect product contains elements that do not commute. This means the semidirect product is not abelian.



Note that a group that is not abelian may still contain elements that do commute with eachother. For example, any element in any group commutes with all its own powers, because $gcdot g^k=g^{k+1}=g^kcdot g$. A concrete example is $S_3$; here we have
$$(1 2)(1 3)neq(1 3)(1 2),$$
so this group is not abelian. But still
$$(1 2 3)(1 3 2)=(1 3 2)(1 2 3).$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a ton! Not sure why I forgot that, haha.
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:37
















2












$begingroup$

Your equivalences show that if $x_1neq x_2$ then $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ do not commute, whatever $y_1,y_2inBbb{Z}_3$ are. So the semidirect product contains elements that do not commute. This means the semidirect product is not abelian.



Note that a group that is not abelian may still contain elements that do commute with eachother. For example, any element in any group commutes with all its own powers, because $gcdot g^k=g^{k+1}=g^kcdot g$. A concrete example is $S_3$; here we have
$$(1 2)(1 3)neq(1 3)(1 2),$$
so this group is not abelian. But still
$$(1 2 3)(1 3 2)=(1 3 2)(1 2 3).$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a ton! Not sure why I forgot that, haha.
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:37














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Your equivalences show that if $x_1neq x_2$ then $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ do not commute, whatever $y_1,y_2inBbb{Z}_3$ are. So the semidirect product contains elements that do not commute. This means the semidirect product is not abelian.



Note that a group that is not abelian may still contain elements that do commute with eachother. For example, any element in any group commutes with all its own powers, because $gcdot g^k=g^{k+1}=g^kcdot g$. A concrete example is $S_3$; here we have
$$(1 2)(1 3)neq(1 3)(1 2),$$
so this group is not abelian. But still
$$(1 2 3)(1 3 2)=(1 3 2)(1 2 3).$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your equivalences show that if $x_1neq x_2$ then $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ do not commute, whatever $y_1,y_2inBbb{Z}_3$ are. So the semidirect product contains elements that do not commute. This means the semidirect product is not abelian.



Note that a group that is not abelian may still contain elements that do commute with eachother. For example, any element in any group commutes with all its own powers, because $gcdot g^k=g^{k+1}=g^kcdot g$. A concrete example is $S_3$; here we have
$$(1 2)(1 3)neq(1 3)(1 2),$$
so this group is not abelian. But still
$$(1 2 3)(1 3 2)=(1 3 2)(1 2 3).$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 2 '18 at 22:05









ServaesServaes

23.3k33893




23.3k33893












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a ton! Not sure why I forgot that, haha.
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:37


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a ton! Not sure why I forgot that, haha.
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:37
















$begingroup$
Thanks a ton! Not sure why I forgot that, haha.
$endgroup$
– manifolded
Dec 2 '18 at 22:37




$begingroup$
Thanks a ton! Not sure why I forgot that, haha.
$endgroup$
– manifolded
Dec 2 '18 at 22:37


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023254%2fhow-to-prove-that-semidirect-product-of-z-13-and-z-3-is-non-abelian-for-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Image
Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
Read more

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
Read more

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

Image
1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
Read more