Weight the probability of a prediction based on historical accuracy
$begingroup$
I have six predictions from six different sources. Each prediction has a percent probability that the prediction will happen, as well as a historical accuracy percentage.
Here's a table of my problem:
This is the link to the table:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fioSBZiucRwsyeUD4foi2Bt2tBAUXSpv9Esvgksm_mk/edit?usp=sharing
An example of how to read this would be TF predicts the likelihood of a 0 is 63% and has been historically correct 43% of the time.
I want to find if the prediction should be 1 or 0 by weighting predictions with more historical accuracy. For example, TF predicts 0 with a probability of 63%. It has a historical accuracy of 43%. In contrast, LINE predicts 1 with a 81% probability and the same 73% historical accuracy. I want the overall prediction between these two sources to be 1 because LINE has a higher probability than TF and a higher historical accuracy.
So, my question is: how can I mathematically find the average prediction weighted by probability and historical accuracy?
Thanks in advance!
probability average
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have six predictions from six different sources. Each prediction has a percent probability that the prediction will happen, as well as a historical accuracy percentage.
Here's a table of my problem:
This is the link to the table:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fioSBZiucRwsyeUD4foi2Bt2tBAUXSpv9Esvgksm_mk/edit?usp=sharing
An example of how to read this would be TF predicts the likelihood of a 0 is 63% and has been historically correct 43% of the time.
I want to find if the prediction should be 1 or 0 by weighting predictions with more historical accuracy. For example, TF predicts 0 with a probability of 63%. It has a historical accuracy of 43%. In contrast, LINE predicts 1 with a 81% probability and the same 73% historical accuracy. I want the overall prediction between these two sources to be 1 because LINE has a higher probability than TF and a higher historical accuracy.
So, my question is: how can I mathematically find the average prediction weighted by probability and historical accuracy?
Thanks in advance!
probability average
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have six predictions from six different sources. Each prediction has a percent probability that the prediction will happen, as well as a historical accuracy percentage.
Here's a table of my problem:
This is the link to the table:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fioSBZiucRwsyeUD4foi2Bt2tBAUXSpv9Esvgksm_mk/edit?usp=sharing
An example of how to read this would be TF predicts the likelihood of a 0 is 63% and has been historically correct 43% of the time.
I want to find if the prediction should be 1 or 0 by weighting predictions with more historical accuracy. For example, TF predicts 0 with a probability of 63%. It has a historical accuracy of 43%. In contrast, LINE predicts 1 with a 81% probability and the same 73% historical accuracy. I want the overall prediction between these two sources to be 1 because LINE has a higher probability than TF and a higher historical accuracy.
So, my question is: how can I mathematically find the average prediction weighted by probability and historical accuracy?
Thanks in advance!
probability average
$endgroup$
I have six predictions from six different sources. Each prediction has a percent probability that the prediction will happen, as well as a historical accuracy percentage.
Here's a table of my problem:
This is the link to the table:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fioSBZiucRwsyeUD4foi2Bt2tBAUXSpv9Esvgksm_mk/edit?usp=sharing
An example of how to read this would be TF predicts the likelihood of a 0 is 63% and has been historically correct 43% of the time.
I want to find if the prediction should be 1 or 0 by weighting predictions with more historical accuracy. For example, TF predicts 0 with a probability of 63%. It has a historical accuracy of 43%. In contrast, LINE predicts 1 with a 81% probability and the same 73% historical accuracy. I want the overall prediction between these two sources to be 1 because LINE has a higher probability than TF and a higher historical accuracy.
So, my question is: how can I mathematically find the average prediction weighted by probability and historical accuracy?
Thanks in advance!
probability average
probability average
asked Dec 2 '18 at 22:04
Malachi BazarMalachi Bazar
1033
1033
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_arithmetic_mean
Above is reference. The basic formula is $p=frac{sum p_ia_i}{sum a_i}$. Where $p$ is the probability you want and $p_i,a_i$ are the individual probabilities and accuracy.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023276%2fweight-the-probability-of-a-prediction-based-on-historical-accuracy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_arithmetic_mean
Above is reference. The basic formula is $p=frac{sum p_ia_i}{sum a_i}$. Where $p$ is the probability you want and $p_i,a_i$ are the individual probabilities and accuracy.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_arithmetic_mean
Above is reference. The basic formula is $p=frac{sum p_ia_i}{sum a_i}$. Where $p$ is the probability you want and $p_i,a_i$ are the individual probabilities and accuracy.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_arithmetic_mean
Above is reference. The basic formula is $p=frac{sum p_ia_i}{sum a_i}$. Where $p$ is the probability you want and $p_i,a_i$ are the individual probabilities and accuracy.
$endgroup$
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_arithmetic_mean
Above is reference. The basic formula is $p=frac{sum p_ia_i}{sum a_i}$. Where $p$ is the probability you want and $p_i,a_i$ are the individual probabilities and accuracy.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 22:59
herb steinbergherb steinberg
2,5732310
2,5732310
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023276%2fweight-the-probability-of-a-prediction-based-on-historical-accuracy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown