Show that A is singular if, only if, $u^t v=-1$












2












$begingroup$


Let be $u,vinmathbb{R}^n$, the matrix $A = I + u v^t$ with $I$ the identity of order n. Show that A is singular if, only if, $u^t v=-1$.



I found that this demonstration is related to the Sherman-Morrison formula.



Any suggestions on where to read to get solved?



I did not find anything on the internet to help me get an insight.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let be $u,vinmathbb{R}^n$, the matrix $A = I + u v^t$ with $I$ the identity of order n. Show that A is singular if, only if, $u^t v=-1$.



    I found that this demonstration is related to the Sherman-Morrison formula.



    Any suggestions on where to read to get solved?



    I did not find anything on the internet to help me get an insight.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let be $u,vinmathbb{R}^n$, the matrix $A = I + u v^t$ with $I$ the identity of order n. Show that A is singular if, only if, $u^t v=-1$.



      I found that this demonstration is related to the Sherman-Morrison formula.



      Any suggestions on where to read to get solved?



      I did not find anything on the internet to help me get an insight.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let be $u,vinmathbb{R}^n$, the matrix $A = I + u v^t$ with $I$ the identity of order n. Show that A is singular if, only if, $u^t v=-1$.



      I found that this demonstration is related to the Sherman-Morrison formula.



      Any suggestions on where to read to get solved?



      I did not find anything on the internet to help me get an insight.







      linear-algebra matrices






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 2 '18 at 22:59









      Juliana de SouzaJuliana de Souza

      636




      636






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          This is the standard line of the proof. Assume $u^tv=-1=ucdot v=vcdot u = v^t u$. We can see that
          $$
          Au = u + u(v^tu) = u-u = 0,
          $$
          thus $ker (A) neq (0)$ and $A$ is singular.

          Assume $u^tv =cneq -1$. Then, formal power series gives us
          $$begin{eqnarray}
          A^{-1} = (I+uv^t)^{-1} &=& I-uv^t+u(v^tu)v^t -u(v^tuv^tu)v^t+cdots \&=& I-uv^t +cuv^t -c^2uv^t+cdots\
          &=&I-frac{uv^t}{1+c}=I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t.
          end{eqnarray}$$

          We can actually see that
          $$Acdot(I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t) = I-(1+c)^{-1}uv^t+uv^t-(1+c)^{-1}uv^tuv^t = I,
          $$
          as we wanted.

          Add: I derived an explicit formula for $A^{-1}$, but in fact, for the purpose of showing singularity of $A$, it suffices to prove $ker(A) = (0)$. Note that
          $$
          A w = w+u(v^tw)=w+(vcdot w)u = 0
          $$
          implies that $w =alpha u$ for some scalar $alpha$. This means, of course, that $ker(A) leq langle urangle$. If we show that $Auneq 0$, then the claim $ker(A)=(0)$ follows. It is easy to see that if $u^tv neq -1$, then
          $$
          Au = (1+u^tv)u neq 0.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            3












            $begingroup$

            Adding $I$ to a matrix has the effect of adding $1$ to the eigenvalues. So the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are precisely those of the form $1+lambda$, with $lambda$ an eigenvalue of $uv^t$. As the matrix $uv^t$ is rank-one, zero is always an eigenvalue; its only possible nonzero eigenvalue is $v^tu$ (proof below). Thus the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are $0$ and $1+v^tu$ (if the latter is nonzero). So $I+uv^t$ is invertible precisely when $1+v^tune0$.



            Proof that $lambda $ is a nonzero eigenvalue of $uv^t$ if and only if $lambda=v^tu$. Suppose that $uv^tw=lambda w$. Then
            $$
            lambda w = uv^tw=(v^tw),u.
            $$

            So $w=alpha u$, where $alpha=(v^tw)/lambda$. Thus (note that $v^twne0$, since $wne0$)
            $$
            lambdaalpha u=lambda w=uv^tw=uv^t(alpha u)=alpha (v^tu),u.
            $$

            Thus $v^tu=lambda$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023342%2fshow-that-a-is-singular-if-only-if-ut-v-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4












              $begingroup$

              This is the standard line of the proof. Assume $u^tv=-1=ucdot v=vcdot u = v^t u$. We can see that
              $$
              Au = u + u(v^tu) = u-u = 0,
              $$
              thus $ker (A) neq (0)$ and $A$ is singular.

              Assume $u^tv =cneq -1$. Then, formal power series gives us
              $$begin{eqnarray}
              A^{-1} = (I+uv^t)^{-1} &=& I-uv^t+u(v^tu)v^t -u(v^tuv^tu)v^t+cdots \&=& I-uv^t +cuv^t -c^2uv^t+cdots\
              &=&I-frac{uv^t}{1+c}=I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t.
              end{eqnarray}$$

              We can actually see that
              $$Acdot(I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t) = I-(1+c)^{-1}uv^t+uv^t-(1+c)^{-1}uv^tuv^t = I,
              $$
              as we wanted.

              Add: I derived an explicit formula for $A^{-1}$, but in fact, for the purpose of showing singularity of $A$, it suffices to prove $ker(A) = (0)$. Note that
              $$
              A w = w+u(v^tw)=w+(vcdot w)u = 0
              $$
              implies that $w =alpha u$ for some scalar $alpha$. This means, of course, that $ker(A) leq langle urangle$. If we show that $Auneq 0$, then the claim $ker(A)=(0)$ follows. It is easy to see that if $u^tv neq -1$, then
              $$
              Au = (1+u^tv)u neq 0.
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                4












                $begingroup$

                This is the standard line of the proof. Assume $u^tv=-1=ucdot v=vcdot u = v^t u$. We can see that
                $$
                Au = u + u(v^tu) = u-u = 0,
                $$
                thus $ker (A) neq (0)$ and $A$ is singular.

                Assume $u^tv =cneq -1$. Then, formal power series gives us
                $$begin{eqnarray}
                A^{-1} = (I+uv^t)^{-1} &=& I-uv^t+u(v^tu)v^t -u(v^tuv^tu)v^t+cdots \&=& I-uv^t +cuv^t -c^2uv^t+cdots\
                &=&I-frac{uv^t}{1+c}=I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t.
                end{eqnarray}$$

                We can actually see that
                $$Acdot(I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t) = I-(1+c)^{-1}uv^t+uv^t-(1+c)^{-1}uv^tuv^t = I,
                $$
                as we wanted.

                Add: I derived an explicit formula for $A^{-1}$, but in fact, for the purpose of showing singularity of $A$, it suffices to prove $ker(A) = (0)$. Note that
                $$
                A w = w+u(v^tw)=w+(vcdot w)u = 0
                $$
                implies that $w =alpha u$ for some scalar $alpha$. This means, of course, that $ker(A) leq langle urangle$. If we show that $Auneq 0$, then the claim $ker(A)=(0)$ follows. It is easy to see that if $u^tv neq -1$, then
                $$
                Au = (1+u^tv)u neq 0.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  This is the standard line of the proof. Assume $u^tv=-1=ucdot v=vcdot u = v^t u$. We can see that
                  $$
                  Au = u + u(v^tu) = u-u = 0,
                  $$
                  thus $ker (A) neq (0)$ and $A$ is singular.

                  Assume $u^tv =cneq -1$. Then, formal power series gives us
                  $$begin{eqnarray}
                  A^{-1} = (I+uv^t)^{-1} &=& I-uv^t+u(v^tu)v^t -u(v^tuv^tu)v^t+cdots \&=& I-uv^t +cuv^t -c^2uv^t+cdots\
                  &=&I-frac{uv^t}{1+c}=I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t.
                  end{eqnarray}$$

                  We can actually see that
                  $$Acdot(I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t) = I-(1+c)^{-1}uv^t+uv^t-(1+c)^{-1}uv^tuv^t = I,
                  $$
                  as we wanted.

                  Add: I derived an explicit formula for $A^{-1}$, but in fact, for the purpose of showing singularity of $A$, it suffices to prove $ker(A) = (0)$. Note that
                  $$
                  A w = w+u(v^tw)=w+(vcdot w)u = 0
                  $$
                  implies that $w =alpha u$ for some scalar $alpha$. This means, of course, that $ker(A) leq langle urangle$. If we show that $Auneq 0$, then the claim $ker(A)=(0)$ follows. It is easy to see that if $u^tv neq -1$, then
                  $$
                  Au = (1+u^tv)u neq 0.
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  This is the standard line of the proof. Assume $u^tv=-1=ucdot v=vcdot u = v^t u$. We can see that
                  $$
                  Au = u + u(v^tu) = u-u = 0,
                  $$
                  thus $ker (A) neq (0)$ and $A$ is singular.

                  Assume $u^tv =cneq -1$. Then, formal power series gives us
                  $$begin{eqnarray}
                  A^{-1} = (I+uv^t)^{-1} &=& I-uv^t+u(v^tu)v^t -u(v^tuv^tu)v^t+cdots \&=& I-uv^t +cuv^t -c^2uv^t+cdots\
                  &=&I-frac{uv^t}{1+c}=I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t.
                  end{eqnarray}$$

                  We can actually see that
                  $$Acdot(I-(1+u^tv)^{-1}uv^t) = I-(1+c)^{-1}uv^t+uv^t-(1+c)^{-1}uv^tuv^t = I,
                  $$
                  as we wanted.

                  Add: I derived an explicit formula for $A^{-1}$, but in fact, for the purpose of showing singularity of $A$, it suffices to prove $ker(A) = (0)$. Note that
                  $$
                  A w = w+u(v^tw)=w+(vcdot w)u = 0
                  $$
                  implies that $w =alpha u$ for some scalar $alpha$. This means, of course, that $ker(A) leq langle urangle$. If we show that $Auneq 0$, then the claim $ker(A)=(0)$ follows. It is easy to see that if $u^tv neq -1$, then
                  $$
                  Au = (1+u^tv)u neq 0.
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 2 '18 at 23:28

























                  answered Dec 2 '18 at 23:13









                  SongSong

                  10.7k627




                  10.7k627























                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Adding $I$ to a matrix has the effect of adding $1$ to the eigenvalues. So the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are precisely those of the form $1+lambda$, with $lambda$ an eigenvalue of $uv^t$. As the matrix $uv^t$ is rank-one, zero is always an eigenvalue; its only possible nonzero eigenvalue is $v^tu$ (proof below). Thus the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are $0$ and $1+v^tu$ (if the latter is nonzero). So $I+uv^t$ is invertible precisely when $1+v^tune0$.



                      Proof that $lambda $ is a nonzero eigenvalue of $uv^t$ if and only if $lambda=v^tu$. Suppose that $uv^tw=lambda w$. Then
                      $$
                      lambda w = uv^tw=(v^tw),u.
                      $$

                      So $w=alpha u$, where $alpha=(v^tw)/lambda$. Thus (note that $v^twne0$, since $wne0$)
                      $$
                      lambdaalpha u=lambda w=uv^tw=uv^t(alpha u)=alpha (v^tu),u.
                      $$

                      Thus $v^tu=lambda$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        Adding $I$ to a matrix has the effect of adding $1$ to the eigenvalues. So the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are precisely those of the form $1+lambda$, with $lambda$ an eigenvalue of $uv^t$. As the matrix $uv^t$ is rank-one, zero is always an eigenvalue; its only possible nonzero eigenvalue is $v^tu$ (proof below). Thus the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are $0$ and $1+v^tu$ (if the latter is nonzero). So $I+uv^t$ is invertible precisely when $1+v^tune0$.



                        Proof that $lambda $ is a nonzero eigenvalue of $uv^t$ if and only if $lambda=v^tu$. Suppose that $uv^tw=lambda w$. Then
                        $$
                        lambda w = uv^tw=(v^tw),u.
                        $$

                        So $w=alpha u$, where $alpha=(v^tw)/lambda$. Thus (note that $v^twne0$, since $wne0$)
                        $$
                        lambdaalpha u=lambda w=uv^tw=uv^t(alpha u)=alpha (v^tu),u.
                        $$

                        Thus $v^tu=lambda$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          Adding $I$ to a matrix has the effect of adding $1$ to the eigenvalues. So the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are precisely those of the form $1+lambda$, with $lambda$ an eigenvalue of $uv^t$. As the matrix $uv^t$ is rank-one, zero is always an eigenvalue; its only possible nonzero eigenvalue is $v^tu$ (proof below). Thus the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are $0$ and $1+v^tu$ (if the latter is nonzero). So $I+uv^t$ is invertible precisely when $1+v^tune0$.



                          Proof that $lambda $ is a nonzero eigenvalue of $uv^t$ if and only if $lambda=v^tu$. Suppose that $uv^tw=lambda w$. Then
                          $$
                          lambda w = uv^tw=(v^tw),u.
                          $$

                          So $w=alpha u$, where $alpha=(v^tw)/lambda$. Thus (note that $v^twne0$, since $wne0$)
                          $$
                          lambdaalpha u=lambda w=uv^tw=uv^t(alpha u)=alpha (v^tu),u.
                          $$

                          Thus $v^tu=lambda$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          Adding $I$ to a matrix has the effect of adding $1$ to the eigenvalues. So the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are precisely those of the form $1+lambda$, with $lambda$ an eigenvalue of $uv^t$. As the matrix $uv^t$ is rank-one, zero is always an eigenvalue; its only possible nonzero eigenvalue is $v^tu$ (proof below). Thus the eigenvalues of $I+uv^t$ are $0$ and $1+v^tu$ (if the latter is nonzero). So $I+uv^t$ is invertible precisely when $1+v^tune0$.



                          Proof that $lambda $ is a nonzero eigenvalue of $uv^t$ if and only if $lambda=v^tu$. Suppose that $uv^tw=lambda w$. Then
                          $$
                          lambda w = uv^tw=(v^tw),u.
                          $$

                          So $w=alpha u$, where $alpha=(v^tw)/lambda$. Thus (note that $v^twne0$, since $wne0$)
                          $$
                          lambdaalpha u=lambda w=uv^tw=uv^t(alpha u)=alpha (v^tu),u.
                          $$

                          Thus $v^tu=lambda$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Dec 3 '18 at 15:43

























                          answered Dec 2 '18 at 23:25









                          Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

                          126k1182180




                          126k1182180






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023342%2fshow-that-a-is-singular-if-only-if-ut-v-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Plaza Victoria

                              In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                              How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...