Proving the relation between probability and Laplace transform












0












$begingroup$


I need to prove that equation 2 is equivalent to 1:
begin{gather*}
sum_{i=1}^K λ_iint_{mathbb{R}^2} mathbb{P}left(frac{P_i h_{x_i} l(x_i) x_i}{I_{x_i} + σ^2} > β_iright) ,mathrm dx_i, tag{1}\
sum_{i=1}^K λ_iint_{mathbb R^2} mathcal{L}_{I_{x_i}}left(frac{β_i}{P_i l(x_i)}right)expleft(frac{-β_i σ^2}{P_i l(x_i) x_i}right), ,mathrm{d} x_i tag{2}
end{gather*}

where $mathcal{L}_{I_{x_i}}$ is Laplace of $I_{x_i}$ and $h_{x_i}$ has Rayleigh distribution.



Equation 1 represents the integral over Euclidean space for that the probability of received signal to noise ratio (SINR) over a multi-tier network is greater than predefined threshold $β_i$ for any $i$-th tier.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 2 '18 at 10:36
















0












$begingroup$


I need to prove that equation 2 is equivalent to 1:
begin{gather*}
sum_{i=1}^K λ_iint_{mathbb{R}^2} mathbb{P}left(frac{P_i h_{x_i} l(x_i) x_i}{I_{x_i} + σ^2} > β_iright) ,mathrm dx_i, tag{1}\
sum_{i=1}^K λ_iint_{mathbb R^2} mathcal{L}_{I_{x_i}}left(frac{β_i}{P_i l(x_i)}right)expleft(frac{-β_i σ^2}{P_i l(x_i) x_i}right), ,mathrm{d} x_i tag{2}
end{gather*}

where $mathcal{L}_{I_{x_i}}$ is Laplace of $I_{x_i}$ and $h_{x_i}$ has Rayleigh distribution.



Equation 1 represents the integral over Euclidean space for that the probability of received signal to noise ratio (SINR) over a multi-tier network is greater than predefined threshold $β_i$ for any $i$-th tier.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 2 '18 at 10:36














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


I need to prove that equation 2 is equivalent to 1:
begin{gather*}
sum_{i=1}^K λ_iint_{mathbb{R}^2} mathbb{P}left(frac{P_i h_{x_i} l(x_i) x_i}{I_{x_i} + σ^2} > β_iright) ,mathrm dx_i, tag{1}\
sum_{i=1}^K λ_iint_{mathbb R^2} mathcal{L}_{I_{x_i}}left(frac{β_i}{P_i l(x_i)}right)expleft(frac{-β_i σ^2}{P_i l(x_i) x_i}right), ,mathrm{d} x_i tag{2}
end{gather*}

where $mathcal{L}_{I_{x_i}}$ is Laplace of $I_{x_i}$ and $h_{x_i}$ has Rayleigh distribution.



Equation 1 represents the integral over Euclidean space for that the probability of received signal to noise ratio (SINR) over a multi-tier network is greater than predefined threshold $β_i$ for any $i$-th tier.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I need to prove that equation 2 is equivalent to 1:
begin{gather*}
sum_{i=1}^K λ_iint_{mathbb{R}^2} mathbb{P}left(frac{P_i h_{x_i} l(x_i) x_i}{I_{x_i} + σ^2} > β_iright) ,mathrm dx_i, tag{1}\
sum_{i=1}^K λ_iint_{mathbb R^2} mathcal{L}_{I_{x_i}}left(frac{β_i}{P_i l(x_i)}right)expleft(frac{-β_i σ^2}{P_i l(x_i) x_i}right), ,mathrm{d} x_i tag{2}
end{gather*}

where $mathcal{L}_{I_{x_i}}$ is Laplace of $I_{x_i}$ and $h_{x_i}$ has Rayleigh distribution.



Equation 1 represents the integral over Euclidean space for that the probability of received signal to noise ratio (SINR) over a multi-tier network is greater than predefined threshold $β_i$ for any $i$-th tier.







linear-algebra statistics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '18 at 11:10









Saad

19.7k92352




19.7k92352










asked Dec 2 '18 at 10:29









Ahmed abd el azizAhmed abd el aziz

11




11








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 2 '18 at 10:36














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 2 '18 at 10:36








2




2




$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 2 '18 at 10:36




$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 2 '18 at 10:36










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022474%2fproving-the-relation-between-probability-and-laplace-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022474%2fproving-the-relation-between-probability-and-laplace-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...