Counting equivalence classes
$begingroup$
Given any $n$ integers $m_1,m_2,ldots m_nin mathbb{N}$ if we define an equivalence relation $sim$ on $mathbb{N}^n$ as follows:
$$(a_1,a_2,ldots a_n)sim (b_1,b_2,ldots b_n)iff text{For every integer }1leq kleq ntext{ we have }a_kequiv b_kbmod m_k$$
Then what is the cardinality of the quotient set $mathbb{N}^n/sim$?
For the special case when $m_1,m_2,ldots m_n$ are pairwise coprime, I know $|mathbb{N}^n/sim|=m_1m_2cdots m_n$. However what about in general when $m_1,m_2,ldots m_n$ might have common factors?
combinatorics modular-arithmetic equivalence-relations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given any $n$ integers $m_1,m_2,ldots m_nin mathbb{N}$ if we define an equivalence relation $sim$ on $mathbb{N}^n$ as follows:
$$(a_1,a_2,ldots a_n)sim (b_1,b_2,ldots b_n)iff text{For every integer }1leq kleq ntext{ we have }a_kequiv b_kbmod m_k$$
Then what is the cardinality of the quotient set $mathbb{N}^n/sim$?
For the special case when $m_1,m_2,ldots m_n$ are pairwise coprime, I know $|mathbb{N}^n/sim|=m_1m_2cdots m_n$. However what about in general when $m_1,m_2,ldots m_n$ might have common factors?
combinatorics modular-arithmetic equivalence-relations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given any $n$ integers $m_1,m_2,ldots m_nin mathbb{N}$ if we define an equivalence relation $sim$ on $mathbb{N}^n$ as follows:
$$(a_1,a_2,ldots a_n)sim (b_1,b_2,ldots b_n)iff text{For every integer }1leq kleq ntext{ we have }a_kequiv b_kbmod m_k$$
Then what is the cardinality of the quotient set $mathbb{N}^n/sim$?
For the special case when $m_1,m_2,ldots m_n$ are pairwise coprime, I know $|mathbb{N}^n/sim|=m_1m_2cdots m_n$. However what about in general when $m_1,m_2,ldots m_n$ might have common factors?
combinatorics modular-arithmetic equivalence-relations
$endgroup$
Given any $n$ integers $m_1,m_2,ldots m_nin mathbb{N}$ if we define an equivalence relation $sim$ on $mathbb{N}^n$ as follows:
$$(a_1,a_2,ldots a_n)sim (b_1,b_2,ldots b_n)iff text{For every integer }1leq kleq ntext{ we have }a_kequiv b_kbmod m_k$$
Then what is the cardinality of the quotient set $mathbb{N}^n/sim$?
For the special case when $m_1,m_2,ldots m_n$ are pairwise coprime, I know $|mathbb{N}^n/sim|=m_1m_2cdots m_n$. However what about in general when $m_1,m_2,ldots m_n$ might have common factors?
combinatorics modular-arithmetic equivalence-relations
combinatorics modular-arithmetic equivalence-relations
asked Dec 5 '18 at 0:43
user3865391user3865391
6141215
6141215
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is unconditionally $m_1...m_n$. You did not place any restrictions between the entries of the $n$-tuple.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand what you mean by restrictions.
$endgroup$
– user3865391
Dec 6 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
You say you have an argument when $m_i$ are pairwise coprime. Is there anything that goes wrong with the proof when for instance $n=2$ and $m_1=2,m_2=4$?
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
Please don't downvote posts simply because you don't understand.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026415%2fcounting-equivalence-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is unconditionally $m_1...m_n$. You did not place any restrictions between the entries of the $n$-tuple.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand what you mean by restrictions.
$endgroup$
– user3865391
Dec 6 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
You say you have an argument when $m_i$ are pairwise coprime. Is there anything that goes wrong with the proof when for instance $n=2$ and $m_1=2,m_2=4$?
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
Please don't downvote posts simply because you don't understand.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is unconditionally $m_1...m_n$. You did not place any restrictions between the entries of the $n$-tuple.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand what you mean by restrictions.
$endgroup$
– user3865391
Dec 6 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
You say you have an argument when $m_i$ are pairwise coprime. Is there anything that goes wrong with the proof when for instance $n=2$ and $m_1=2,m_2=4$?
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
Please don't downvote posts simply because you don't understand.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is unconditionally $m_1...m_n$. You did not place any restrictions between the entries of the $n$-tuple.
$endgroup$
The answer is unconditionally $m_1...m_n$. You did not place any restrictions between the entries of the $n$-tuple.
answered Dec 5 '18 at 4:27
zoidbergzoidberg
1,065113
1,065113
$begingroup$
I don't understand what you mean by restrictions.
$endgroup$
– user3865391
Dec 6 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
You say you have an argument when $m_i$ are pairwise coprime. Is there anything that goes wrong with the proof when for instance $n=2$ and $m_1=2,m_2=4$?
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
Please don't downvote posts simply because you don't understand.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't understand what you mean by restrictions.
$endgroup$
– user3865391
Dec 6 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
You say you have an argument when $m_i$ are pairwise coprime. Is there anything that goes wrong with the proof when for instance $n=2$ and $m_1=2,m_2=4$?
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
Please don't downvote posts simply because you don't understand.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:47
$begingroup$
I don't understand what you mean by restrictions.
$endgroup$
– user3865391
Dec 6 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
I don't understand what you mean by restrictions.
$endgroup$
– user3865391
Dec 6 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
You say you have an argument when $m_i$ are pairwise coprime. Is there anything that goes wrong with the proof when for instance $n=2$ and $m_1=2,m_2=4$?
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
You say you have an argument when $m_i$ are pairwise coprime. Is there anything that goes wrong with the proof when for instance $n=2$ and $m_1=2,m_2=4$?
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
Please don't downvote posts simply because you don't understand.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:47
$begingroup$
Please don't downvote posts simply because you don't understand.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 6 '18 at 20:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026415%2fcounting-equivalence-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown