Generated space by the harmonic oscillators $e^{iw}$.
$begingroup$
Let $mathbb{T}$ represent the $[0,1)$ interval and for each $winmathbb{Z}$ denote the function $$e_w:mathbb{T}tomathbb{C}$$ such that $$forall xinmathbb{T}, e_w(x)=e^{2pi iwx}.$$ It is known that the set of harmonic oscillators $e_w$ is a complete system in $L_p(mathbb{T})$, i.e. such spaces are "generated" by $big{ e_w : winmathbb{Z} big}$ with coefficients in some specific set of series $ell^qsubsetbig{(c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}: c_winmathbb{C}big}$ since the set of finite sums $big{ sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_we_wbig}$ is dense in it, that is
$forall f in L_p(mathbb{T}), exists (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}in ell^q
Big( limlimits_{kto infty} sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_w e_w = f Big)$.
For each $pin (0,infty], (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}$ lies in a specific set of complex series $ell^q$ where $1=dfrac{1}{p} + dfrac{1}{q}$.
My question is: given the set of all complex sequences ${ (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}} : c_winmathbb{C}}$, What is the space generated by the topological closure of the finite sums $sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_w e_w$ ? In other words, What is
$$overline{bigg{ sumlimits_{w=-n}^{n} c_w e_w : ninmathbb{N}, c_winmathbb{C}bigg} } ?$$
Evidently, several of these funcions reach infinite values in various subsets.
convergence exponential-function fourier-series lp-spaces topological-vector-spaces
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $mathbb{T}$ represent the $[0,1)$ interval and for each $winmathbb{Z}$ denote the function $$e_w:mathbb{T}tomathbb{C}$$ such that $$forall xinmathbb{T}, e_w(x)=e^{2pi iwx}.$$ It is known that the set of harmonic oscillators $e_w$ is a complete system in $L_p(mathbb{T})$, i.e. such spaces are "generated" by $big{ e_w : winmathbb{Z} big}$ with coefficients in some specific set of series $ell^qsubsetbig{(c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}: c_winmathbb{C}big}$ since the set of finite sums $big{ sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_we_wbig}$ is dense in it, that is
$forall f in L_p(mathbb{T}), exists (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}in ell^q
Big( limlimits_{kto infty} sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_w e_w = f Big)$.
For each $pin (0,infty], (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}$ lies in a specific set of complex series $ell^q$ where $1=dfrac{1}{p} + dfrac{1}{q}$.
My question is: given the set of all complex sequences ${ (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}} : c_winmathbb{C}}$, What is the space generated by the topological closure of the finite sums $sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_w e_w$ ? In other words, What is
$$overline{bigg{ sumlimits_{w=-n}^{n} c_w e_w : ninmathbb{N}, c_winmathbb{C}bigg} } ?$$
Evidently, several of these funcions reach infinite values in various subsets.
convergence exponential-function fourier-series lp-spaces topological-vector-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What do you mean by 'orthogonal' in $L_p$?.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 4 '18 at 23:20
$begingroup$
You are right, I just corrected it! Orthogonality only makes sense when $p=2$.
$endgroup$
– Dr Potato
Dec 4 '18 at 23:23
1
$begingroup$
Closure under what topology?
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
Dec 6 '18 at 23:13
1
$begingroup$
There is something wrong with your literal formulation. E.g., the way you're writing it, the $e^{iw}$ are just numbers, not functions. Don't you want to talk about functions $psi_n(x)=e^{2pi inx}$ on $[0,1]$, instead? If you rewrite in such terms, your question would be much clearer...
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Dec 7 '18 at 0:31
1
$begingroup$
That ${ u_n}$ is dense in $X,|.|$ doesn't mean that for any element $f in X$ there is a sequence of complex numbers $(c_n)$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_n u_n| = 0$ ! It means that for any element $f in X$ there is $(c_{n,N})$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_{n,N} u_n| = 0$ (try with $u_n(x) = x^n$ then $sum_{n=1}^infty c_n u_n$ converges in $L^q([0,1])$ iff it converges uniformly to an analytic function for $|x| le r < 1$)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 7 '18 at 12:55
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $mathbb{T}$ represent the $[0,1)$ interval and for each $winmathbb{Z}$ denote the function $$e_w:mathbb{T}tomathbb{C}$$ such that $$forall xinmathbb{T}, e_w(x)=e^{2pi iwx}.$$ It is known that the set of harmonic oscillators $e_w$ is a complete system in $L_p(mathbb{T})$, i.e. such spaces are "generated" by $big{ e_w : winmathbb{Z} big}$ with coefficients in some specific set of series $ell^qsubsetbig{(c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}: c_winmathbb{C}big}$ since the set of finite sums $big{ sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_we_wbig}$ is dense in it, that is
$forall f in L_p(mathbb{T}), exists (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}in ell^q
Big( limlimits_{kto infty} sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_w e_w = f Big)$.
For each $pin (0,infty], (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}$ lies in a specific set of complex series $ell^q$ where $1=dfrac{1}{p} + dfrac{1}{q}$.
My question is: given the set of all complex sequences ${ (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}} : c_winmathbb{C}}$, What is the space generated by the topological closure of the finite sums $sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_w e_w$ ? In other words, What is
$$overline{bigg{ sumlimits_{w=-n}^{n} c_w e_w : ninmathbb{N}, c_winmathbb{C}bigg} } ?$$
Evidently, several of these funcions reach infinite values in various subsets.
convergence exponential-function fourier-series lp-spaces topological-vector-spaces
$endgroup$
Let $mathbb{T}$ represent the $[0,1)$ interval and for each $winmathbb{Z}$ denote the function $$e_w:mathbb{T}tomathbb{C}$$ such that $$forall xinmathbb{T}, e_w(x)=e^{2pi iwx}.$$ It is known that the set of harmonic oscillators $e_w$ is a complete system in $L_p(mathbb{T})$, i.e. such spaces are "generated" by $big{ e_w : winmathbb{Z} big}$ with coefficients in some specific set of series $ell^qsubsetbig{(c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}: c_winmathbb{C}big}$ since the set of finite sums $big{ sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_we_wbig}$ is dense in it, that is
$forall f in L_p(mathbb{T}), exists (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}in ell^q
Big( limlimits_{kto infty} sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_w e_w = f Big)$.
For each $pin (0,infty], (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}}$ lies in a specific set of complex series $ell^q$ where $1=dfrac{1}{p} + dfrac{1}{q}$.
My question is: given the set of all complex sequences ${ (c_w)_{winmathbb{N}} : c_winmathbb{C}}$, What is the space generated by the topological closure of the finite sums $sumlimits_{w=0}^{k} c_w e_w$ ? In other words, What is
$$overline{bigg{ sumlimits_{w=-n}^{n} c_w e_w : ninmathbb{N}, c_winmathbb{C}bigg} } ?$$
Evidently, several of these funcions reach infinite values in various subsets.
convergence exponential-function fourier-series lp-spaces topological-vector-spaces
convergence exponential-function fourier-series lp-spaces topological-vector-spaces
edited Jan 21 at 17:18
Dr Potato
asked Dec 4 '18 at 23:11
Dr PotatoDr Potato
394
394
$begingroup$
What do you mean by 'orthogonal' in $L_p$?.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 4 '18 at 23:20
$begingroup$
You are right, I just corrected it! Orthogonality only makes sense when $p=2$.
$endgroup$
– Dr Potato
Dec 4 '18 at 23:23
1
$begingroup$
Closure under what topology?
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
Dec 6 '18 at 23:13
1
$begingroup$
There is something wrong with your literal formulation. E.g., the way you're writing it, the $e^{iw}$ are just numbers, not functions. Don't you want to talk about functions $psi_n(x)=e^{2pi inx}$ on $[0,1]$, instead? If you rewrite in such terms, your question would be much clearer...
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Dec 7 '18 at 0:31
1
$begingroup$
That ${ u_n}$ is dense in $X,|.|$ doesn't mean that for any element $f in X$ there is a sequence of complex numbers $(c_n)$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_n u_n| = 0$ ! It means that for any element $f in X$ there is $(c_{n,N})$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_{n,N} u_n| = 0$ (try with $u_n(x) = x^n$ then $sum_{n=1}^infty c_n u_n$ converges in $L^q([0,1])$ iff it converges uniformly to an analytic function for $|x| le r < 1$)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 7 '18 at 12:55
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
What do you mean by 'orthogonal' in $L_p$?.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 4 '18 at 23:20
$begingroup$
You are right, I just corrected it! Orthogonality only makes sense when $p=2$.
$endgroup$
– Dr Potato
Dec 4 '18 at 23:23
1
$begingroup$
Closure under what topology?
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
Dec 6 '18 at 23:13
1
$begingroup$
There is something wrong with your literal formulation. E.g., the way you're writing it, the $e^{iw}$ are just numbers, not functions. Don't you want to talk about functions $psi_n(x)=e^{2pi inx}$ on $[0,1]$, instead? If you rewrite in such terms, your question would be much clearer...
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Dec 7 '18 at 0:31
1
$begingroup$
That ${ u_n}$ is dense in $X,|.|$ doesn't mean that for any element $f in X$ there is a sequence of complex numbers $(c_n)$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_n u_n| = 0$ ! It means that for any element $f in X$ there is $(c_{n,N})$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_{n,N} u_n| = 0$ (try with $u_n(x) = x^n$ then $sum_{n=1}^infty c_n u_n$ converges in $L^q([0,1])$ iff it converges uniformly to an analytic function for $|x| le r < 1$)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 7 '18 at 12:55
$begingroup$
What do you mean by 'orthogonal' in $L_p$?.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 4 '18 at 23:20
$begingroup$
What do you mean by 'orthogonal' in $L_p$?.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 4 '18 at 23:20
$begingroup$
You are right, I just corrected it! Orthogonality only makes sense when $p=2$.
$endgroup$
– Dr Potato
Dec 4 '18 at 23:23
$begingroup$
You are right, I just corrected it! Orthogonality only makes sense when $p=2$.
$endgroup$
– Dr Potato
Dec 4 '18 at 23:23
1
1
$begingroup$
Closure under what topology?
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
Dec 6 '18 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Closure under what topology?
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
Dec 6 '18 at 23:13
1
1
$begingroup$
There is something wrong with your literal formulation. E.g., the way you're writing it, the $e^{iw}$ are just numbers, not functions. Don't you want to talk about functions $psi_n(x)=e^{2pi inx}$ on $[0,1]$, instead? If you rewrite in such terms, your question would be much clearer...
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Dec 7 '18 at 0:31
$begingroup$
There is something wrong with your literal formulation. E.g., the way you're writing it, the $e^{iw}$ are just numbers, not functions. Don't you want to talk about functions $psi_n(x)=e^{2pi inx}$ on $[0,1]$, instead? If you rewrite in such terms, your question would be much clearer...
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Dec 7 '18 at 0:31
1
1
$begingroup$
That ${ u_n}$ is dense in $X,|.|$ doesn't mean that for any element $f in X$ there is a sequence of complex numbers $(c_n)$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_n u_n| = 0$ ! It means that for any element $f in X$ there is $(c_{n,N})$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_{n,N} u_n| = 0$ (try with $u_n(x) = x^n$ then $sum_{n=1}^infty c_n u_n$ converges in $L^q([0,1])$ iff it converges uniformly to an analytic function for $|x| le r < 1$)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 7 '18 at 12:55
$begingroup$
That ${ u_n}$ is dense in $X,|.|$ doesn't mean that for any element $f in X$ there is a sequence of complex numbers $(c_n)$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_n u_n| = 0$ ! It means that for any element $f in X$ there is $(c_{n,N})$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_{n,N} u_n| = 0$ (try with $u_n(x) = x^n$ then $sum_{n=1}^infty c_n u_n$ converges in $L^q([0,1])$ iff it converges uniformly to an analytic function for $|x| le r < 1$)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 7 '18 at 12:55
|
show 3 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026323%2fgenerated-space-by-the-harmonic-oscillators-eiw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026323%2fgenerated-space-by-the-harmonic-oscillators-eiw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What do you mean by 'orthogonal' in $L_p$?.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 4 '18 at 23:20
$begingroup$
You are right, I just corrected it! Orthogonality only makes sense when $p=2$.
$endgroup$
– Dr Potato
Dec 4 '18 at 23:23
1
$begingroup$
Closure under what topology?
$endgroup$
– Mike Miller
Dec 6 '18 at 23:13
1
$begingroup$
There is something wrong with your literal formulation. E.g., the way you're writing it, the $e^{iw}$ are just numbers, not functions. Don't you want to talk about functions $psi_n(x)=e^{2pi inx}$ on $[0,1]$, instead? If you rewrite in such terms, your question would be much clearer...
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Dec 7 '18 at 0:31
1
$begingroup$
That ${ u_n}$ is dense in $X,|.|$ doesn't mean that for any element $f in X$ there is a sequence of complex numbers $(c_n)$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_n u_n| = 0$ ! It means that for any element $f in X$ there is $(c_{n,N})$ such that $lim_{N to infty} |f-sum_{n=1}^N c_{n,N} u_n| = 0$ (try with $u_n(x) = x^n$ then $sum_{n=1}^infty c_n u_n$ converges in $L^q([0,1])$ iff it converges uniformly to an analytic function for $|x| le r < 1$)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 7 '18 at 12:55