Number of Hamiltonian cycles in complete graph Kn with constraints












0














I am currently working on a exercice which aims to count the number of hamiltonian cycles in a complete graph. Since it is a completely new topic to me, I struggle to think about how to solve the problem.
I understand how to count the number of Hamiltonian cycles in a complete graph Kn but my main problem is: what if we have constraints on some particular edges that the Hamiltonian must contain?
Here is the exercice with which I'm struggling with





Suppose Kn is a complete graph whose vertices are indexed by
[n] = {1,2,3,...,n} where n >= 4. In this question, a cycle is identied solely by the collection of edges it contains; there is no particular orientation or starting point
associated with a cycle. (Give your answers in terms of n for the following questions.



(a) How many Hamiltonian cycles are there in Kn?



-> My answer : (n-1)!/2. In fact, there is no particular orientation or stationg point, so we can avoid counting the starting point (thus we have n-1)



(b) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain the edge {1,2}?



-> My answer : since I consider the edge {1,2} as a vertex, the number of HC should be (n-2)!/2



(c) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain both the edges{1,2} and {2,3}?



-> My Answer : Same reflexion as above, there are (n-3)!/2 hamiltonian cycles



(d) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain both the edges {1,2} and {3,4}?



-> My question : should I consider {1,2} and {3,4} as proper vertices also?



(e) Suppose that M is a set of k <= n
2 edges in Kn with the property that no two
edges in M share a vertex. How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain all the
edges in M? Give your answer in terms of n and k.



-> Note : Do you have any hint?



(f) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn do not contain any edge from {1,2}, {2,3} and {3,4}?



-> Note : Do you have any hint?





Thanks by advance for your help










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    I am currently working on a exercice which aims to count the number of hamiltonian cycles in a complete graph. Since it is a completely new topic to me, I struggle to think about how to solve the problem.
    I understand how to count the number of Hamiltonian cycles in a complete graph Kn but my main problem is: what if we have constraints on some particular edges that the Hamiltonian must contain?
    Here is the exercice with which I'm struggling with





    Suppose Kn is a complete graph whose vertices are indexed by
    [n] = {1,2,3,...,n} where n >= 4. In this question, a cycle is identied solely by the collection of edges it contains; there is no particular orientation or starting point
    associated with a cycle. (Give your answers in terms of n for the following questions.



    (a) How many Hamiltonian cycles are there in Kn?



    -> My answer : (n-1)!/2. In fact, there is no particular orientation or stationg point, so we can avoid counting the starting point (thus we have n-1)



    (b) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain the edge {1,2}?



    -> My answer : since I consider the edge {1,2} as a vertex, the number of HC should be (n-2)!/2



    (c) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain both the edges{1,2} and {2,3}?



    -> My Answer : Same reflexion as above, there are (n-3)!/2 hamiltonian cycles



    (d) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain both the edges {1,2} and {3,4}?



    -> My question : should I consider {1,2} and {3,4} as proper vertices also?



    (e) Suppose that M is a set of k <= n
    2 edges in Kn with the property that no two
    edges in M share a vertex. How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain all the
    edges in M? Give your answer in terms of n and k.



    -> Note : Do you have any hint?



    (f) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn do not contain any edge from {1,2}, {2,3} and {3,4}?



    -> Note : Do you have any hint?





    Thanks by advance for your help










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I am currently working on a exercice which aims to count the number of hamiltonian cycles in a complete graph. Since it is a completely new topic to me, I struggle to think about how to solve the problem.
      I understand how to count the number of Hamiltonian cycles in a complete graph Kn but my main problem is: what if we have constraints on some particular edges that the Hamiltonian must contain?
      Here is the exercice with which I'm struggling with





      Suppose Kn is a complete graph whose vertices are indexed by
      [n] = {1,2,3,...,n} where n >= 4. In this question, a cycle is identied solely by the collection of edges it contains; there is no particular orientation or starting point
      associated with a cycle. (Give your answers in terms of n for the following questions.



      (a) How many Hamiltonian cycles are there in Kn?



      -> My answer : (n-1)!/2. In fact, there is no particular orientation or stationg point, so we can avoid counting the starting point (thus we have n-1)



      (b) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain the edge {1,2}?



      -> My answer : since I consider the edge {1,2} as a vertex, the number of HC should be (n-2)!/2



      (c) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain both the edges{1,2} and {2,3}?



      -> My Answer : Same reflexion as above, there are (n-3)!/2 hamiltonian cycles



      (d) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain both the edges {1,2} and {3,4}?



      -> My question : should I consider {1,2} and {3,4} as proper vertices also?



      (e) Suppose that M is a set of k <= n
      2 edges in Kn with the property that no two
      edges in M share a vertex. How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain all the
      edges in M? Give your answer in terms of n and k.



      -> Note : Do you have any hint?



      (f) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn do not contain any edge from {1,2}, {2,3} and {3,4}?



      -> Note : Do you have any hint?





      Thanks by advance for your help










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am currently working on a exercice which aims to count the number of hamiltonian cycles in a complete graph. Since it is a completely new topic to me, I struggle to think about how to solve the problem.
      I understand how to count the number of Hamiltonian cycles in a complete graph Kn but my main problem is: what if we have constraints on some particular edges that the Hamiltonian must contain?
      Here is the exercice with which I'm struggling with





      Suppose Kn is a complete graph whose vertices are indexed by
      [n] = {1,2,3,...,n} where n >= 4. In this question, a cycle is identied solely by the collection of edges it contains; there is no particular orientation or starting point
      associated with a cycle. (Give your answers in terms of n for the following questions.



      (a) How many Hamiltonian cycles are there in Kn?



      -> My answer : (n-1)!/2. In fact, there is no particular orientation or stationg point, so we can avoid counting the starting point (thus we have n-1)



      (b) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain the edge {1,2}?



      -> My answer : since I consider the edge {1,2} as a vertex, the number of HC should be (n-2)!/2



      (c) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain both the edges{1,2} and {2,3}?



      -> My Answer : Same reflexion as above, there are (n-3)!/2 hamiltonian cycles



      (d) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain both the edges {1,2} and {3,4}?



      -> My question : should I consider {1,2} and {3,4} as proper vertices also?



      (e) Suppose that M is a set of k <= n
      2 edges in Kn with the property that no two
      edges in M share a vertex. How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn contain all the
      edges in M? Give your answer in terms of n and k.



      -> Note : Do you have any hint?



      (f) How many Hamiltonian cycles in Kn do not contain any edge from {1,2}, {2,3} and {3,4}?



      -> Note : Do you have any hint?





      Thanks by advance for your help







      discrete-mathematics graph-theory hamiltonian-path






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 24 at 10:21









      Cleola

      11




      11






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Q(a)-Q(c) is correct, and Q(d) can be seen as {1,2}{2,3}{3,4} - {2,3} which is 2(n-2)!-(n-3)!
          (e) can brake into (12)(34)(56)789
          and applying counting,answer=(n)!(n-k-1)!/(2n)
          (f)Obviously
          Answer=1/2
          (n-1)!-(n-3)!






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 30 at 9:22











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011395%2fnumber-of-hamiltonian-cycles-in-complete-graph-kn-with-constraints%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          Q(a)-Q(c) is correct, and Q(d) can be seen as {1,2}{2,3}{3,4} - {2,3} which is 2(n-2)!-(n-3)!
          (e) can brake into (12)(34)(56)789
          and applying counting,answer=(n)!(n-k-1)!/(2n)
          (f)Obviously
          Answer=1/2
          (n-1)!-(n-3)!






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 30 at 9:22
















          0














          Q(a)-Q(c) is correct, and Q(d) can be seen as {1,2}{2,3}{3,4} - {2,3} which is 2(n-2)!-(n-3)!
          (e) can brake into (12)(34)(56)789
          and applying counting,answer=(n)!(n-k-1)!/(2n)
          (f)Obviously
          Answer=1/2
          (n-1)!-(n-3)!






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 30 at 9:22














          0












          0








          0






          Q(a)-Q(c) is correct, and Q(d) can be seen as {1,2}{2,3}{3,4} - {2,3} which is 2(n-2)!-(n-3)!
          (e) can brake into (12)(34)(56)789
          and applying counting,answer=(n)!(n-k-1)!/(2n)
          (f)Obviously
          Answer=1/2
          (n-1)!-(n-3)!






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Q(a)-Q(c) is correct, and Q(d) can be seen as {1,2}{2,3}{3,4} - {2,3} which is 2(n-2)!-(n-3)!
          (e) can brake into (12)(34)(56)789
          and applying counting,answer=(n)!(n-k-1)!/(2n)
          (f)Obviously
          Answer=1/2
          (n-1)!-(n-3)!







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 30 at 9:19









          zacahry

          1




          1












          • Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 30 at 9:22


















          • Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 30 at 9:22
















          Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
          – José Carlos Santos
          Nov 30 at 9:22




          Welcome to MSE. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to.
          – José Carlos Santos
          Nov 30 at 9:22


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011395%2fnumber-of-hamiltonian-cycles-in-complete-graph-kn-with-constraints%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa