Two questions on ODEs: Maximum interval of positivity of solution to linear ODE; Analytic solution to Riccati...
$begingroup$
I have two questions about ordinary differential equations:
Consider the first-order linear differential equation $x'(t)=a(t)x(t)+b(t)$, with initial condition $x(t_0)=x_0$. Suppose that $x_0>0$. By continuity, we know that there is a neighborhood of $t_0$, say $(t_0-delta,t_0+delta)$, where $x(t)>0$. Is it possible to know the maximum interval where $x(t)>0$ ?
Consider the Riccati differential equation $x'(t)=a x(t)^2+b x(t)+c$ (here $a$, $b$ and $c$ are constants), with initial condition $x(t_0)=x_0$. Applying the Fröbenius method (search of a power series solution), one can find a formal solution $x(t)=sum_{n=0}^infty x_n (t-t_0)^n$, where the coefficients $x_n$ satisfy a difference equation. Is is possible to establish the convergence of this series on a maximum interval? I was not able to do so, due to the difficulty arisen from the term $x(t)^2$.
I do not know if these two questions belong to well-studied topics in the literature or not. In the former case, a reference would be great.
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have two questions about ordinary differential equations:
Consider the first-order linear differential equation $x'(t)=a(t)x(t)+b(t)$, with initial condition $x(t_0)=x_0$. Suppose that $x_0>0$. By continuity, we know that there is a neighborhood of $t_0$, say $(t_0-delta,t_0+delta)$, where $x(t)>0$. Is it possible to know the maximum interval where $x(t)>0$ ?
Consider the Riccati differential equation $x'(t)=a x(t)^2+b x(t)+c$ (here $a$, $b$ and $c$ are constants), with initial condition $x(t_0)=x_0$. Applying the Fröbenius method (search of a power series solution), one can find a formal solution $x(t)=sum_{n=0}^infty x_n (t-t_0)^n$, where the coefficients $x_n$ satisfy a difference equation. Is is possible to establish the convergence of this series on a maximum interval? I was not able to do so, due to the difficulty arisen from the term $x(t)^2$.
I do not know if these two questions belong to well-studied topics in the literature or not. In the former case, a reference would be great.
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Regarding 1., how would you find the maximum interval without having an explicit expression for $a$ and $b$? What answer are you looking for? In general this interval can be as short as you want, or even infinite
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
If you know $a(t)geqalpha$ and $b(t)geqbeta$ for all $t$, then you can have a lower bound for the interval by comparing with the solution to the ODE $x'(t)=alpha x(t)+beta$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
As for the second question, Federico's comment applies verbatim.
$endgroup$
– Julián Aguirre
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
Similarly, if you have upper bounds for both $a$ and $b$ you can give an upper bound to the maximal interval.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@JuliánAguirre I don't understand. How do you know that the power series converges?
$endgroup$
– user39756
Dec 10 '18 at 18:50
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have two questions about ordinary differential equations:
Consider the first-order linear differential equation $x'(t)=a(t)x(t)+b(t)$, with initial condition $x(t_0)=x_0$. Suppose that $x_0>0$. By continuity, we know that there is a neighborhood of $t_0$, say $(t_0-delta,t_0+delta)$, where $x(t)>0$. Is it possible to know the maximum interval where $x(t)>0$ ?
Consider the Riccati differential equation $x'(t)=a x(t)^2+b x(t)+c$ (here $a$, $b$ and $c$ are constants), with initial condition $x(t_0)=x_0$. Applying the Fröbenius method (search of a power series solution), one can find a formal solution $x(t)=sum_{n=0}^infty x_n (t-t_0)^n$, where the coefficients $x_n$ satisfy a difference equation. Is is possible to establish the convergence of this series on a maximum interval? I was not able to do so, due to the difficulty arisen from the term $x(t)^2$.
I do not know if these two questions belong to well-studied topics in the literature or not. In the former case, a reference would be great.
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
I have two questions about ordinary differential equations:
Consider the first-order linear differential equation $x'(t)=a(t)x(t)+b(t)$, with initial condition $x(t_0)=x_0$. Suppose that $x_0>0$. By continuity, we know that there is a neighborhood of $t_0$, say $(t_0-delta,t_0+delta)$, where $x(t)>0$. Is it possible to know the maximum interval where $x(t)>0$ ?
Consider the Riccati differential equation $x'(t)=a x(t)^2+b x(t)+c$ (here $a$, $b$ and $c$ are constants), with initial condition $x(t_0)=x_0$. Applying the Fröbenius method (search of a power series solution), one can find a formal solution $x(t)=sum_{n=0}^infty x_n (t-t_0)^n$, where the coefficients $x_n$ satisfy a difference equation. Is is possible to establish the convergence of this series on a maximum interval? I was not able to do so, due to the difficulty arisen from the term $x(t)^2$.
I do not know if these two questions belong to well-studied topics in the literature or not. In the former case, a reference would be great.
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
asked Dec 10 '18 at 18:33
user39756user39756
229313
229313
1
$begingroup$
Regarding 1., how would you find the maximum interval without having an explicit expression for $a$ and $b$? What answer are you looking for? In general this interval can be as short as you want, or even infinite
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
If you know $a(t)geqalpha$ and $b(t)geqbeta$ for all $t$, then you can have a lower bound for the interval by comparing with the solution to the ODE $x'(t)=alpha x(t)+beta$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
As for the second question, Federico's comment applies verbatim.
$endgroup$
– Julián Aguirre
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
Similarly, if you have upper bounds for both $a$ and $b$ you can give an upper bound to the maximal interval.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@JuliánAguirre I don't understand. How do you know that the power series converges?
$endgroup$
– user39756
Dec 10 '18 at 18:50
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Regarding 1., how would you find the maximum interval without having an explicit expression for $a$ and $b$? What answer are you looking for? In general this interval can be as short as you want, or even infinite
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
If you know $a(t)geqalpha$ and $b(t)geqbeta$ for all $t$, then you can have a lower bound for the interval by comparing with the solution to the ODE $x'(t)=alpha x(t)+beta$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
As for the second question, Federico's comment applies verbatim.
$endgroup$
– Julián Aguirre
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
Similarly, if you have upper bounds for both $a$ and $b$ you can give an upper bound to the maximal interval.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@JuliánAguirre I don't understand. How do you know that the power series converges?
$endgroup$
– user39756
Dec 10 '18 at 18:50
1
1
$begingroup$
Regarding 1., how would you find the maximum interval without having an explicit expression for $a$ and $b$? What answer are you looking for? In general this interval can be as short as you want, or even infinite
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
Regarding 1., how would you find the maximum interval without having an explicit expression for $a$ and $b$? What answer are you looking for? In general this interval can be as short as you want, or even infinite
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
If you know $a(t)geqalpha$ and $b(t)geqbeta$ for all $t$, then you can have a lower bound for the interval by comparing with the solution to the ODE $x'(t)=alpha x(t)+beta$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
If you know $a(t)geqalpha$ and $b(t)geqbeta$ for all $t$, then you can have a lower bound for the interval by comparing with the solution to the ODE $x'(t)=alpha x(t)+beta$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
As for the second question, Federico's comment applies verbatim.
$endgroup$
– Julián Aguirre
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
As for the second question, Federico's comment applies verbatim.
$endgroup$
– Julián Aguirre
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
Similarly, if you have upper bounds for both $a$ and $b$ you can give an upper bound to the maximal interval.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
Similarly, if you have upper bounds for both $a$ and $b$ you can give an upper bound to the maximal interval.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@JuliánAguirre I don't understand. How do you know that the power series converges?
$endgroup$
– user39756
Dec 10 '18 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@JuliánAguirre I don't understand. How do you know that the power series converges?
$endgroup$
– user39756
Dec 10 '18 at 18:50
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assuming $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuous, solutions are globally defined. The maximal interval where $x(t)>0$ is $(c,d)$ where $d$ is the least root $> t_0$ of $x(t)=0$ (or $+infty$ if there is no such root), and similarly $c$ is the greatest root $<t_0$ or $-infty$. Of course the first-order linear DE has an explicit solution in terms of integrals, but
in general those integrals can't be expressed in closed form, nor can we express the roots in closed form.Your Riccati equation's solution is of the form
$$ x(t) = A tan(B (t - t_0) + C) + D$$
for appropriate $A,B,C, D$ (which I'll leave it to you to find). This has singularities when $B (t-t_0) + C= (2k+1)pi/2$ for integer $k$. The radius of convergence of the power series solution is the distance from $t_0$ to the closest singularity in the complex plane.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1) Asking about the positivity of $x$ is the same as asking about the positivity of $y(t)=e^{-A(t)}x(t)$ where $A'=a$. Then $$y'(t)=e^{-A(t)}b(t).$$ Any upper bound for that expression will give some lower bound for the position of a root.
2) You can transform the Riccati equation into a linear ODE of second order by setting $y=-frac{u'}{au}$ with $$u''-frac bau'+cu=0$$ where the recursion formula for the power series coefficients will be easier to derive. The roots of $u$ are the poles of $y$, so that bounds on the roots are also bounds on the poles.
Alternatively take $r_1,r_2$ to be the roots of $ar^2+br+c$ and consider $$u=frac{y-r_1}{y-r_2}implies u'=-a(r_2-r_1)u$$
which allows a direct computation of the solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034302%2ftwo-questions-on-odes-maximum-interval-of-positivity-of-solution-to-linear-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assuming $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuous, solutions are globally defined. The maximal interval where $x(t)>0$ is $(c,d)$ where $d$ is the least root $> t_0$ of $x(t)=0$ (or $+infty$ if there is no such root), and similarly $c$ is the greatest root $<t_0$ or $-infty$. Of course the first-order linear DE has an explicit solution in terms of integrals, but
in general those integrals can't be expressed in closed form, nor can we express the roots in closed form.Your Riccati equation's solution is of the form
$$ x(t) = A tan(B (t - t_0) + C) + D$$
for appropriate $A,B,C, D$ (which I'll leave it to you to find). This has singularities when $B (t-t_0) + C= (2k+1)pi/2$ for integer $k$. The radius of convergence of the power series solution is the distance from $t_0$ to the closest singularity in the complex plane.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuous, solutions are globally defined. The maximal interval where $x(t)>0$ is $(c,d)$ where $d$ is the least root $> t_0$ of $x(t)=0$ (or $+infty$ if there is no such root), and similarly $c$ is the greatest root $<t_0$ or $-infty$. Of course the first-order linear DE has an explicit solution in terms of integrals, but
in general those integrals can't be expressed in closed form, nor can we express the roots in closed form.Your Riccati equation's solution is of the form
$$ x(t) = A tan(B (t - t_0) + C) + D$$
for appropriate $A,B,C, D$ (which I'll leave it to you to find). This has singularities when $B (t-t_0) + C= (2k+1)pi/2$ for integer $k$. The radius of convergence of the power series solution is the distance from $t_0$ to the closest singularity in the complex plane.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuous, solutions are globally defined. The maximal interval where $x(t)>0$ is $(c,d)$ where $d$ is the least root $> t_0$ of $x(t)=0$ (or $+infty$ if there is no such root), and similarly $c$ is the greatest root $<t_0$ or $-infty$. Of course the first-order linear DE has an explicit solution in terms of integrals, but
in general those integrals can't be expressed in closed form, nor can we express the roots in closed form.Your Riccati equation's solution is of the form
$$ x(t) = A tan(B (t - t_0) + C) + D$$
for appropriate $A,B,C, D$ (which I'll leave it to you to find). This has singularities when $B (t-t_0) + C= (2k+1)pi/2$ for integer $k$. The radius of convergence of the power series solution is the distance from $t_0$ to the closest singularity in the complex plane.
$endgroup$
Assuming $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuous, solutions are globally defined. The maximal interval where $x(t)>0$ is $(c,d)$ where $d$ is the least root $> t_0$ of $x(t)=0$ (or $+infty$ if there is no such root), and similarly $c$ is the greatest root $<t_0$ or $-infty$. Of course the first-order linear DE has an explicit solution in terms of integrals, but
in general those integrals can't be expressed in closed form, nor can we express the roots in closed form.Your Riccati equation's solution is of the form
$$ x(t) = A tan(B (t - t_0) + C) + D$$
for appropriate $A,B,C, D$ (which I'll leave it to you to find). This has singularities when $B (t-t_0) + C= (2k+1)pi/2$ for integer $k$. The radius of convergence of the power series solution is the distance from $t_0$ to the closest singularity in the complex plane.
edited Dec 10 '18 at 20:08
answered Dec 10 '18 at 19:48
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
324k23214468
324k23214468
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1) Asking about the positivity of $x$ is the same as asking about the positivity of $y(t)=e^{-A(t)}x(t)$ where $A'=a$. Then $$y'(t)=e^{-A(t)}b(t).$$ Any upper bound for that expression will give some lower bound for the position of a root.
2) You can transform the Riccati equation into a linear ODE of second order by setting $y=-frac{u'}{au}$ with $$u''-frac bau'+cu=0$$ where the recursion formula for the power series coefficients will be easier to derive. The roots of $u$ are the poles of $y$, so that bounds on the roots are also bounds on the poles.
Alternatively take $r_1,r_2$ to be the roots of $ar^2+br+c$ and consider $$u=frac{y-r_1}{y-r_2}implies u'=-a(r_2-r_1)u$$
which allows a direct computation of the solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1) Asking about the positivity of $x$ is the same as asking about the positivity of $y(t)=e^{-A(t)}x(t)$ where $A'=a$. Then $$y'(t)=e^{-A(t)}b(t).$$ Any upper bound for that expression will give some lower bound for the position of a root.
2) You can transform the Riccati equation into a linear ODE of second order by setting $y=-frac{u'}{au}$ with $$u''-frac bau'+cu=0$$ where the recursion formula for the power series coefficients will be easier to derive. The roots of $u$ are the poles of $y$, so that bounds on the roots are also bounds on the poles.
Alternatively take $r_1,r_2$ to be the roots of $ar^2+br+c$ and consider $$u=frac{y-r_1}{y-r_2}implies u'=-a(r_2-r_1)u$$
which allows a direct computation of the solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1) Asking about the positivity of $x$ is the same as asking about the positivity of $y(t)=e^{-A(t)}x(t)$ where $A'=a$. Then $$y'(t)=e^{-A(t)}b(t).$$ Any upper bound for that expression will give some lower bound for the position of a root.
2) You can transform the Riccati equation into a linear ODE of second order by setting $y=-frac{u'}{au}$ with $$u''-frac bau'+cu=0$$ where the recursion formula for the power series coefficients will be easier to derive. The roots of $u$ are the poles of $y$, so that bounds on the roots are also bounds on the poles.
Alternatively take $r_1,r_2$ to be the roots of $ar^2+br+c$ and consider $$u=frac{y-r_1}{y-r_2}implies u'=-a(r_2-r_1)u$$
which allows a direct computation of the solution.
$endgroup$
1) Asking about the positivity of $x$ is the same as asking about the positivity of $y(t)=e^{-A(t)}x(t)$ where $A'=a$. Then $$y'(t)=e^{-A(t)}b(t).$$ Any upper bound for that expression will give some lower bound for the position of a root.
2) You can transform the Riccati equation into a linear ODE of second order by setting $y=-frac{u'}{au}$ with $$u''-frac bau'+cu=0$$ where the recursion formula for the power series coefficients will be easier to derive. The roots of $u$ are the poles of $y$, so that bounds on the roots are also bounds on the poles.
Alternatively take $r_1,r_2$ to be the roots of $ar^2+br+c$ and consider $$u=frac{y-r_1}{y-r_2}implies u'=-a(r_2-r_1)u$$
which allows a direct computation of the solution.
answered Dec 10 '18 at 20:12
LutzLLutzL
58.8k42055
58.8k42055
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034302%2ftwo-questions-on-odes-maximum-interval-of-positivity-of-solution-to-linear-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Regarding 1., how would you find the maximum interval without having an explicit expression for $a$ and $b$? What answer are you looking for? In general this interval can be as short as you want, or even infinite
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
If you know $a(t)geqalpha$ and $b(t)geqbeta$ for all $t$, then you can have a lower bound for the interval by comparing with the solution to the ODE $x'(t)=alpha x(t)+beta$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
As for the second question, Federico's comment applies verbatim.
$endgroup$
– Julián Aguirre
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
Similarly, if you have upper bounds for both $a$ and $b$ you can give an upper bound to the maximal interval.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 10 '18 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@JuliánAguirre I don't understand. How do you know that the power series converges?
$endgroup$
– user39756
Dec 10 '18 at 18:50