Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
New contributor
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
Mar 27 at 10:10
add a comment |
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
New contributor
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
debian repository
New contributor
New contributor
edited Mar 26 at 13:59
GAD3R
27.7k1958114
27.7k1958114
New contributor
asked Mar 26 at 12:39
user12345user12345
311124
311124
New contributor
New contributor
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
Mar 27 at 10:10
add a comment |
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
Mar 27 at 10:10
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
Mar 27 at 10:10
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
Mar 27 at 10:10
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
Mar 27 at 14:45
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
Mar 27 at 22:19
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
Mar 28 at 15:57
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
Mar 28 at 16:31
1
Here is an updated version of yoursed
command that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
Mar 29 at 0:26
|
show 1 more comment
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
Mar 27 at 2:53
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
add a comment |
protected by Jeff Schaller♦ Mar 27 at 13:01
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
edited Mar 27 at 20:58
answered Mar 26 at 12:48
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
179k24406484
179k24406484
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.
jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still on security.debian.org
.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.
jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still on security.debian.org
.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided on
security.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, so jessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes for jessie-backports
.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
@Ian no, security updates are provided on
security.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, so jessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes for jessie-backports
.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
2
Have found that subsequent
apt
commands also seem to require -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
Have found that subsequent
apt
commands also seem to require -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that in
apt.conf
should work too (see my update).– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
@sumitsu thanks, setting that in
apt.conf
should work too (see my update).– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
Mar 27 at 14:45
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
Mar 27 at 22:19
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
Mar 28 at 15:57
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
Mar 28 at 16:31
1
Here is an updated version of yoursed
command that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
Mar 29 at 0:26
|
show 1 more comment
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
Mar 27 at 14:45
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
Mar 27 at 22:19
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
Mar 28 at 15:57
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
Mar 28 at 16:31
1
Here is an updated version of yoursed
command that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
Mar 29 at 0:26
|
show 1 more comment
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
New contributor
answered Mar 27 at 11:01
henadzithenadzit
2513
2513
New contributor
New contributor
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
Mar 27 at 14:45
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
Mar 27 at 22:19
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
Mar 28 at 15:57
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
Mar 28 at 16:31
1
Here is an updated version of yoursed
command that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
Mar 29 at 0:26
|
show 1 more comment
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
Mar 27 at 14:45
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
Mar 27 at 22:19
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
Mar 28 at 15:57
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
Mar 28 at 16:31
1
Here is an updated version of yoursed
command that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
Mar 29 at 0:26
1
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
Mar 27 at 14:45
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
Mar 27 at 14:45
1
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
Mar 27 at 22:19
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
Mar 27 at 22:19
1
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
Mar 28 at 15:57
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
Mar 28 at 15:57
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
Mar 28 at 16:31
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
Mar 28 at 16:31
1
1
Here is an updated version of your
sed
command that did the trick for me: sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
Mar 29 at 0:26
Here is an updated version of your
sed
command that did the trick for me: sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
Mar 29 at 0:26
|
show 1 more comment
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
Mar 27 at 2:53
add a comment |
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
Mar 27 at 2:53
add a comment |
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
edited Mar 27 at 3:05
New contributor
answered Mar 26 at 21:38
inostiainostia
1814
1814
New contributor
New contributor
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
Mar 27 at 2:53
add a comment |
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
Mar 27 at 2:53
1
1
it didn't work when i only included
[check-valid-until=no]
in jessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the -o
flag when running apt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from *.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including -o
when running apt.– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
it didn't work when i only included
[check-valid-until=no]
in jessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the -o
flag when running apt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from *.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including -o
when running apt.– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the
-o
flag issue if you set it in apt.conf
– inostia
Mar 27 at 2:53
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the
-o
flag issue if you set it in apt.conf
– inostia
Mar 27 at 2:53
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Mar 26 at 23:40
Glen C.Glen C.
212
212
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by Jeff Schaller♦ Mar 27 at 13:01
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
Mar 27 at 10:10