$min{h(t),1}$ represented as an algebraic expression
$begingroup$
This function just blew my mind, how can it be derived?
$$min,{h(t),1}=frac{h(t)+1-|h(t)-1|}{2}\
h(t)=frac{1}{3}=frac{frac{1}{3}+1-|frac{1}{3}-1|}{2}=frac{frac{4}{3}-frac{2}{3}}{2}=frac{2}{3*2}=frac{1}{3}\
h(t)=2=frac{2+1-|2-1|}{2}=frac{3-1}{2}=1$$
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This function just blew my mind, how can it be derived?
$$min,{h(t),1}=frac{h(t)+1-|h(t)-1|}{2}\
h(t)=frac{1}{3}=frac{frac{1}{3}+1-|frac{1}{3}-1|}{2}=frac{frac{4}{3}-frac{2}{3}}{2}=frac{2}{3*2}=frac{1}{3}\
h(t)=2=frac{2+1-|2-1|}{2}=frac{3-1}{2}=1$$
real-analysis
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Just argue in cases depending on who's bigger. It follows from how the absolute value behaves.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 2:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This function just blew my mind, how can it be derived?
$$min,{h(t),1}=frac{h(t)+1-|h(t)-1|}{2}\
h(t)=frac{1}{3}=frac{frac{1}{3}+1-|frac{1}{3}-1|}{2}=frac{frac{4}{3}-frac{2}{3}}{2}=frac{2}{3*2}=frac{1}{3}\
h(t)=2=frac{2+1-|2-1|}{2}=frac{3-1}{2}=1$$
real-analysis
$endgroup$
This function just blew my mind, how can it be derived?
$$min,{h(t),1}=frac{h(t)+1-|h(t)-1|}{2}\
h(t)=frac{1}{3}=frac{frac{1}{3}+1-|frac{1}{3}-1|}{2}=frac{frac{4}{3}-frac{2}{3}}{2}=frac{2}{3*2}=frac{1}{3}\
h(t)=2=frac{2+1-|2-1|}{2}=frac{3-1}{2}=1$$
real-analysis
real-analysis
edited Dec 19 '18 at 3:00
JimmyK4542
41.3k245107
41.3k245107
asked Dec 19 '18 at 2:51
FrankFrank
17610
17610
1
$begingroup$
Just argue in cases depending on who's bigger. It follows from how the absolute value behaves.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 2:54
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Just argue in cases depending on who's bigger. It follows from how the absolute value behaves.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 2:54
1
1
$begingroup$
Just argue in cases depending on who's bigger. It follows from how the absolute value behaves.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 2:54
$begingroup$
Just argue in cases depending on who's bigger. It follows from how the absolute value behaves.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 2:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Arguing in cases (as Randall suggested in the comments) is the best formal way to go about proving that formula. But if you are looking for a more intuitive way, here is one approach:
Take two real numbers $a$ and $b$. The midpoint between them is at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$. Also, since $|b-a|$ is the distance between $a$ and $b$, both of the numbers $a$ and $b$ are $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$ away from this midpoint. So to get to the smaller of $a$ and $b$, you need to start at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$ and "go backward" by $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. Thus, $min{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} - dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. You can think in a similar manner to see that $max{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} + dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Pretty nice. +1
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 3:19
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045936%2fmin-ht-1-represented-as-an-algebraic-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Arguing in cases (as Randall suggested in the comments) is the best formal way to go about proving that formula. But if you are looking for a more intuitive way, here is one approach:
Take two real numbers $a$ and $b$. The midpoint between them is at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$. Also, since $|b-a|$ is the distance between $a$ and $b$, both of the numbers $a$ and $b$ are $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$ away from this midpoint. So to get to the smaller of $a$ and $b$, you need to start at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$ and "go backward" by $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. Thus, $min{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} - dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. You can think in a similar manner to see that $max{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} + dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Pretty nice. +1
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 3:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Arguing in cases (as Randall suggested in the comments) is the best formal way to go about proving that formula. But if you are looking for a more intuitive way, here is one approach:
Take two real numbers $a$ and $b$. The midpoint between them is at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$. Also, since $|b-a|$ is the distance between $a$ and $b$, both of the numbers $a$ and $b$ are $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$ away from this midpoint. So to get to the smaller of $a$ and $b$, you need to start at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$ and "go backward" by $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. Thus, $min{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} - dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. You can think in a similar manner to see that $max{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} + dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Pretty nice. +1
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 3:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Arguing in cases (as Randall suggested in the comments) is the best formal way to go about proving that formula. But if you are looking for a more intuitive way, here is one approach:
Take two real numbers $a$ and $b$. The midpoint between them is at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$. Also, since $|b-a|$ is the distance between $a$ and $b$, both of the numbers $a$ and $b$ are $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$ away from this midpoint. So to get to the smaller of $a$ and $b$, you need to start at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$ and "go backward" by $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. Thus, $min{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} - dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. You can think in a similar manner to see that $max{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} + dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$.
$endgroup$
Arguing in cases (as Randall suggested in the comments) is the best formal way to go about proving that formula. But if you are looking for a more intuitive way, here is one approach:
Take two real numbers $a$ and $b$. The midpoint between them is at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$. Also, since $|b-a|$ is the distance between $a$ and $b$, both of the numbers $a$ and $b$ are $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$ away from this midpoint. So to get to the smaller of $a$ and $b$, you need to start at $dfrac{a+b}{2}$ and "go backward" by $dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. Thus, $min{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} - dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$. You can think in a similar manner to see that $max{a,b} = dfrac{a+b}{2} + dfrac{|b-a|}{2}$.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 2:58
JimmyK4542JimmyK4542
41.3k245107
41.3k245107
$begingroup$
Pretty nice. +1
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 3:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pretty nice. +1
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 3:19
$begingroup$
Pretty nice. +1
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 3:19
$begingroup$
Pretty nice. +1
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 3:19
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045936%2fmin-ht-1-represented-as-an-algebraic-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Just argue in cases depending on who's bigger. It follows from how the absolute value behaves.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 19 '18 at 2:54