How to use the chain rule for change of variable
$begingroup$
I have asked this questions: Change of variables in differential equation?
...but after thinking about it, I am still a little confused of how to rigorously use the chain rule to calculate the derivative(s) of a function for a change of variable.
I have the following derivative:
$f(x) = frac{dw(x)}{dx}$
Now I introduce the change of variable: $hat{x}=frac{x}{L}$
and I apply the chain rule:
- I write: $g(hat{x}) = L hat{x} = x$
- I substitute: $f(g(hat{x})) = frac{dw(g(hat{x}))}{d(g(hat{x}))}$
...but this does not help me... I am confusing something.
I would be glad, if someone could show me in detail and step by step how to do this rigorously.
Thanks a lot.
derivatives chain-rule
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have asked this questions: Change of variables in differential equation?
...but after thinking about it, I am still a little confused of how to rigorously use the chain rule to calculate the derivative(s) of a function for a change of variable.
I have the following derivative:
$f(x) = frac{dw(x)}{dx}$
Now I introduce the change of variable: $hat{x}=frac{x}{L}$
and I apply the chain rule:
- I write: $g(hat{x}) = L hat{x} = x$
- I substitute: $f(g(hat{x})) = frac{dw(g(hat{x}))}{d(g(hat{x}))}$
...but this does not help me... I am confusing something.
I would be glad, if someone could show me in detail and step by step how to do this rigorously.
Thanks a lot.
derivatives chain-rule
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have asked this questions: Change of variables in differential equation?
...but after thinking about it, I am still a little confused of how to rigorously use the chain rule to calculate the derivative(s) of a function for a change of variable.
I have the following derivative:
$f(x) = frac{dw(x)}{dx}$
Now I introduce the change of variable: $hat{x}=frac{x}{L}$
and I apply the chain rule:
- I write: $g(hat{x}) = L hat{x} = x$
- I substitute: $f(g(hat{x})) = frac{dw(g(hat{x}))}{d(g(hat{x}))}$
...but this does not help me... I am confusing something.
I would be glad, if someone could show me in detail and step by step how to do this rigorously.
Thanks a lot.
derivatives chain-rule
$endgroup$
I have asked this questions: Change of variables in differential equation?
...but after thinking about it, I am still a little confused of how to rigorously use the chain rule to calculate the derivative(s) of a function for a change of variable.
I have the following derivative:
$f(x) = frac{dw(x)}{dx}$
Now I introduce the change of variable: $hat{x}=frac{x}{L}$
and I apply the chain rule:
- I write: $g(hat{x}) = L hat{x} = x$
- I substitute: $f(g(hat{x})) = frac{dw(g(hat{x}))}{d(g(hat{x}))}$
...but this does not help me... I am confusing something.
I would be glad, if someone could show me in detail and step by step how to do this rigorously.
Thanks a lot.
derivatives chain-rule
derivatives chain-rule
asked Dec 15 '18 at 9:02
jamesjames
15110
15110
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let's say you want to change $x$ for $y$, where $y$ is a function of $x$, i.e., $y=g(x)$. I will use $y$ for the nondimensional variable because it's way easier to type in my phone. The chain rule tells us that if we want to calculate the derivative
$$frac{df}{dx}$$
in terms of $y$, we need to use the formula
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dy}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
The $dy/dx$ part is equal to $dg(x)/dx$, therefore,
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dg(x)}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
See that it works for any possible change of variables. In your particular case, $g(x)=x/L$ and $dg/dx=1/L$. Therefore, we have
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$$
It leads to
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(g^{-1}(y)),$$
in which $g^{-1}(y)=Ly$. Finally:
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(Ly).$$
It's up to you to show that this equation is dimensionally consistent. Remember: $L$ has the same dimension of $x$ and $y$ is nondimensional. Let me know if you have any question.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Many thnaks for your answer. There is one thing that I don't understand, if I take $frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$ and I know that $frac{df}{dy} = Lw(Ly)$, then the final result is: $frac{df}{dx} = w(Ly)$... ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 15 '18 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@james You are right, but I can't see how this is useful. In general, one has the dimensional form of an equation and then obtains the nondimensional form of it. It's useful then to have "consistency" the variables, in the sense that you use only $x$ or only $y$; since they mean the same thing (say, the dimensional and nondimensional distance, respectively), you won't want to mix them. Therefore, while $df/dx=w(Ly)$ is true, I think that $df/dy=Lw(Ly)$ is far more useful.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 15 '18 at 23:55
$begingroup$
I see. Okay, so if I apply the change of variable to the following integral $int _ { - frac { L } { 2 } } ^ { frac { L} { 2 } } w ^ { prime } ( x ) ^ { 2 } d x$, I would get: $int _ { - frac { 1 } { 2 } } ^ { frac { 1} { 2 } } frac{1}{L^2} w ^ { prime } ( Lhat{x} ) ^ { 2 } L d hat{x}$, right ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 9:12
$begingroup$
@james Precisely!
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 16 '18 at 10:46
$begingroup$
Thank you so much for your help !
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 13:28
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040296%2fhow-to-use-the-chain-rule-for-change-of-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let's say you want to change $x$ for $y$, where $y$ is a function of $x$, i.e., $y=g(x)$. I will use $y$ for the nondimensional variable because it's way easier to type in my phone. The chain rule tells us that if we want to calculate the derivative
$$frac{df}{dx}$$
in terms of $y$, we need to use the formula
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dy}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
The $dy/dx$ part is equal to $dg(x)/dx$, therefore,
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dg(x)}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
See that it works for any possible change of variables. In your particular case, $g(x)=x/L$ and $dg/dx=1/L$. Therefore, we have
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$$
It leads to
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(g^{-1}(y)),$$
in which $g^{-1}(y)=Ly$. Finally:
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(Ly).$$
It's up to you to show that this equation is dimensionally consistent. Remember: $L$ has the same dimension of $x$ and $y$ is nondimensional. Let me know if you have any question.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Many thnaks for your answer. There is one thing that I don't understand, if I take $frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$ and I know that $frac{df}{dy} = Lw(Ly)$, then the final result is: $frac{df}{dx} = w(Ly)$... ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 15 '18 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@james You are right, but I can't see how this is useful. In general, one has the dimensional form of an equation and then obtains the nondimensional form of it. It's useful then to have "consistency" the variables, in the sense that you use only $x$ or only $y$; since they mean the same thing (say, the dimensional and nondimensional distance, respectively), you won't want to mix them. Therefore, while $df/dx=w(Ly)$ is true, I think that $df/dy=Lw(Ly)$ is far more useful.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 15 '18 at 23:55
$begingroup$
I see. Okay, so if I apply the change of variable to the following integral $int _ { - frac { L } { 2 } } ^ { frac { L} { 2 } } w ^ { prime } ( x ) ^ { 2 } d x$, I would get: $int _ { - frac { 1 } { 2 } } ^ { frac { 1} { 2 } } frac{1}{L^2} w ^ { prime } ( Lhat{x} ) ^ { 2 } L d hat{x}$, right ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 9:12
$begingroup$
@james Precisely!
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 16 '18 at 10:46
$begingroup$
Thank you so much for your help !
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 13:28
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Let's say you want to change $x$ for $y$, where $y$ is a function of $x$, i.e., $y=g(x)$. I will use $y$ for the nondimensional variable because it's way easier to type in my phone. The chain rule tells us that if we want to calculate the derivative
$$frac{df}{dx}$$
in terms of $y$, we need to use the formula
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dy}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
The $dy/dx$ part is equal to $dg(x)/dx$, therefore,
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dg(x)}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
See that it works for any possible change of variables. In your particular case, $g(x)=x/L$ and $dg/dx=1/L$. Therefore, we have
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$$
It leads to
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(g^{-1}(y)),$$
in which $g^{-1}(y)=Ly$. Finally:
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(Ly).$$
It's up to you to show that this equation is dimensionally consistent. Remember: $L$ has the same dimension of $x$ and $y$ is nondimensional. Let me know if you have any question.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Many thnaks for your answer. There is one thing that I don't understand, if I take $frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$ and I know that $frac{df}{dy} = Lw(Ly)$, then the final result is: $frac{df}{dx} = w(Ly)$... ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 15 '18 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@james You are right, but I can't see how this is useful. In general, one has the dimensional form of an equation and then obtains the nondimensional form of it. It's useful then to have "consistency" the variables, in the sense that you use only $x$ or only $y$; since they mean the same thing (say, the dimensional and nondimensional distance, respectively), you won't want to mix them. Therefore, while $df/dx=w(Ly)$ is true, I think that $df/dy=Lw(Ly)$ is far more useful.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 15 '18 at 23:55
$begingroup$
I see. Okay, so if I apply the change of variable to the following integral $int _ { - frac { L } { 2 } } ^ { frac { L} { 2 } } w ^ { prime } ( x ) ^ { 2 } d x$, I would get: $int _ { - frac { 1 } { 2 } } ^ { frac { 1} { 2 } } frac{1}{L^2} w ^ { prime } ( Lhat{x} ) ^ { 2 } L d hat{x}$, right ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 9:12
$begingroup$
@james Precisely!
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 16 '18 at 10:46
$begingroup$
Thank you so much for your help !
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 13:28
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Let's say you want to change $x$ for $y$, where $y$ is a function of $x$, i.e., $y=g(x)$. I will use $y$ for the nondimensional variable because it's way easier to type in my phone. The chain rule tells us that if we want to calculate the derivative
$$frac{df}{dx}$$
in terms of $y$, we need to use the formula
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dy}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
The $dy/dx$ part is equal to $dg(x)/dx$, therefore,
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dg(x)}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
See that it works for any possible change of variables. In your particular case, $g(x)=x/L$ and $dg/dx=1/L$. Therefore, we have
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$$
It leads to
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(g^{-1}(y)),$$
in which $g^{-1}(y)=Ly$. Finally:
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(Ly).$$
It's up to you to show that this equation is dimensionally consistent. Remember: $L$ has the same dimension of $x$ and $y$ is nondimensional. Let me know if you have any question.
$endgroup$
Let's say you want to change $x$ for $y$, where $y$ is a function of $x$, i.e., $y=g(x)$. I will use $y$ for the nondimensional variable because it's way easier to type in my phone. The chain rule tells us that if we want to calculate the derivative
$$frac{df}{dx}$$
in terms of $y$, we need to use the formula
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dy}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
The $dy/dx$ part is equal to $dg(x)/dx$, therefore,
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{dg(x)}{dx}frac{df}{dy}.$$
See that it works for any possible change of variables. In your particular case, $g(x)=x/L$ and $dg/dx=1/L$. Therefore, we have
$$frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$$
It leads to
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(g^{-1}(y)),$$
in which $g^{-1}(y)=Ly$. Finally:
$$frac{df}{dy}=Lw(Ly).$$
It's up to you to show that this equation is dimensionally consistent. Remember: $L$ has the same dimension of $x$ and $y$ is nondimensional. Let me know if you have any question.
answered Dec 15 '18 at 19:46
rafa11111rafa11111
1,1712417
1,1712417
$begingroup$
Many thnaks for your answer. There is one thing that I don't understand, if I take $frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$ and I know that $frac{df}{dy} = Lw(Ly)$, then the final result is: $frac{df}{dx} = w(Ly)$... ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 15 '18 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@james You are right, but I can't see how this is useful. In general, one has the dimensional form of an equation and then obtains the nondimensional form of it. It's useful then to have "consistency" the variables, in the sense that you use only $x$ or only $y$; since they mean the same thing (say, the dimensional and nondimensional distance, respectively), you won't want to mix them. Therefore, while $df/dx=w(Ly)$ is true, I think that $df/dy=Lw(Ly)$ is far more useful.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 15 '18 at 23:55
$begingroup$
I see. Okay, so if I apply the change of variable to the following integral $int _ { - frac { L } { 2 } } ^ { frac { L} { 2 } } w ^ { prime } ( x ) ^ { 2 } d x$, I would get: $int _ { - frac { 1 } { 2 } } ^ { frac { 1} { 2 } } frac{1}{L^2} w ^ { prime } ( Lhat{x} ) ^ { 2 } L d hat{x}$, right ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 9:12
$begingroup$
@james Precisely!
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 16 '18 at 10:46
$begingroup$
Thank you so much for your help !
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 13:28
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Many thnaks for your answer. There is one thing that I don't understand, if I take $frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$ and I know that $frac{df}{dy} = Lw(Ly)$, then the final result is: $frac{df}{dx} = w(Ly)$... ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 15 '18 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@james You are right, but I can't see how this is useful. In general, one has the dimensional form of an equation and then obtains the nondimensional form of it. It's useful then to have "consistency" the variables, in the sense that you use only $x$ or only $y$; since they mean the same thing (say, the dimensional and nondimensional distance, respectively), you won't want to mix them. Therefore, while $df/dx=w(Ly)$ is true, I think that $df/dy=Lw(Ly)$ is far more useful.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 15 '18 at 23:55
$begingroup$
I see. Okay, so if I apply the change of variable to the following integral $int _ { - frac { L } { 2 } } ^ { frac { L} { 2 } } w ^ { prime } ( x ) ^ { 2 } d x$, I would get: $int _ { - frac { 1 } { 2 } } ^ { frac { 1} { 2 } } frac{1}{L^2} w ^ { prime } ( Lhat{x} ) ^ { 2 } L d hat{x}$, right ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 9:12
$begingroup$
@james Precisely!
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 16 '18 at 10:46
$begingroup$
Thank you so much for your help !
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Many thnaks for your answer. There is one thing that I don't understand, if I take $frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$ and I know that $frac{df}{dy} = Lw(Ly)$, then the final result is: $frac{df}{dx} = w(Ly)$... ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 15 '18 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Many thnaks for your answer. There is one thing that I don't understand, if I take $frac{df}{dx}=frac{1}{L}frac{df}{dy}.$ and I know that $frac{df}{dy} = Lw(Ly)$, then the final result is: $frac{df}{dx} = w(Ly)$... ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 15 '18 at 21:03
$begingroup$
@james You are right, but I can't see how this is useful. In general, one has the dimensional form of an equation and then obtains the nondimensional form of it. It's useful then to have "consistency" the variables, in the sense that you use only $x$ or only $y$; since they mean the same thing (say, the dimensional and nondimensional distance, respectively), you won't want to mix them. Therefore, while $df/dx=w(Ly)$ is true, I think that $df/dy=Lw(Ly)$ is far more useful.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 15 '18 at 23:55
$begingroup$
@james You are right, but I can't see how this is useful. In general, one has the dimensional form of an equation and then obtains the nondimensional form of it. It's useful then to have "consistency" the variables, in the sense that you use only $x$ or only $y$; since they mean the same thing (say, the dimensional and nondimensional distance, respectively), you won't want to mix them. Therefore, while $df/dx=w(Ly)$ is true, I think that $df/dy=Lw(Ly)$ is far more useful.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 15 '18 at 23:55
$begingroup$
I see. Okay, so if I apply the change of variable to the following integral $int _ { - frac { L } { 2 } } ^ { frac { L} { 2 } } w ^ { prime } ( x ) ^ { 2 } d x$, I would get: $int _ { - frac { 1 } { 2 } } ^ { frac { 1} { 2 } } frac{1}{L^2} w ^ { prime } ( Lhat{x} ) ^ { 2 } L d hat{x}$, right ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 9:12
$begingroup$
I see. Okay, so if I apply the change of variable to the following integral $int _ { - frac { L } { 2 } } ^ { frac { L} { 2 } } w ^ { prime } ( x ) ^ { 2 } d x$, I would get: $int _ { - frac { 1 } { 2 } } ^ { frac { 1} { 2 } } frac{1}{L^2} w ^ { prime } ( Lhat{x} ) ^ { 2 } L d hat{x}$, right ?
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 9:12
$begingroup$
@james Precisely!
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 16 '18 at 10:46
$begingroup$
@james Precisely!
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Dec 16 '18 at 10:46
$begingroup$
Thank you so much for your help !
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 13:28
$begingroup$
Thank you so much for your help !
$endgroup$
– james
Dec 16 '18 at 13:28
|
show 4 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040296%2fhow-to-use-the-chain-rule-for-change-of-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown