Is a polynomial $f$ zero at $(a_1,ldots,a_n)$ iff $f$ lies in the ideal $(X_1-a_1,ldots,X_n-a_n)$?












4












$begingroup$


This is probably a very silly question:



If $R$ is an arbitrary commutative ring with unit and $fin R[X]$ a polynomial, then for any element $ain R$ we have
$$f(a)=0 Longleftrightarrow X-a ~mbox{ divides }~ f Longleftrightarrow fin (X-a)$$
where the last equivalence is clear. The first is probably a little surprising as $R[X]$ is usually not euclidean and it is perhaps not clear how to divide by $X-a$.




Now let $fin R[X_1,ldots, X_n]$ be a polynomial. How can I see for an element $(a_1,ldots,a_n)in R^n$ that
$$f(a_1,ldots,a_n)=0 Longleftrightarrow fin (X_1-a_1,ldots,X_n-a_n) ?$$
If this does not work in general, let $R=K$ be a field.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    This is probably a very silly question:



    If $R$ is an arbitrary commutative ring with unit and $fin R[X]$ a polynomial, then for any element $ain R$ we have
    $$f(a)=0 Longleftrightarrow X-a ~mbox{ divides }~ f Longleftrightarrow fin (X-a)$$
    where the last equivalence is clear. The first is probably a little surprising as $R[X]$ is usually not euclidean and it is perhaps not clear how to divide by $X-a$.




    Now let $fin R[X_1,ldots, X_n]$ be a polynomial. How can I see for an element $(a_1,ldots,a_n)in R^n$ that
    $$f(a_1,ldots,a_n)=0 Longleftrightarrow fin (X_1-a_1,ldots,X_n-a_n) ?$$
    If this does not work in general, let $R=K$ be a field.











    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      This is probably a very silly question:



      If $R$ is an arbitrary commutative ring with unit and $fin R[X]$ a polynomial, then for any element $ain R$ we have
      $$f(a)=0 Longleftrightarrow X-a ~mbox{ divides }~ f Longleftrightarrow fin (X-a)$$
      where the last equivalence is clear. The first is probably a little surprising as $R[X]$ is usually not euclidean and it is perhaps not clear how to divide by $X-a$.




      Now let $fin R[X_1,ldots, X_n]$ be a polynomial. How can I see for an element $(a_1,ldots,a_n)in R^n$ that
      $$f(a_1,ldots,a_n)=0 Longleftrightarrow fin (X_1-a_1,ldots,X_n-a_n) ?$$
      If this does not work in general, let $R=K$ be a field.











      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      This is probably a very silly question:



      If $R$ is an arbitrary commutative ring with unit and $fin R[X]$ a polynomial, then for any element $ain R$ we have
      $$f(a)=0 Longleftrightarrow X-a ~mbox{ divides }~ f Longleftrightarrow fin (X-a)$$
      where the last equivalence is clear. The first is probably a little surprising as $R[X]$ is usually not euclidean and it is perhaps not clear how to divide by $X-a$.




      Now let $fin R[X_1,ldots, X_n]$ be a polynomial. How can I see for an element $(a_1,ldots,a_n)in R^n$ that
      $$f(a_1,ldots,a_n)=0 Longleftrightarrow fin (X_1-a_1,ldots,X_n-a_n) ?$$
      If this does not work in general, let $R=K$ be a field.








      abstract-algebra polynomials ideals roots






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 1 '17 at 17:49









      coproc

      977514




      977514










      asked Jul 7 '15 at 13:54









      user8463524user8463524

      577315




      577315






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Yes. Another way to see this is by the following:



          We can assume without loss of generality that $X_n$ appears in $f$. Then $$f=varphi_0+varphi_1X_n+cdots + varphi_kX_n^k$$
          for some $varphiin R[X_1,...,X_{n-1}]$ with $varphi_k(a_1,..,a_{n-1})neq 0$. This reduces to the case you are okay with!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            4












            $begingroup$

            Consider the case of $(a_1,ldots,a_n)=(0,ldots,0)$ first, where it's obvious. Then observe that
            $$f(a_1,ldots,a_n)=0iff g(0,ldots,0)=0$$
            and
            $$fin (x_1-a_1,ldots,x_n-a_n)iff gin (x_1,ldots,x_n)$$
            where
            $$g(x_1,ldots,x_n)=f(x_1+a_1,ldots,x_n+a_n)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1352606%2fis-a-polynomial-f-zero-at-a-1-ldots-a-n-iff-f-lies-in-the-ideal-x-1-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              Yes. Another way to see this is by the following:



              We can assume without loss of generality that $X_n$ appears in $f$. Then $$f=varphi_0+varphi_1X_n+cdots + varphi_kX_n^k$$
              for some $varphiin R[X_1,...,X_{n-1}]$ with $varphi_k(a_1,..,a_{n-1})neq 0$. This reduces to the case you are okay with!






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Yes. Another way to see this is by the following:



                We can assume without loss of generality that $X_n$ appears in $f$. Then $$f=varphi_0+varphi_1X_n+cdots + varphi_kX_n^k$$
                for some $varphiin R[X_1,...,X_{n-1}]$ with $varphi_k(a_1,..,a_{n-1})neq 0$. This reduces to the case you are okay with!






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Yes. Another way to see this is by the following:



                  We can assume without loss of generality that $X_n$ appears in $f$. Then $$f=varphi_0+varphi_1X_n+cdots + varphi_kX_n^k$$
                  for some $varphiin R[X_1,...,X_{n-1}]$ with $varphi_k(a_1,..,a_{n-1})neq 0$. This reduces to the case you are okay with!






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Yes. Another way to see this is by the following:



                  We can assume without loss of generality that $X_n$ appears in $f$. Then $$f=varphi_0+varphi_1X_n+cdots + varphi_kX_n^k$$
                  for some $varphiin R[X_1,...,X_{n-1}]$ with $varphi_k(a_1,..,a_{n-1})neq 0$. This reduces to the case you are okay with!







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 18 '18 at 20:39

























                  answered Jul 7 '15 at 14:10









                  EoinEoin

                  4,5211927




                  4,5211927























                      4












                      $begingroup$

                      Consider the case of $(a_1,ldots,a_n)=(0,ldots,0)$ first, where it's obvious. Then observe that
                      $$f(a_1,ldots,a_n)=0iff g(0,ldots,0)=0$$
                      and
                      $$fin (x_1-a_1,ldots,x_n-a_n)iff gin (x_1,ldots,x_n)$$
                      where
                      $$g(x_1,ldots,x_n)=f(x_1+a_1,ldots,x_n+a_n)$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        4












                        $begingroup$

                        Consider the case of $(a_1,ldots,a_n)=(0,ldots,0)$ first, where it's obvious. Then observe that
                        $$f(a_1,ldots,a_n)=0iff g(0,ldots,0)=0$$
                        and
                        $$fin (x_1-a_1,ldots,x_n-a_n)iff gin (x_1,ldots,x_n)$$
                        where
                        $$g(x_1,ldots,x_n)=f(x_1+a_1,ldots,x_n+a_n)$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          4












                          4








                          4





                          $begingroup$

                          Consider the case of $(a_1,ldots,a_n)=(0,ldots,0)$ first, where it's obvious. Then observe that
                          $$f(a_1,ldots,a_n)=0iff g(0,ldots,0)=0$$
                          and
                          $$fin (x_1-a_1,ldots,x_n-a_n)iff gin (x_1,ldots,x_n)$$
                          where
                          $$g(x_1,ldots,x_n)=f(x_1+a_1,ldots,x_n+a_n)$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Consider the case of $(a_1,ldots,a_n)=(0,ldots,0)$ first, where it's obvious. Then observe that
                          $$f(a_1,ldots,a_n)=0iff g(0,ldots,0)=0$$
                          and
                          $$fin (x_1-a_1,ldots,x_n-a_n)iff gin (x_1,ldots,x_n)$$
                          where
                          $$g(x_1,ldots,x_n)=f(x_1+a_1,ldots,x_n+a_n)$$







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jul 7 '15 at 14:02









                          Zev ChonolesZev Chonoles

                          110k16231430




                          110k16231430






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1352606%2fis-a-polynomial-f-zero-at-a-1-ldots-a-n-iff-f-lies-in-the-ideal-x-1-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Plaza Victoria

                              In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                              How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...