Is $sum _{n=1} ^ infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2 cdot n^2 }$ uniformly convergent on $(-pi , pi)$?












2












$begingroup$



Is this series uniformly convergent on $(-pi , pi)$:
$$sum _{n=1} ^ infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2 cdot n^2 },?$$




My Attempt:



If the series were convergent we would have got a natural number $k$ for a fixed $epsilon>0$ such that $sum _{n=k} ^ infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2 cdot n^2 } < epsilon$ for all $x in (-pi , pi)$. But for this case we will get the term $f_n$ in the summation greater than $1$ for $-pi + 1/n$.
So for every $n$ we will get a $xin (-pi , pi) $ such that summation at $x$ is greater than $1$.



That's why the series is not uniformly convergent on $(-pi , pi)$.



Can somebody please tell me if I have gone wrong anywhere?






real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis convergence uniform-convergence







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Edited. Now is it okay? @Winther
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:36










  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean uniformly continuous?
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:37










  • $begingroup$
    no convergent..@MostafaAyaz
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:40
















2












$begingroup$



Is this series uniformly convergent on $(-pi , pi)$:
$$sum _{n=1} ^ infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2 cdot n^2 },?$$




My Attempt:



If the series were convergent we would have got a natural number $k$ for a fixed $epsilon>0$ such that $sum _{n=k} ^ infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2 cdot n^2 } < epsilon$ for all $x in (-pi , pi)$. But for this case we will get the term $f_n$ in the summation greater than $1$ for $-pi + 1/n$.
So for every $n$ we will get a $xin (-pi , pi) $ such that summation at $x$ is greater than $1$.



That's why the series is not uniformly convergent on $(-pi , pi)$.



Can somebody please tell me if I have gone wrong anywhere?






real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis convergence uniform-convergence







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Edited. Now is it okay? @Winther
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:36










  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean uniformly continuous?
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:37










  • $begingroup$
    no convergent..@MostafaAyaz
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:40














2












2








2





$begingroup$



Is this series uniformly convergent on $(-pi , pi)$:
$$sum _{n=1} ^ infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2 cdot n^2 },?$$




My Attempt:



If the series were convergent we would have got a natural number $k$ for a fixed $epsilon>0$ such that $sum _{n=k} ^ infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2 cdot n^2 } < epsilon$ for all $x in (-pi , pi)$. But for this case we will get the term $f_n$ in the summation greater than $1$ for $-pi + 1/n$.
So for every $n$ we will get a $xin (-pi , pi) $ such that summation at $x$ is greater than $1$.



That's why the series is not uniformly convergent on $(-pi , pi)$.



Can somebody please tell me if I have gone wrong anywhere?






real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis convergence uniform-convergence







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Is this series uniformly convergent on $(-pi , pi)$:
$$sum _{n=1} ^ infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2 cdot n^2 },?$$




My Attempt:



If the series were convergent we would have got a natural number $k$ for a fixed $epsilon>0$ such that $sum _{n=k} ^ infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2 cdot n^2 } < epsilon$ for all $x in (-pi , pi)$. But for this case we will get the term $f_n$ in the summation greater than $1$ for $-pi + 1/n$.
So for every $n$ we will get a $xin (-pi , pi) $ such that summation at $x$ is greater than $1$.



That's why the series is not uniformly convergent on $(-pi , pi)$.



Can somebody please tell me if I have gone wrong anywhere?






real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis convergence uniform-convergence




real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis convergence uniform-convergence






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 14 '18 at 21:00









Batominovski

33.1k33293




33.1k33293










asked Dec 14 '18 at 20:27









cmicmi

1,120312




1,120312












  • $begingroup$
    Edited. Now is it okay? @Winther
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:36










  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean uniformly continuous?
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:37










  • $begingroup$
    no convergent..@MostafaAyaz
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:40


















  • $begingroup$
    Edited. Now is it okay? @Winther
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:36










  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean uniformly continuous?
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:37










  • $begingroup$
    no convergent..@MostafaAyaz
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:40
















$begingroup$
Edited. Now is it okay? @Winther
$endgroup$
– cmi
Dec 14 '18 at 20:36




$begingroup$
Edited. Now is it okay? @Winther
$endgroup$
– cmi
Dec 14 '18 at 20:36












$begingroup$
Do you mean uniformly continuous?
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Dec 14 '18 at 20:37




$begingroup$
Do you mean uniformly continuous?
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Dec 14 '18 at 20:37












$begingroup$
no convergent..@MostafaAyaz
$endgroup$
– cmi
Dec 14 '18 at 20:40




$begingroup$
no convergent..@MostafaAyaz
$endgroup$
– cmi
Dec 14 '18 at 20:40










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If a series uniformly converges, then its summands must approach zero uniformly.



Clearly, the summands do not converge uniformly to $0$.



To see this, take $epsilon=1$.



Then, for all $N$, take any $n>N$ and $x=-pi +frac1n$ and find that



$$left|frac{1}{left(x+piright)^2 n^2}right|=left|frac{1}{left(-pi+frac1n+piright)^2 n^2}right|=1$$



This negates the uniform convergence of the summand $frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}$. And we are done!




If one does not wish to rely on the aforementioned requirement for a series to converge uniformly, then we can proceed brute force as follows.



With $epsilon=1$, we have for all $N>1$



$$begin{align}
left|sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2} right|&=sum_{n=N+1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}\\
&ge frac1{(x+pi)^2(N+1)^2}\\
&ge1
end{align}$$



whenever $x= -pi+frac1{ N+1}$. And we are done!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine. Can you please check mine? @Mark Viola
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 15 '18 at 4:32










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is flawed. The summation index is a dummy index. So, your saying $x=-pi +1/n$ makes no sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 15 '18 at 14:59



















2












$begingroup$

Your answer is correct. The series isn't uniformly convergent.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The OP's reasoning is flawed. Hence, your statement "Your answer is correct," is misleading, at best.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:37











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039847%2fis-sum-n-1-infty-frac1x-pi2-cdot-n2-uniformly-convergent-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

If a series uniformly converges, then its summands must approach zero uniformly.



Clearly, the summands do not converge uniformly to $0$.



To see this, take $epsilon=1$.



Then, for all $N$, take any $n>N$ and $x=-pi +frac1n$ and find that



$$left|frac{1}{left(x+piright)^2 n^2}right|=left|frac{1}{left(-pi+frac1n+piright)^2 n^2}right|=1$$



This negates the uniform convergence of the summand $frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}$. And we are done!




If one does not wish to rely on the aforementioned requirement for a series to converge uniformly, then we can proceed brute force as follows.



With $epsilon=1$, we have for all $N>1$



$$begin{align}
left|sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2} right|&=sum_{n=N+1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}\\
&ge frac1{(x+pi)^2(N+1)^2}\\
&ge1
end{align}$$



whenever $x= -pi+frac1{ N+1}$. And we are done!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine. Can you please check mine? @Mark Viola
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 15 '18 at 4:32










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is flawed. The summation index is a dummy index. So, your saying $x=-pi +1/n$ makes no sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 15 '18 at 14:59
















2












$begingroup$

If a series uniformly converges, then its summands must approach zero uniformly.



Clearly, the summands do not converge uniformly to $0$.



To see this, take $epsilon=1$.



Then, for all $N$, take any $n>N$ and $x=-pi +frac1n$ and find that



$$left|frac{1}{left(x+piright)^2 n^2}right|=left|frac{1}{left(-pi+frac1n+piright)^2 n^2}right|=1$$



This negates the uniform convergence of the summand $frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}$. And we are done!




If one does not wish to rely on the aforementioned requirement for a series to converge uniformly, then we can proceed brute force as follows.



With $epsilon=1$, we have for all $N>1$



$$begin{align}
left|sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2} right|&=sum_{n=N+1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}\\
&ge frac1{(x+pi)^2(N+1)^2}\\
&ge1
end{align}$$



whenever $x= -pi+frac1{ N+1}$. And we are done!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine. Can you please check mine? @Mark Viola
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 15 '18 at 4:32










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is flawed. The summation index is a dummy index. So, your saying $x=-pi +1/n$ makes no sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 15 '18 at 14:59














2












2








2





$begingroup$

If a series uniformly converges, then its summands must approach zero uniformly.



Clearly, the summands do not converge uniformly to $0$.



To see this, take $epsilon=1$.



Then, for all $N$, take any $n>N$ and $x=-pi +frac1n$ and find that



$$left|frac{1}{left(x+piright)^2 n^2}right|=left|frac{1}{left(-pi+frac1n+piright)^2 n^2}right|=1$$



This negates the uniform convergence of the summand $frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}$. And we are done!




If one does not wish to rely on the aforementioned requirement for a series to converge uniformly, then we can proceed brute force as follows.



With $epsilon=1$, we have for all $N>1$



$$begin{align}
left|sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2} right|&=sum_{n=N+1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}\\
&ge frac1{(x+pi)^2(N+1)^2}\\
&ge1
end{align}$$



whenever $x= -pi+frac1{ N+1}$. And we are done!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



If a series uniformly converges, then its summands must approach zero uniformly.



Clearly, the summands do not converge uniformly to $0$.



To see this, take $epsilon=1$.



Then, for all $N$, take any $n>N$ and $x=-pi +frac1n$ and find that



$$left|frac{1}{left(x+piright)^2 n^2}right|=left|frac{1}{left(-pi+frac1n+piright)^2 n^2}right|=1$$



This negates the uniform convergence of the summand $frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}$. And we are done!




If one does not wish to rely on the aforementioned requirement for a series to converge uniformly, then we can proceed brute force as follows.



With $epsilon=1$, we have for all $N>1$



$$begin{align}
left|sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^N frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2} right|&=sum_{n=N+1}^infty frac{1}{(x+pi)^2n^2}\\
&ge frac1{(x+pi)^2(N+1)^2}\\
&ge1
end{align}$$



whenever $x= -pi+frac1{ N+1}$. And we are done!







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 14 '18 at 21:31

























answered Dec 14 '18 at 21:10









Mark ViolaMark Viola

133k1277175




133k1277175












  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine. Can you please check mine? @Mark Viola
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 15 '18 at 4:32










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is flawed. The summation index is a dummy index. So, your saying $x=-pi +1/n$ makes no sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 15 '18 at 14:59


















  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is fine. Can you please check mine? @Mark Viola
    $endgroup$
    – cmi
    Dec 15 '18 at 4:32










  • $begingroup$
    Your solution is flawed. The summation index is a dummy index. So, your saying $x=-pi +1/n$ makes no sense.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 15 '18 at 14:59
















$begingroup$
Your solution is fine. Can you please check mine? @Mark Viola
$endgroup$
– cmi
Dec 15 '18 at 4:32




$begingroup$
Your solution is fine. Can you please check mine? @Mark Viola
$endgroup$
– cmi
Dec 15 '18 at 4:32












$begingroup$
Your solution is flawed. The summation index is a dummy index. So, your saying $x=-pi +1/n$ makes no sense.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 15 '18 at 14:59




$begingroup$
Your solution is flawed. The summation index is a dummy index. So, your saying $x=-pi +1/n$ makes no sense.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 15 '18 at 14:59











2












$begingroup$

Your answer is correct. The series isn't uniformly convergent.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The OP's reasoning is flawed. Hence, your statement "Your answer is correct," is misleading, at best.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:37
















2












$begingroup$

Your answer is correct. The series isn't uniformly convergent.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The OP's reasoning is flawed. Hence, your statement "Your answer is correct," is misleading, at best.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:37














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Your answer is correct. The series isn't uniformly convergent.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Your answer is correct. The series isn't uniformly convergent.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 14 '18 at 22:07









Jam

4,98921431




4,98921431










answered Dec 14 '18 at 20:43









moutheticsmouthetics

51037




51037












  • $begingroup$
    The OP's reasoning is flawed. Hence, your statement "Your answer is correct," is misleading, at best.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:37


















  • $begingroup$
    The OP's reasoning is flawed. Hence, your statement "Your answer is correct," is misleading, at best.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:37
















$begingroup$
The OP's reasoning is flawed. Hence, your statement "Your answer is correct," is misleading, at best.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 16 '18 at 15:37




$begingroup$
The OP's reasoning is flawed. Hence, your statement "Your answer is correct," is misleading, at best.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 16 '18 at 15:37


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039847%2fis-sum-n-1-infty-frac1x-pi2-cdot-n2-uniformly-convergent-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Image
Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
Read more

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
Read more

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

Image
1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
Read more