Product in the category of functors.












2












$begingroup$


Let $A$ be a category and $C= Fun(A, Set)$ (i.e. the objects are functors and morphisms are natural transformations between them). I want to know if this category has a product. For given $X in A$ and functors $F_i in C$, is $Pi_{i in Lambda}F_i(X)$ the correct product? If yes, what would be the projection maps onto the $F_i$'s? I'm having a hard time constructing the required unique natural transformation. Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $A$ be a category and $C= Fun(A, Set)$ (i.e. the objects are functors and morphisms are natural transformations between them). I want to know if this category has a product. For given $X in A$ and functors $F_i in C$, is $Pi_{i in Lambda}F_i(X)$ the correct product? If yes, what would be the projection maps onto the $F_i$'s? I'm having a hard time constructing the required unique natural transformation. Any help is appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Let $A$ be a category and $C= Fun(A, Set)$ (i.e. the objects are functors and morphisms are natural transformations between them). I want to know if this category has a product. For given $X in A$ and functors $F_i in C$, is $Pi_{i in Lambda}F_i(X)$ the correct product? If yes, what would be the projection maps onto the $F_i$'s? I'm having a hard time constructing the required unique natural transformation. Any help is appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $A$ be a category and $C= Fun(A, Set)$ (i.e. the objects are functors and morphisms are natural transformations between them). I want to know if this category has a product. For given $X in A$ and functors $F_i in C$, is $Pi_{i in Lambda}F_i(X)$ the correct product? If yes, what would be the projection maps onto the $F_i$'s? I'm having a hard time constructing the required unique natural transformation. Any help is appreciated.







      category-theory functors natural-transformations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 14 '18 at 22:23









      tangentbundletangentbundle

      422411




      422411






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Yes, the product of $F_iintext{Obj}(text{Fun}(A,mathbf{Set}))$, $iinLambda$, is the functor $prod_{iinLambda}F_i$, such that $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(X)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X))$ for every $Xintext{Obj}(A)$ and $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(f)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ for every $fintext{Mor}(A)$. Projections are natural transformations $P_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)to F_j$, $jinLambda$, such that $P_j(X)=p_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X)))to F_j(X)$, $Xin text{Obj}(A)$, $jinLambda$, where $p_j$ is a projection of an "ordinary" product in $mathbf{Set}$. These transformations are natural by the universal properties of products (note, that $p_jcirc(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f)))=F_j(f)circ p_j$, and the morphism $prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ is unique with such property). Such products are called pointwise by the obvious reason.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Just as an addendum for the OP and others, this fact generalizes in a couple ways. First, it holds for arbitrary limits and, in fact, colimits. Second, it generalizes to target categories other than $mathbf{Set}$. In particular, if the (co)limits of the appropriate shape exist in the target category, then they exist in the functor category and are computed pointwise. ($mathbf{Set}$ is (co)complete so all (co)limits exist.) It is possible, however, for a functor category to have (co)limits even when the pointwise (co)limits don't exist.
            $endgroup$
            – Derek Elkins
            Dec 15 '18 at 2:27



















          3












          $begingroup$

          Oskar already gave a good answer (+1). I just wanted to add a different perspective.



          Given a collection of objects $C_i$ in a category $C$, the product of the $C_i$, $prod_i C_i$, is an object representing the (contravariant) functor $Cto newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Set$
          $$A mapsto prod_inewcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}} Hom(A,C_i).$$



          Thus if $C$ and $A$ are categories, if $F_i$ are functors in $C^A$, the product of the $F_i$ is the functor $F$ representing
          $$G mapsto prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
          I.e. it is a functor satisfying
          $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F)simeq prod_i Hom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
          However if we already know that $C$ has products, then let $F'(x)=prod_i F_i(x)$ for any $xin A$.



          Then $$Hom_C(y,F'(x)) simeq prod_i Hom_C(y,F_i(x))$$ as functors from $C^{mathrm{op}}times Ato Set$. Thus for any functor $G:Ato C$, given a natural transformation $mu:Gto F'$, for any $xin A$, we can use this natural isomorphism to break apart the component $mu_x:G(x)to F'(x)$ of the natural transformation into maps $mu_{x,i} : G(x)to F_i(x)$ giving natural transformations $mu_i$, and conversely given natural transformations $mu_i : Gto F_i$, we can put them together to get a natural transformation $mu$. Thus $F'$ satisfies
          $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F')simeq prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i),$$
          so $F'=prod_i F_i$ as desired.



          It should hopefully be clear how to generalize this argument to arbitrary codomain categories and arbitrary limits/colimits as indicated by Derek's comment. (Well I already generalized to arbitrary codomain categories, I guess I mean to arbitrary shapes of limits/colimits).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039948%2fproduct-in-the-category-of-functors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            Yes, the product of $F_iintext{Obj}(text{Fun}(A,mathbf{Set}))$, $iinLambda$, is the functor $prod_{iinLambda}F_i$, such that $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(X)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X))$ for every $Xintext{Obj}(A)$ and $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(f)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ for every $fintext{Mor}(A)$. Projections are natural transformations $P_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)to F_j$, $jinLambda$, such that $P_j(X)=p_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X)))to F_j(X)$, $Xin text{Obj}(A)$, $jinLambda$, where $p_j$ is a projection of an "ordinary" product in $mathbf{Set}$. These transformations are natural by the universal properties of products (note, that $p_jcirc(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f)))=F_j(f)circ p_j$, and the morphism $prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ is unique with such property). Such products are called pointwise by the obvious reason.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Just as an addendum for the OP and others, this fact generalizes in a couple ways. First, it holds for arbitrary limits and, in fact, colimits. Second, it generalizes to target categories other than $mathbf{Set}$. In particular, if the (co)limits of the appropriate shape exist in the target category, then they exist in the functor category and are computed pointwise. ($mathbf{Set}$ is (co)complete so all (co)limits exist.) It is possible, however, for a functor category to have (co)limits even when the pointwise (co)limits don't exist.
              $endgroup$
              – Derek Elkins
              Dec 15 '18 at 2:27
















            5












            $begingroup$

            Yes, the product of $F_iintext{Obj}(text{Fun}(A,mathbf{Set}))$, $iinLambda$, is the functor $prod_{iinLambda}F_i$, such that $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(X)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X))$ for every $Xintext{Obj}(A)$ and $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(f)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ for every $fintext{Mor}(A)$. Projections are natural transformations $P_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)to F_j$, $jinLambda$, such that $P_j(X)=p_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X)))to F_j(X)$, $Xin text{Obj}(A)$, $jinLambda$, where $p_j$ is a projection of an "ordinary" product in $mathbf{Set}$. These transformations are natural by the universal properties of products (note, that $p_jcirc(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f)))=F_j(f)circ p_j$, and the morphism $prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ is unique with such property). Such products are called pointwise by the obvious reason.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Just as an addendum for the OP and others, this fact generalizes in a couple ways. First, it holds for arbitrary limits and, in fact, colimits. Second, it generalizes to target categories other than $mathbf{Set}$. In particular, if the (co)limits of the appropriate shape exist in the target category, then they exist in the functor category and are computed pointwise. ($mathbf{Set}$ is (co)complete so all (co)limits exist.) It is possible, however, for a functor category to have (co)limits even when the pointwise (co)limits don't exist.
              $endgroup$
              – Derek Elkins
              Dec 15 '18 at 2:27














            5












            5








            5





            $begingroup$

            Yes, the product of $F_iintext{Obj}(text{Fun}(A,mathbf{Set}))$, $iinLambda$, is the functor $prod_{iinLambda}F_i$, such that $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(X)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X))$ for every $Xintext{Obj}(A)$ and $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(f)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ for every $fintext{Mor}(A)$. Projections are natural transformations $P_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)to F_j$, $jinLambda$, such that $P_j(X)=p_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X)))to F_j(X)$, $Xin text{Obj}(A)$, $jinLambda$, where $p_j$ is a projection of an "ordinary" product in $mathbf{Set}$. These transformations are natural by the universal properties of products (note, that $p_jcirc(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f)))=F_j(f)circ p_j$, and the morphism $prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ is unique with such property). Such products are called pointwise by the obvious reason.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Yes, the product of $F_iintext{Obj}(text{Fun}(A,mathbf{Set}))$, $iinLambda$, is the functor $prod_{iinLambda}F_i$, such that $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(X)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X))$ for every $Xintext{Obj}(A)$ and $(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)(f)=prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ for every $fintext{Mor}(A)$. Projections are natural transformations $P_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}F_i)to F_j$, $jinLambda$, such that $P_j(X)=p_jcolon(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(X)))to F_j(X)$, $Xin text{Obj}(A)$, $jinLambda$, where $p_j$ is a projection of an "ordinary" product in $mathbf{Set}$. These transformations are natural by the universal properties of products (note, that $p_jcirc(prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f)))=F_j(f)circ p_j$, and the morphism $prod_{iinLambda}(F_i(f))$ is unique with such property). Such products are called pointwise by the obvious reason.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 15 '18 at 0:37

























            answered Dec 15 '18 at 0:16









            OskarOskar

            3,1731819




            3,1731819








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Just as an addendum for the OP and others, this fact generalizes in a couple ways. First, it holds for arbitrary limits and, in fact, colimits. Second, it generalizes to target categories other than $mathbf{Set}$. In particular, if the (co)limits of the appropriate shape exist in the target category, then they exist in the functor category and are computed pointwise. ($mathbf{Set}$ is (co)complete so all (co)limits exist.) It is possible, however, for a functor category to have (co)limits even when the pointwise (co)limits don't exist.
              $endgroup$
              – Derek Elkins
              Dec 15 '18 at 2:27














            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Just as an addendum for the OP and others, this fact generalizes in a couple ways. First, it holds for arbitrary limits and, in fact, colimits. Second, it generalizes to target categories other than $mathbf{Set}$. In particular, if the (co)limits of the appropriate shape exist in the target category, then they exist in the functor category and are computed pointwise. ($mathbf{Set}$ is (co)complete so all (co)limits exist.) It is possible, however, for a functor category to have (co)limits even when the pointwise (co)limits don't exist.
              $endgroup$
              – Derek Elkins
              Dec 15 '18 at 2:27








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Just as an addendum for the OP and others, this fact generalizes in a couple ways. First, it holds for arbitrary limits and, in fact, colimits. Second, it generalizes to target categories other than $mathbf{Set}$. In particular, if the (co)limits of the appropriate shape exist in the target category, then they exist in the functor category and are computed pointwise. ($mathbf{Set}$ is (co)complete so all (co)limits exist.) It is possible, however, for a functor category to have (co)limits even when the pointwise (co)limits don't exist.
            $endgroup$
            – Derek Elkins
            Dec 15 '18 at 2:27




            $begingroup$
            Just as an addendum for the OP and others, this fact generalizes in a couple ways. First, it holds for arbitrary limits and, in fact, colimits. Second, it generalizes to target categories other than $mathbf{Set}$. In particular, if the (co)limits of the appropriate shape exist in the target category, then they exist in the functor category and are computed pointwise. ($mathbf{Set}$ is (co)complete so all (co)limits exist.) It is possible, however, for a functor category to have (co)limits even when the pointwise (co)limits don't exist.
            $endgroup$
            – Derek Elkins
            Dec 15 '18 at 2:27











            3












            $begingroup$

            Oskar already gave a good answer (+1). I just wanted to add a different perspective.



            Given a collection of objects $C_i$ in a category $C$, the product of the $C_i$, $prod_i C_i$, is an object representing the (contravariant) functor $Cto newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Set$
            $$A mapsto prod_inewcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}} Hom(A,C_i).$$



            Thus if $C$ and $A$ are categories, if $F_i$ are functors in $C^A$, the product of the $F_i$ is the functor $F$ representing
            $$G mapsto prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
            I.e. it is a functor satisfying
            $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F)simeq prod_i Hom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
            However if we already know that $C$ has products, then let $F'(x)=prod_i F_i(x)$ for any $xin A$.



            Then $$Hom_C(y,F'(x)) simeq prod_i Hom_C(y,F_i(x))$$ as functors from $C^{mathrm{op}}times Ato Set$. Thus for any functor $G:Ato C$, given a natural transformation $mu:Gto F'$, for any $xin A$, we can use this natural isomorphism to break apart the component $mu_x:G(x)to F'(x)$ of the natural transformation into maps $mu_{x,i} : G(x)to F_i(x)$ giving natural transformations $mu_i$, and conversely given natural transformations $mu_i : Gto F_i$, we can put them together to get a natural transformation $mu$. Thus $F'$ satisfies
            $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F')simeq prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i),$$
            so $F'=prod_i F_i$ as desired.



            It should hopefully be clear how to generalize this argument to arbitrary codomain categories and arbitrary limits/colimits as indicated by Derek's comment. (Well I already generalized to arbitrary codomain categories, I guess I mean to arbitrary shapes of limits/colimits).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              Oskar already gave a good answer (+1). I just wanted to add a different perspective.



              Given a collection of objects $C_i$ in a category $C$, the product of the $C_i$, $prod_i C_i$, is an object representing the (contravariant) functor $Cto newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Set$
              $$A mapsto prod_inewcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}} Hom(A,C_i).$$



              Thus if $C$ and $A$ are categories, if $F_i$ are functors in $C^A$, the product of the $F_i$ is the functor $F$ representing
              $$G mapsto prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
              I.e. it is a functor satisfying
              $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F)simeq prod_i Hom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
              However if we already know that $C$ has products, then let $F'(x)=prod_i F_i(x)$ for any $xin A$.



              Then $$Hom_C(y,F'(x)) simeq prod_i Hom_C(y,F_i(x))$$ as functors from $C^{mathrm{op}}times Ato Set$. Thus for any functor $G:Ato C$, given a natural transformation $mu:Gto F'$, for any $xin A$, we can use this natural isomorphism to break apart the component $mu_x:G(x)to F'(x)$ of the natural transformation into maps $mu_{x,i} : G(x)to F_i(x)$ giving natural transformations $mu_i$, and conversely given natural transformations $mu_i : Gto F_i$, we can put them together to get a natural transformation $mu$. Thus $F'$ satisfies
              $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F')simeq prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i),$$
              so $F'=prod_i F_i$ as desired.



              It should hopefully be clear how to generalize this argument to arbitrary codomain categories and arbitrary limits/colimits as indicated by Derek's comment. (Well I already generalized to arbitrary codomain categories, I guess I mean to arbitrary shapes of limits/colimits).






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                Oskar already gave a good answer (+1). I just wanted to add a different perspective.



                Given a collection of objects $C_i$ in a category $C$, the product of the $C_i$, $prod_i C_i$, is an object representing the (contravariant) functor $Cto newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Set$
                $$A mapsto prod_inewcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}} Hom(A,C_i).$$



                Thus if $C$ and $A$ are categories, if $F_i$ are functors in $C^A$, the product of the $F_i$ is the functor $F$ representing
                $$G mapsto prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
                I.e. it is a functor satisfying
                $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F)simeq prod_i Hom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
                However if we already know that $C$ has products, then let $F'(x)=prod_i F_i(x)$ for any $xin A$.



                Then $$Hom_C(y,F'(x)) simeq prod_i Hom_C(y,F_i(x))$$ as functors from $C^{mathrm{op}}times Ato Set$. Thus for any functor $G:Ato C$, given a natural transformation $mu:Gto F'$, for any $xin A$, we can use this natural isomorphism to break apart the component $mu_x:G(x)to F'(x)$ of the natural transformation into maps $mu_{x,i} : G(x)to F_i(x)$ giving natural transformations $mu_i$, and conversely given natural transformations $mu_i : Gto F_i$, we can put them together to get a natural transformation $mu$. Thus $F'$ satisfies
                $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F')simeq prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i),$$
                so $F'=prod_i F_i$ as desired.



                It should hopefully be clear how to generalize this argument to arbitrary codomain categories and arbitrary limits/colimits as indicated by Derek's comment. (Well I already generalized to arbitrary codomain categories, I guess I mean to arbitrary shapes of limits/colimits).






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Oskar already gave a good answer (+1). I just wanted to add a different perspective.



                Given a collection of objects $C_i$ in a category $C$, the product of the $C_i$, $prod_i C_i$, is an object representing the (contravariant) functor $Cto newcommandSet{mathbf{Set}}Set$
                $$A mapsto prod_inewcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}} Hom(A,C_i).$$



                Thus if $C$ and $A$ are categories, if $F_i$ are functors in $C^A$, the product of the $F_i$ is the functor $F$ representing
                $$G mapsto prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
                I.e. it is a functor satisfying
                $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F)simeq prod_i Hom_{C^A}(G,F_i).$$
                However if we already know that $C$ has products, then let $F'(x)=prod_i F_i(x)$ for any $xin A$.



                Then $$Hom_C(y,F'(x)) simeq prod_i Hom_C(y,F_i(x))$$ as functors from $C^{mathrm{op}}times Ato Set$. Thus for any functor $G:Ato C$, given a natural transformation $mu:Gto F'$, for any $xin A$, we can use this natural isomorphism to break apart the component $mu_x:G(x)to F'(x)$ of the natural transformation into maps $mu_{x,i} : G(x)to F_i(x)$ giving natural transformations $mu_i$, and conversely given natural transformations $mu_i : Gto F_i$, we can put them together to get a natural transformation $mu$. Thus $F'$ satisfies
                $$Hom_{C^A}(G,F')simeq prod_iHom_{C^A}(G,F_i),$$
                so $F'=prod_i F_i$ as desired.



                It should hopefully be clear how to generalize this argument to arbitrary codomain categories and arbitrary limits/colimits as indicated by Derek's comment. (Well I already generalized to arbitrary codomain categories, I guess I mean to arbitrary shapes of limits/colimits).







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 15 '18 at 3:00









                jgonjgon

                14.9k32042




                14.9k32042






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039948%2fproduct-in-the-category-of-functors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    Puebla de Zaragoza

                    Musa