The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」
I know that both of them mean "In 10 minutes" but I don't understand the difference between them.
I have some examples which kind of tell me which one has to be used in different situations but I saw an example when both options can be used.
Here are the examples:
本を1日で読みました。
本は後10ページで終わります。
I can assume that 「後」can/must be used when talking about the end or the beginning of something.
Sentences where both options were used:
車で15分で着く。
車で後15分で着く。
So, what is the difference between with and without 「後」?
grammar
asked yesterday
TawahacheeTawahachee
37213
add a comment |
I know that both of them mean "In 10 minutes" but I don't understand the difference between them.
I have some examples which kind of tell me which one has to be used in different situations but I saw an example when both options can be used.
Here are the examples:
本を1日で読みました。
本は後10ページで終わります。
I can assume that 「後」can/must be used when talking about the end or the beginning of something.
Sentences where both options were used:
車で15分で着く。
車で後15分で着く。
So, what is the difference between with and without 「後」?
grammar
asked yesterday
TawahacheeTawahachee
37213
add a comment |
I know that both of them mean "In 10 minutes" but I don't understand the difference between them.
I have some examples which kind of tell me which one has to be used in different situations but I saw an example when both options can be used.
Here are the examples:
本を1日で読みました。
本は後10ページで終わります。
I can assume that 「後」can/must be used when talking about the end or the beginning of something.
Sentences where both options were used:
車で15分で着く。
車で後15分で着く。
So, what is the difference between with and without 「後」?
grammar
asked yesterday
TawahacheeTawahachee
37213
I know that both of them mean "In 10 minutes" but I don't understand the difference between them.
I have some examples which kind of tell me which one has to be used in different situations but I saw an example when both options can be used.
Here are the examples:
本を1日で読みました。
本は後10ページで終わります。
I can assume that 「後」can/must be used when talking about the end or the beginning of something.
Sentences where both options were used:
車で15分で着く。
車で後15分で着く。
So, what is the difference between with and without 「後」?
grammar
grammar
asked yesterday
TawahacheeTawahachee
37213
asked yesterday
TawahacheeTawahachee
37213
asked yesterday
TawahacheeTawahachee
37213
asked yesterday
TawahacheeTawahachee
37213
asked yesterday
TawahacheeTawahachee
37213
37213
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I'd understand the two phrases as "it takes N minutes" (in general) and "it takes N more minutes" (in addition to time already spent). Especially the last example reads to me as:
- 車で15分で着く。 It takes 15 minutes by car. (In general, no mention of whether people are even planning on going)
- 車で後15分で着く。 Will arrive by car in 15 more minutes. (We're already on our way)
In practice, the first sentence could also mean the same as the second sentence depending on context, but if the 後 is there it would definitely mean people are already on the move.
answered yesterday
Matti VirkkunenMatti Virkkunen
3,0591920
add a comment |
What you are asking about is equivalent to the difference between "in # minutes" and "after # minutes" in English.
Your first example:
本を1日で読みました。
I finished the book in one day.
You are giving the amount of time it takes, without the use of the word after.
Your second example:
本は後10ページで終わります。
The book will finish after 10 pages.
Here you employ the use of "after" in your given period.
The same applies to your example with the car. The first sentence you say "It takes (me) 15 minutes by car," and in the second sentence you say "(I) got there after 15 minutes of driving."
So the difference made by putting 後 into your sentence is that you are specifically indicating that the verb happens after your period of time.
edited 18 hours ago
V2Blast
274210
answered yesterday
ajsmartajsmart
4,38621237
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66022%2fthe-difference-between-n%25e5%2588%2586%25e3%2581%25a7-and-%25e5%25be%258cn%25e5%2588%2586%25e3%2581%25a7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I'd understand the two phrases as "it takes N minutes" (in general) and "it takes N more minutes" (in addition to time already spent). Especially the last example reads to me as:
- 車で15分で着く。 It takes 15 minutes by car. (In general, no mention of whether people are even planning on going)
- 車で後15分で着く。 Will arrive by car in 15 more minutes. (We're already on our way)
In practice, the first sentence could also mean the same as the second sentence depending on context, but if the 後 is there it would definitely mean people are already on the move.
answered yesterday
Matti VirkkunenMatti Virkkunen
3,0591920
add a comment |
I'd understand the two phrases as "it takes N minutes" (in general) and "it takes N more minutes" (in addition to time already spent). Especially the last example reads to me as:
- 車で15分で着く。 It takes 15 minutes by car. (In general, no mention of whether people are even planning on going)
- 車で後15分で着く。 Will arrive by car in 15 more minutes. (We're already on our way)
In practice, the first sentence could also mean the same as the second sentence depending on context, but if the 後 is there it would definitely mean people are already on the move.
answered yesterday
Matti VirkkunenMatti Virkkunen
3,0591920
add a comment |
I'd understand the two phrases as "it takes N minutes" (in general) and "it takes N more minutes" (in addition to time already spent). Especially the last example reads to me as:
- 車で15分で着く。 It takes 15 minutes by car. (In general, no mention of whether people are even planning on going)
- 車で後15分で着く。 Will arrive by car in 15 more minutes. (We're already on our way)
In practice, the first sentence could also mean the same as the second sentence depending on context, but if the 後 is there it would definitely mean people are already on the move.
answered yesterday
Matti VirkkunenMatti Virkkunen
3,0591920
I'd understand the two phrases as "it takes N minutes" (in general) and "it takes N more minutes" (in addition to time already spent). Especially the last example reads to me as:
- 車で15分で着く。 It takes 15 minutes by car. (In general, no mention of whether people are even planning on going)
- 車で後15分で着く。 Will arrive by car in 15 more minutes. (We're already on our way)
In practice, the first sentence could also mean the same as the second sentence depending on context, but if the 後 is there it would definitely mean people are already on the move.
answered yesterday
Matti VirkkunenMatti Virkkunen
3,0591920
answered yesterday
Matti VirkkunenMatti Virkkunen
3,0591920
answered yesterday
Matti VirkkunenMatti Virkkunen
3,0591920
answered yesterday
Matti VirkkunenMatti Virkkunen
3,0591920
3,0591920
add a comment |
add a comment |
What you are asking about is equivalent to the difference between "in # minutes" and "after # minutes" in English.
Your first example:
本を1日で読みました。
I finished the book in one day.
You are giving the amount of time it takes, without the use of the word after.
Your second example:
本は後10ページで終わります。
The book will finish after 10 pages.
Here you employ the use of "after" in your given period.
The same applies to your example with the car. The first sentence you say "It takes (me) 15 minutes by car," and in the second sentence you say "(I) got there after 15 minutes of driving."
So the difference made by putting 後 into your sentence is that you are specifically indicating that the verb happens after your period of time.
edited 18 hours ago
V2Blast
274210
answered yesterday
ajsmartajsmart
4,38621237
add a comment |
What you are asking about is equivalent to the difference between "in # minutes" and "after # minutes" in English.
Your first example:
本を1日で読みました。
I finished the book in one day.
You are giving the amount of time it takes, without the use of the word after.
Your second example:
本は後10ページで終わります。
The book will finish after 10 pages.
Here you employ the use of "after" in your given period.
The same applies to your example with the car. The first sentence you say "It takes (me) 15 minutes by car," and in the second sentence you say "(I) got there after 15 minutes of driving."
So the difference made by putting 後 into your sentence is that you are specifically indicating that the verb happens after your period of time.
edited 18 hours ago
V2Blast
274210
answered yesterday
ajsmartajsmart
4,38621237
add a comment |
What you are asking about is equivalent to the difference between "in # minutes" and "after # minutes" in English.
Your first example:
本を1日で読みました。
I finished the book in one day.
You are giving the amount of time it takes, without the use of the word after.
Your second example:
本は後10ページで終わります。
The book will finish after 10 pages.
Here you employ the use of "after" in your given period.
The same applies to your example with the car. The first sentence you say "It takes (me) 15 minutes by car," and in the second sentence you say "(I) got there after 15 minutes of driving."
So the difference made by putting 後 into your sentence is that you are specifically indicating that the verb happens after your period of time.
edited 18 hours ago
V2Blast
274210
answered yesterday
ajsmartajsmart
4,38621237
What you are asking about is equivalent to the difference between "in # minutes" and "after # minutes" in English.
Your first example:
本を1日で読みました。
I finished the book in one day.
You are giving the amount of time it takes, without the use of the word after.
Your second example:
本は後10ページで終わります。
The book will finish after 10 pages.
Here you employ the use of "after" in your given period.
The same applies to your example with the car. The first sentence you say "It takes (me) 15 minutes by car," and in the second sentence you say "(I) got there after 15 minutes of driving."
So the difference made by putting 後 into your sentence is that you are specifically indicating that the verb happens after your period of time.
edited 18 hours ago
V2Blast
274210
answered yesterday
ajsmartajsmart
4,38621237
edited 18 hours ago
V2Blast
274210
edited 18 hours ago
V2Blast
274210
edited 18 hours ago
V2Blast
274210
274210
answered yesterday
ajsmartajsmart
4,38621237
answered yesterday
ajsmartajsmart
4,38621237
answered yesterday
ajsmartajsmart
4,38621237
4,38621237
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66022%2fthe-difference-between-n%25e5%2588%2586%25e3%2581%25a7-and-%25e5%25be%258cn%25e5%2588%2586%25e3%2581%25a7%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
