What is the significance behind “40 days” that often appears in the Bible?












26















Several times within the Old and New Testament of the Bible there are notes pertaining to a long time as "40 days," as in 40 days of fasting, rain, traveling, etc. Why 40? Is there a factual association? The only thing I've noticed are references to 40 days needed for mummification in natron. Any insight? Thanks!










share|improve this question







New contributor




Ron P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    Answers have concentrated on why use a specific number at all, or have simply given further examples of its use but I understood the question to be why use this particular one. Did it have any numerological significance? Did it sound like something else? Was it a round number in any early counting system (as it would be in Europe where it was normal at one stage to count in 20s (e.g. French quatre-vingt=4x20=80) so 40 would actually be a rounder number than 50)? Was it a month in any early calendar? Etc.

    – David Robinson
    yesterday






  • 1





    Egyptians, who greatly influenced biblical Judaism (e.g., Rosh Hashanah vs. Thout 1), had ten day weeks, and their mummification process lasted about forty days (see Egyptian mummies and ancient Egyptian mummification process).

    – Lucian
    yesterday
















26















Several times within the Old and New Testament of the Bible there are notes pertaining to a long time as "40 days," as in 40 days of fasting, rain, traveling, etc. Why 40? Is there a factual association? The only thing I've noticed are references to 40 days needed for mummification in natron. Any insight? Thanks!










share|improve this question







New contributor




Ron P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    Answers have concentrated on why use a specific number at all, or have simply given further examples of its use but I understood the question to be why use this particular one. Did it have any numerological significance? Did it sound like something else? Was it a round number in any early counting system (as it would be in Europe where it was normal at one stage to count in 20s (e.g. French quatre-vingt=4x20=80) so 40 would actually be a rounder number than 50)? Was it a month in any early calendar? Etc.

    – David Robinson
    yesterday






  • 1





    Egyptians, who greatly influenced biblical Judaism (e.g., Rosh Hashanah vs. Thout 1), had ten day weeks, and their mummification process lasted about forty days (see Egyptian mummies and ancient Egyptian mummification process).

    – Lucian
    yesterday














26












26








26


2






Several times within the Old and New Testament of the Bible there are notes pertaining to a long time as "40 days," as in 40 days of fasting, rain, traveling, etc. Why 40? Is there a factual association? The only thing I've noticed are references to 40 days needed for mummification in natron. Any insight? Thanks!










share|improve this question







New contributor




Ron P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Several times within the Old and New Testament of the Bible there are notes pertaining to a long time as "40 days," as in 40 days of fasting, rain, traveling, etc. Why 40? Is there a factual association? The only thing I've noticed are references to 40 days needed for mummification in natron. Any insight? Thanks!







religious-history timeline






share|improve this question







New contributor




Ron P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Ron P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Ron P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Ron PRon P

13123




13123




New contributor




Ron P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ron P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ron P is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 3





    Answers have concentrated on why use a specific number at all, or have simply given further examples of its use but I understood the question to be why use this particular one. Did it have any numerological significance? Did it sound like something else? Was it a round number in any early counting system (as it would be in Europe where it was normal at one stage to count in 20s (e.g. French quatre-vingt=4x20=80) so 40 would actually be a rounder number than 50)? Was it a month in any early calendar? Etc.

    – David Robinson
    yesterday






  • 1





    Egyptians, who greatly influenced biblical Judaism (e.g., Rosh Hashanah vs. Thout 1), had ten day weeks, and their mummification process lasted about forty days (see Egyptian mummies and ancient Egyptian mummification process).

    – Lucian
    yesterday














  • 3





    Answers have concentrated on why use a specific number at all, or have simply given further examples of its use but I understood the question to be why use this particular one. Did it have any numerological significance? Did it sound like something else? Was it a round number in any early counting system (as it would be in Europe where it was normal at one stage to count in 20s (e.g. French quatre-vingt=4x20=80) so 40 would actually be a rounder number than 50)? Was it a month in any early calendar? Etc.

    – David Robinson
    yesterday






  • 1





    Egyptians, who greatly influenced biblical Judaism (e.g., Rosh Hashanah vs. Thout 1), had ten day weeks, and their mummification process lasted about forty days (see Egyptian mummies and ancient Egyptian mummification process).

    – Lucian
    yesterday








3




3





Answers have concentrated on why use a specific number at all, or have simply given further examples of its use but I understood the question to be why use this particular one. Did it have any numerological significance? Did it sound like something else? Was it a round number in any early counting system (as it would be in Europe where it was normal at one stage to count in 20s (e.g. French quatre-vingt=4x20=80) so 40 would actually be a rounder number than 50)? Was it a month in any early calendar? Etc.

– David Robinson
yesterday





Answers have concentrated on why use a specific number at all, or have simply given further examples of its use but I understood the question to be why use this particular one. Did it have any numerological significance? Did it sound like something else? Was it a round number in any early counting system (as it would be in Europe where it was normal at one stage to count in 20s (e.g. French quatre-vingt=4x20=80) so 40 would actually be a rounder number than 50)? Was it a month in any early calendar? Etc.

– David Robinson
yesterday




1




1





Egyptians, who greatly influenced biblical Judaism (e.g., Rosh Hashanah vs. Thout 1), had ten day weeks, and their mummification process lasted about forty days (see Egyptian mummies and ancient Egyptian mummification process).

– Lucian
yesterday





Egyptians, who greatly influenced biblical Judaism (e.g., Rosh Hashanah vs. Thout 1), had ten day weeks, and their mummification process lasted about forty days (see Egyptian mummies and ancient Egyptian mummification process).

– Lucian
yesterday










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















42














I believe it to be an euphemism similar to how today one might say something like gazillions for a large number.



In a society that is mostly innumerate as well as illiterate, where neither pencils nor paper exist and both slateboards and chalk are fragile and rare, the scale of numbers readily accessible to the common population are much smaller than today. The meaning of 40 to me comes across as: "longer than a month, and more days than one would care to count"; or as Wikepedia puts it in that link:




similar to "umpteen".






There is push-back in the comments about my use of the word euphemism above. I stand by that usage. The 1928 edition of the Oxford English Dictionary provides, as an exemplification of (proper) usage, the following from Fur Animals: by Eliott Coues, 1877: (p. 216, start of paragraph)




The skunk yields a handsome fur, lately become fashionable, under the euphemism of Alaska Sable - for our elegant dames would surely not deck themselves in obscene Skunk skins if they were not permitted to call the rose by some other name.




The softening of an exact, possibly estimated, number by the more general and de-nerded forty seems quite inline with Coues' usage.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    @Mohair The extreme ages are almost certainly also poetically motivated exaggerations for "really old". You might also notice that Moses' age is exactly 3 * 40, where each 40-year period corresponds roughly to a different phase of his life: early adult life in Egypt; mid-life exile from, return to, and final departure from Egypt; and wandering in the desert.

    – chepner
    yesterday






  • 9





    Hebrew uses 40 like six year olds use 100.

    – Joshua
    yesterday






  • 9





    @Joshua Or adults use "million" ("If I had a million dollars."/"One in a million"/"There's a million reasons why that won't work."/etc.)

    – R.M.
    yesterday






  • 5





    Having taken grad-level Hebrew, I recall 10,000 being the gazillions equivalent. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the rest of the answer - but I think it draws in the boundaries a bit.

    – vbnet3d
    yesterday






  • 4





    Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I don't think euphemism is the word you want.

    – ruakh
    yesterday



















39














There seems to be a bit of pushback on Pieter's (correct) answer, so perhaps a bit more detail is in order.



It is not at all uncommon in languages to have words that, while technically a specific number, are usually used just to indicate an unspecified large amount. One of the technical terms for this is non-numerical vague quantifiers.



The most well-known of these is of course the Hebrew Bible's "40", but they also had a word for an even larger indeterminate number: רבבה. This word came into English (via Greek) as "myriad", but the technical literal value for it is 10,000.



Probably the next most famous for us English speakers is 1,001, which came into English from the Arabic work 1,001 Nights (which usually doesn't contain exactly 1,001 stories, unless you get an edition that purposely tried to edit to that amount for some weird reason). You can find all kinds of English-language books with titles on the theme "1,001 Uses For...", and nobody really expects those to contain exactly 1,001 of the thing in question.



Now most secular (and mainline Christian) Biblical scholars will tell you that the earliest written source for the Hebrew scriptures (including the story of Noah that prominently featured the indeterminate 40) committed the stories to writing around the 6th Century BC.



This was about 4 centuries before the Hebrews started using their distinctive Greek-borrowed numeric system (which resembles Roman Numerals a bit in implementation). At that time the numeric system in use would have been the old Babylonian Sexagesimal system. This survives today mostly in our units of time and angle "degree" (and thus Earth surface coordinate) measurements. This was technically a hybrid base 60 system, but represented with a weird base 10 tally system within the 60.



enter image description here



If that sounds complicated to you, you're probably still better off than the common Semite, who as Pieter pointed out, probably didn't really know how to read or use this system themselves beyond the bare basics required for everyday life. Doing reckoning under this system was much harder than what we have today, and there was no equivalent to the modern western education system, where every child gets basic mathematics instruction. Working with numbers that high was difficult, and very few in the audience of these stories would have been trained to do so.



You may notice that the superglyph for 40 specifically is the first one where there isn't enough space for all the 10's tallies on one line, so you have to start compressing them together into 2 lines in the same amount of space. Perhaps its a coincidence, but this is certainly the point where the writing/carving for numbers starts to look like a bit of a mess. Its a lot.






share|improve this answer


























  • That's really interesting. Any thoughts on how this relates to New Testament (Greek) use of 40?

    – vbnet3d
    yesterday






  • 3





    @vbnet3d - Given that the other known users of this "indeterminate 40" (early Christians, Muslims, and Yazidis) all came later and were influenced heavily by the Hebrew scriptures, the logical conclusion is that they borrowed it. Its also possible this was just a widespread aspect of the regional culture that they all inherited.

    – T.E.D.
    yesterday








  • 1





    Have you back-checked how often other numbers appear in the text? 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 50, 70? OT and NT concordances are different for "40". But especially in OT this interpretation is not incorrect, imo in more than two ways, but this A looks only at just one aspect. My 2 cents.

    – LangLangC
    yesterday











  • unspecified large amount

    – Mazura
    yesterday



















5














Biblically, Forty is a number associated with testing and trials
https://www.thoughtco.com/biblical-numerology-700168



Jesus wandered in the wilderness 40 days, Israel wandered in the desert for 40 years etc.



It's a number that indicates enough time passed for God to achieve a goal. Fullness of time.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




David is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "324"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Ron P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51599%2fwhat-is-the-significance-behind-40-days-that-often-appears-in-the-bible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    42














    I believe it to be an euphemism similar to how today one might say something like gazillions for a large number.



    In a society that is mostly innumerate as well as illiterate, where neither pencils nor paper exist and both slateboards and chalk are fragile and rare, the scale of numbers readily accessible to the common population are much smaller than today. The meaning of 40 to me comes across as: "longer than a month, and more days than one would care to count"; or as Wikepedia puts it in that link:




    similar to "umpteen".






    There is push-back in the comments about my use of the word euphemism above. I stand by that usage. The 1928 edition of the Oxford English Dictionary provides, as an exemplification of (proper) usage, the following from Fur Animals: by Eliott Coues, 1877: (p. 216, start of paragraph)




    The skunk yields a handsome fur, lately become fashionable, under the euphemism of Alaska Sable - for our elegant dames would surely not deck themselves in obscene Skunk skins if they were not permitted to call the rose by some other name.




    The softening of an exact, possibly estimated, number by the more general and de-nerded forty seems quite inline with Coues' usage.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 4





      @Mohair The extreme ages are almost certainly also poetically motivated exaggerations for "really old". You might also notice that Moses' age is exactly 3 * 40, where each 40-year period corresponds roughly to a different phase of his life: early adult life in Egypt; mid-life exile from, return to, and final departure from Egypt; and wandering in the desert.

      – chepner
      yesterday






    • 9





      Hebrew uses 40 like six year olds use 100.

      – Joshua
      yesterday






    • 9





      @Joshua Or adults use "million" ("If I had a million dollars."/"One in a million"/"There's a million reasons why that won't work."/etc.)

      – R.M.
      yesterday






    • 5





      Having taken grad-level Hebrew, I recall 10,000 being the gazillions equivalent. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the rest of the answer - but I think it draws in the boundaries a bit.

      – vbnet3d
      yesterday






    • 4





      Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I don't think euphemism is the word you want.

      – ruakh
      yesterday
















    42














    I believe it to be an euphemism similar to how today one might say something like gazillions for a large number.



    In a society that is mostly innumerate as well as illiterate, where neither pencils nor paper exist and both slateboards and chalk are fragile and rare, the scale of numbers readily accessible to the common population are much smaller than today. The meaning of 40 to me comes across as: "longer than a month, and more days than one would care to count"; or as Wikepedia puts it in that link:




    similar to "umpteen".






    There is push-back in the comments about my use of the word euphemism above. I stand by that usage. The 1928 edition of the Oxford English Dictionary provides, as an exemplification of (proper) usage, the following from Fur Animals: by Eliott Coues, 1877: (p. 216, start of paragraph)




    The skunk yields a handsome fur, lately become fashionable, under the euphemism of Alaska Sable - for our elegant dames would surely not deck themselves in obscene Skunk skins if they were not permitted to call the rose by some other name.




    The softening of an exact, possibly estimated, number by the more general and de-nerded forty seems quite inline with Coues' usage.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 4





      @Mohair The extreme ages are almost certainly also poetically motivated exaggerations for "really old". You might also notice that Moses' age is exactly 3 * 40, where each 40-year period corresponds roughly to a different phase of his life: early adult life in Egypt; mid-life exile from, return to, and final departure from Egypt; and wandering in the desert.

      – chepner
      yesterday






    • 9





      Hebrew uses 40 like six year olds use 100.

      – Joshua
      yesterday






    • 9





      @Joshua Or adults use "million" ("If I had a million dollars."/"One in a million"/"There's a million reasons why that won't work."/etc.)

      – R.M.
      yesterday






    • 5





      Having taken grad-level Hebrew, I recall 10,000 being the gazillions equivalent. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the rest of the answer - but I think it draws in the boundaries a bit.

      – vbnet3d
      yesterday






    • 4





      Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I don't think euphemism is the word you want.

      – ruakh
      yesterday














    42












    42








    42







    I believe it to be an euphemism similar to how today one might say something like gazillions for a large number.



    In a society that is mostly innumerate as well as illiterate, where neither pencils nor paper exist and both slateboards and chalk are fragile and rare, the scale of numbers readily accessible to the common population are much smaller than today. The meaning of 40 to me comes across as: "longer than a month, and more days than one would care to count"; or as Wikepedia puts it in that link:




    similar to "umpteen".






    There is push-back in the comments about my use of the word euphemism above. I stand by that usage. The 1928 edition of the Oxford English Dictionary provides, as an exemplification of (proper) usage, the following from Fur Animals: by Eliott Coues, 1877: (p. 216, start of paragraph)




    The skunk yields a handsome fur, lately become fashionable, under the euphemism of Alaska Sable - for our elegant dames would surely not deck themselves in obscene Skunk skins if they were not permitted to call the rose by some other name.




    The softening of an exact, possibly estimated, number by the more general and de-nerded forty seems quite inline with Coues' usage.






    share|improve this answer















    I believe it to be an euphemism similar to how today one might say something like gazillions for a large number.



    In a society that is mostly innumerate as well as illiterate, where neither pencils nor paper exist and both slateboards and chalk are fragile and rare, the scale of numbers readily accessible to the common population are much smaller than today. The meaning of 40 to me comes across as: "longer than a month, and more days than one would care to count"; or as Wikepedia puts it in that link:




    similar to "umpteen".






    There is push-back in the comments about my use of the word euphemism above. I stand by that usage. The 1928 edition of the Oxford English Dictionary provides, as an exemplification of (proper) usage, the following from Fur Animals: by Eliott Coues, 1877: (p. 216, start of paragraph)




    The skunk yields a handsome fur, lately become fashionable, under the euphemism of Alaska Sable - for our elegant dames would surely not deck themselves in obscene Skunk skins if they were not permitted to call the rose by some other name.




    The softening of an exact, possibly estimated, number by the more general and de-nerded forty seems quite inline with Coues' usage.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 58 mins ago

























    answered yesterday









    Pieter GeerkensPieter Geerkens

    40.7k6117192




    40.7k6117192








    • 4





      @Mohair The extreme ages are almost certainly also poetically motivated exaggerations for "really old". You might also notice that Moses' age is exactly 3 * 40, where each 40-year period corresponds roughly to a different phase of his life: early adult life in Egypt; mid-life exile from, return to, and final departure from Egypt; and wandering in the desert.

      – chepner
      yesterday






    • 9





      Hebrew uses 40 like six year olds use 100.

      – Joshua
      yesterday






    • 9





      @Joshua Or adults use "million" ("If I had a million dollars."/"One in a million"/"There's a million reasons why that won't work."/etc.)

      – R.M.
      yesterday






    • 5





      Having taken grad-level Hebrew, I recall 10,000 being the gazillions equivalent. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the rest of the answer - but I think it draws in the boundaries a bit.

      – vbnet3d
      yesterday






    • 4





      Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I don't think euphemism is the word you want.

      – ruakh
      yesterday














    • 4





      @Mohair The extreme ages are almost certainly also poetically motivated exaggerations for "really old". You might also notice that Moses' age is exactly 3 * 40, where each 40-year period corresponds roughly to a different phase of his life: early adult life in Egypt; mid-life exile from, return to, and final departure from Egypt; and wandering in the desert.

      – chepner
      yesterday






    • 9





      Hebrew uses 40 like six year olds use 100.

      – Joshua
      yesterday






    • 9





      @Joshua Or adults use "million" ("If I had a million dollars."/"One in a million"/"There's a million reasons why that won't work."/etc.)

      – R.M.
      yesterday






    • 5





      Having taken grad-level Hebrew, I recall 10,000 being the gazillions equivalent. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the rest of the answer - but I think it draws in the boundaries a bit.

      – vbnet3d
      yesterday






    • 4





      Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I don't think euphemism is the word you want.

      – ruakh
      yesterday








    4




    4





    @Mohair The extreme ages are almost certainly also poetically motivated exaggerations for "really old". You might also notice that Moses' age is exactly 3 * 40, where each 40-year period corresponds roughly to a different phase of his life: early adult life in Egypt; mid-life exile from, return to, and final departure from Egypt; and wandering in the desert.

    – chepner
    yesterday





    @Mohair The extreme ages are almost certainly also poetically motivated exaggerations for "really old". You might also notice that Moses' age is exactly 3 * 40, where each 40-year period corresponds roughly to a different phase of his life: early adult life in Egypt; mid-life exile from, return to, and final departure from Egypt; and wandering in the desert.

    – chepner
    yesterday




    9




    9





    Hebrew uses 40 like six year olds use 100.

    – Joshua
    yesterday





    Hebrew uses 40 like six year olds use 100.

    – Joshua
    yesterday




    9




    9





    @Joshua Or adults use "million" ("If I had a million dollars."/"One in a million"/"There's a million reasons why that won't work."/etc.)

    – R.M.
    yesterday





    @Joshua Or adults use "million" ("If I had a million dollars."/"One in a million"/"There's a million reasons why that won't work."/etc.)

    – R.M.
    yesterday




    5




    5





    Having taken grad-level Hebrew, I recall 10,000 being the gazillions equivalent. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the rest of the answer - but I think it draws in the boundaries a bit.

    – vbnet3d
    yesterday





    Having taken grad-level Hebrew, I recall 10,000 being the gazillions equivalent. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the rest of the answer - but I think it draws in the boundaries a bit.

    – vbnet3d
    yesterday




    4




    4





    Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I don't think euphemism is the word you want.

    – ruakh
    yesterday





    Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I don't think euphemism is the word you want.

    – ruakh
    yesterday











    39














    There seems to be a bit of pushback on Pieter's (correct) answer, so perhaps a bit more detail is in order.



    It is not at all uncommon in languages to have words that, while technically a specific number, are usually used just to indicate an unspecified large amount. One of the technical terms for this is non-numerical vague quantifiers.



    The most well-known of these is of course the Hebrew Bible's "40", but they also had a word for an even larger indeterminate number: רבבה. This word came into English (via Greek) as "myriad", but the technical literal value for it is 10,000.



    Probably the next most famous for us English speakers is 1,001, which came into English from the Arabic work 1,001 Nights (which usually doesn't contain exactly 1,001 stories, unless you get an edition that purposely tried to edit to that amount for some weird reason). You can find all kinds of English-language books with titles on the theme "1,001 Uses For...", and nobody really expects those to contain exactly 1,001 of the thing in question.



    Now most secular (and mainline Christian) Biblical scholars will tell you that the earliest written source for the Hebrew scriptures (including the story of Noah that prominently featured the indeterminate 40) committed the stories to writing around the 6th Century BC.



    This was about 4 centuries before the Hebrews started using their distinctive Greek-borrowed numeric system (which resembles Roman Numerals a bit in implementation). At that time the numeric system in use would have been the old Babylonian Sexagesimal system. This survives today mostly in our units of time and angle "degree" (and thus Earth surface coordinate) measurements. This was technically a hybrid base 60 system, but represented with a weird base 10 tally system within the 60.



    enter image description here



    If that sounds complicated to you, you're probably still better off than the common Semite, who as Pieter pointed out, probably didn't really know how to read or use this system themselves beyond the bare basics required for everyday life. Doing reckoning under this system was much harder than what we have today, and there was no equivalent to the modern western education system, where every child gets basic mathematics instruction. Working with numbers that high was difficult, and very few in the audience of these stories would have been trained to do so.



    You may notice that the superglyph for 40 specifically is the first one where there isn't enough space for all the 10's tallies on one line, so you have to start compressing them together into 2 lines in the same amount of space. Perhaps its a coincidence, but this is certainly the point where the writing/carving for numbers starts to look like a bit of a mess. Its a lot.






    share|improve this answer


























    • That's really interesting. Any thoughts on how this relates to New Testament (Greek) use of 40?

      – vbnet3d
      yesterday






    • 3





      @vbnet3d - Given that the other known users of this "indeterminate 40" (early Christians, Muslims, and Yazidis) all came later and were influenced heavily by the Hebrew scriptures, the logical conclusion is that they borrowed it. Its also possible this was just a widespread aspect of the regional culture that they all inherited.

      – T.E.D.
      yesterday








    • 1





      Have you back-checked how often other numbers appear in the text? 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 50, 70? OT and NT concordances are different for "40". But especially in OT this interpretation is not incorrect, imo in more than two ways, but this A looks only at just one aspect. My 2 cents.

      – LangLangC
      yesterday











    • unspecified large amount

      – Mazura
      yesterday
















    39














    There seems to be a bit of pushback on Pieter's (correct) answer, so perhaps a bit more detail is in order.



    It is not at all uncommon in languages to have words that, while technically a specific number, are usually used just to indicate an unspecified large amount. One of the technical terms for this is non-numerical vague quantifiers.



    The most well-known of these is of course the Hebrew Bible's "40", but they also had a word for an even larger indeterminate number: רבבה. This word came into English (via Greek) as "myriad", but the technical literal value for it is 10,000.



    Probably the next most famous for us English speakers is 1,001, which came into English from the Arabic work 1,001 Nights (which usually doesn't contain exactly 1,001 stories, unless you get an edition that purposely tried to edit to that amount for some weird reason). You can find all kinds of English-language books with titles on the theme "1,001 Uses For...", and nobody really expects those to contain exactly 1,001 of the thing in question.



    Now most secular (and mainline Christian) Biblical scholars will tell you that the earliest written source for the Hebrew scriptures (including the story of Noah that prominently featured the indeterminate 40) committed the stories to writing around the 6th Century BC.



    This was about 4 centuries before the Hebrews started using their distinctive Greek-borrowed numeric system (which resembles Roman Numerals a bit in implementation). At that time the numeric system in use would have been the old Babylonian Sexagesimal system. This survives today mostly in our units of time and angle "degree" (and thus Earth surface coordinate) measurements. This was technically a hybrid base 60 system, but represented with a weird base 10 tally system within the 60.



    enter image description here



    If that sounds complicated to you, you're probably still better off than the common Semite, who as Pieter pointed out, probably didn't really know how to read or use this system themselves beyond the bare basics required for everyday life. Doing reckoning under this system was much harder than what we have today, and there was no equivalent to the modern western education system, where every child gets basic mathematics instruction. Working with numbers that high was difficult, and very few in the audience of these stories would have been trained to do so.



    You may notice that the superglyph for 40 specifically is the first one where there isn't enough space for all the 10's tallies on one line, so you have to start compressing them together into 2 lines in the same amount of space. Perhaps its a coincidence, but this is certainly the point where the writing/carving for numbers starts to look like a bit of a mess. Its a lot.






    share|improve this answer


























    • That's really interesting. Any thoughts on how this relates to New Testament (Greek) use of 40?

      – vbnet3d
      yesterday






    • 3





      @vbnet3d - Given that the other known users of this "indeterminate 40" (early Christians, Muslims, and Yazidis) all came later and were influenced heavily by the Hebrew scriptures, the logical conclusion is that they borrowed it. Its also possible this was just a widespread aspect of the regional culture that they all inherited.

      – T.E.D.
      yesterday








    • 1





      Have you back-checked how often other numbers appear in the text? 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 50, 70? OT and NT concordances are different for "40". But especially in OT this interpretation is not incorrect, imo in more than two ways, but this A looks only at just one aspect. My 2 cents.

      – LangLangC
      yesterday











    • unspecified large amount

      – Mazura
      yesterday














    39












    39








    39







    There seems to be a bit of pushback on Pieter's (correct) answer, so perhaps a bit more detail is in order.



    It is not at all uncommon in languages to have words that, while technically a specific number, are usually used just to indicate an unspecified large amount. One of the technical terms for this is non-numerical vague quantifiers.



    The most well-known of these is of course the Hebrew Bible's "40", but they also had a word for an even larger indeterminate number: רבבה. This word came into English (via Greek) as "myriad", but the technical literal value for it is 10,000.



    Probably the next most famous for us English speakers is 1,001, which came into English from the Arabic work 1,001 Nights (which usually doesn't contain exactly 1,001 stories, unless you get an edition that purposely tried to edit to that amount for some weird reason). You can find all kinds of English-language books with titles on the theme "1,001 Uses For...", and nobody really expects those to contain exactly 1,001 of the thing in question.



    Now most secular (and mainline Christian) Biblical scholars will tell you that the earliest written source for the Hebrew scriptures (including the story of Noah that prominently featured the indeterminate 40) committed the stories to writing around the 6th Century BC.



    This was about 4 centuries before the Hebrews started using their distinctive Greek-borrowed numeric system (which resembles Roman Numerals a bit in implementation). At that time the numeric system in use would have been the old Babylonian Sexagesimal system. This survives today mostly in our units of time and angle "degree" (and thus Earth surface coordinate) measurements. This was technically a hybrid base 60 system, but represented with a weird base 10 tally system within the 60.



    enter image description here



    If that sounds complicated to you, you're probably still better off than the common Semite, who as Pieter pointed out, probably didn't really know how to read or use this system themselves beyond the bare basics required for everyday life. Doing reckoning under this system was much harder than what we have today, and there was no equivalent to the modern western education system, where every child gets basic mathematics instruction. Working with numbers that high was difficult, and very few in the audience of these stories would have been trained to do so.



    You may notice that the superglyph for 40 specifically is the first one where there isn't enough space for all the 10's tallies on one line, so you have to start compressing them together into 2 lines in the same amount of space. Perhaps its a coincidence, but this is certainly the point where the writing/carving for numbers starts to look like a bit of a mess. Its a lot.






    share|improve this answer















    There seems to be a bit of pushback on Pieter's (correct) answer, so perhaps a bit more detail is in order.



    It is not at all uncommon in languages to have words that, while technically a specific number, are usually used just to indicate an unspecified large amount. One of the technical terms for this is non-numerical vague quantifiers.



    The most well-known of these is of course the Hebrew Bible's "40", but they also had a word for an even larger indeterminate number: רבבה. This word came into English (via Greek) as "myriad", but the technical literal value for it is 10,000.



    Probably the next most famous for us English speakers is 1,001, which came into English from the Arabic work 1,001 Nights (which usually doesn't contain exactly 1,001 stories, unless you get an edition that purposely tried to edit to that amount for some weird reason). You can find all kinds of English-language books with titles on the theme "1,001 Uses For...", and nobody really expects those to contain exactly 1,001 of the thing in question.



    Now most secular (and mainline Christian) Biblical scholars will tell you that the earliest written source for the Hebrew scriptures (including the story of Noah that prominently featured the indeterminate 40) committed the stories to writing around the 6th Century BC.



    This was about 4 centuries before the Hebrews started using their distinctive Greek-borrowed numeric system (which resembles Roman Numerals a bit in implementation). At that time the numeric system in use would have been the old Babylonian Sexagesimal system. This survives today mostly in our units of time and angle "degree" (and thus Earth surface coordinate) measurements. This was technically a hybrid base 60 system, but represented with a weird base 10 tally system within the 60.



    enter image description here



    If that sounds complicated to you, you're probably still better off than the common Semite, who as Pieter pointed out, probably didn't really know how to read or use this system themselves beyond the bare basics required for everyday life. Doing reckoning under this system was much harder than what we have today, and there was no equivalent to the modern western education system, where every child gets basic mathematics instruction. Working with numbers that high was difficult, and very few in the audience of these stories would have been trained to do so.



    You may notice that the superglyph for 40 specifically is the first one where there isn't enough space for all the 10's tallies on one line, so you have to start compressing them together into 2 lines in the same amount of space. Perhaps its a coincidence, but this is certainly the point where the writing/carving for numbers starts to look like a bit of a mess. Its a lot.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    T.E.D.T.E.D.

    76.1k10171313




    76.1k10171313













    • That's really interesting. Any thoughts on how this relates to New Testament (Greek) use of 40?

      – vbnet3d
      yesterday






    • 3





      @vbnet3d - Given that the other known users of this "indeterminate 40" (early Christians, Muslims, and Yazidis) all came later and were influenced heavily by the Hebrew scriptures, the logical conclusion is that they borrowed it. Its also possible this was just a widespread aspect of the regional culture that they all inherited.

      – T.E.D.
      yesterday








    • 1





      Have you back-checked how often other numbers appear in the text? 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 50, 70? OT and NT concordances are different for "40". But especially in OT this interpretation is not incorrect, imo in more than two ways, but this A looks only at just one aspect. My 2 cents.

      – LangLangC
      yesterday











    • unspecified large amount

      – Mazura
      yesterday



















    • That's really interesting. Any thoughts on how this relates to New Testament (Greek) use of 40?

      – vbnet3d
      yesterday






    • 3





      @vbnet3d - Given that the other known users of this "indeterminate 40" (early Christians, Muslims, and Yazidis) all came later and were influenced heavily by the Hebrew scriptures, the logical conclusion is that they borrowed it. Its also possible this was just a widespread aspect of the regional culture that they all inherited.

      – T.E.D.
      yesterday








    • 1





      Have you back-checked how often other numbers appear in the text? 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 50, 70? OT and NT concordances are different for "40". But especially in OT this interpretation is not incorrect, imo in more than two ways, but this A looks only at just one aspect. My 2 cents.

      – LangLangC
      yesterday











    • unspecified large amount

      – Mazura
      yesterday

















    That's really interesting. Any thoughts on how this relates to New Testament (Greek) use of 40?

    – vbnet3d
    yesterday





    That's really interesting. Any thoughts on how this relates to New Testament (Greek) use of 40?

    – vbnet3d
    yesterday




    3




    3





    @vbnet3d - Given that the other known users of this "indeterminate 40" (early Christians, Muslims, and Yazidis) all came later and were influenced heavily by the Hebrew scriptures, the logical conclusion is that they borrowed it. Its also possible this was just a widespread aspect of the regional culture that they all inherited.

    – T.E.D.
    yesterday







    @vbnet3d - Given that the other known users of this "indeterminate 40" (early Christians, Muslims, and Yazidis) all came later and were influenced heavily by the Hebrew scriptures, the logical conclusion is that they borrowed it. Its also possible this was just a widespread aspect of the regional culture that they all inherited.

    – T.E.D.
    yesterday






    1




    1





    Have you back-checked how often other numbers appear in the text? 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 50, 70? OT and NT concordances are different for "40". But especially in OT this interpretation is not incorrect, imo in more than two ways, but this A looks only at just one aspect. My 2 cents.

    – LangLangC
    yesterday





    Have you back-checked how often other numbers appear in the text? 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, 50, 70? OT and NT concordances are different for "40". But especially in OT this interpretation is not incorrect, imo in more than two ways, but this A looks only at just one aspect. My 2 cents.

    – LangLangC
    yesterday













    unspecified large amount

    – Mazura
    yesterday





    unspecified large amount

    – Mazura
    yesterday











    5














    Biblically, Forty is a number associated with testing and trials
    https://www.thoughtco.com/biblical-numerology-700168



    Jesus wandered in the wilderness 40 days, Israel wandered in the desert for 40 years etc.



    It's a number that indicates enough time passed for God to achieve a goal. Fullness of time.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    David is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      5














      Biblically, Forty is a number associated with testing and trials
      https://www.thoughtco.com/biblical-numerology-700168



      Jesus wandered in the wilderness 40 days, Israel wandered in the desert for 40 years etc.



      It's a number that indicates enough time passed for God to achieve a goal. Fullness of time.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      David is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        5












        5








        5







        Biblically, Forty is a number associated with testing and trials
        https://www.thoughtco.com/biblical-numerology-700168



        Jesus wandered in the wilderness 40 days, Israel wandered in the desert for 40 years etc.



        It's a number that indicates enough time passed for God to achieve a goal. Fullness of time.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        David is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        Biblically, Forty is a number associated with testing and trials
        https://www.thoughtco.com/biblical-numerology-700168



        Jesus wandered in the wilderness 40 days, Israel wandered in the desert for 40 years etc.



        It's a number that indicates enough time passed for God to achieve a goal. Fullness of time.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        David is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        David is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered yesterday









        DavidDavid

        751




        751




        New contributor




        David is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        David is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        David is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            Ron P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ron P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Ron P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ron P is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51599%2fwhat-is-the-significance-behind-40-days-that-often-appears-in-the-bible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa