A small doubt about the dominated convergence theorem












6












$begingroup$



Theorem $mathbf{A.2.11}$ (Dominated convergence). Let $f_n : X to mathbb R$ be a sequence of measurable functions and assume that there exists some integrable function $g : X to mathbb R$ such that $|f_n(x)| leq |g(x)|$ for $mu$-almost every $x$ in $X$. Assume moreover that the sequence $(f_n)_n$ converges at $mu$-almost every point to some function $f : X to mathbb R$. Then $f$ is integrable and satisfies $$lim_n int f_n , dmu = int f , dmu.$$




I wanted to know if in the hypothesis $|f_n(x)| leq|g(x)|$ above, if I already know that each $f_n$ is integrable, besides convergent, the theorem remains valid? Without me having to find this $g$ integrable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The dominating function $g$ is the whole point of the theorem. It's in the very name of the theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Mar 31 at 3:30
















6












$begingroup$



Theorem $mathbf{A.2.11}$ (Dominated convergence). Let $f_n : X to mathbb R$ be a sequence of measurable functions and assume that there exists some integrable function $g : X to mathbb R$ such that $|f_n(x)| leq |g(x)|$ for $mu$-almost every $x$ in $X$. Assume moreover that the sequence $(f_n)_n$ converges at $mu$-almost every point to some function $f : X to mathbb R$. Then $f$ is integrable and satisfies $$lim_n int f_n , dmu = int f , dmu.$$




I wanted to know if in the hypothesis $|f_n(x)| leq|g(x)|$ above, if I already know that each $f_n$ is integrable, besides convergent, the theorem remains valid? Without me having to find this $g$ integrable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The dominating function $g$ is the whole point of the theorem. It's in the very name of the theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Mar 31 at 3:30














6












6








6


2



$begingroup$



Theorem $mathbf{A.2.11}$ (Dominated convergence). Let $f_n : X to mathbb R$ be a sequence of measurable functions and assume that there exists some integrable function $g : X to mathbb R$ such that $|f_n(x)| leq |g(x)|$ for $mu$-almost every $x$ in $X$. Assume moreover that the sequence $(f_n)_n$ converges at $mu$-almost every point to some function $f : X to mathbb R$. Then $f$ is integrable and satisfies $$lim_n int f_n , dmu = int f , dmu.$$




I wanted to know if in the hypothesis $|f_n(x)| leq|g(x)|$ above, if I already know that each $f_n$ is integrable, besides convergent, the theorem remains valid? Without me having to find this $g$ integrable?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Theorem $mathbf{A.2.11}$ (Dominated convergence). Let $f_n : X to mathbb R$ be a sequence of measurable functions and assume that there exists some integrable function $g : X to mathbb R$ such that $|f_n(x)| leq |g(x)|$ for $mu$-almost every $x$ in $X$. Assume moreover that the sequence $(f_n)_n$ converges at $mu$-almost every point to some function $f : X to mathbb R$. Then $f$ is integrable and satisfies $$lim_n int f_n , dmu = int f , dmu.$$




I wanted to know if in the hypothesis $|f_n(x)| leq|g(x)|$ above, if I already know that each $f_n$ is integrable, besides convergent, the theorem remains valid? Without me having to find this $g$ integrable?







measure-theory convergence lebesgue-integral






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 31 at 1:27









Rócherz

3,0263822




3,0263822










asked Mar 31 at 1:14









Ricardo FreireRicardo Freire

599211




599211








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The dominating function $g$ is the whole point of the theorem. It's in the very name of the theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Mar 31 at 3:30














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The dominating function $g$ is the whole point of the theorem. It's in the very name of the theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Mar 31 at 3:30








4




4




$begingroup$
The dominating function $g$ is the whole point of the theorem. It's in the very name of the theorem.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Mar 31 at 3:30




$begingroup$
The dominating function $g$ is the whole point of the theorem. It's in the very name of the theorem.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Mar 31 at 3:30










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

This is an excellent question. For the theorem to apply, you need the $f_n$'s to be uniformly dominated by an integrable function $g$. To see this, consider the sequence
$$
f_n(x) := frac{1}{n} mathbf{1}_{[0,n]}(x).
$$

Clearly, $f_n in L^1(mathbb{R})$ for each $n in mathbb{N}$. Moreover, $f_n(x) to 0$ as $n to infty$ for each $x in mathbb{R}$. However,
begin{align*}
lim_{n to infty} int_{mathbb{R}} f_n,mathrm{d}m = lim_{n to infty} int_0^n frac{1}{n},mathrm{d}x = 1 neq 0.
end{align*}



Nevertheless, you are not in too much trouble if you cannot find a dominating function. If your sequence of functions is uniformly bounded in $L^p(E)$ for $1 < p < infty$ where $E$ has finite measure, then you can still take the limit inside the integral. Namely, the following theorem often helps to rectify the situation.




Theorem. Let $(f_n)$ be a sequence of measurable functions on a measure space $(X,mathfrak{M},mu)$ converging almost everywhere to a measurable function $f$. If $E in mathfrak{M}$ has finite measure and $(f_n)$ is bounded in $L^p(E)$ for some $1 < p < infty$, then
$$
lim_{n to infty} int_E f_n,mathrm{d}mu = int_E f,mathrm{d}mu.
$$

In fact, one has $f_n to f$ strongly in $L^1(E)$.




In a sense, one can do without a dominating function when the sequence is uniformly bounded in a "higher $L^p$-space" and the domain of integration has finite measure.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:45



















4












$begingroup$

In general, it is not sufficient that each $f_n$ be integrable without a dominating function. For instance, the functions $f_n = chi_{[n,n+1]}$ on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$ are all integrable, and $f_n(x) to 0$ for all $xin mathbf R_{ge 0}$, but they are not dominated by an integrable function $g$, and indeed we do not have
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} int f_n = int lim_{ntoinfty}f_n
$$

since in this case, the left-hand side is $1$, but the right-hand side is $0$.





To see why there is no dominating function $g$, such a function would have the property that $g(x)ge 1$ for each $xge 0$, so it would not be integrable on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:46












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168945%2fa-small-doubt-about-the-dominated-convergence-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

This is an excellent question. For the theorem to apply, you need the $f_n$'s to be uniformly dominated by an integrable function $g$. To see this, consider the sequence
$$
f_n(x) := frac{1}{n} mathbf{1}_{[0,n]}(x).
$$

Clearly, $f_n in L^1(mathbb{R})$ for each $n in mathbb{N}$. Moreover, $f_n(x) to 0$ as $n to infty$ for each $x in mathbb{R}$. However,
begin{align*}
lim_{n to infty} int_{mathbb{R}} f_n,mathrm{d}m = lim_{n to infty} int_0^n frac{1}{n},mathrm{d}x = 1 neq 0.
end{align*}



Nevertheless, you are not in too much trouble if you cannot find a dominating function. If your sequence of functions is uniformly bounded in $L^p(E)$ for $1 < p < infty$ where $E$ has finite measure, then you can still take the limit inside the integral. Namely, the following theorem often helps to rectify the situation.




Theorem. Let $(f_n)$ be a sequence of measurable functions on a measure space $(X,mathfrak{M},mu)$ converging almost everywhere to a measurable function $f$. If $E in mathfrak{M}$ has finite measure and $(f_n)$ is bounded in $L^p(E)$ for some $1 < p < infty$, then
$$
lim_{n to infty} int_E f_n,mathrm{d}mu = int_E f,mathrm{d}mu.
$$

In fact, one has $f_n to f$ strongly in $L^1(E)$.




In a sense, one can do without a dominating function when the sequence is uniformly bounded in a "higher $L^p$-space" and the domain of integration has finite measure.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:45
















7












$begingroup$

This is an excellent question. For the theorem to apply, you need the $f_n$'s to be uniformly dominated by an integrable function $g$. To see this, consider the sequence
$$
f_n(x) := frac{1}{n} mathbf{1}_{[0,n]}(x).
$$

Clearly, $f_n in L^1(mathbb{R})$ for each $n in mathbb{N}$. Moreover, $f_n(x) to 0$ as $n to infty$ for each $x in mathbb{R}$. However,
begin{align*}
lim_{n to infty} int_{mathbb{R}} f_n,mathrm{d}m = lim_{n to infty} int_0^n frac{1}{n},mathrm{d}x = 1 neq 0.
end{align*}



Nevertheless, you are not in too much trouble if you cannot find a dominating function. If your sequence of functions is uniformly bounded in $L^p(E)$ for $1 < p < infty$ where $E$ has finite measure, then you can still take the limit inside the integral. Namely, the following theorem often helps to rectify the situation.




Theorem. Let $(f_n)$ be a sequence of measurable functions on a measure space $(X,mathfrak{M},mu)$ converging almost everywhere to a measurable function $f$. If $E in mathfrak{M}$ has finite measure and $(f_n)$ is bounded in $L^p(E)$ for some $1 < p < infty$, then
$$
lim_{n to infty} int_E f_n,mathrm{d}mu = int_E f,mathrm{d}mu.
$$

In fact, one has $f_n to f$ strongly in $L^1(E)$.




In a sense, one can do without a dominating function when the sequence is uniformly bounded in a "higher $L^p$-space" and the domain of integration has finite measure.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:45














7












7








7





$begingroup$

This is an excellent question. For the theorem to apply, you need the $f_n$'s to be uniformly dominated by an integrable function $g$. To see this, consider the sequence
$$
f_n(x) := frac{1}{n} mathbf{1}_{[0,n]}(x).
$$

Clearly, $f_n in L^1(mathbb{R})$ for each $n in mathbb{N}$. Moreover, $f_n(x) to 0$ as $n to infty$ for each $x in mathbb{R}$. However,
begin{align*}
lim_{n to infty} int_{mathbb{R}} f_n,mathrm{d}m = lim_{n to infty} int_0^n frac{1}{n},mathrm{d}x = 1 neq 0.
end{align*}



Nevertheless, you are not in too much trouble if you cannot find a dominating function. If your sequence of functions is uniformly bounded in $L^p(E)$ for $1 < p < infty$ where $E$ has finite measure, then you can still take the limit inside the integral. Namely, the following theorem often helps to rectify the situation.




Theorem. Let $(f_n)$ be a sequence of measurable functions on a measure space $(X,mathfrak{M},mu)$ converging almost everywhere to a measurable function $f$. If $E in mathfrak{M}$ has finite measure and $(f_n)$ is bounded in $L^p(E)$ for some $1 < p < infty$, then
$$
lim_{n to infty} int_E f_n,mathrm{d}mu = int_E f,mathrm{d}mu.
$$

In fact, one has $f_n to f$ strongly in $L^1(E)$.




In a sense, one can do without a dominating function when the sequence is uniformly bounded in a "higher $L^p$-space" and the domain of integration has finite measure.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



This is an excellent question. For the theorem to apply, you need the $f_n$'s to be uniformly dominated by an integrable function $g$. To see this, consider the sequence
$$
f_n(x) := frac{1}{n} mathbf{1}_{[0,n]}(x).
$$

Clearly, $f_n in L^1(mathbb{R})$ for each $n in mathbb{N}$. Moreover, $f_n(x) to 0$ as $n to infty$ for each $x in mathbb{R}$. However,
begin{align*}
lim_{n to infty} int_{mathbb{R}} f_n,mathrm{d}m = lim_{n to infty} int_0^n frac{1}{n},mathrm{d}x = 1 neq 0.
end{align*}



Nevertheless, you are not in too much trouble if you cannot find a dominating function. If your sequence of functions is uniformly bounded in $L^p(E)$ for $1 < p < infty$ where $E$ has finite measure, then you can still take the limit inside the integral. Namely, the following theorem often helps to rectify the situation.




Theorem. Let $(f_n)$ be a sequence of measurable functions on a measure space $(X,mathfrak{M},mu)$ converging almost everywhere to a measurable function $f$. If $E in mathfrak{M}$ has finite measure and $(f_n)$ is bounded in $L^p(E)$ for some $1 < p < infty$, then
$$
lim_{n to infty} int_E f_n,mathrm{d}mu = int_E f,mathrm{d}mu.
$$

In fact, one has $f_n to f$ strongly in $L^1(E)$.




In a sense, one can do without a dominating function when the sequence is uniformly bounded in a "higher $L^p$-space" and the domain of integration has finite measure.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 31 at 8:01

























answered Mar 31 at 1:31









rolandcyprolandcyp

2,234421




2,234421












  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:45


















  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:45
















$begingroup$
I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Freire
Mar 31 at 1:45




$begingroup$
I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Freire
Mar 31 at 1:45











4












$begingroup$

In general, it is not sufficient that each $f_n$ be integrable without a dominating function. For instance, the functions $f_n = chi_{[n,n+1]}$ on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$ are all integrable, and $f_n(x) to 0$ for all $xin mathbf R_{ge 0}$, but they are not dominated by an integrable function $g$, and indeed we do not have
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} int f_n = int lim_{ntoinfty}f_n
$$

since in this case, the left-hand side is $1$, but the right-hand side is $0$.





To see why there is no dominating function $g$, such a function would have the property that $g(x)ge 1$ for each $xge 0$, so it would not be integrable on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:46
















4












$begingroup$

In general, it is not sufficient that each $f_n$ be integrable without a dominating function. For instance, the functions $f_n = chi_{[n,n+1]}$ on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$ are all integrable, and $f_n(x) to 0$ for all $xin mathbf R_{ge 0}$, but they are not dominated by an integrable function $g$, and indeed we do not have
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} int f_n = int lim_{ntoinfty}f_n
$$

since in this case, the left-hand side is $1$, but the right-hand side is $0$.





To see why there is no dominating function $g$, such a function would have the property that $g(x)ge 1$ for each $xge 0$, so it would not be integrable on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:46














4












4








4





$begingroup$

In general, it is not sufficient that each $f_n$ be integrable without a dominating function. For instance, the functions $f_n = chi_{[n,n+1]}$ on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$ are all integrable, and $f_n(x) to 0$ for all $xin mathbf R_{ge 0}$, but they are not dominated by an integrable function $g$, and indeed we do not have
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} int f_n = int lim_{ntoinfty}f_n
$$

since in this case, the left-hand side is $1$, but the right-hand side is $0$.





To see why there is no dominating function $g$, such a function would have the property that $g(x)ge 1$ for each $xge 0$, so it would not be integrable on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



In general, it is not sufficient that each $f_n$ be integrable without a dominating function. For instance, the functions $f_n = chi_{[n,n+1]}$ on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$ are all integrable, and $f_n(x) to 0$ for all $xin mathbf R_{ge 0}$, but they are not dominated by an integrable function $g$, and indeed we do not have
$$
lim_{ntoinfty} int f_n = int lim_{ntoinfty}f_n
$$

since in this case, the left-hand side is $1$, but the right-hand side is $0$.





To see why there is no dominating function $g$, such a function would have the property that $g(x)ge 1$ for each $xge 0$, so it would not be integrable on $mathbf R_{ge 0}$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 31 at 1:33









Alex OrtizAlex Ortiz

11.3k21441




11.3k21441












  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:46


















  • $begingroup$
    I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
    $endgroup$
    – Ricardo Freire
    Mar 31 at 1:46
















$begingroup$
I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Freire
Mar 31 at 1:46




$begingroup$
I understood. Thanks a lot for the help
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Freire
Mar 31 at 1:46


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168945%2fa-small-doubt-about-the-dominated-convergence-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...