Finding a solution of a PDE, which is growing in time












1












$begingroup$


I've been dealing with a problem about partial differential equations for a while and hope you can help me.



Let be $omega, c>0$ and $h: [0,a]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ regular ($a>0 in mathbb{R}$). Concern the inhomogenious, damped wave-equation



$u_{tt}(x,t) - c^2 u_{xx}(x,t)+ p u_t(x,t) =h(x) sin(omega t)~~~$ for $t>0, x in (0,a)$



$u(x,0) = 0 = u_t(x,0)$



$u(0,t) = 0 = u(a,t)$.



(a) Let be $p=0$. For which $omega$ do we get a solution, which is growing in time?
(b) What about $p>0$?



Well, I guess (a) requires solving the equation, so - due to $u(x,0) = 0 = u_t(x,0)$ and $u(0,t) = 0 = u(a,t)$ - my approach was as follows:



There is only one term in the universal solution which contributes. For Eigenvectors $phi_n(x)=sqrt{2} sin(frac{npi x}{l})$ and Eigenvalues $lambda_n = left(frac{c n pi}{l}right)^2$ we get:



$u(x,t) = int_{0}^{t} sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{sin(sqrt{lambda_n}(t-s))}{sqrt{lambda_n}} f_n(s) phi_n(s) ds $



I tried to evalueate the integral above and hoped to get some term, where I see some kind of condition for $omega$ but this integral gets a real crap (which even doesn't result into something nice when I use some trigonometric identities before summing up).



Does anyone have an idea how I can find out some condition for $omega$?



Furthermore, due to the $r$-Term doesn't vanish any more (and nothing I've found in my book doesn't apply), I don't have an idea for b). Can anyone help me?



Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Which means you probably meant $r$ instead of $p$.
    $endgroup$
    – DaveNine
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:15










  • $begingroup$
    What book is this out of?
    $endgroup$
    – DaveNine
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:16










  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you use the tag hyperbolic equation instead of elliptic?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 20 '18 at 6:45
















1












$begingroup$


I've been dealing with a problem about partial differential equations for a while and hope you can help me.



Let be $omega, c>0$ and $h: [0,a]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ regular ($a>0 in mathbb{R}$). Concern the inhomogenious, damped wave-equation



$u_{tt}(x,t) - c^2 u_{xx}(x,t)+ p u_t(x,t) =h(x) sin(omega t)~~~$ for $t>0, x in (0,a)$



$u(x,0) = 0 = u_t(x,0)$



$u(0,t) = 0 = u(a,t)$.



(a) Let be $p=0$. For which $omega$ do we get a solution, which is growing in time?
(b) What about $p>0$?



Well, I guess (a) requires solving the equation, so - due to $u(x,0) = 0 = u_t(x,0)$ and $u(0,t) = 0 = u(a,t)$ - my approach was as follows:



There is only one term in the universal solution which contributes. For Eigenvectors $phi_n(x)=sqrt{2} sin(frac{npi x}{l})$ and Eigenvalues $lambda_n = left(frac{c n pi}{l}right)^2$ we get:



$u(x,t) = int_{0}^{t} sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{sin(sqrt{lambda_n}(t-s))}{sqrt{lambda_n}} f_n(s) phi_n(s) ds $



I tried to evalueate the integral above and hoped to get some term, where I see some kind of condition for $omega$ but this integral gets a real crap (which even doesn't result into something nice when I use some trigonometric identities before summing up).



Does anyone have an idea how I can find out some condition for $omega$?



Furthermore, due to the $r$-Term doesn't vanish any more (and nothing I've found in my book doesn't apply), I don't have an idea for b). Can anyone help me?



Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Which means you probably meant $r$ instead of $p$.
    $endgroup$
    – DaveNine
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:15










  • $begingroup$
    What book is this out of?
    $endgroup$
    – DaveNine
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:16










  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you use the tag hyperbolic equation instead of elliptic?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 20 '18 at 6:45














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


I've been dealing with a problem about partial differential equations for a while and hope you can help me.



Let be $omega, c>0$ and $h: [0,a]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ regular ($a>0 in mathbb{R}$). Concern the inhomogenious, damped wave-equation



$u_{tt}(x,t) - c^2 u_{xx}(x,t)+ p u_t(x,t) =h(x) sin(omega t)~~~$ for $t>0, x in (0,a)$



$u(x,0) = 0 = u_t(x,0)$



$u(0,t) = 0 = u(a,t)$.



(a) Let be $p=0$. For which $omega$ do we get a solution, which is growing in time?
(b) What about $p>0$?



Well, I guess (a) requires solving the equation, so - due to $u(x,0) = 0 = u_t(x,0)$ and $u(0,t) = 0 = u(a,t)$ - my approach was as follows:



There is only one term in the universal solution which contributes. For Eigenvectors $phi_n(x)=sqrt{2} sin(frac{npi x}{l})$ and Eigenvalues $lambda_n = left(frac{c n pi}{l}right)^2$ we get:



$u(x,t) = int_{0}^{t} sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{sin(sqrt{lambda_n}(t-s))}{sqrt{lambda_n}} f_n(s) phi_n(s) ds $



I tried to evalueate the integral above and hoped to get some term, where I see some kind of condition for $omega$ but this integral gets a real crap (which even doesn't result into something nice when I use some trigonometric identities before summing up).



Does anyone have an idea how I can find out some condition for $omega$?



Furthermore, due to the $r$-Term doesn't vanish any more (and nothing I've found in my book doesn't apply), I don't have an idea for b). Can anyone help me?



Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I've been dealing with a problem about partial differential equations for a while and hope you can help me.



Let be $omega, c>0$ and $h: [0,a]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ regular ($a>0 in mathbb{R}$). Concern the inhomogenious, damped wave-equation



$u_{tt}(x,t) - c^2 u_{xx}(x,t)+ p u_t(x,t) =h(x) sin(omega t)~~~$ for $t>0, x in (0,a)$



$u(x,0) = 0 = u_t(x,0)$



$u(0,t) = 0 = u(a,t)$.



(a) Let be $p=0$. For which $omega$ do we get a solution, which is growing in time?
(b) What about $p>0$?



Well, I guess (a) requires solving the equation, so - due to $u(x,0) = 0 = u_t(x,0)$ and $u(0,t) = 0 = u(a,t)$ - my approach was as follows:



There is only one term in the universal solution which contributes. For Eigenvectors $phi_n(x)=sqrt{2} sin(frac{npi x}{l})$ and Eigenvalues $lambda_n = left(frac{c n pi}{l}right)^2$ we get:



$u(x,t) = int_{0}^{t} sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{sin(sqrt{lambda_n}(t-s))}{sqrt{lambda_n}} f_n(s) phi_n(s) ds $



I tried to evalueate the integral above and hoped to get some term, where I see some kind of condition for $omega$ but this integral gets a real crap (which even doesn't result into something nice when I use some trigonometric identities before summing up).



Does anyone have an idea how I can find out some condition for $omega$?



Furthermore, due to the $r$-Term doesn't vanish any more (and nothing I've found in my book doesn't apply), I don't have an idea for b). Can anyone help me?



Thanks in advance!







ordinary-differential-equations pde elliptic-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 20 '18 at 7:16







pcalc

















asked Dec 19 '18 at 22:06









pcalcpcalc

29918




29918












  • $begingroup$
    Which means you probably meant $r$ instead of $p$.
    $endgroup$
    – DaveNine
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:15










  • $begingroup$
    What book is this out of?
    $endgroup$
    – DaveNine
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:16










  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you use the tag hyperbolic equation instead of elliptic?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 20 '18 at 6:45


















  • $begingroup$
    Which means you probably meant $r$ instead of $p$.
    $endgroup$
    – DaveNine
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:15










  • $begingroup$
    What book is this out of?
    $endgroup$
    – DaveNine
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:16










  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you use the tag hyperbolic equation instead of elliptic?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 20 '18 at 6:45
















$begingroup$
Which means you probably meant $r$ instead of $p$.
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 20 '18 at 1:15




$begingroup$
Which means you probably meant $r$ instead of $p$.
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 20 '18 at 1:15












$begingroup$
What book is this out of?
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 20 '18 at 1:16




$begingroup$
What book is this out of?
$endgroup$
– DaveNine
Dec 20 '18 at 1:16












$begingroup$
Shouldn't you use the tag hyperbolic equation instead of elliptic?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 20 '18 at 6:45




$begingroup$
Shouldn't you use the tag hyperbolic equation instead of elliptic?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 20 '18 at 6:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

I'm going to write this out in hopes that it puts you in the write direction, but this is not a complete answer.



Assuming that the solution takes the form(taking on a eigenfunction expansion technique)



$$u(x, t) = sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_n(t) sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)}$$



We get



$$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left[c_n''(t)+rc_n'(t)+left(frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) right]sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)} = h(x)sin{(omega t)}$$



Since $h(x)in L^2[0,a]$, we can write that



$$h(x) = sum_{n=0}^{infty}b_n sin{left(frac{n pi x}{a}right)}$$



where $b_n$ are the fourier coefficients for $h(x)$, $b_n = frac{2}{a}int_0^a h(x)sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)},dx$. This means we get the following ODE which we only really care about to analyze, since we are concerned with long term behavior.



$$begin{cases}
c_n''(t) + rc_n'(t) + left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) = b_n sin{(omega t)} \
c_n(0) = c_n'(0) = 0
end{cases}$$



The solution to this system completely depends on the eigenvalues of this ODE, we can actually write out a solution using variation of parameters.



Letting $$gamma =left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2, lambda_{pm} = frac{-r pm sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}{2}$$



We can solve for $c_n(t)$ with variation of parameters, this gives



$$c_n(t) = Ae^{lambda_{+}t}+Be^{lambda_{-}t} + y_p(t)$$
Where



$$y_p(t) = -b_ne^{lambda_{+}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{-}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds + b_ne^{lambda_{-}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{+}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds$$



It can be shown that $y_p(0)=y_p'(0)=0$, so that $A = B = 0$, and our solution is just



$$c_n(t) = frac{b_n}{sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}int_0^t e^{rs}sin{(omega s)}left(e^{lambda_{-}s + lambda_{+}t} - e^{lambda_{+}s + lambda_{-}t} right), ds$$



We can now use this expression to divulge on some cases:



When $r = 0$,



$$c_n(t) = b_nfrac{gamma sin{omega t} - omega sin{gamma t}}{gamma^3 - gamma omega^2}$$



When $r > 0$, it may be worth looking at some specific cases, such as $r = 2gamma$ which gives a repeated eigenvalue (which you should be able to conclude blow up). It looks like $omega = gamma$ might be of interest as well.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046916%2ffinding-a-solution-of-a-pde-which-is-growing-in-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    I'm going to write this out in hopes that it puts you in the write direction, but this is not a complete answer.



    Assuming that the solution takes the form(taking on a eigenfunction expansion technique)



    $$u(x, t) = sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_n(t) sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)}$$



    We get



    $$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left[c_n''(t)+rc_n'(t)+left(frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) right]sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)} = h(x)sin{(omega t)}$$



    Since $h(x)in L^2[0,a]$, we can write that



    $$h(x) = sum_{n=0}^{infty}b_n sin{left(frac{n pi x}{a}right)}$$



    where $b_n$ are the fourier coefficients for $h(x)$, $b_n = frac{2}{a}int_0^a h(x)sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)},dx$. This means we get the following ODE which we only really care about to analyze, since we are concerned with long term behavior.



    $$begin{cases}
    c_n''(t) + rc_n'(t) + left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) = b_n sin{(omega t)} \
    c_n(0) = c_n'(0) = 0
    end{cases}$$



    The solution to this system completely depends on the eigenvalues of this ODE, we can actually write out a solution using variation of parameters.



    Letting $$gamma =left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2, lambda_{pm} = frac{-r pm sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}{2}$$



    We can solve for $c_n(t)$ with variation of parameters, this gives



    $$c_n(t) = Ae^{lambda_{+}t}+Be^{lambda_{-}t} + y_p(t)$$
    Where



    $$y_p(t) = -b_ne^{lambda_{+}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{-}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds + b_ne^{lambda_{-}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{+}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds$$



    It can be shown that $y_p(0)=y_p'(0)=0$, so that $A = B = 0$, and our solution is just



    $$c_n(t) = frac{b_n}{sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}int_0^t e^{rs}sin{(omega s)}left(e^{lambda_{-}s + lambda_{+}t} - e^{lambda_{+}s + lambda_{-}t} right), ds$$



    We can now use this expression to divulge on some cases:



    When $r = 0$,



    $$c_n(t) = b_nfrac{gamma sin{omega t} - omega sin{gamma t}}{gamma^3 - gamma omega^2}$$



    When $r > 0$, it may be worth looking at some specific cases, such as $r = 2gamma$ which gives a repeated eigenvalue (which you should be able to conclude blow up). It looks like $omega = gamma$ might be of interest as well.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      I'm going to write this out in hopes that it puts you in the write direction, but this is not a complete answer.



      Assuming that the solution takes the form(taking on a eigenfunction expansion technique)



      $$u(x, t) = sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_n(t) sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)}$$



      We get



      $$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left[c_n''(t)+rc_n'(t)+left(frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) right]sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)} = h(x)sin{(omega t)}$$



      Since $h(x)in L^2[0,a]$, we can write that



      $$h(x) = sum_{n=0}^{infty}b_n sin{left(frac{n pi x}{a}right)}$$



      where $b_n$ are the fourier coefficients for $h(x)$, $b_n = frac{2}{a}int_0^a h(x)sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)},dx$. This means we get the following ODE which we only really care about to analyze, since we are concerned with long term behavior.



      $$begin{cases}
      c_n''(t) + rc_n'(t) + left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) = b_n sin{(omega t)} \
      c_n(0) = c_n'(0) = 0
      end{cases}$$



      The solution to this system completely depends on the eigenvalues of this ODE, we can actually write out a solution using variation of parameters.



      Letting $$gamma =left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2, lambda_{pm} = frac{-r pm sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}{2}$$



      We can solve for $c_n(t)$ with variation of parameters, this gives



      $$c_n(t) = Ae^{lambda_{+}t}+Be^{lambda_{-}t} + y_p(t)$$
      Where



      $$y_p(t) = -b_ne^{lambda_{+}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{-}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds + b_ne^{lambda_{-}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{+}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds$$



      It can be shown that $y_p(0)=y_p'(0)=0$, so that $A = B = 0$, and our solution is just



      $$c_n(t) = frac{b_n}{sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}int_0^t e^{rs}sin{(omega s)}left(e^{lambda_{-}s + lambda_{+}t} - e^{lambda_{+}s + lambda_{-}t} right), ds$$



      We can now use this expression to divulge on some cases:



      When $r = 0$,



      $$c_n(t) = b_nfrac{gamma sin{omega t} - omega sin{gamma t}}{gamma^3 - gamma omega^2}$$



      When $r > 0$, it may be worth looking at some specific cases, such as $r = 2gamma$ which gives a repeated eigenvalue (which you should be able to conclude blow up). It looks like $omega = gamma$ might be of interest as well.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        I'm going to write this out in hopes that it puts you in the write direction, but this is not a complete answer.



        Assuming that the solution takes the form(taking on a eigenfunction expansion technique)



        $$u(x, t) = sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_n(t) sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)}$$



        We get



        $$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left[c_n''(t)+rc_n'(t)+left(frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) right]sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)} = h(x)sin{(omega t)}$$



        Since $h(x)in L^2[0,a]$, we can write that



        $$h(x) = sum_{n=0}^{infty}b_n sin{left(frac{n pi x}{a}right)}$$



        where $b_n$ are the fourier coefficients for $h(x)$, $b_n = frac{2}{a}int_0^a h(x)sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)},dx$. This means we get the following ODE which we only really care about to analyze, since we are concerned with long term behavior.



        $$begin{cases}
        c_n''(t) + rc_n'(t) + left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) = b_n sin{(omega t)} \
        c_n(0) = c_n'(0) = 0
        end{cases}$$



        The solution to this system completely depends on the eigenvalues of this ODE, we can actually write out a solution using variation of parameters.



        Letting $$gamma =left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2, lambda_{pm} = frac{-r pm sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}{2}$$



        We can solve for $c_n(t)$ with variation of parameters, this gives



        $$c_n(t) = Ae^{lambda_{+}t}+Be^{lambda_{-}t} + y_p(t)$$
        Where



        $$y_p(t) = -b_ne^{lambda_{+}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{-}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds + b_ne^{lambda_{-}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{+}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds$$



        It can be shown that $y_p(0)=y_p'(0)=0$, so that $A = B = 0$, and our solution is just



        $$c_n(t) = frac{b_n}{sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}int_0^t e^{rs}sin{(omega s)}left(e^{lambda_{-}s + lambda_{+}t} - e^{lambda_{+}s + lambda_{-}t} right), ds$$



        We can now use this expression to divulge on some cases:



        When $r = 0$,



        $$c_n(t) = b_nfrac{gamma sin{omega t} - omega sin{gamma t}}{gamma^3 - gamma omega^2}$$



        When $r > 0$, it may be worth looking at some specific cases, such as $r = 2gamma$ which gives a repeated eigenvalue (which you should be able to conclude blow up). It looks like $omega = gamma$ might be of interest as well.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        I'm going to write this out in hopes that it puts you in the write direction, but this is not a complete answer.



        Assuming that the solution takes the form(taking on a eigenfunction expansion technique)



        $$u(x, t) = sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_n(t) sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)}$$



        We get



        $$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left[c_n''(t)+rc_n'(t)+left(frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) right]sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)} = h(x)sin{(omega t)}$$



        Since $h(x)in L^2[0,a]$, we can write that



        $$h(x) = sum_{n=0}^{infty}b_n sin{left(frac{n pi x}{a}right)}$$



        where $b_n$ are the fourier coefficients for $h(x)$, $b_n = frac{2}{a}int_0^a h(x)sin{left( frac{n pi x}{a} right)},dx$. This means we get the following ODE which we only really care about to analyze, since we are concerned with long term behavior.



        $$begin{cases}
        c_n''(t) + rc_n'(t) + left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2c_n(t) = b_n sin{(omega t)} \
        c_n(0) = c_n'(0) = 0
        end{cases}$$



        The solution to this system completely depends on the eigenvalues of this ODE, we can actually write out a solution using variation of parameters.



        Letting $$gamma =left( frac{n pi c}{a} right)^2, lambda_{pm} = frac{-r pm sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}{2}$$



        We can solve for $c_n(t)$ with variation of parameters, this gives



        $$c_n(t) = Ae^{lambda_{+}t}+Be^{lambda_{-}t} + y_p(t)$$
        Where



        $$y_p(t) = -b_ne^{lambda_{+}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{-}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds + b_ne^{lambda_{-}t}int_0^t frac{e^{lambda_{+}s}sin{omega s}}{-e^{-rs}sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}, ds$$



        It can be shown that $y_p(0)=y_p'(0)=0$, so that $A = B = 0$, and our solution is just



        $$c_n(t) = frac{b_n}{sqrt{r^2 - 4gamma^2}}int_0^t e^{rs}sin{(omega s)}left(e^{lambda_{-}s + lambda_{+}t} - e^{lambda_{+}s + lambda_{-}t} right), ds$$



        We can now use this expression to divulge on some cases:



        When $r = 0$,



        $$c_n(t) = b_nfrac{gamma sin{omega t} - omega sin{gamma t}}{gamma^3 - gamma omega^2}$$



        When $r > 0$, it may be worth looking at some specific cases, such as $r = 2gamma$ which gives a repeated eigenvalue (which you should be able to conclude blow up). It looks like $omega = gamma$ might be of interest as well.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 20 '18 at 6:49

























        answered Dec 20 '18 at 2:37









        DaveNineDaveNine

        1,3161914




        1,3161914






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046916%2ffinding-a-solution-of-a-pde-which-is-growing-in-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...