Unique right eigenvector for row stochastic matrix












1












$begingroup$


Suppose $P$ is a row-stochastic matrix. Then $1$ is a right-eigenvalue of $P$, and any constant vector $v$ will satisfy $Pv=v$. When is it the case that only constant vectors solve $Pv=v$? In particular, I am wondering if this is the case if if $P$ is irreducible and aperiodic.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Suppose $P$ is a row-stochastic matrix. Then $1$ is a right-eigenvalue of $P$, and any constant vector $v$ will satisfy $Pv=v$. When is it the case that only constant vectors solve $Pv=v$? In particular, I am wondering if this is the case if if $P$ is irreducible and aperiodic.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Suppose $P$ is a row-stochastic matrix. Then $1$ is a right-eigenvalue of $P$, and any constant vector $v$ will satisfy $Pv=v$. When is it the case that only constant vectors solve $Pv=v$? In particular, I am wondering if this is the case if if $P$ is irreducible and aperiodic.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose $P$ is a row-stochastic matrix. Then $1$ is a right-eigenvalue of $P$, and any constant vector $v$ will satisfy $Pv=v$. When is it the case that only constant vectors solve $Pv=v$? In particular, I am wondering if this is the case if if $P$ is irreducible and aperiodic.







      linear-algebra markov-chains






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 19 '18 at 23:22









      MikeMike

      368110




      368110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The condition that $P$ is irreducible is enough to guarantee that property.



          We need to show that $Pv=v$ implies $v_1=ldots=v_n$. Let $v_p$ be the smallest component of $v$, so that $v_i ge v_p$ for all $i$. Let $U subseteq {1,ldots,n}$ be the set of those indices for which $v_i=v_p$. Note that $Uneq emptyset$ since $p in U$. If $m in U$, then
          $$
          (P v)_m = v_m = v_p.
          $$

          Now, because $P$ is row-stochastic, the left hand side of the above equation is a convex combination of the components of $v$, while the right hand side is a minimum-value component of $v$. The only way that a convex combination of elements can yield a value equal to the minimum element is when all elements with a positive coefficient (here, all $v_k$ such that $P_{km}>0$) are equal to the minimum. Thus, $m in U$ implies $k in U$ whenever $P_{km}>0$. Since $P$ is irreducible, this implies $U={1,ldots,n}$, hence $v_1=ldots=v_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046972%2funique-right-eigenvector-for-row-stochastic-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            The condition that $P$ is irreducible is enough to guarantee that property.



            We need to show that $Pv=v$ implies $v_1=ldots=v_n$. Let $v_p$ be the smallest component of $v$, so that $v_i ge v_p$ for all $i$. Let $U subseteq {1,ldots,n}$ be the set of those indices for which $v_i=v_p$. Note that $Uneq emptyset$ since $p in U$. If $m in U$, then
            $$
            (P v)_m = v_m = v_p.
            $$

            Now, because $P$ is row-stochastic, the left hand side of the above equation is a convex combination of the components of $v$, while the right hand side is a minimum-value component of $v$. The only way that a convex combination of elements can yield a value equal to the minimum element is when all elements with a positive coefficient (here, all $v_k$ such that $P_{km}>0$) are equal to the minimum. Thus, $m in U$ implies $k in U$ whenever $P_{km}>0$. Since $P$ is irreducible, this implies $U={1,ldots,n}$, hence $v_1=ldots=v_n$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              The condition that $P$ is irreducible is enough to guarantee that property.



              We need to show that $Pv=v$ implies $v_1=ldots=v_n$. Let $v_p$ be the smallest component of $v$, so that $v_i ge v_p$ for all $i$. Let $U subseteq {1,ldots,n}$ be the set of those indices for which $v_i=v_p$. Note that $Uneq emptyset$ since $p in U$. If $m in U$, then
              $$
              (P v)_m = v_m = v_p.
              $$

              Now, because $P$ is row-stochastic, the left hand side of the above equation is a convex combination of the components of $v$, while the right hand side is a minimum-value component of $v$. The only way that a convex combination of elements can yield a value equal to the minimum element is when all elements with a positive coefficient (here, all $v_k$ such that $P_{km}>0$) are equal to the minimum. Thus, $m in U$ implies $k in U$ whenever $P_{km}>0$. Since $P$ is irreducible, this implies $U={1,ldots,n}$, hence $v_1=ldots=v_n$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                The condition that $P$ is irreducible is enough to guarantee that property.



                We need to show that $Pv=v$ implies $v_1=ldots=v_n$. Let $v_p$ be the smallest component of $v$, so that $v_i ge v_p$ for all $i$. Let $U subseteq {1,ldots,n}$ be the set of those indices for which $v_i=v_p$. Note that $Uneq emptyset$ since $p in U$. If $m in U$, then
                $$
                (P v)_m = v_m = v_p.
                $$

                Now, because $P$ is row-stochastic, the left hand side of the above equation is a convex combination of the components of $v$, while the right hand side is a minimum-value component of $v$. The only way that a convex combination of elements can yield a value equal to the minimum element is when all elements with a positive coefficient (here, all $v_k$ such that $P_{km}>0$) are equal to the minimum. Thus, $m in U$ implies $k in U$ whenever $P_{km}>0$. Since $P$ is irreducible, this implies $U={1,ldots,n}$, hence $v_1=ldots=v_n$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The condition that $P$ is irreducible is enough to guarantee that property.



                We need to show that $Pv=v$ implies $v_1=ldots=v_n$. Let $v_p$ be the smallest component of $v$, so that $v_i ge v_p$ for all $i$. Let $U subseteq {1,ldots,n}$ be the set of those indices for which $v_i=v_p$. Note that $Uneq emptyset$ since $p in U$. If $m in U$, then
                $$
                (P v)_m = v_m = v_p.
                $$

                Now, because $P$ is row-stochastic, the left hand side of the above equation is a convex combination of the components of $v$, while the right hand side is a minimum-value component of $v$. The only way that a convex combination of elements can yield a value equal to the minimum element is when all elements with a positive coefficient (here, all $v_k$ such that $P_{km}>0$) are equal to the minimum. Thus, $m in U$ implies $k in U$ whenever $P_{km}>0$. Since $P$ is irreducible, this implies $U={1,ldots,n}$, hence $v_1=ldots=v_n$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 19 '18 at 23:51









                VincenzoVincenzo

                21816




                21816






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046972%2funique-right-eigenvector-for-row-stochastic-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...