How to disable “uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading”?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I'm using the Chrome browser extension uBlock Origin. It works to block ads and other elements on web pages.
However sometimes it blocks whole pages with the message:
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading
How can I disable this feature completely? It really annoys me.
google-chrome-extensions ublock
edited Jul 22 '16 at 11:30
DavidPostill♦
108k27235271
asked Jul 22 '16 at 8:01
Colonel PanicColonel Panic
6,136164874
add a comment |
I'm using the Chrome browser extension uBlock Origin. It works to block ads and other elements on web pages.
However sometimes it blocks whole pages with the message:
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading
How can I disable this feature completely? It really annoys me.
google-chrome-extensions ublock
edited Jul 22 '16 at 11:30
DavidPostill♦
108k27235271
asked Jul 22 '16 at 8:01
Colonel PanicColonel Panic
6,136164874
1
can you give me an example, where I can try that? never encountered a page that was blocked completely by ublock (using it myself for some months now)
– Phillip -Zyan K Lee- Stockmann
Jul 22 '16 at 8:03
@Phillip-ZyanKLee-Stockmann I'll post an example here when I next see one.
– Colonel Panic
Jul 22 '16 at 8:52
Here is an example which I encountered using the Enhanced Steam firefox addon: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:28
add a comment |
I'm using the Chrome browser extension uBlock Origin. It works to block ads and other elements on web pages.
However sometimes it blocks whole pages with the message:
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading
How can I disable this feature completely? It really annoys me.
google-chrome-extensions ublock
edited Jul 22 '16 at 11:30
DavidPostill♦
108k27235271
asked Jul 22 '16 at 8:01
Colonel PanicColonel Panic
6,136164874
I'm using the Chrome browser extension uBlock Origin. It works to block ads and other elements on web pages.
However sometimes it blocks whole pages with the message:
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading
How can I disable this feature completely? It really annoys me.
google-chrome-extensions ublock
google-chrome-extensions ublock
edited Jul 22 '16 at 11:30
DavidPostill♦
108k27235271
asked Jul 22 '16 at 8:01
Colonel PanicColonel Panic
6,136164874
edited Jul 22 '16 at 11:30
DavidPostill♦
108k27235271
asked Jul 22 '16 at 8:01
Colonel PanicColonel Panic
6,136164874
edited Jul 22 '16 at 11:30
DavidPostill♦
108k27235271
edited Jul 22 '16 at 11:30
DavidPostill♦
108k27235271
edited Jul 22 '16 at 11:30
DavidPostill♦
108k27235271
108k27235271
asked Jul 22 '16 at 8:01
Colonel PanicColonel Panic
6,136164874
asked Jul 22 '16 at 8:01
Colonel PanicColonel Panic
6,136164874
asked Jul 22 '16 at 8:01
Colonel PanicColonel Panic
6,136164874
6,136164874
1
can you give me an example, where I can try that? never encountered a page that was blocked completely by ublock (using it myself for some months now)
– Phillip -Zyan K Lee- Stockmann
Jul 22 '16 at 8:03
@Phillip-ZyanKLee-Stockmann I'll post an example here when I next see one.
– Colonel Panic
Jul 22 '16 at 8:52
Here is an example which I encountered using the Enhanced Steam firefox addon: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:28
add a comment |
1
can you give me an example, where I can try that? never encountered a page that was blocked completely by ublock (using it myself for some months now)
– Phillip -Zyan K Lee- Stockmann
Jul 22 '16 at 8:03
@Phillip-ZyanKLee-Stockmann I'll post an example here when I next see one.
– Colonel Panic
Jul 22 '16 at 8:52
Here is an example which I encountered using the Enhanced Steam firefox addon: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:28
1
1
can you give me an example, where I can try that? never encountered a page that was blocked completely by ublock (using it myself for some months now)
– Phillip -Zyan K Lee- Stockmann
Jul 22 '16 at 8:03
can you give me an example, where I can try that? never encountered a page that was blocked completely by ublock (using it myself for some months now)
– Phillip -Zyan K Lee- Stockmann
Jul 22 '16 at 8:03
@Phillip-ZyanKLee-Stockmann I'll post an example here when I next see one.
– Colonel Panic
Jul 22 '16 at 8:52
@Phillip-ZyanKLee-Stockmann I'll post an example here when I next see one.
– Colonel Panic
Jul 22 '16 at 8:52
Here is an example which I encountered using the Enhanced Steam firefox addon: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:28
Here is an example which I encountered using the Enhanced Steam firefox addon: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:28
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The page itself has the solution: there are buttons in there which offers you to disable temporarily or permanently the whole page blocking (aka "strict blocking") for the current site.
If exposing hidden redirects and not connecting at all to dubious sites is less important to you than a once-in-a-while-with-easy-temporary-or-permanent-remediation "annoyance", then the wiki documentation has the solution (add to the My rules pane):
no-strict-blocking: * true
edited May 20 '18 at 20:08
Freedom_Ben
24017
answered Jul 22 '16 at 16:57
rhillrhill
50634
1
Bad cut & paste from doc, the rule to add isno-strict-blocking: * true, notstrict-blocking: * true. I fixed my answer.
– rhill
Jul 23 '16 at 3:55
The page itself does not always have the solution. Typically, no solution with this redirection: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:30
For info, the problem exists for uMatrix as well, and I could not find the equivalent of this wiki page (the one you linked to is for uBlock).
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:44
add a comment |
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading
uBlock Origin will block whole pages if the URL matches something in the Malware Domains list:
These domains are blocked by default:
The default behavior of uBlock Origin when newly installed is to block ads, trackers and malware sites
You can unblock them (at your own risk) by white-listing the site or by unchecking the appropriate list.
You will then be able to visit the site in question.
answered Jul 22 '16 at 8:47
DavidPostill♦DavidPostill
108k27235271
Strict blocking is enforced for more than just the malware domains, it applies to any filter for which there is a strict hostname match. Un-checking filter lists or whitelisting is not the solution, disabling strict blocking for the current site (recommended) or everywhere (not recommended) is the solution.
– rhill
Jul 22 '16 at 17:00
While the other answer explaining how to disable "strict blocking" is very interesting, I think this answer is the most adequate. Indeed, i) one does not want to disable "strict blocking" globally, ii) for most cases, it is a filter which is the cause of the blocking, so there will be a temporary fix, iii) for the remaining cases, the cause of the blocking is in the HOSTS file, and it is smarter to disable "over-protective" HOSTS files which include false positives.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:48
For the benign redirection which I encountered and which is blocked, the blocked host is present in two files: "Dan Pollock’s hosts file" and "MVPS HOSTS". The rest of the files, such as "Malware Domain List", do not include this host. This is likely a false positive and a sign that the two files listing the host are not serious enough to my tastes.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1103889%2fhow-to-disable-ublock-origin-has-prevented-the-following-page-from-loading%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The page itself has the solution: there are buttons in there which offers you to disable temporarily or permanently the whole page blocking (aka "strict blocking") for the current site.
If exposing hidden redirects and not connecting at all to dubious sites is less important to you than a once-in-a-while-with-easy-temporary-or-permanent-remediation "annoyance", then the wiki documentation has the solution (add to the My rules pane):
no-strict-blocking: * true
edited May 20 '18 at 20:08
Freedom_Ben
24017
answered Jul 22 '16 at 16:57
rhillrhill
50634
1
Bad cut & paste from doc, the rule to add isno-strict-blocking: * true, notstrict-blocking: * true. I fixed my answer.
– rhill
Jul 23 '16 at 3:55
The page itself does not always have the solution. Typically, no solution with this redirection: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:30
For info, the problem exists for uMatrix as well, and I could not find the equivalent of this wiki page (the one you linked to is for uBlock).
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:44
add a comment |
The page itself has the solution: there are buttons in there which offers you to disable temporarily or permanently the whole page blocking (aka "strict blocking") for the current site.
If exposing hidden redirects and not connecting at all to dubious sites is less important to you than a once-in-a-while-with-easy-temporary-or-permanent-remediation "annoyance", then the wiki documentation has the solution (add to the My rules pane):
no-strict-blocking: * true
edited May 20 '18 at 20:08
Freedom_Ben
24017
answered Jul 22 '16 at 16:57
rhillrhill
50634
1
Bad cut & paste from doc, the rule to add isno-strict-blocking: * true, notstrict-blocking: * true. I fixed my answer.
– rhill
Jul 23 '16 at 3:55
The page itself does not always have the solution. Typically, no solution with this redirection: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:30
For info, the problem exists for uMatrix as well, and I could not find the equivalent of this wiki page (the one you linked to is for uBlock).
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:44
add a comment |
The page itself has the solution: there are buttons in there which offers you to disable temporarily or permanently the whole page blocking (aka "strict blocking") for the current site.
If exposing hidden redirects and not connecting at all to dubious sites is less important to you than a once-in-a-while-with-easy-temporary-or-permanent-remediation "annoyance", then the wiki documentation has the solution (add to the My rules pane):
no-strict-blocking: * true
edited May 20 '18 at 20:08
Freedom_Ben
24017
answered Jul 22 '16 at 16:57
rhillrhill
50634
The page itself has the solution: there are buttons in there which offers you to disable temporarily or permanently the whole page blocking (aka "strict blocking") for the current site.
If exposing hidden redirects and not connecting at all to dubious sites is less important to you than a once-in-a-while-with-easy-temporary-or-permanent-remediation "annoyance", then the wiki documentation has the solution (add to the My rules pane):
no-strict-blocking: * true
edited May 20 '18 at 20:08
Freedom_Ben
24017
answered Jul 22 '16 at 16:57
rhillrhill
50634
edited May 20 '18 at 20:08
Freedom_Ben
24017
edited May 20 '18 at 20:08
Freedom_Ben
24017
edited May 20 '18 at 20:08
Freedom_Ben
24017
24017
answered Jul 22 '16 at 16:57
rhillrhill
50634
answered Jul 22 '16 at 16:57
rhillrhill
50634
answered Jul 22 '16 at 16:57
rhillrhill
50634
50634
1
Bad cut & paste from doc, the rule to add isno-strict-blocking: * true, notstrict-blocking: * true. I fixed my answer.
– rhill
Jul 23 '16 at 3:55
The page itself does not always have the solution. Typically, no solution with this redirection: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:30
For info, the problem exists for uMatrix as well, and I could not find the equivalent of this wiki page (the one you linked to is for uBlock).
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:44
add a comment |
1
Bad cut & paste from doc, the rule to add isno-strict-blocking: * true, notstrict-blocking: * true. I fixed my answer.
– rhill
Jul 23 '16 at 3:55
The page itself does not always have the solution. Typically, no solution with this redirection: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:30
For info, the problem exists for uMatrix as well, and I could not find the equivalent of this wiki page (the one you linked to is for uBlock).
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:44
1
1
Bad cut & paste from doc, the rule to add is
no-strict-blocking: * true, not strict-blocking: * true. I fixed my answer.– rhill
Jul 23 '16 at 3:55
Bad cut & paste from doc, the rule to add is
no-strict-blocking: * true, not strict-blocking: * true. I fixed my answer.– rhill
Jul 23 '16 at 3:55
The page itself does not always have the solution. Typically, no solution with this redirection: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:30
The page itself does not always have the solution. Typically, no solution with this redirection: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:30
For info, the problem exists for uMatrix as well, and I could not find the equivalent of this wiki page (the one you linked to is for uBlock).
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:44
For info, the problem exists for uMatrix as well, and I could not find the equivalent of this wiki page (the one you linked to is for uBlock).
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:44
add a comment |
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading
uBlock Origin will block whole pages if the URL matches something in the Malware Domains list:
These domains are blocked by default:
The default behavior of uBlock Origin when newly installed is to block ads, trackers and malware sites
You can unblock them (at your own risk) by white-listing the site or by unchecking the appropriate list.
You will then be able to visit the site in question.
answered Jul 22 '16 at 8:47
DavidPostill♦DavidPostill
108k27235271
Strict blocking is enforced for more than just the malware domains, it applies to any filter for which there is a strict hostname match. Un-checking filter lists or whitelisting is not the solution, disabling strict blocking for the current site (recommended) or everywhere (not recommended) is the solution.
– rhill
Jul 22 '16 at 17:00
While the other answer explaining how to disable "strict blocking" is very interesting, I think this answer is the most adequate. Indeed, i) one does not want to disable "strict blocking" globally, ii) for most cases, it is a filter which is the cause of the blocking, so there will be a temporary fix, iii) for the remaining cases, the cause of the blocking is in the HOSTS file, and it is smarter to disable "over-protective" HOSTS files which include false positives.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:48
For the benign redirection which I encountered and which is blocked, the blocked host is present in two files: "Dan Pollock’s hosts file" and "MVPS HOSTS". The rest of the files, such as "Malware Domain List", do not include this host. This is likely a false positive and a sign that the two files listing the host are not serious enough to my tastes.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:52
add a comment |
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading
uBlock Origin will block whole pages if the URL matches something in the Malware Domains list:
These domains are blocked by default:
The default behavior of uBlock Origin when newly installed is to block ads, trackers and malware sites
You can unblock them (at your own risk) by white-listing the site or by unchecking the appropriate list.
You will then be able to visit the site in question.
answered Jul 22 '16 at 8:47
DavidPostill♦DavidPostill
108k27235271
Strict blocking is enforced for more than just the malware domains, it applies to any filter for which there is a strict hostname match. Un-checking filter lists or whitelisting is not the solution, disabling strict blocking for the current site (recommended) or everywhere (not recommended) is the solution.
– rhill
Jul 22 '16 at 17:00
While the other answer explaining how to disable "strict blocking" is very interesting, I think this answer is the most adequate. Indeed, i) one does not want to disable "strict blocking" globally, ii) for most cases, it is a filter which is the cause of the blocking, so there will be a temporary fix, iii) for the remaining cases, the cause of the blocking is in the HOSTS file, and it is smarter to disable "over-protective" HOSTS files which include false positives.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:48
For the benign redirection which I encountered and which is blocked, the blocked host is present in two files: "Dan Pollock’s hosts file" and "MVPS HOSTS". The rest of the files, such as "Malware Domain List", do not include this host. This is likely a false positive and a sign that the two files listing the host are not serious enough to my tastes.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:52
add a comment |
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading
uBlock Origin will block whole pages if the URL matches something in the Malware Domains list:
These domains are blocked by default:
The default behavior of uBlock Origin when newly installed is to block ads, trackers and malware sites
You can unblock them (at your own risk) by white-listing the site or by unchecking the appropriate list.
You will then be able to visit the site in question.
answered Jul 22 '16 at 8:47
DavidPostill♦DavidPostill
108k27235271
uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading
uBlock Origin will block whole pages if the URL matches something in the Malware Domains list:
These domains are blocked by default:
The default behavior of uBlock Origin when newly installed is to block ads, trackers and malware sites
You can unblock them (at your own risk) by white-listing the site or by unchecking the appropriate list.
You will then be able to visit the site in question.
answered Jul 22 '16 at 8:47
DavidPostill♦DavidPostill
108k27235271
answered Jul 22 '16 at 8:47
DavidPostill♦DavidPostill
108k27235271
answered Jul 22 '16 at 8:47
DavidPostill♦DavidPostill
108k27235271
answered Jul 22 '16 at 8:47
DavidPostill♦DavidPostill
108k27235271
108k27235271
Strict blocking is enforced for more than just the malware domains, it applies to any filter for which there is a strict hostname match. Un-checking filter lists or whitelisting is not the solution, disabling strict blocking for the current site (recommended) or everywhere (not recommended) is the solution.
– rhill
Jul 22 '16 at 17:00
While the other answer explaining how to disable "strict blocking" is very interesting, I think this answer is the most adequate. Indeed, i) one does not want to disable "strict blocking" globally, ii) for most cases, it is a filter which is the cause of the blocking, so there will be a temporary fix, iii) for the remaining cases, the cause of the blocking is in the HOSTS file, and it is smarter to disable "over-protective" HOSTS files which include false positives.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:48
For the benign redirection which I encountered and which is blocked, the blocked host is present in two files: "Dan Pollock’s hosts file" and "MVPS HOSTS". The rest of the files, such as "Malware Domain List", do not include this host. This is likely a false positive and a sign that the two files listing the host are not serious enough to my tastes.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:52
add a comment |
Strict blocking is enforced for more than just the malware domains, it applies to any filter for which there is a strict hostname match. Un-checking filter lists or whitelisting is not the solution, disabling strict blocking for the current site (recommended) or everywhere (not recommended) is the solution.
– rhill
Jul 22 '16 at 17:00
While the other answer explaining how to disable "strict blocking" is very interesting, I think this answer is the most adequate. Indeed, i) one does not want to disable "strict blocking" globally, ii) for most cases, it is a filter which is the cause of the blocking, so there will be a temporary fix, iii) for the remaining cases, the cause of the blocking is in the HOSTS file, and it is smarter to disable "over-protective" HOSTS files which include false positives.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:48
For the benign redirection which I encountered and which is blocked, the blocked host is present in two files: "Dan Pollock’s hosts file" and "MVPS HOSTS". The rest of the files, such as "Malware Domain List", do not include this host. This is likely a false positive and a sign that the two files listing the host are not serious enough to my tastes.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:52
Strict blocking is enforced for more than just the malware domains, it applies to any filter for which there is a strict hostname match. Un-checking filter lists or whitelisting is not the solution, disabling strict blocking for the current site (recommended) or everywhere (not recommended) is the solution.
– rhill
Jul 22 '16 at 17:00
Strict blocking is enforced for more than just the malware domains, it applies to any filter for which there is a strict hostname match. Un-checking filter lists or whitelisting is not the solution, disabling strict blocking for the current site (recommended) or everywhere (not recommended) is the solution.
– rhill
Jul 22 '16 at 17:00
While the other answer explaining how to disable "strict blocking" is very interesting, I think this answer is the most adequate. Indeed, i) one does not want to disable "strict blocking" globally, ii) for most cases, it is a filter which is the cause of the blocking, so there will be a temporary fix, iii) for the remaining cases, the cause of the blocking is in the HOSTS file, and it is smarter to disable "over-protective" HOSTS files which include false positives.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:48
While the other answer explaining how to disable "strict blocking" is very interesting, I think this answer is the most adequate. Indeed, i) one does not want to disable "strict blocking" globally, ii) for most cases, it is a filter which is the cause of the blocking, so there will be a temporary fix, iii) for the remaining cases, the cause of the blocking is in the HOSTS file, and it is smarter to disable "over-protective" HOSTS files which include false positives.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:48
For the benign redirection which I encountered and which is blocked, the blocked host is present in two files: "Dan Pollock’s hosts file" and "MVPS HOSTS". The rest of the files, such as "Malware Domain List", do not include this host. This is likely a false positive and a sign that the two files listing the host are not serious enough to my tastes.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:52
For the benign redirection which I encountered and which is blocked, the blocked host is present in two files: "Dan Pollock’s hosts file" and "MVPS HOSTS". The rest of the files, such as "Malware Domain List", do not include this host. This is likely a false positive and a sign that the two files listing the host are not serious enough to my tastes.
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1103889%2fhow-to-disable-ublock-origin-has-prevented-the-following-page-from-loading%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
can you give me an example, where I can try that? never encountered a page that was blocked completely by ublock (using it myself for some months now)
– Phillip -Zyan K Lee- Stockmann
Jul 22 '16 at 8:03
@Phillip-ZyanKLee-Stockmann I'll post an example here when I next see one.
– Colonel Panic
Jul 22 '16 at 8:52
Here is an example which I encountered using the Enhanced Steam firefox addon: dpbolvw.net/…
– Wok
Jul 15 '17 at 8:28