Partial fraction failure for $frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}$
$begingroup$
Here in this answer I have tried to perform partial fraction for $frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}$ as follows:
$$frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}=frac{p}{sin(x-a)}+frac{q}{sin(x-b)} quad(1)$$
Multiplying $(1)$ by $sin(x-a)$ and plugging $x=a$ yields:
$$left(frac{1}{sin(x-b)}=p+qunderset{rightarrow 0}{frac{sin(x-a)}{sin(x-b)}}right)bigg|_{x=a}Rightarrow p=frac{1}{sin(a-b)}$$
Also to obtain q, multiply $(1)$ by $sin(x-b)$ and plugg $x=b$ gives:
$$left(frac{1}{sin(x-a)}=punderset{rightarrow 0}{frac{sin(x-b)}{sin(x-a)}}+qright)bigg|_{x=b}Rightarrow q=frac{1}{sin(b-a)}=-p$$
So that means we can rewrite the original expression as: $$frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}=frac{1}{sinleft(a-bright)}left(frac{1}{sinleft(x-aright)}-frac{1}{sinleft(x-bright)}right)$$
However as pointed out in the comments this doesn't verify. Can anyone point out where I went sideways with this?
Also the same approach can be found here. Is there a rigurous way to prove that we can't perform partial fraction in this case?
Further question, what a about a general case such as proving/disproving: $${prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}}neqsum_{k=1}^n frac{a_k}{sin(x-x_k)}$$
trigonometry proof-verification partial-fractions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here in this answer I have tried to perform partial fraction for $frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}$ as follows:
$$frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}=frac{p}{sin(x-a)}+frac{q}{sin(x-b)} quad(1)$$
Multiplying $(1)$ by $sin(x-a)$ and plugging $x=a$ yields:
$$left(frac{1}{sin(x-b)}=p+qunderset{rightarrow 0}{frac{sin(x-a)}{sin(x-b)}}right)bigg|_{x=a}Rightarrow p=frac{1}{sin(a-b)}$$
Also to obtain q, multiply $(1)$ by $sin(x-b)$ and plugg $x=b$ gives:
$$left(frac{1}{sin(x-a)}=punderset{rightarrow 0}{frac{sin(x-b)}{sin(x-a)}}+qright)bigg|_{x=b}Rightarrow q=frac{1}{sin(b-a)}=-p$$
So that means we can rewrite the original expression as: $$frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}=frac{1}{sinleft(a-bright)}left(frac{1}{sinleft(x-aright)}-frac{1}{sinleft(x-bright)}right)$$
However as pointed out in the comments this doesn't verify. Can anyone point out where I went sideways with this?
Also the same approach can be found here. Is there a rigurous way to prove that we can't perform partial fraction in this case?
Further question, what a about a general case such as proving/disproving: $${prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}}neqsum_{k=1}^n frac{a_k}{sin(x-x_k)}$$
trigonometry proof-verification partial-fractions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Write $$sin(a-b)=sin{x-b-(x-a)}=?$$
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 20 '18 at 12:46
1
$begingroup$
What's the goal here? To find constants $p,q$ that make (1) hold? But perhaps there are no such constants.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 20 '18 at 12:48
$begingroup$
Still doesn't add up... // Sure, so that we can evaluate the integral afterwards, but you're probably right, I haven't thought that we can't find such $p$ and $q$.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here in this answer I have tried to perform partial fraction for $frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}$ as follows:
$$frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}=frac{p}{sin(x-a)}+frac{q}{sin(x-b)} quad(1)$$
Multiplying $(1)$ by $sin(x-a)$ and plugging $x=a$ yields:
$$left(frac{1}{sin(x-b)}=p+qunderset{rightarrow 0}{frac{sin(x-a)}{sin(x-b)}}right)bigg|_{x=a}Rightarrow p=frac{1}{sin(a-b)}$$
Also to obtain q, multiply $(1)$ by $sin(x-b)$ and plugg $x=b$ gives:
$$left(frac{1}{sin(x-a)}=punderset{rightarrow 0}{frac{sin(x-b)}{sin(x-a)}}+qright)bigg|_{x=b}Rightarrow q=frac{1}{sin(b-a)}=-p$$
So that means we can rewrite the original expression as: $$frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}=frac{1}{sinleft(a-bright)}left(frac{1}{sinleft(x-aright)}-frac{1}{sinleft(x-bright)}right)$$
However as pointed out in the comments this doesn't verify. Can anyone point out where I went sideways with this?
Also the same approach can be found here. Is there a rigurous way to prove that we can't perform partial fraction in this case?
Further question, what a about a general case such as proving/disproving: $${prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}}neqsum_{k=1}^n frac{a_k}{sin(x-x_k)}$$
trigonometry proof-verification partial-fractions
$endgroup$
Here in this answer I have tried to perform partial fraction for $frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}$ as follows:
$$frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}=frac{p}{sin(x-a)}+frac{q}{sin(x-b)} quad(1)$$
Multiplying $(1)$ by $sin(x-a)$ and plugging $x=a$ yields:
$$left(frac{1}{sin(x-b)}=p+qunderset{rightarrow 0}{frac{sin(x-a)}{sin(x-b)}}right)bigg|_{x=a}Rightarrow p=frac{1}{sin(a-b)}$$
Also to obtain q, multiply $(1)$ by $sin(x-b)$ and plugg $x=b$ gives:
$$left(frac{1}{sin(x-a)}=punderset{rightarrow 0}{frac{sin(x-b)}{sin(x-a)}}+qright)bigg|_{x=b}Rightarrow q=frac{1}{sin(b-a)}=-p$$
So that means we can rewrite the original expression as: $$frac{1}{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)}=frac{1}{sinleft(a-bright)}left(frac{1}{sinleft(x-aright)}-frac{1}{sinleft(x-bright)}right)$$
However as pointed out in the comments this doesn't verify. Can anyone point out where I went sideways with this?
Also the same approach can be found here. Is there a rigurous way to prove that we can't perform partial fraction in this case?
Further question, what a about a general case such as proving/disproving: $${prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}}neqsum_{k=1}^n frac{a_k}{sin(x-x_k)}$$
trigonometry proof-verification partial-fractions
trigonometry proof-verification partial-fractions
edited Dec 20 '18 at 13:29
Zacky
asked Dec 20 '18 at 12:44
ZackyZacky
7,79511062
7,79511062
$begingroup$
Write $$sin(a-b)=sin{x-b-(x-a)}=?$$
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 20 '18 at 12:46
1
$begingroup$
What's the goal here? To find constants $p,q$ that make (1) hold? But perhaps there are no such constants.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 20 '18 at 12:48
$begingroup$
Still doesn't add up... // Sure, so that we can evaluate the integral afterwards, but you're probably right, I haven't thought that we can't find such $p$ and $q$.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Write $$sin(a-b)=sin{x-b-(x-a)}=?$$
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 20 '18 at 12:46
1
$begingroup$
What's the goal here? To find constants $p,q$ that make (1) hold? But perhaps there are no such constants.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 20 '18 at 12:48
$begingroup$
Still doesn't add up... // Sure, so that we can evaluate the integral afterwards, but you're probably right, I haven't thought that we can't find such $p$ and $q$.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:49
$begingroup$
Write $$sin(a-b)=sin{x-b-(x-a)}=?$$
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 20 '18 at 12:46
$begingroup$
Write $$sin(a-b)=sin{x-b-(x-a)}=?$$
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 20 '18 at 12:46
1
1
$begingroup$
What's the goal here? To find constants $p,q$ that make (1) hold? But perhaps there are no such constants.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 20 '18 at 12:48
$begingroup$
What's the goal here? To find constants $p,q$ that make (1) hold? But perhaps there are no such constants.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 20 '18 at 12:48
$begingroup$
Still doesn't add up... // Sure, so that we can evaluate the integral afterwards, but you're probably right, I haven't thought that we can't find such $p$ and $q$.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:49
$begingroup$
Still doesn't add up... // Sure, so that we can evaluate the integral afterwards, but you're probably right, I haven't thought that we can't find such $p$ and $q$.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:49
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What is really happening is that $xmapstosin(x-x_k)$ is a rational function of $exp(ix)$, so $displaystyleprod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}$ has a partial fraction decomposition of the form
begin{align*}
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}
&=prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2iexp(-ix_k)exp(ix)}{[exp(ix)]^2-[exp(ix_k)]^2}
\
&=sum_{k=1}^nleft(frac{alpha^-_k}{exp(ix)+exp(ix_k)}+frac{alpha^+_k}{exp(ix)-exp(ix_k)}right)
end{align*}
with $alpha_k^pminmathbb{C}$. To be able to say
$$
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}=sum_{k=1}^n frac{a_k}{sin(x-x_k)}
$$
is thus the condition $alpha_k^+=alpha_k^-$ which we can check holds if and only if $n$ is odd.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem is there are no constants $p,,q$ satisfying the intended identity. The reason $frac{1}{(x-a)(x-b)}=frac{p}{x-a}+frac{q}{x-b}$ works is because the denominators are degree-$1$ polynomials, allowing the numerators to be degree-$0$. More generally distinct functions $f,,g$ give $frac{1}{fg}=frac{p}{f}+frac{q}{g}$ with functions $p=frac{1}{g-f},,q=-p$, among other options. But usually there isn't a solution with constant $p,,q$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! Is there a direct way to prove that there isn't a solution?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:59
$begingroup$
@Zacky You've effectively already found it. Your calculation uniquely determined what $p,,q$ could be if they were constant, but we can verify it doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
Can you please take a look here too: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1882536/… that is invalid too right?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 13:03
1
$begingroup$
@Zacky I can't find a numerical counterexample to that, even with a computer search. I think the result is correct, even though the method of finding it needs more justification. Why does it only work with three sines, not two? Probably because the coefficients' ratios depend on $a,,b,,c$ in the three-sines case.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We actually have
$$frac1{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)} = frac1{sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)}left(frac1{sin(x-a)}-frac1{sin(x-b)}right)$$
That factor of $sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)$ is equal to $sin(a-b)$ at $a$ and at $b$, but not everywhere; it isn't constant.
Partial fractions are a theorem of linear algebra. If the factors we're dealing with aren't linear or at least polynomial, the theorem isn't valid. There is no partial fraction expansion of the type you're looking for here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047489%2fpartial-fraction-failure-for-frac1-sinx-a-sinx-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What is really happening is that $xmapstosin(x-x_k)$ is a rational function of $exp(ix)$, so $displaystyleprod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}$ has a partial fraction decomposition of the form
begin{align*}
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}
&=prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2iexp(-ix_k)exp(ix)}{[exp(ix)]^2-[exp(ix_k)]^2}
\
&=sum_{k=1}^nleft(frac{alpha^-_k}{exp(ix)+exp(ix_k)}+frac{alpha^+_k}{exp(ix)-exp(ix_k)}right)
end{align*}
with $alpha_k^pminmathbb{C}$. To be able to say
$$
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}=sum_{k=1}^n frac{a_k}{sin(x-x_k)}
$$
is thus the condition $alpha_k^+=alpha_k^-$ which we can check holds if and only if $n$ is odd.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is really happening is that $xmapstosin(x-x_k)$ is a rational function of $exp(ix)$, so $displaystyleprod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}$ has a partial fraction decomposition of the form
begin{align*}
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}
&=prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2iexp(-ix_k)exp(ix)}{[exp(ix)]^2-[exp(ix_k)]^2}
\
&=sum_{k=1}^nleft(frac{alpha^-_k}{exp(ix)+exp(ix_k)}+frac{alpha^+_k}{exp(ix)-exp(ix_k)}right)
end{align*}
with $alpha_k^pminmathbb{C}$. To be able to say
$$
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}=sum_{k=1}^n frac{a_k}{sin(x-x_k)}
$$
is thus the condition $alpha_k^+=alpha_k^-$ which we can check holds if and only if $n$ is odd.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is really happening is that $xmapstosin(x-x_k)$ is a rational function of $exp(ix)$, so $displaystyleprod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}$ has a partial fraction decomposition of the form
begin{align*}
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}
&=prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2iexp(-ix_k)exp(ix)}{[exp(ix)]^2-[exp(ix_k)]^2}
\
&=sum_{k=1}^nleft(frac{alpha^-_k}{exp(ix)+exp(ix_k)}+frac{alpha^+_k}{exp(ix)-exp(ix_k)}right)
end{align*}
with $alpha_k^pminmathbb{C}$. To be able to say
$$
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}=sum_{k=1}^n frac{a_k}{sin(x-x_k)}
$$
is thus the condition $alpha_k^+=alpha_k^-$ which we can check holds if and only if $n$ is odd.
$endgroup$
What is really happening is that $xmapstosin(x-x_k)$ is a rational function of $exp(ix)$, so $displaystyleprod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}$ has a partial fraction decomposition of the form
begin{align*}
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}
&=prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2iexp(-ix_k)exp(ix)}{[exp(ix)]^2-[exp(ix_k)]^2}
\
&=sum_{k=1}^nleft(frac{alpha^-_k}{exp(ix)+exp(ix_k)}+frac{alpha^+_k}{exp(ix)-exp(ix_k)}right)
end{align*}
with $alpha_k^pminmathbb{C}$. To be able to say
$$
prod_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{sin(x-x_k)}=sum_{k=1}^n frac{a_k}{sin(x-x_k)}
$$
is thus the condition $alpha_k^+=alpha_k^-$ which we can check holds if and only if $n$ is odd.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 15:19
user10354138user10354138
7,5472925
7,5472925
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem is there are no constants $p,,q$ satisfying the intended identity. The reason $frac{1}{(x-a)(x-b)}=frac{p}{x-a}+frac{q}{x-b}$ works is because the denominators are degree-$1$ polynomials, allowing the numerators to be degree-$0$. More generally distinct functions $f,,g$ give $frac{1}{fg}=frac{p}{f}+frac{q}{g}$ with functions $p=frac{1}{g-f},,q=-p$, among other options. But usually there isn't a solution with constant $p,,q$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! Is there a direct way to prove that there isn't a solution?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:59
$begingroup$
@Zacky You've effectively already found it. Your calculation uniquely determined what $p,,q$ could be if they were constant, but we can verify it doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
Can you please take a look here too: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1882536/… that is invalid too right?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 13:03
1
$begingroup$
@Zacky I can't find a numerical counterexample to that, even with a computer search. I think the result is correct, even though the method of finding it needs more justification. Why does it only work with three sines, not two? Probably because the coefficients' ratios depend on $a,,b,,c$ in the three-sines case.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem is there are no constants $p,,q$ satisfying the intended identity. The reason $frac{1}{(x-a)(x-b)}=frac{p}{x-a}+frac{q}{x-b}$ works is because the denominators are degree-$1$ polynomials, allowing the numerators to be degree-$0$. More generally distinct functions $f,,g$ give $frac{1}{fg}=frac{p}{f}+frac{q}{g}$ with functions $p=frac{1}{g-f},,q=-p$, among other options. But usually there isn't a solution with constant $p,,q$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! Is there a direct way to prove that there isn't a solution?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:59
$begingroup$
@Zacky You've effectively already found it. Your calculation uniquely determined what $p,,q$ could be if they were constant, but we can verify it doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
Can you please take a look here too: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1882536/… that is invalid too right?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 13:03
1
$begingroup$
@Zacky I can't find a numerical counterexample to that, even with a computer search. I think the result is correct, even though the method of finding it needs more justification. Why does it only work with three sines, not two? Probably because the coefficients' ratios depend on $a,,b,,c$ in the three-sines case.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem is there are no constants $p,,q$ satisfying the intended identity. The reason $frac{1}{(x-a)(x-b)}=frac{p}{x-a}+frac{q}{x-b}$ works is because the denominators are degree-$1$ polynomials, allowing the numerators to be degree-$0$. More generally distinct functions $f,,g$ give $frac{1}{fg}=frac{p}{f}+frac{q}{g}$ with functions $p=frac{1}{g-f},,q=-p$, among other options. But usually there isn't a solution with constant $p,,q$.
$endgroup$
The problem is there are no constants $p,,q$ satisfying the intended identity. The reason $frac{1}{(x-a)(x-b)}=frac{p}{x-a}+frac{q}{x-b}$ works is because the denominators are degree-$1$ polynomials, allowing the numerators to be degree-$0$. More generally distinct functions $f,,g$ give $frac{1}{fg}=frac{p}{f}+frac{q}{g}$ with functions $p=frac{1}{g-f},,q=-p$, among other options. But usually there isn't a solution with constant $p,,q$.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:52
J.G.J.G.
33.1k23251
33.1k23251
$begingroup$
Thanks! Is there a direct way to prove that there isn't a solution?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:59
$begingroup$
@Zacky You've effectively already found it. Your calculation uniquely determined what $p,,q$ could be if they were constant, but we can verify it doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
Can you please take a look here too: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1882536/… that is invalid too right?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 13:03
1
$begingroup$
@Zacky I can't find a numerical counterexample to that, even with a computer search. I think the result is correct, even though the method of finding it needs more justification. Why does it only work with three sines, not two? Probably because the coefficients' ratios depend on $a,,b,,c$ in the three-sines case.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks! Is there a direct way to prove that there isn't a solution?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:59
$begingroup$
@Zacky You've effectively already found it. Your calculation uniquely determined what $p,,q$ could be if they were constant, but we can verify it doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
Can you please take a look here too: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1882536/… that is invalid too right?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 13:03
1
$begingroup$
@Zacky I can't find a numerical counterexample to that, even with a computer search. I think the result is correct, even though the method of finding it needs more justification. Why does it only work with three sines, not two? Probably because the coefficients' ratios depend on $a,,b,,c$ in the three-sines case.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:19
$begingroup$
Thanks! Is there a direct way to prove that there isn't a solution?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:59
$begingroup$
Thanks! Is there a direct way to prove that there isn't a solution?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:59
$begingroup$
@Zacky You've effectively already found it. Your calculation uniquely determined what $p,,q$ could be if they were constant, but we can verify it doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
@Zacky You've effectively already found it. Your calculation uniquely determined what $p,,q$ could be if they were constant, but we can verify it doesn't work.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
Can you please take a look here too: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1882536/… that is invalid too right?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 13:03
$begingroup$
Can you please take a look here too: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1882536/… that is invalid too right?
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 13:03
1
1
$begingroup$
@Zacky I can't find a numerical counterexample to that, even with a computer search. I think the result is correct, even though the method of finding it needs more justification. Why does it only work with three sines, not two? Probably because the coefficients' ratios depend on $a,,b,,c$ in the three-sines case.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:19
$begingroup$
@Zacky I can't find a numerical counterexample to that, even with a computer search. I think the result is correct, even though the method of finding it needs more justification. Why does it only work with three sines, not two? Probably because the coefficients' ratios depend on $a,,b,,c$ in the three-sines case.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Dec 20 '18 at 13:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We actually have
$$frac1{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)} = frac1{sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)}left(frac1{sin(x-a)}-frac1{sin(x-b)}right)$$
That factor of $sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)$ is equal to $sin(a-b)$ at $a$ and at $b$, but not everywhere; it isn't constant.
Partial fractions are a theorem of linear algebra. If the factors we're dealing with aren't linear or at least polynomial, the theorem isn't valid. There is no partial fraction expansion of the type you're looking for here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We actually have
$$frac1{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)} = frac1{sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)}left(frac1{sin(x-a)}-frac1{sin(x-b)}right)$$
That factor of $sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)$ is equal to $sin(a-b)$ at $a$ and at $b$, but not everywhere; it isn't constant.
Partial fractions are a theorem of linear algebra. If the factors we're dealing with aren't linear or at least polynomial, the theorem isn't valid. There is no partial fraction expansion of the type you're looking for here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We actually have
$$frac1{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)} = frac1{sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)}left(frac1{sin(x-a)}-frac1{sin(x-b)}right)$$
That factor of $sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)$ is equal to $sin(a-b)$ at $a$ and at $b$, but not everywhere; it isn't constant.
Partial fractions are a theorem of linear algebra. If the factors we're dealing with aren't linear or at least polynomial, the theorem isn't valid. There is no partial fraction expansion of the type you're looking for here.
$endgroup$
We actually have
$$frac1{sin(x-a)sin(x-b)} = frac1{sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)}left(frac1{sin(x-a)}-frac1{sin(x-b)}right)$$
That factor of $sin(x-b)-sin(x-a)$ is equal to $sin(a-b)$ at $a$ and at $b$, but not everywhere; it isn't constant.
Partial fractions are a theorem of linear algebra. If the factors we're dealing with aren't linear or at least polynomial, the theorem isn't valid. There is no partial fraction expansion of the type you're looking for here.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:53
jmerryjmerry
17k11633
17k11633
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047489%2fpartial-fraction-failure-for-frac1-sinx-a-sinx-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Write $$sin(a-b)=sin{x-b-(x-a)}=?$$
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 20 '18 at 12:46
1
$begingroup$
What's the goal here? To find constants $p,q$ that make (1) hold? But perhaps there are no such constants.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 20 '18 at 12:48
$begingroup$
Still doesn't add up... // Sure, so that we can evaluate the integral afterwards, but you're probably right, I haven't thought that we can't find such $p$ and $q$.
$endgroup$
– Zacky
Dec 20 '18 at 12:49