Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions
$begingroup$
In version 2.0 of Mathematica there was a command, ReadProgrammerIntentions[ ] which allowed it rapidly compose code that could solve problems simple to complex, based on my requirements. Understand it was deprecated in later versions. Is there a similar functionality available in maybe a hidden package?
machine-learning date-and-time neural-networks
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
In version 2.0 of Mathematica there was a command, ReadProgrammerIntentions[ ] which allowed it rapidly compose code that could solve problems simple to complex, based on my requirements. Understand it was deprecated in later versions. Is there a similar functionality available in maybe a hidden package?
machine-learning date-and-time neural-networks
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
(not sure if April Fools joke or real)
$endgroup$
– user6014
Apr 1 at 15:37
6
$begingroup$
The desire is real.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 15:47
8
$begingroup$
To get this to work, you need to write all your code in Eton-accented English. The system will recognise you and put you into SW-mode, allowing you to simply write code by employing dozens of programmers to do so for you. (/s)
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Apr 1 at 16:07
10
$begingroup$
The feature of early Mathematica that I really miss is support for the Klingon Language character set.
$endgroup$
– bill s
Apr 1 at 16:07
13
$begingroup$
We had to deprecate it before it deprecated us (I began here near the beginning of the 2.1 development cycle).
$endgroup$
– Daniel Lichtblau
Apr 1 at 22:51
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
In version 2.0 of Mathematica there was a command, ReadProgrammerIntentions[ ] which allowed it rapidly compose code that could solve problems simple to complex, based on my requirements. Understand it was deprecated in later versions. Is there a similar functionality available in maybe a hidden package?
machine-learning date-and-time neural-networks
$endgroup$
In version 2.0 of Mathematica there was a command, ReadProgrammerIntentions[ ] which allowed it rapidly compose code that could solve problems simple to complex, based on my requirements. Understand it was deprecated in later versions. Is there a similar functionality available in maybe a hidden package?
machine-learning date-and-time neural-networks
machine-learning date-and-time neural-networks
edited Apr 1 at 18:53
community wiki
MikeY
6
$begingroup$
(not sure if April Fools joke or real)
$endgroup$
– user6014
Apr 1 at 15:37
6
$begingroup$
The desire is real.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 15:47
8
$begingroup$
To get this to work, you need to write all your code in Eton-accented English. The system will recognise you and put you into SW-mode, allowing you to simply write code by employing dozens of programmers to do so for you. (/s)
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Apr 1 at 16:07
10
$begingroup$
The feature of early Mathematica that I really miss is support for the Klingon Language character set.
$endgroup$
– bill s
Apr 1 at 16:07
13
$begingroup$
We had to deprecate it before it deprecated us (I began here near the beginning of the 2.1 development cycle).
$endgroup$
– Daniel Lichtblau
Apr 1 at 22:51
|
show 2 more comments
6
$begingroup$
(not sure if April Fools joke or real)
$endgroup$
– user6014
Apr 1 at 15:37
6
$begingroup$
The desire is real.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 15:47
8
$begingroup$
To get this to work, you need to write all your code in Eton-accented English. The system will recognise you and put you into SW-mode, allowing you to simply write code by employing dozens of programmers to do so for you. (/s)
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Apr 1 at 16:07
10
$begingroup$
The feature of early Mathematica that I really miss is support for the Klingon Language character set.
$endgroup$
– bill s
Apr 1 at 16:07
13
$begingroup$
We had to deprecate it before it deprecated us (I began here near the beginning of the 2.1 development cycle).
$endgroup$
– Daniel Lichtblau
Apr 1 at 22:51
6
6
$begingroup$
(not sure if April Fools joke or real)
$endgroup$
– user6014
Apr 1 at 15:37
$begingroup$
(not sure if April Fools joke or real)
$endgroup$
– user6014
Apr 1 at 15:37
6
6
$begingroup$
The desire is real.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 15:47
$begingroup$
The desire is real.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 15:47
8
8
$begingroup$
To get this to work, you need to write all your code in Eton-accented English. The system will recognise you and put you into SW-mode, allowing you to simply write code by employing dozens of programmers to do so for you. (/s)
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Apr 1 at 16:07
$begingroup$
To get this to work, you need to write all your code in Eton-accented English. The system will recognise you and put you into SW-mode, allowing you to simply write code by employing dozens of programmers to do so for you. (/s)
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Apr 1 at 16:07
10
10
$begingroup$
The feature of early Mathematica that I really miss is support for the Klingon Language character set.
$endgroup$
– bill s
Apr 1 at 16:07
$begingroup$
The feature of early Mathematica that I really miss is support for the Klingon Language character set.
$endgroup$
– bill s
Apr 1 at 16:07
13
13
$begingroup$
We had to deprecate it before it deprecated us (I began here near the beginning of the 2.1 development cycle).
$endgroup$
– Daniel Lichtblau
Apr 1 at 22:51
$begingroup$
We had to deprecate it before it deprecated us (I began here near the beginning of the 2.1 development cycle).
$endgroup$
– Daniel Lichtblau
Apr 1 at 22:51
|
show 2 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Indeed, this functionality still exists, but it has been moved into its own package.
Load the package:
Needs["aBetterProgrammer`"]
You will have access to such functions as
GimmeDaCodez(answers any nebulous MMA.SE question by guessing the unspoken needs of the asker)
WizardForm(an output wrapper; produces perfectly terse code; all function calls are infix)
JMstyle(deals with special functions; sometimes works even without a computer)
... and many others.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Is there a Haiku option?
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:21
7
$begingroup$
@MikeYHaikuFormis drafted // the future will see it // so meta
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Apr 1 at 16:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since version 11 most commands finally support the Interpretation option: Interpretation -> "Literal" being the classical (default) way of operation, and Interpretation -> "Guess" using advanced machine learning to get much better results than ReadProgrammerIntentions ever achieved. Makes programming a lot easier. You can emulate the old behavior with a simple Return["the result", Interpretation -> "Guess"].
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
doesn't return anything for me !? can you correct the code please !
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Apr 1 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@Alrubaie you need version 11 for the advanced Machine Learning (Artificial Intelligence) stuff.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 16:25
15
$begingroup$
@Alrubie, whichever version you have, you need the next one.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:31
3
$begingroup$
Roman, whenever I try your code with theGuessoption set, my 10-year old gets an email.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 17:40
3
$begingroup$
Yes @MikeY, Mathematica is probably aware that s?he knows best and needs to be consulted. Same at my place.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 17:51
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I tend to use a pattern matching approach:
myCode/.{x_?BugQ:>BugStrip[x],x_?TypoQ:>Detypo[x],x_?WrongSignQ:>-x,x_?OffBy2PiQ:>x*2[Pi]}
With the usual caveat that pattern matching can be slower than other methods, but conceptually easier to understand. Hopefully someone will aggregate the answers to compare performance. Good luck!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This function was deprecated in V4.2, being succeeded by CellularAutomaton.
Since your answer is hidden somewhere in rules like 110, why reinvent the wheel with ReadProgrammerIntentions?
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
I tried using The Game of Life, but my answer was stuck with a Glider last seen wandering off towards Hoboken.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In all seriousness you can achieve something similar by pressing the equal key once. It will turn input to "Free input" and display a big orange equal sign by the side. In this field you can type your calculation how you would said in English and it will generate the code to do it.
Also if you press the key twice the it will show a star shape sign and your input will be send to Wolfram alpha to so you can get more complex answers involving data and stuff.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In all seriousness are you talkingCtrl + =, orSemanticInterpretation?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 2 at 6:45
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194384%2fmathematica-command-that-allows-it-to-read-my-intentions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Indeed, this functionality still exists, but it has been moved into its own package.
Load the package:
Needs["aBetterProgrammer`"]
You will have access to such functions as
GimmeDaCodez(answers any nebulous MMA.SE question by guessing the unspoken needs of the asker)
WizardForm(an output wrapper; produces perfectly terse code; all function calls are infix)
JMstyle(deals with special functions; sometimes works even without a computer)
... and many others.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Is there a Haiku option?
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:21
7
$begingroup$
@MikeYHaikuFormis drafted // the future will see it // so meta
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Apr 1 at 16:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Indeed, this functionality still exists, but it has been moved into its own package.
Load the package:
Needs["aBetterProgrammer`"]
You will have access to such functions as
GimmeDaCodez(answers any nebulous MMA.SE question by guessing the unspoken needs of the asker)
WizardForm(an output wrapper; produces perfectly terse code; all function calls are infix)
JMstyle(deals with special functions; sometimes works even without a computer)
... and many others.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Is there a Haiku option?
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:21
7
$begingroup$
@MikeYHaikuFormis drafted // the future will see it // so meta
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Apr 1 at 16:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Indeed, this functionality still exists, but it has been moved into its own package.
Load the package:
Needs["aBetterProgrammer`"]
You will have access to such functions as
GimmeDaCodez(answers any nebulous MMA.SE question by guessing the unspoken needs of the asker)
WizardForm(an output wrapper; produces perfectly terse code; all function calls are infix)
JMstyle(deals with special functions; sometimes works even without a computer)
... and many others.
$endgroup$
Indeed, this functionality still exists, but it has been moved into its own package.
Load the package:
Needs["aBetterProgrammer`"]
You will have access to such functions as
GimmeDaCodez(answers any nebulous MMA.SE question by guessing the unspoken needs of the asker)
WizardForm(an output wrapper; produces perfectly terse code; all function calls are infix)
JMstyle(deals with special functions; sometimes works even without a computer)
... and many others.
answered Apr 1 at 16:19
community wiki
MarcoB
2
$begingroup$
Is there a Haiku option?
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:21
7
$begingroup$
@MikeYHaikuFormis drafted // the future will see it // so meta
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Apr 1 at 16:32
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Is there a Haiku option?
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:21
7
$begingroup$
@MikeYHaikuFormis drafted // the future will see it // so meta
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Apr 1 at 16:32
2
2
$begingroup$
Is there a Haiku option?
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:21
$begingroup$
Is there a Haiku option?
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:21
7
7
$begingroup$
@MikeY
HaikuForm is drafted // the future will see it // so meta$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Apr 1 at 16:32
$begingroup$
@MikeY
HaikuForm is drafted // the future will see it // so meta$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Apr 1 at 16:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since version 11 most commands finally support the Interpretation option: Interpretation -> "Literal" being the classical (default) way of operation, and Interpretation -> "Guess" using advanced machine learning to get much better results than ReadProgrammerIntentions ever achieved. Makes programming a lot easier. You can emulate the old behavior with a simple Return["the result", Interpretation -> "Guess"].
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
doesn't return anything for me !? can you correct the code please !
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Apr 1 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@Alrubaie you need version 11 for the advanced Machine Learning (Artificial Intelligence) stuff.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 16:25
15
$begingroup$
@Alrubie, whichever version you have, you need the next one.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:31
3
$begingroup$
Roman, whenever I try your code with theGuessoption set, my 10-year old gets an email.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 17:40
3
$begingroup$
Yes @MikeY, Mathematica is probably aware that s?he knows best and needs to be consulted. Same at my place.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 17:51
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Since version 11 most commands finally support the Interpretation option: Interpretation -> "Literal" being the classical (default) way of operation, and Interpretation -> "Guess" using advanced machine learning to get much better results than ReadProgrammerIntentions ever achieved. Makes programming a lot easier. You can emulate the old behavior with a simple Return["the result", Interpretation -> "Guess"].
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
doesn't return anything for me !? can you correct the code please !
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Apr 1 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@Alrubaie you need version 11 for the advanced Machine Learning (Artificial Intelligence) stuff.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 16:25
15
$begingroup$
@Alrubie, whichever version you have, you need the next one.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:31
3
$begingroup$
Roman, whenever I try your code with theGuessoption set, my 10-year old gets an email.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 17:40
3
$begingroup$
Yes @MikeY, Mathematica is probably aware that s?he knows best and needs to be consulted. Same at my place.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 17:51
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Since version 11 most commands finally support the Interpretation option: Interpretation -> "Literal" being the classical (default) way of operation, and Interpretation -> "Guess" using advanced machine learning to get much better results than ReadProgrammerIntentions ever achieved. Makes programming a lot easier. You can emulate the old behavior with a simple Return["the result", Interpretation -> "Guess"].
$endgroup$
Since version 11 most commands finally support the Interpretation option: Interpretation -> "Literal" being the classical (default) way of operation, and Interpretation -> "Guess" using advanced machine learning to get much better results than ReadProgrammerIntentions ever achieved. Makes programming a lot easier. You can emulate the old behavior with a simple Return["the result", Interpretation -> "Guess"].
answered Apr 1 at 15:50
community wiki
Roman
1
$begingroup$
doesn't return anything for me !? can you correct the code please !
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Apr 1 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@Alrubaie you need version 11 for the advanced Machine Learning (Artificial Intelligence) stuff.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 16:25
15
$begingroup$
@Alrubie, whichever version you have, you need the next one.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:31
3
$begingroup$
Roman, whenever I try your code with theGuessoption set, my 10-year old gets an email.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 17:40
3
$begingroup$
Yes @MikeY, Mathematica is probably aware that s?he knows best and needs to be consulted. Same at my place.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 17:51
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
doesn't return anything for me !? can you correct the code please !
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Apr 1 at 16:14
1
$begingroup$
@Alrubaie you need version 11 for the advanced Machine Learning (Artificial Intelligence) stuff.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 16:25
15
$begingroup$
@Alrubie, whichever version you have, you need the next one.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:31
3
$begingroup$
Roman, whenever I try your code with theGuessoption set, my 10-year old gets an email.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 17:40
3
$begingroup$
Yes @MikeY, Mathematica is probably aware that s?he knows best and needs to be consulted. Same at my place.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 17:51
1
1
$begingroup$
doesn't return anything for me !? can you correct the code please !
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Apr 1 at 16:14
$begingroup$
doesn't return anything for me !? can you correct the code please !
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Apr 1 at 16:14
1
1
$begingroup$
@Alrubaie you need version 11 for the advanced Machine Learning (Artificial Intelligence) stuff.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 16:25
$begingroup$
@Alrubaie you need version 11 for the advanced Machine Learning (Artificial Intelligence) stuff.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 16:25
15
15
$begingroup$
@Alrubie, whichever version you have, you need the next one.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:31
$begingroup$
@Alrubie, whichever version you have, you need the next one.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 16:31
3
3
$begingroup$
Roman, whenever I try your code with the
Guess option set, my 10-year old gets an email.$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 17:40
$begingroup$
Roman, whenever I try your code with the
Guess option set, my 10-year old gets an email.$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 17:40
3
3
$begingroup$
Yes @MikeY, Mathematica is probably aware that s?he knows best and needs to be consulted. Same at my place.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 17:51
$begingroup$
Yes @MikeY, Mathematica is probably aware that s?he knows best and needs to be consulted. Same at my place.
$endgroup$
– Roman
Apr 1 at 17:51
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I tend to use a pattern matching approach:
myCode/.{x_?BugQ:>BugStrip[x],x_?TypoQ:>Detypo[x],x_?WrongSignQ:>-x,x_?OffBy2PiQ:>x*2[Pi]}
With the usual caveat that pattern matching can be slower than other methods, but conceptually easier to understand. Hopefully someone will aggregate the answers to compare performance. Good luck!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I tend to use a pattern matching approach:
myCode/.{x_?BugQ:>BugStrip[x],x_?TypoQ:>Detypo[x],x_?WrongSignQ:>-x,x_?OffBy2PiQ:>x*2[Pi]}
With the usual caveat that pattern matching can be slower than other methods, but conceptually easier to understand. Hopefully someone will aggregate the answers to compare performance. Good luck!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I tend to use a pattern matching approach:
myCode/.{x_?BugQ:>BugStrip[x],x_?TypoQ:>Detypo[x],x_?WrongSignQ:>-x,x_?OffBy2PiQ:>x*2[Pi]}
With the usual caveat that pattern matching can be slower than other methods, but conceptually easier to understand. Hopefully someone will aggregate the answers to compare performance. Good luck!
$endgroup$
I tend to use a pattern matching approach:
myCode/.{x_?BugQ:>BugStrip[x],x_?TypoQ:>Detypo[x],x_?WrongSignQ:>-x,x_?OffBy2PiQ:>x*2[Pi]}
With the usual caveat that pattern matching can be slower than other methods, but conceptually easier to understand. Hopefully someone will aggregate the answers to compare performance. Good luck!
answered Apr 1 at 20:22
community wiki
N.J.Evans
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This function was deprecated in V4.2, being succeeded by CellularAutomaton.
Since your answer is hidden somewhere in rules like 110, why reinvent the wheel with ReadProgrammerIntentions?
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
I tried using The Game of Life, but my answer was stuck with a Glider last seen wandering off towards Hoboken.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This function was deprecated in V4.2, being succeeded by CellularAutomaton.
Since your answer is hidden somewhere in rules like 110, why reinvent the wheel with ReadProgrammerIntentions?
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
I tried using The Game of Life, but my answer was stuck with a Glider last seen wandering off towards Hoboken.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This function was deprecated in V4.2, being succeeded by CellularAutomaton.
Since your answer is hidden somewhere in rules like 110, why reinvent the wheel with ReadProgrammerIntentions?
$endgroup$
This function was deprecated in V4.2, being succeeded by CellularAutomaton.
Since your answer is hidden somewhere in rules like 110, why reinvent the wheel with ReadProgrammerIntentions?
answered Apr 1 at 20:29
community wiki
Chip Hurst
7
$begingroup$
I tried using The Game of Life, but my answer was stuck with a Glider last seen wandering off towards Hoboken.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 22:04
add a comment |
7
$begingroup$
I tried using The Game of Life, but my answer was stuck with a Glider last seen wandering off towards Hoboken.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 22:04
7
7
$begingroup$
I tried using The Game of Life, but my answer was stuck with a Glider last seen wandering off towards Hoboken.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 22:04
$begingroup$
I tried using The Game of Life, but my answer was stuck with a Glider last seen wandering off towards Hoboken.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 22:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In all seriousness you can achieve something similar by pressing the equal key once. It will turn input to "Free input" and display a big orange equal sign by the side. In this field you can type your calculation how you would said in English and it will generate the code to do it.
Also if you press the key twice the it will show a star shape sign and your input will be send to Wolfram alpha to so you can get more complex answers involving data and stuff.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In all seriousness are you talkingCtrl + =, orSemanticInterpretation?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 2 at 6:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In all seriousness you can achieve something similar by pressing the equal key once. It will turn input to "Free input" and display a big orange equal sign by the side. In this field you can type your calculation how you would said in English and it will generate the code to do it.
Also if you press the key twice the it will show a star shape sign and your input will be send to Wolfram alpha to so you can get more complex answers involving data and stuff.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In all seriousness are you talkingCtrl + =, orSemanticInterpretation?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 2 at 6:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In all seriousness you can achieve something similar by pressing the equal key once. It will turn input to "Free input" and display a big orange equal sign by the side. In this field you can type your calculation how you would said in English and it will generate the code to do it.
Also if you press the key twice the it will show a star shape sign and your input will be send to Wolfram alpha to so you can get more complex answers involving data and stuff.
$endgroup$
In all seriousness you can achieve something similar by pressing the equal key once. It will turn input to "Free input" and display a big orange equal sign by the side. In this field you can type your calculation how you would said in English and it will generate the code to do it.
Also if you press the key twice the it will show a star shape sign and your input will be send to Wolfram alpha to so you can get more complex answers involving data and stuff.
answered Apr 1 at 23:07
community wiki
Alberto Di Biase
$begingroup$
In all seriousness are you talkingCtrl + =, orSemanticInterpretation?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 2 at 6:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In all seriousness are you talkingCtrl + =, orSemanticInterpretation?
$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 2 at 6:45
$begingroup$
In all seriousness are you talking
Ctrl + =, or SemanticInterpretation?$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 2 at 6:45
$begingroup$
In all seriousness are you talking
Ctrl + =, or SemanticInterpretation?$endgroup$
– Kai
Apr 2 at 6:45
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194384%2fmathematica-command-that-allows-it-to-read-my-intentions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
$begingroup$
(not sure if April Fools joke or real)
$endgroup$
– user6014
Apr 1 at 15:37
6
$begingroup$
The desire is real.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
Apr 1 at 15:47
8
$begingroup$
To get this to work, you need to write all your code in Eton-accented English. The system will recognise you and put you into SW-mode, allowing you to simply write code by employing dozens of programmers to do so for you. (/s)
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
Apr 1 at 16:07
10
$begingroup$
The feature of early Mathematica that I really miss is support for the Klingon Language character set.
$endgroup$
– bill s
Apr 1 at 16:07
13
$begingroup$
We had to deprecate it before it deprecated us (I began here near the beginning of the 2.1 development cycle).
$endgroup$
– Daniel Lichtblau
Apr 1 at 22:51