Conditional expectation for a partition











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Consider a probability space $(Omega,mathcal{F},P)$ and a bounded random variable $X$. Let $(A_n)_{nge 1}$ be a countable partition of $Omega$ and define $mathcal{A}:=sigma({A_n:nge 1})$. Then it holds:
$$E[X|mathcal{A}]=sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}$$



One can prove it by using the uniqueness of $E[X|mathcal{A}]$, i.e. I should be done, if I can show that the expression on the right is $mathcal{A}$-measurable, and that for any $Binmathcal{A}$, it holds



$$EBig[E[X|mathcal{A}]cdot 1_BBig]=EBig[Big(sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}Big)cdot 1_BBig]$$



EDIT:



First property: For any $nge 1$: $E[X|A_n]$ and $1_{A_n}$ are $sigma(1_{A_n})$-measurable, therefore $mathcal{A}$-measurable. Now using the fact that products and sums of measurable functions are measurable, we have that
$$sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}$$
is $mathcal{A}$-measurable.



Second property:
Now let $A_ninmathcal{A}$ with $P(A_n)=0$. Then we know that



$$E[Xcdot1_{A_n}]=sum_{omegain A_n}X(omega)cdot underbrace{P({omega})}_{=0}=0.$$



Therefore we have for any $Binmathcal{A}$, i.e. $B=cup_{min M} A_m$ with a countable subset $Msubsetmathbb{N}$



begin{align}
EBig[E[X|mathcal{A}] 1_B Big]
&=E[X 1_B]\
&=E[Xsum_{min M}1_{A_m}]\
&=E[sum_{min M}X 1_{A_m}]\
&=sum_{min M}E[X 1_{A_m}],text{ since $X$ is bounded we can use Fubini here}\
&=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}E[X 1_{A_m}],text{ with the statement above}\
&=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}EBig[E[X|A_m] 1_{A_m}Big]\
&=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}EBig[E[X|A_m] 1_{A_m}1_BBig],text{ since }1_Bcdot 1_{A_m}=1_{A_m}.\
&=sum_{nge 1,P(A_n)>0}EBig[E[X|A_n] 1_{A_n}1_BBig],text{ since }1_Bcdot 1_{A_n}=0text{ for }nnotin M.\
&=EBig[Big(sum_{nge 1,P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n] 1_{A_n}Big)1_BBig],text{ again Fubini}\
end{align}



For the Fubini statement see here










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Consider a probability space $(Omega,mathcal{F},P)$ and a bounded random variable $X$. Let $(A_n)_{nge 1}$ be a countable partition of $Omega$ and define $mathcal{A}:=sigma({A_n:nge 1})$. Then it holds:
    $$E[X|mathcal{A}]=sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}$$



    One can prove it by using the uniqueness of $E[X|mathcal{A}]$, i.e. I should be done, if I can show that the expression on the right is $mathcal{A}$-measurable, and that for any $Binmathcal{A}$, it holds



    $$EBig[E[X|mathcal{A}]cdot 1_BBig]=EBig[Big(sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}Big)cdot 1_BBig]$$



    EDIT:



    First property: For any $nge 1$: $E[X|A_n]$ and $1_{A_n}$ are $sigma(1_{A_n})$-measurable, therefore $mathcal{A}$-measurable. Now using the fact that products and sums of measurable functions are measurable, we have that
    $$sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}$$
    is $mathcal{A}$-measurable.



    Second property:
    Now let $A_ninmathcal{A}$ with $P(A_n)=0$. Then we know that



    $$E[Xcdot1_{A_n}]=sum_{omegain A_n}X(omega)cdot underbrace{P({omega})}_{=0}=0.$$



    Therefore we have for any $Binmathcal{A}$, i.e. $B=cup_{min M} A_m$ with a countable subset $Msubsetmathbb{N}$



    begin{align}
    EBig[E[X|mathcal{A}] 1_B Big]
    &=E[X 1_B]\
    &=E[Xsum_{min M}1_{A_m}]\
    &=E[sum_{min M}X 1_{A_m}]\
    &=sum_{min M}E[X 1_{A_m}],text{ since $X$ is bounded we can use Fubini here}\
    &=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}E[X 1_{A_m}],text{ with the statement above}\
    &=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}EBig[E[X|A_m] 1_{A_m}Big]\
    &=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}EBig[E[X|A_m] 1_{A_m}1_BBig],text{ since }1_Bcdot 1_{A_m}=1_{A_m}.\
    &=sum_{nge 1,P(A_n)>0}EBig[E[X|A_n] 1_{A_n}1_BBig],text{ since }1_Bcdot 1_{A_n}=0text{ for }nnotin M.\
    &=EBig[Big(sum_{nge 1,P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n] 1_{A_n}Big)1_BBig],text{ again Fubini}\
    end{align}



    For the Fubini statement see here










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Consider a probability space $(Omega,mathcal{F},P)$ and a bounded random variable $X$. Let $(A_n)_{nge 1}$ be a countable partition of $Omega$ and define $mathcal{A}:=sigma({A_n:nge 1})$. Then it holds:
      $$E[X|mathcal{A}]=sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}$$



      One can prove it by using the uniqueness of $E[X|mathcal{A}]$, i.e. I should be done, if I can show that the expression on the right is $mathcal{A}$-measurable, and that for any $Binmathcal{A}$, it holds



      $$EBig[E[X|mathcal{A}]cdot 1_BBig]=EBig[Big(sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}Big)cdot 1_BBig]$$



      EDIT:



      First property: For any $nge 1$: $E[X|A_n]$ and $1_{A_n}$ are $sigma(1_{A_n})$-measurable, therefore $mathcal{A}$-measurable. Now using the fact that products and sums of measurable functions are measurable, we have that
      $$sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}$$
      is $mathcal{A}$-measurable.



      Second property:
      Now let $A_ninmathcal{A}$ with $P(A_n)=0$. Then we know that



      $$E[Xcdot1_{A_n}]=sum_{omegain A_n}X(omega)cdot underbrace{P({omega})}_{=0}=0.$$



      Therefore we have for any $Binmathcal{A}$, i.e. $B=cup_{min M} A_m$ with a countable subset $Msubsetmathbb{N}$



      begin{align}
      EBig[E[X|mathcal{A}] 1_B Big]
      &=E[X 1_B]\
      &=E[Xsum_{min M}1_{A_m}]\
      &=E[sum_{min M}X 1_{A_m}]\
      &=sum_{min M}E[X 1_{A_m}],text{ since $X$ is bounded we can use Fubini here}\
      &=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}E[X 1_{A_m}],text{ with the statement above}\
      &=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}EBig[E[X|A_m] 1_{A_m}Big]\
      &=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}EBig[E[X|A_m] 1_{A_m}1_BBig],text{ since }1_Bcdot 1_{A_m}=1_{A_m}.\
      &=sum_{nge 1,P(A_n)>0}EBig[E[X|A_n] 1_{A_n}1_BBig],text{ since }1_Bcdot 1_{A_n}=0text{ for }nnotin M.\
      &=EBig[Big(sum_{nge 1,P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n] 1_{A_n}Big)1_BBig],text{ again Fubini}\
      end{align}



      For the Fubini statement see here










      share|cite|improve this question















      Consider a probability space $(Omega,mathcal{F},P)$ and a bounded random variable $X$. Let $(A_n)_{nge 1}$ be a countable partition of $Omega$ and define $mathcal{A}:=sigma({A_n:nge 1})$. Then it holds:
      $$E[X|mathcal{A}]=sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}$$



      One can prove it by using the uniqueness of $E[X|mathcal{A}]$, i.e. I should be done, if I can show that the expression on the right is $mathcal{A}$-measurable, and that for any $Binmathcal{A}$, it holds



      $$EBig[E[X|mathcal{A}]cdot 1_BBig]=EBig[Big(sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}Big)cdot 1_BBig]$$



      EDIT:



      First property: For any $nge 1$: $E[X|A_n]$ and $1_{A_n}$ are $sigma(1_{A_n})$-measurable, therefore $mathcal{A}$-measurable. Now using the fact that products and sums of measurable functions are measurable, we have that
      $$sum_{nge 1, P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n]cdotmathbb{1}_{A_n}$$
      is $mathcal{A}$-measurable.



      Second property:
      Now let $A_ninmathcal{A}$ with $P(A_n)=0$. Then we know that



      $$E[Xcdot1_{A_n}]=sum_{omegain A_n}X(omega)cdot underbrace{P({omega})}_{=0}=0.$$



      Therefore we have for any $Binmathcal{A}$, i.e. $B=cup_{min M} A_m$ with a countable subset $Msubsetmathbb{N}$



      begin{align}
      EBig[E[X|mathcal{A}] 1_B Big]
      &=E[X 1_B]\
      &=E[Xsum_{min M}1_{A_m}]\
      &=E[sum_{min M}X 1_{A_m}]\
      &=sum_{min M}E[X 1_{A_m}],text{ since $X$ is bounded we can use Fubini here}\
      &=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}E[X 1_{A_m}],text{ with the statement above}\
      &=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}EBig[E[X|A_m] 1_{A_m}Big]\
      &=sum_{min M,P(A_m)>0}EBig[E[X|A_m] 1_{A_m}1_BBig],text{ since }1_Bcdot 1_{A_m}=1_{A_m}.\
      &=sum_{nge 1,P(A_n)>0}EBig[E[X|A_n] 1_{A_n}1_BBig],text{ since }1_Bcdot 1_{A_n}=0text{ for }nnotin M.\
      &=EBig[Big(sum_{nge 1,P(A_n)>0}E[X|A_n] 1_{A_n}Big)1_BBig],text{ again Fubini}\
      end{align}



      For the Fubini statement see here







      real-analysis probability functional-analysis probability-theory stochastic-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 at 22:32

























      asked Nov 14 at 21:29









      user408858

      19510




      19510






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Assume for simplicity that $mathsf{P}(A_i)>0$ for all $i$. Every element of $mathcal{A}$ is an at most countable union of sets in $(A_n)$. Thus, for $B=bigcup_{i}A_i$,
          $$
          mathsf{E}X1_B=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[X1_{A_i}]=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[mathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}]=mathsf{E}left[sum_imathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}1_Bright]
          $$

          because $(A_n)$ are disjoint and $X$ is bounded (although, it suffices to assume that $mathsf{E}|X|<infty$).






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Ok, I see, this is exactly that calculation I was missing in my edit. Still, I have to figure out, where I need that $X$ is bounded. I will give it a try tomorrow. Thank you already for your reply! :-)
            – user408858
            Nov 14 at 22:43













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998838%2fconditional-expectation-for-a-partition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Assume for simplicity that $mathsf{P}(A_i)>0$ for all $i$. Every element of $mathcal{A}$ is an at most countable union of sets in $(A_n)$. Thus, for $B=bigcup_{i}A_i$,
          $$
          mathsf{E}X1_B=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[X1_{A_i}]=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[mathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}]=mathsf{E}left[sum_imathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}1_Bright]
          $$

          because $(A_n)$ are disjoint and $X$ is bounded (although, it suffices to assume that $mathsf{E}|X|<infty$).






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Ok, I see, this is exactly that calculation I was missing in my edit. Still, I have to figure out, where I need that $X$ is bounded. I will give it a try tomorrow. Thank you already for your reply! :-)
            – user408858
            Nov 14 at 22:43

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Assume for simplicity that $mathsf{P}(A_i)>0$ for all $i$. Every element of $mathcal{A}$ is an at most countable union of sets in $(A_n)$. Thus, for $B=bigcup_{i}A_i$,
          $$
          mathsf{E}X1_B=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[X1_{A_i}]=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[mathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}]=mathsf{E}left[sum_imathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}1_Bright]
          $$

          because $(A_n)$ are disjoint and $X$ is bounded (although, it suffices to assume that $mathsf{E}|X|<infty$).






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Ok, I see, this is exactly that calculation I was missing in my edit. Still, I have to figure out, where I need that $X$ is bounded. I will give it a try tomorrow. Thank you already for your reply! :-)
            – user408858
            Nov 14 at 22:43















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Assume for simplicity that $mathsf{P}(A_i)>0$ for all $i$. Every element of $mathcal{A}$ is an at most countable union of sets in $(A_n)$. Thus, for $B=bigcup_{i}A_i$,
          $$
          mathsf{E}X1_B=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[X1_{A_i}]=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[mathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}]=mathsf{E}left[sum_imathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}1_Bright]
          $$

          because $(A_n)$ are disjoint and $X$ is bounded (although, it suffices to assume that $mathsf{E}|X|<infty$).






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Assume for simplicity that $mathsf{P}(A_i)>0$ for all $i$. Every element of $mathcal{A}$ is an at most countable union of sets in $(A_n)$. Thus, for $B=bigcup_{i}A_i$,
          $$
          mathsf{E}X1_B=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[X1_{A_i}]=sum_{i}mathsf{E}[mathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}]=mathsf{E}left[sum_imathsf{E}[Xmid A_i]1_{A_i}1_Bright]
          $$

          because $(A_n)$ are disjoint and $X$ is bounded (although, it suffices to assume that $mathsf{E}|X|<infty$).







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 15 at 9:51

























          answered Nov 14 at 22:36









          d.k.o.

          8,089527




          8,089527












          • Ok, I see, this is exactly that calculation I was missing in my edit. Still, I have to figure out, where I need that $X$ is bounded. I will give it a try tomorrow. Thank you already for your reply! :-)
            – user408858
            Nov 14 at 22:43




















          • Ok, I see, this is exactly that calculation I was missing in my edit. Still, I have to figure out, where I need that $X$ is bounded. I will give it a try tomorrow. Thank you already for your reply! :-)
            – user408858
            Nov 14 at 22:43


















          Ok, I see, this is exactly that calculation I was missing in my edit. Still, I have to figure out, where I need that $X$ is bounded. I will give it a try tomorrow. Thank you already for your reply! :-)
          – user408858
          Nov 14 at 22:43






          Ok, I see, this is exactly that calculation I was missing in my edit. Still, I have to figure out, where I need that $X$ is bounded. I will give it a try tomorrow. Thank you already for your reply! :-)
          – user408858
          Nov 14 at 22:43




















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998838%2fconditional-expectation-for-a-partition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...