How to calculate the surface area of parametric surface?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Suppose you have the surface $z=3xy$ and you want to find the area that lies within the cylinder $x^2+y^2leq 1$.



My homework is forcing me to use the parameterization



$$textbf{r}_1(s,t)= <scos(t), ssin(t), 3s^2sin(t)cos(t)>$$



I am having a difficult time visualizing this parameterization, and I do not have any graphing software to graph the surface, but I want to make sure I understand this concept.



This is quite obvious, but I want to be sure; using the above parameterization, I am not parameterizing the entire surface, right? If I wanted to, I assume the parameterization would be $$textbf{r}_2(s,t) = <s,t,3st>$$



Instead, is $textbf{r}_1$ just the parameterization adjusted for the region - the region being the cylinder $x^2+y^2leq 1$? That is, are we just making a revolution around $z=3xy$?



Any insight would be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose you have the surface $z=3xy$ and you want to find the area that lies within the cylinder $x^2+y^2leq 1$.



    My homework is forcing me to use the parameterization



    $$textbf{r}_1(s,t)= <scos(t), ssin(t), 3s^2sin(t)cos(t)>$$



    I am having a difficult time visualizing this parameterization, and I do not have any graphing software to graph the surface, but I want to make sure I understand this concept.



    This is quite obvious, but I want to be sure; using the above parameterization, I am not parameterizing the entire surface, right? If I wanted to, I assume the parameterization would be $$textbf{r}_2(s,t) = <s,t,3st>$$



    Instead, is $textbf{r}_1$ just the parameterization adjusted for the region - the region being the cylinder $x^2+y^2leq 1$? That is, are we just making a revolution around $z=3xy$?



    Any insight would be helpful.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose you have the surface $z=3xy$ and you want to find the area that lies within the cylinder $x^2+y^2leq 1$.



      My homework is forcing me to use the parameterization



      $$textbf{r}_1(s,t)= <scos(t), ssin(t), 3s^2sin(t)cos(t)>$$



      I am having a difficult time visualizing this parameterization, and I do not have any graphing software to graph the surface, but I want to make sure I understand this concept.



      This is quite obvious, but I want to be sure; using the above parameterization, I am not parameterizing the entire surface, right? If I wanted to, I assume the parameterization would be $$textbf{r}_2(s,t) = <s,t,3st>$$



      Instead, is $textbf{r}_1$ just the parameterization adjusted for the region - the region being the cylinder $x^2+y^2leq 1$? That is, are we just making a revolution around $z=3xy$?



      Any insight would be helpful.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Suppose you have the surface $z=3xy$ and you want to find the area that lies within the cylinder $x^2+y^2leq 1$.



      My homework is forcing me to use the parameterization



      $$textbf{r}_1(s,t)= <scos(t), ssin(t), 3s^2sin(t)cos(t)>$$



      I am having a difficult time visualizing this parameterization, and I do not have any graphing software to graph the surface, but I want to make sure I understand this concept.



      This is quite obvious, but I want to be sure; using the above parameterization, I am not parameterizing the entire surface, right? If I wanted to, I assume the parameterization would be $$textbf{r}_2(s,t) = <s,t,3st>$$



      Instead, is $textbf{r}_1$ just the parameterization adjusted for the region - the region being the cylinder $x^2+y^2leq 1$? That is, are we just making a revolution around $z=3xy$?



      Any insight would be helpful.







      multivariable-calculus vectors surfaces parametrization






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 10:34









      Art

      3057




      3057






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You can see this exercise as a surface integral or you can also see it as a double integral of a function $f(x,y)$ over the unit disc.





          $mathbf r_1$ is the cylindrical parameterization, which, generally, is
          $$begin{cases}x=scos t\y=ssin t\z=f(x,y)=f(scos t,ssin t)end{cases}$$



          In your case $z=f(x,y)=3xy$. In $mathbf r_1$, the cylinder becomes $sle1$ and you have no limitations on $t$. You have to evaluate the integral
          $$begin{align}int_0^1stimes 3s^2mathrm dsint_0^{2pi}sin(t)cos(t)mathrm dt&=0end{align}$$



          I got to this integral by the following way:



          $$iint f(x,y)mathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}=iint 3xymathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}$$
          Using polar coordinates $(x=scos t, y=ssin t)$ and adding the Jacobian:
          $$iint3s^3sin tcos tmathop{mathrm ds}mathop{mathrm dt}$$
          Because we are in the unit disc, $0<sle1, quad0<t<2pi$
          $$int_0^13s^3left(int_0^{2pi}sin tcos tmathop{mathrm dt}right)mathop{mathrm ds}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • The three upvotes and acceptance notwithstanding this answer is seriously wrong. Why should the area in question be $=0>$? We have a real "floppy disc" here!
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 11:57










          • I think the integrand is right, the limits of integration could be wrong. I tried to evaluate the integral in cartesian coordinates and I got $0$ again: $oint_{x^2+y^2le1}3xymathop{mathrm dxmathrm dy}=3int_{-1}^1xmathop{mathrm dx} int_{-sqrt{1-x^2}}^{sqrt{1-x^2}}ymathop{mathrm dy}=0$. I honestly do not see where the mistake is
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 12:21












          • I understand your answer (+1). Why mine is wrong?
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 14:36










          • What made you arrive at the integrand $3s^3cos tsin t>$? – That's my last word on this matter.
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 15:00




















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since in the end you have to integrate over the unit disc in the $(x,y)$-plane your source proposes to use polar coordinates instead of $x$ and $y$ as parameters. Then $x=scos t$, $y=ssin t$. In this way the idea $z=3xy$ $>(x^2+y^2leq1)$ translates into
          $${bf r}(s,t)=(scos t,ssin t,3s^2cos tsin t)qquad(0leq sleq 1, 0leq tleq2pi) .$$
          In order to find the area of this floppy disc $F$ we have to compute
          $${bf r}_s=(cos t,sin t, 6scos tsin t),quad {bf r}_t=bigl(-ssin t,scos t ,3s^2cos(2t)bigr)$$
          and then
          $${bf r}_stimes{bf r}_t=(ldots,ldots,ldots) .$$
          The area is then finally given as
          $${rm area}(F)=int_0^1int_0^{2pi}bigl|{bf r}_stimes{bf r}_tbigr|>dt>ds .$$
          The resulting integral will be simpler than dreaded.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Sorry, it's me again. Shouldn't you integrate $|bf r_s times bf r_t|{f}(bf r)$ instead of just $|bf r_s times bf r_t|$?
            – Lorenzo B.
            yesterday













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004766%2fhow-to-calculate-the-surface-area-of-parametric-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You can see this exercise as a surface integral or you can also see it as a double integral of a function $f(x,y)$ over the unit disc.





          $mathbf r_1$ is the cylindrical parameterization, which, generally, is
          $$begin{cases}x=scos t\y=ssin t\z=f(x,y)=f(scos t,ssin t)end{cases}$$



          In your case $z=f(x,y)=3xy$. In $mathbf r_1$, the cylinder becomes $sle1$ and you have no limitations on $t$. You have to evaluate the integral
          $$begin{align}int_0^1stimes 3s^2mathrm dsint_0^{2pi}sin(t)cos(t)mathrm dt&=0end{align}$$



          I got to this integral by the following way:



          $$iint f(x,y)mathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}=iint 3xymathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}$$
          Using polar coordinates $(x=scos t, y=ssin t)$ and adding the Jacobian:
          $$iint3s^3sin tcos tmathop{mathrm ds}mathop{mathrm dt}$$
          Because we are in the unit disc, $0<sle1, quad0<t<2pi$
          $$int_0^13s^3left(int_0^{2pi}sin tcos tmathop{mathrm dt}right)mathop{mathrm ds}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • The three upvotes and acceptance notwithstanding this answer is seriously wrong. Why should the area in question be $=0>$? We have a real "floppy disc" here!
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 11:57










          • I think the integrand is right, the limits of integration could be wrong. I tried to evaluate the integral in cartesian coordinates and I got $0$ again: $oint_{x^2+y^2le1}3xymathop{mathrm dxmathrm dy}=3int_{-1}^1xmathop{mathrm dx} int_{-sqrt{1-x^2}}^{sqrt{1-x^2}}ymathop{mathrm dy}=0$. I honestly do not see where the mistake is
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 12:21












          • I understand your answer (+1). Why mine is wrong?
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 14:36










          • What made you arrive at the integrand $3s^3cos tsin t>$? – That's my last word on this matter.
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 15:00

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You can see this exercise as a surface integral or you can also see it as a double integral of a function $f(x,y)$ over the unit disc.





          $mathbf r_1$ is the cylindrical parameterization, which, generally, is
          $$begin{cases}x=scos t\y=ssin t\z=f(x,y)=f(scos t,ssin t)end{cases}$$



          In your case $z=f(x,y)=3xy$. In $mathbf r_1$, the cylinder becomes $sle1$ and you have no limitations on $t$. You have to evaluate the integral
          $$begin{align}int_0^1stimes 3s^2mathrm dsint_0^{2pi}sin(t)cos(t)mathrm dt&=0end{align}$$



          I got to this integral by the following way:



          $$iint f(x,y)mathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}=iint 3xymathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}$$
          Using polar coordinates $(x=scos t, y=ssin t)$ and adding the Jacobian:
          $$iint3s^3sin tcos tmathop{mathrm ds}mathop{mathrm dt}$$
          Because we are in the unit disc, $0<sle1, quad0<t<2pi$
          $$int_0^13s^3left(int_0^{2pi}sin tcos tmathop{mathrm dt}right)mathop{mathrm ds}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • The three upvotes and acceptance notwithstanding this answer is seriously wrong. Why should the area in question be $=0>$? We have a real "floppy disc" here!
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 11:57










          • I think the integrand is right, the limits of integration could be wrong. I tried to evaluate the integral in cartesian coordinates and I got $0$ again: $oint_{x^2+y^2le1}3xymathop{mathrm dxmathrm dy}=3int_{-1}^1xmathop{mathrm dx} int_{-sqrt{1-x^2}}^{sqrt{1-x^2}}ymathop{mathrm dy}=0$. I honestly do not see where the mistake is
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 12:21












          • I understand your answer (+1). Why mine is wrong?
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 14:36










          • What made you arrive at the integrand $3s^3cos tsin t>$? – That's my last word on this matter.
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 15:00















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          You can see this exercise as a surface integral or you can also see it as a double integral of a function $f(x,y)$ over the unit disc.





          $mathbf r_1$ is the cylindrical parameterization, which, generally, is
          $$begin{cases}x=scos t\y=ssin t\z=f(x,y)=f(scos t,ssin t)end{cases}$$



          In your case $z=f(x,y)=3xy$. In $mathbf r_1$, the cylinder becomes $sle1$ and you have no limitations on $t$. You have to evaluate the integral
          $$begin{align}int_0^1stimes 3s^2mathrm dsint_0^{2pi}sin(t)cos(t)mathrm dt&=0end{align}$$



          I got to this integral by the following way:



          $$iint f(x,y)mathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}=iint 3xymathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}$$
          Using polar coordinates $(x=scos t, y=ssin t)$ and adding the Jacobian:
          $$iint3s^3sin tcos tmathop{mathrm ds}mathop{mathrm dt}$$
          Because we are in the unit disc, $0<sle1, quad0<t<2pi$
          $$int_0^13s^3left(int_0^{2pi}sin tcos tmathop{mathrm dt}right)mathop{mathrm ds}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          You can see this exercise as a surface integral or you can also see it as a double integral of a function $f(x,y)$ over the unit disc.





          $mathbf r_1$ is the cylindrical parameterization, which, generally, is
          $$begin{cases}x=scos t\y=ssin t\z=f(x,y)=f(scos t,ssin t)end{cases}$$



          In your case $z=f(x,y)=3xy$. In $mathbf r_1$, the cylinder becomes $sle1$ and you have no limitations on $t$. You have to evaluate the integral
          $$begin{align}int_0^1stimes 3s^2mathrm dsint_0^{2pi}sin(t)cos(t)mathrm dt&=0end{align}$$



          I got to this integral by the following way:



          $$iint f(x,y)mathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}=iint 3xymathop{mathrm dx}mathop{mathrm dy}$$
          Using polar coordinates $(x=scos t, y=ssin t)$ and adding the Jacobian:
          $$iint3s^3sin tcos tmathop{mathrm ds}mathop{mathrm dt}$$
          Because we are in the unit disc, $0<sle1, quad0<t<2pi$
          $$int_0^13s^3left(int_0^{2pi}sin tcos tmathop{mathrm dt}right)mathop{mathrm ds}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 19 at 15:24

























          answered Nov 19 at 10:57









          Lorenzo B.

          1,6422519




          1,6422519












          • The three upvotes and acceptance notwithstanding this answer is seriously wrong. Why should the area in question be $=0>$? We have a real "floppy disc" here!
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 11:57










          • I think the integrand is right, the limits of integration could be wrong. I tried to evaluate the integral in cartesian coordinates and I got $0$ again: $oint_{x^2+y^2le1}3xymathop{mathrm dxmathrm dy}=3int_{-1}^1xmathop{mathrm dx} int_{-sqrt{1-x^2}}^{sqrt{1-x^2}}ymathop{mathrm dy}=0$. I honestly do not see where the mistake is
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 12:21












          • I understand your answer (+1). Why mine is wrong?
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 14:36










          • What made you arrive at the integrand $3s^3cos tsin t>$? – That's my last word on this matter.
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 15:00




















          • The three upvotes and acceptance notwithstanding this answer is seriously wrong. Why should the area in question be $=0>$? We have a real "floppy disc" here!
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 11:57










          • I think the integrand is right, the limits of integration could be wrong. I tried to evaluate the integral in cartesian coordinates and I got $0$ again: $oint_{x^2+y^2le1}3xymathop{mathrm dxmathrm dy}=3int_{-1}^1xmathop{mathrm dx} int_{-sqrt{1-x^2}}^{sqrt{1-x^2}}ymathop{mathrm dy}=0$. I honestly do not see where the mistake is
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 12:21












          • I understand your answer (+1). Why mine is wrong?
            – Lorenzo B.
            Nov 19 at 14:36










          • What made you arrive at the integrand $3s^3cos tsin t>$? – That's my last word on this matter.
            – Christian Blatter
            Nov 19 at 15:00


















          The three upvotes and acceptance notwithstanding this answer is seriously wrong. Why should the area in question be $=0>$? We have a real "floppy disc" here!
          – Christian Blatter
          Nov 19 at 11:57




          The three upvotes and acceptance notwithstanding this answer is seriously wrong. Why should the area in question be $=0>$? We have a real "floppy disc" here!
          – Christian Blatter
          Nov 19 at 11:57












          I think the integrand is right, the limits of integration could be wrong. I tried to evaluate the integral in cartesian coordinates and I got $0$ again: $oint_{x^2+y^2le1}3xymathop{mathrm dxmathrm dy}=3int_{-1}^1xmathop{mathrm dx} int_{-sqrt{1-x^2}}^{sqrt{1-x^2}}ymathop{mathrm dy}=0$. I honestly do not see where the mistake is
          – Lorenzo B.
          Nov 19 at 12:21






          I think the integrand is right, the limits of integration could be wrong. I tried to evaluate the integral in cartesian coordinates and I got $0$ again: $oint_{x^2+y^2le1}3xymathop{mathrm dxmathrm dy}=3int_{-1}^1xmathop{mathrm dx} int_{-sqrt{1-x^2}}^{sqrt{1-x^2}}ymathop{mathrm dy}=0$. I honestly do not see where the mistake is
          – Lorenzo B.
          Nov 19 at 12:21














          I understand your answer (+1). Why mine is wrong?
          – Lorenzo B.
          Nov 19 at 14:36




          I understand your answer (+1). Why mine is wrong?
          – Lorenzo B.
          Nov 19 at 14:36












          What made you arrive at the integrand $3s^3cos tsin t>$? – That's my last word on this matter.
          – Christian Blatter
          Nov 19 at 15:00






          What made you arrive at the integrand $3s^3cos tsin t>$? – That's my last word on this matter.
          – Christian Blatter
          Nov 19 at 15:00












          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since in the end you have to integrate over the unit disc in the $(x,y)$-plane your source proposes to use polar coordinates instead of $x$ and $y$ as parameters. Then $x=scos t$, $y=ssin t$. In this way the idea $z=3xy$ $>(x^2+y^2leq1)$ translates into
          $${bf r}(s,t)=(scos t,ssin t,3s^2cos tsin t)qquad(0leq sleq 1, 0leq tleq2pi) .$$
          In order to find the area of this floppy disc $F$ we have to compute
          $${bf r}_s=(cos t,sin t, 6scos tsin t),quad {bf r}_t=bigl(-ssin t,scos t ,3s^2cos(2t)bigr)$$
          and then
          $${bf r}_stimes{bf r}_t=(ldots,ldots,ldots) .$$
          The area is then finally given as
          $${rm area}(F)=int_0^1int_0^{2pi}bigl|{bf r}_stimes{bf r}_tbigr|>dt>ds .$$
          The resulting integral will be simpler than dreaded.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Sorry, it's me again. Shouldn't you integrate $|bf r_s times bf r_t|{f}(bf r)$ instead of just $|bf r_s times bf r_t|$?
            – Lorenzo B.
            yesterday

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since in the end you have to integrate over the unit disc in the $(x,y)$-plane your source proposes to use polar coordinates instead of $x$ and $y$ as parameters. Then $x=scos t$, $y=ssin t$. In this way the idea $z=3xy$ $>(x^2+y^2leq1)$ translates into
          $${bf r}(s,t)=(scos t,ssin t,3s^2cos tsin t)qquad(0leq sleq 1, 0leq tleq2pi) .$$
          In order to find the area of this floppy disc $F$ we have to compute
          $${bf r}_s=(cos t,sin t, 6scos tsin t),quad {bf r}_t=bigl(-ssin t,scos t ,3s^2cos(2t)bigr)$$
          and then
          $${bf r}_stimes{bf r}_t=(ldots,ldots,ldots) .$$
          The area is then finally given as
          $${rm area}(F)=int_0^1int_0^{2pi}bigl|{bf r}_stimes{bf r}_tbigr|>dt>ds .$$
          The resulting integral will be simpler than dreaded.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Sorry, it's me again. Shouldn't you integrate $|bf r_s times bf r_t|{f}(bf r)$ instead of just $|bf r_s times bf r_t|$?
            – Lorenzo B.
            yesterday















          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          Since in the end you have to integrate over the unit disc in the $(x,y)$-plane your source proposes to use polar coordinates instead of $x$ and $y$ as parameters. Then $x=scos t$, $y=ssin t$. In this way the idea $z=3xy$ $>(x^2+y^2leq1)$ translates into
          $${bf r}(s,t)=(scos t,ssin t,3s^2cos tsin t)qquad(0leq sleq 1, 0leq tleq2pi) .$$
          In order to find the area of this floppy disc $F$ we have to compute
          $${bf r}_s=(cos t,sin t, 6scos tsin t),quad {bf r}_t=bigl(-ssin t,scos t ,3s^2cos(2t)bigr)$$
          and then
          $${bf r}_stimes{bf r}_t=(ldots,ldots,ldots) .$$
          The area is then finally given as
          $${rm area}(F)=int_0^1int_0^{2pi}bigl|{bf r}_stimes{bf r}_tbigr|>dt>ds .$$
          The resulting integral will be simpler than dreaded.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Since in the end you have to integrate over the unit disc in the $(x,y)$-plane your source proposes to use polar coordinates instead of $x$ and $y$ as parameters. Then $x=scos t$, $y=ssin t$. In this way the idea $z=3xy$ $>(x^2+y^2leq1)$ translates into
          $${bf r}(s,t)=(scos t,ssin t,3s^2cos tsin t)qquad(0leq sleq 1, 0leq tleq2pi) .$$
          In order to find the area of this floppy disc $F$ we have to compute
          $${bf r}_s=(cos t,sin t, 6scos tsin t),quad {bf r}_t=bigl(-ssin t,scos t ,3s^2cos(2t)bigr)$$
          and then
          $${bf r}_stimes{bf r}_t=(ldots,ldots,ldots) .$$
          The area is then finally given as
          $${rm area}(F)=int_0^1int_0^{2pi}bigl|{bf r}_stimes{bf r}_tbigr|>dt>ds .$$
          The resulting integral will be simpler than dreaded.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 19 at 13:37

























          answered Nov 19 at 10:50









          Christian Blatter

          170k7111324




          170k7111324












          • Sorry, it's me again. Shouldn't you integrate $|bf r_s times bf r_t|{f}(bf r)$ instead of just $|bf r_s times bf r_t|$?
            – Lorenzo B.
            yesterday




















          • Sorry, it's me again. Shouldn't you integrate $|bf r_s times bf r_t|{f}(bf r)$ instead of just $|bf r_s times bf r_t|$?
            – Lorenzo B.
            yesterday


















          Sorry, it's me again. Shouldn't you integrate $|bf r_s times bf r_t|{f}(bf r)$ instead of just $|bf r_s times bf r_t|$?
          – Lorenzo B.
          yesterday






          Sorry, it's me again. Shouldn't you integrate $|bf r_s times bf r_t|{f}(bf r)$ instead of just $|bf r_s times bf r_t|$?
          – Lorenzo B.
          yesterday




















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004766%2fhow-to-calculate-the-surface-area-of-parametric-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...