$mathrm{Log}(prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k))=sum_{k=1}^n (mathrm{Log}(1+a_k))$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $a_1,ldots a_nin mathbb{C}$, $|a_j|<1$
for each $j=1,ldots n$ such that $left| prod_{k=1}^j (1+a_k)-1 right| < 1$.



Show that



$$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k)right)=sum_{k=1}^n (mathrm{Log}(1+a_k))$$



Can anyone help?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Welcome to Maths SX! Please type your formulæ using MathJax.
    – Bernard
    Nov 14 at 20:34










  • As @Bernard said, try to use MathJax (or Latex) for the mathematical formulae. This time, I edited your post, and you can have an idea how to do it. Good luck, and welcome to MSE!
    – user559615
    Nov 14 at 20:43






  • 1




    Forgive me If I'm wrong. I think you should have to apply log property $log ab=log a+log b$
    – IEDC PHY
    Nov 14 at 21:57










  • Hi, I think the principal value Log still has most of the same properties so might be able to do what @IEDCPHY had said
    – Questlove
    Nov 14 at 22:37










  • @IEDCPHY It is not true that $Log , ab =Log, a +Log, b$ for all non-zero complex numbers $a,b$ so the question is not entirely trivial.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Nov 14 at 23:49

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $a_1,ldots a_nin mathbb{C}$, $|a_j|<1$
for each $j=1,ldots n$ such that $left| prod_{k=1}^j (1+a_k)-1 right| < 1$.



Show that



$$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k)right)=sum_{k=1}^n (mathrm{Log}(1+a_k))$$



Can anyone help?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Welcome to Maths SX! Please type your formulæ using MathJax.
    – Bernard
    Nov 14 at 20:34










  • As @Bernard said, try to use MathJax (or Latex) for the mathematical formulae. This time, I edited your post, and you can have an idea how to do it. Good luck, and welcome to MSE!
    – user559615
    Nov 14 at 20:43






  • 1




    Forgive me If I'm wrong. I think you should have to apply log property $log ab=log a+log b$
    – IEDC PHY
    Nov 14 at 21:57










  • Hi, I think the principal value Log still has most of the same properties so might be able to do what @IEDCPHY had said
    – Questlove
    Nov 14 at 22:37










  • @IEDCPHY It is not true that $Log , ab =Log, a +Log, b$ for all non-zero complex numbers $a,b$ so the question is not entirely trivial.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Nov 14 at 23:49















up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $a_1,ldots a_nin mathbb{C}$, $|a_j|<1$
for each $j=1,ldots n$ such that $left| prod_{k=1}^j (1+a_k)-1 right| < 1$.



Show that



$$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k)right)=sum_{k=1}^n (mathrm{Log}(1+a_k))$$



Can anyone help?










share|cite|improve this question















Let $a_1,ldots a_nin mathbb{C}$, $|a_j|<1$
for each $j=1,ldots n$ such that $left| prod_{k=1}^j (1+a_k)-1 right| < 1$.



Show that



$$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k)right)=sum_{k=1}^n (mathrm{Log}(1+a_k))$$



Can anyone help?







complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 14 at 22:33









ignorantFid

21916




21916










asked Nov 14 at 20:26









widich

83




83












  • Welcome to Maths SX! Please type your formulæ using MathJax.
    – Bernard
    Nov 14 at 20:34










  • As @Bernard said, try to use MathJax (or Latex) for the mathematical formulae. This time, I edited your post, and you can have an idea how to do it. Good luck, and welcome to MSE!
    – user559615
    Nov 14 at 20:43






  • 1




    Forgive me If I'm wrong. I think you should have to apply log property $log ab=log a+log b$
    – IEDC PHY
    Nov 14 at 21:57










  • Hi, I think the principal value Log still has most of the same properties so might be able to do what @IEDCPHY had said
    – Questlove
    Nov 14 at 22:37










  • @IEDCPHY It is not true that $Log , ab =Log, a +Log, b$ for all non-zero complex numbers $a,b$ so the question is not entirely trivial.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Nov 14 at 23:49




















  • Welcome to Maths SX! Please type your formulæ using MathJax.
    – Bernard
    Nov 14 at 20:34










  • As @Bernard said, try to use MathJax (or Latex) for the mathematical formulae. This time, I edited your post, and you can have an idea how to do it. Good luck, and welcome to MSE!
    – user559615
    Nov 14 at 20:43






  • 1




    Forgive me If I'm wrong. I think you should have to apply log property $log ab=log a+log b$
    – IEDC PHY
    Nov 14 at 21:57










  • Hi, I think the principal value Log still has most of the same properties so might be able to do what @IEDCPHY had said
    – Questlove
    Nov 14 at 22:37










  • @IEDCPHY It is not true that $Log , ab =Log, a +Log, b$ for all non-zero complex numbers $a,b$ so the question is not entirely trivial.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Nov 14 at 23:49


















Welcome to Maths SX! Please type your formulæ using MathJax.
– Bernard
Nov 14 at 20:34




Welcome to Maths SX! Please type your formulæ using MathJax.
– Bernard
Nov 14 at 20:34












As @Bernard said, try to use MathJax (or Latex) for the mathematical formulae. This time, I edited your post, and you can have an idea how to do it. Good luck, and welcome to MSE!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:43




As @Bernard said, try to use MathJax (or Latex) for the mathematical formulae. This time, I edited your post, and you can have an idea how to do it. Good luck, and welcome to MSE!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:43




1




1




Forgive me If I'm wrong. I think you should have to apply log property $log ab=log a+log b$
– IEDC PHY
Nov 14 at 21:57




Forgive me If I'm wrong. I think you should have to apply log property $log ab=log a+log b$
– IEDC PHY
Nov 14 at 21:57












Hi, I think the principal value Log still has most of the same properties so might be able to do what @IEDCPHY had said
– Questlove
Nov 14 at 22:37




Hi, I think the principal value Log still has most of the same properties so might be able to do what @IEDCPHY had said
– Questlove
Nov 14 at 22:37












@IEDCPHY It is not true that $Log , ab =Log, a +Log, b$ for all non-zero complex numbers $a,b$ so the question is not entirely trivial.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 14 at 23:49






@IEDCPHY It is not true that $Log , ab =Log, a +Log, b$ for all non-zero complex numbers $a,b$ so the question is not entirely trivial.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 14 at 23:49












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Let $mathrm{Log}$ denote the (holomorphic) principal branch of the complex logarithm, defined on $G = { z in mathbb{C} mid z notin (-infty,0] }$, whose imaginary part lies in the interval $(-pi,pi)$. This means that for $z in (0,infty)$ the value of $mathrm{Log}(z)$ is the ordinary real logarithm of $z$.



Let us start with $n = 2$. Since $lvert a_1 rvert, lvert a_2 rvert < 1$, we see that $1 + a_j$ have positive real parts so that we can write $1 + a_j = r_je^{iphi_j}$ with $r_j >0$ and $phi_j in (-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$. Therefore $phi_1 + phi_2 ne -pi$ and we conclude $(1+a_1)(1+a_2) in G$. Let $D = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z rvert < 1 }$ and define
$$f : D times D to mathbb{C}, f(z_1,z_2) = mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) - sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) .$$
We have $e^{f(z_1,z_2)} = 1$ for all $z_1,z_2$, hence $f$ must have values in $2pi i mathbb{Z} = { 2 pi i k mid k in mathbb{Z} }$. Since $f$ is continuous and $D times D$ is connected, also $f(D times D)$ is connected, and this implies that $f$ must be constant. But $f(0,0) = 0$ which proves that $f equiv 0$. Thus the claim is true for $n=2$.



Note that it is essential that $mathrm{Log}$ was chosen as the principal branch, otherwise we would have $mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) = sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) + 2pi i l$ for some fixed $l ne 0$. In fact, if $mathrm{Log}$ is a different branch on $G$, then $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some fixed $k ne 0$ and therefore $f equiv f(0,0) = -2pi i k$.



We finish the proof by induction. The equation is true for $n=1,2$. Assume it is true for some $n ge 2$. For $n+1$ we argue as follows.



Let $b = prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k)-1$. Then $lvert b rvert < 1$ and $ prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k) = (1+b)(1+a_{n+1})$. Hence
$$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k)right) = mathrm{Log}left((1+b) (1+a_{n+1})right) = mathrm{Log}(1+b) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1})$$
$$= sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1}) = sum_{k=1}^{n+1} mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) .$$



ADDED:



We can reformulate the above "theorem" as follows.



Let $U = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z - 1 rvert < 1 } subset G$ be the open disk with center $1$ and radius $1$, and let $mathrm{Log}$ be a holomorphic branch of the logarithm on $G$. It is uniquely determined by the value $mathrm{Log}(1)$ which has the form $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some $k in mathbb{Z}$.



If $A_1,dots,A_n in U$ and $prod_{k=1}^j A_k in U$ for $j =1,dots,n$, then
$$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^n A_k right) = sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}A_k - (n-1) cdot2 pi i k .$$
This is proved as above. Now set $a_k = A_k-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998780%2fmathrmlog-prod-k-1n-1a-k-sum-k-1n-mathrmlog1a-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Let $mathrm{Log}$ denote the (holomorphic) principal branch of the complex logarithm, defined on $G = { z in mathbb{C} mid z notin (-infty,0] }$, whose imaginary part lies in the interval $(-pi,pi)$. This means that for $z in (0,infty)$ the value of $mathrm{Log}(z)$ is the ordinary real logarithm of $z$.



    Let us start with $n = 2$. Since $lvert a_1 rvert, lvert a_2 rvert < 1$, we see that $1 + a_j$ have positive real parts so that we can write $1 + a_j = r_je^{iphi_j}$ with $r_j >0$ and $phi_j in (-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$. Therefore $phi_1 + phi_2 ne -pi$ and we conclude $(1+a_1)(1+a_2) in G$. Let $D = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z rvert < 1 }$ and define
    $$f : D times D to mathbb{C}, f(z_1,z_2) = mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) - sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) .$$
    We have $e^{f(z_1,z_2)} = 1$ for all $z_1,z_2$, hence $f$ must have values in $2pi i mathbb{Z} = { 2 pi i k mid k in mathbb{Z} }$. Since $f$ is continuous and $D times D$ is connected, also $f(D times D)$ is connected, and this implies that $f$ must be constant. But $f(0,0) = 0$ which proves that $f equiv 0$. Thus the claim is true for $n=2$.



    Note that it is essential that $mathrm{Log}$ was chosen as the principal branch, otherwise we would have $mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) = sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) + 2pi i l$ for some fixed $l ne 0$. In fact, if $mathrm{Log}$ is a different branch on $G$, then $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some fixed $k ne 0$ and therefore $f equiv f(0,0) = -2pi i k$.



    We finish the proof by induction. The equation is true for $n=1,2$. Assume it is true for some $n ge 2$. For $n+1$ we argue as follows.



    Let $b = prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k)-1$. Then $lvert b rvert < 1$ and $ prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k) = (1+b)(1+a_{n+1})$. Hence
    $$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k)right) = mathrm{Log}left((1+b) (1+a_{n+1})right) = mathrm{Log}(1+b) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1})$$
    $$= sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1}) = sum_{k=1}^{n+1} mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) .$$



    ADDED:



    We can reformulate the above "theorem" as follows.



    Let $U = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z - 1 rvert < 1 } subset G$ be the open disk with center $1$ and radius $1$, and let $mathrm{Log}$ be a holomorphic branch of the logarithm on $G$. It is uniquely determined by the value $mathrm{Log}(1)$ which has the form $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some $k in mathbb{Z}$.



    If $A_1,dots,A_n in U$ and $prod_{k=1}^j A_k in U$ for $j =1,dots,n$, then
    $$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^n A_k right) = sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}A_k - (n-1) cdot2 pi i k .$$
    This is proved as above. Now set $a_k = A_k-1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Let $mathrm{Log}$ denote the (holomorphic) principal branch of the complex logarithm, defined on $G = { z in mathbb{C} mid z notin (-infty,0] }$, whose imaginary part lies in the interval $(-pi,pi)$. This means that for $z in (0,infty)$ the value of $mathrm{Log}(z)$ is the ordinary real logarithm of $z$.



      Let us start with $n = 2$. Since $lvert a_1 rvert, lvert a_2 rvert < 1$, we see that $1 + a_j$ have positive real parts so that we can write $1 + a_j = r_je^{iphi_j}$ with $r_j >0$ and $phi_j in (-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$. Therefore $phi_1 + phi_2 ne -pi$ and we conclude $(1+a_1)(1+a_2) in G$. Let $D = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z rvert < 1 }$ and define
      $$f : D times D to mathbb{C}, f(z_1,z_2) = mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) - sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) .$$
      We have $e^{f(z_1,z_2)} = 1$ for all $z_1,z_2$, hence $f$ must have values in $2pi i mathbb{Z} = { 2 pi i k mid k in mathbb{Z} }$. Since $f$ is continuous and $D times D$ is connected, also $f(D times D)$ is connected, and this implies that $f$ must be constant. But $f(0,0) = 0$ which proves that $f equiv 0$. Thus the claim is true for $n=2$.



      Note that it is essential that $mathrm{Log}$ was chosen as the principal branch, otherwise we would have $mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) = sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) + 2pi i l$ for some fixed $l ne 0$. In fact, if $mathrm{Log}$ is a different branch on $G$, then $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some fixed $k ne 0$ and therefore $f equiv f(0,0) = -2pi i k$.



      We finish the proof by induction. The equation is true for $n=1,2$. Assume it is true for some $n ge 2$. For $n+1$ we argue as follows.



      Let $b = prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k)-1$. Then $lvert b rvert < 1$ and $ prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k) = (1+b)(1+a_{n+1})$. Hence
      $$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k)right) = mathrm{Log}left((1+b) (1+a_{n+1})right) = mathrm{Log}(1+b) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1})$$
      $$= sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1}) = sum_{k=1}^{n+1} mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) .$$



      ADDED:



      We can reformulate the above "theorem" as follows.



      Let $U = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z - 1 rvert < 1 } subset G$ be the open disk with center $1$ and radius $1$, and let $mathrm{Log}$ be a holomorphic branch of the logarithm on $G$. It is uniquely determined by the value $mathrm{Log}(1)$ which has the form $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some $k in mathbb{Z}$.



      If $A_1,dots,A_n in U$ and $prod_{k=1}^j A_k in U$ for $j =1,dots,n$, then
      $$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^n A_k right) = sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}A_k - (n-1) cdot2 pi i k .$$
      This is proved as above. Now set $a_k = A_k-1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        Let $mathrm{Log}$ denote the (holomorphic) principal branch of the complex logarithm, defined on $G = { z in mathbb{C} mid z notin (-infty,0] }$, whose imaginary part lies in the interval $(-pi,pi)$. This means that for $z in (0,infty)$ the value of $mathrm{Log}(z)$ is the ordinary real logarithm of $z$.



        Let us start with $n = 2$. Since $lvert a_1 rvert, lvert a_2 rvert < 1$, we see that $1 + a_j$ have positive real parts so that we can write $1 + a_j = r_je^{iphi_j}$ with $r_j >0$ and $phi_j in (-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$. Therefore $phi_1 + phi_2 ne -pi$ and we conclude $(1+a_1)(1+a_2) in G$. Let $D = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z rvert < 1 }$ and define
        $$f : D times D to mathbb{C}, f(z_1,z_2) = mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) - sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) .$$
        We have $e^{f(z_1,z_2)} = 1$ for all $z_1,z_2$, hence $f$ must have values in $2pi i mathbb{Z} = { 2 pi i k mid k in mathbb{Z} }$. Since $f$ is continuous and $D times D$ is connected, also $f(D times D)$ is connected, and this implies that $f$ must be constant. But $f(0,0) = 0$ which proves that $f equiv 0$. Thus the claim is true for $n=2$.



        Note that it is essential that $mathrm{Log}$ was chosen as the principal branch, otherwise we would have $mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) = sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) + 2pi i l$ for some fixed $l ne 0$. In fact, if $mathrm{Log}$ is a different branch on $G$, then $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some fixed $k ne 0$ and therefore $f equiv f(0,0) = -2pi i k$.



        We finish the proof by induction. The equation is true for $n=1,2$. Assume it is true for some $n ge 2$. For $n+1$ we argue as follows.



        Let $b = prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k)-1$. Then $lvert b rvert < 1$ and $ prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k) = (1+b)(1+a_{n+1})$. Hence
        $$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k)right) = mathrm{Log}left((1+b) (1+a_{n+1})right) = mathrm{Log}(1+b) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1})$$
        $$= sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1}) = sum_{k=1}^{n+1} mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) .$$



        ADDED:



        We can reformulate the above "theorem" as follows.



        Let $U = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z - 1 rvert < 1 } subset G$ be the open disk with center $1$ and radius $1$, and let $mathrm{Log}$ be a holomorphic branch of the logarithm on $G$. It is uniquely determined by the value $mathrm{Log}(1)$ which has the form $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some $k in mathbb{Z}$.



        If $A_1,dots,A_n in U$ and $prod_{k=1}^j A_k in U$ for $j =1,dots,n$, then
        $$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^n A_k right) = sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}A_k - (n-1) cdot2 pi i k .$$
        This is proved as above. Now set $a_k = A_k-1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Let $mathrm{Log}$ denote the (holomorphic) principal branch of the complex logarithm, defined on $G = { z in mathbb{C} mid z notin (-infty,0] }$, whose imaginary part lies in the interval $(-pi,pi)$. This means that for $z in (0,infty)$ the value of $mathrm{Log}(z)$ is the ordinary real logarithm of $z$.



        Let us start with $n = 2$. Since $lvert a_1 rvert, lvert a_2 rvert < 1$, we see that $1 + a_j$ have positive real parts so that we can write $1 + a_j = r_je^{iphi_j}$ with $r_j >0$ and $phi_j in (-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$. Therefore $phi_1 + phi_2 ne -pi$ and we conclude $(1+a_1)(1+a_2) in G$. Let $D = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z rvert < 1 }$ and define
        $$f : D times D to mathbb{C}, f(z_1,z_2) = mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) - sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) .$$
        We have $e^{f(z_1,z_2)} = 1$ for all $z_1,z_2$, hence $f$ must have values in $2pi i mathbb{Z} = { 2 pi i k mid k in mathbb{Z} }$. Since $f$ is continuous and $D times D$ is connected, also $f(D times D)$ is connected, and this implies that $f$ must be constant. But $f(0,0) = 0$ which proves that $f equiv 0$. Thus the claim is true for $n=2$.



        Note that it is essential that $mathrm{Log}$ was chosen as the principal branch, otherwise we would have $mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^2 (1+z_k)right) = sum_{k=1}^2 mathrm{Log}(1+z_k) + 2pi i l$ for some fixed $l ne 0$. In fact, if $mathrm{Log}$ is a different branch on $G$, then $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some fixed $k ne 0$ and therefore $f equiv f(0,0) = -2pi i k$.



        We finish the proof by induction. The equation is true for $n=1,2$. Assume it is true for some $n ge 2$. For $n+1$ we argue as follows.



        Let $b = prod_{k=1}^n (1+a_k)-1$. Then $lvert b rvert < 1$ and $ prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k) = (1+b)(1+a_{n+1})$. Hence
        $$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^{n+1} (1+a_k)right) = mathrm{Log}left((1+b) (1+a_{n+1})right) = mathrm{Log}(1+b) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1})$$
        $$= sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) + mathrm{Log} (1+a_{n+1}) = sum_{k=1}^{n+1} mathrm{Log}(1+a_k) .$$



        ADDED:



        We can reformulate the above "theorem" as follows.



        Let $U = { z in mathbb{C} mid lvert z - 1 rvert < 1 } subset G$ be the open disk with center $1$ and radius $1$, and let $mathrm{Log}$ be a holomorphic branch of the logarithm on $G$. It is uniquely determined by the value $mathrm{Log}(1)$ which has the form $mathrm{Log}(1) = 2 pi i k$ for some $k in mathbb{Z}$.



        If $A_1,dots,A_n in U$ and $prod_{k=1}^j A_k in U$ for $j =1,dots,n$, then
        $$mathrm{Log}left(prod_{k=1}^n A_k right) = sum_{k=1}^n mathrm{Log}A_k - (n-1) cdot2 pi i k .$$
        This is proved as above. Now set $a_k = A_k-1$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 15 at 8:45

























        answered Nov 15 at 0:45









        Paul Frost

        7,4341527




        7,4341527






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998780%2fmathrmlog-prod-k-1n-1a-k-sum-k-1n-mathrmlog1a-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa