Damped Harmonic Oscillator and Response Function











up vote
11
down vote

favorite
5












This is another one of those questions that I feel like I am almost there, but not quite, and it's the math that gets me. But here goes:



For a driven damped harmonic oscillator, show that the full width at half maximum of the response function $| R(omega)|^2$ is $gamma$. Where $gamma $ is the damping factor. So we start off with: $$ddot x + gamma dot x + omega_0x = frac{F_{ext}(t)}{m} = f(t)$$



And I move to solve this. I know that the solution will be $x_0 e^{iomega t}$ and that I should get the following:
$$-omega^2 x_0 e^{iomega t} + (iomega)x_0 e^{iomega t}gamma+ omega_0^2x_0e^{iomega t} = frac{F_0 e^{iomega t}}{m}$$
which turns into $$x_0 (omega_0^2 -omega^2 + (iomega) gamma ) = frac{F_0}{m}= f_0$$ which then becomes $$x_0 = frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 + (iomega) gamma }$$
The denominator should give me the response function $R(omega)$. So I take the absolute value and square it and I get: $$|R(omega^2)| = frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 t + (iomega) gamma } frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 t - (iomega) gamma } = frac{f_0}{(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + gamma^2 omega^2 }$$



So far so good. I want to find the maximum of this function and that means I want to know where the derivative of the denominator is zero. Taking that derivative: $$frac{d}{domega}(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + gamma^2 omega^2) = 2((omega_0^2 -omega^2)(2omega) + 2gamma^2 omega = 0$$ and since it = 0 we can divide thru by $2omega$ and we are left with $$-2(omega_0^2 - omega^2) + gamma^2 = 0$$ and solving for $omega$: $omega = sqrt{omega_0^2 - frac{gamma^2}{2}} $. We will replace $gamma$ with $2beta$, leaving us $omega = sqrt{omega_0^2 - 2 beta^2} $



we know where the maximum is, but now we want to find the half-maximum. Plugging my $omega$ back into my $|R(omega)|^2$ expression, I have $$frac{1}{(omega_0^2 - omega_0^2 + 2 beta^2)^2 + 4beta^4 (omega_0^2 - 2beta^2)}=frac{1}{(2 beta^2)^2 + 4beta^4 (omega_0^2 - 2beta^2)}=frac{1}{4 beta^4 + 4beta^2 omega_0^2 - 8beta^6}$$



which shows me the maximum of $|R(omega)|^2$. At 1/2 that is the half maximum and I want to know what $omega$ is at that point. So going back to my original equation I posit: $$|R(omega^2)| = frac{1}{(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + 4beta^2 omega^2 }=frac{1}{8 beta^4 + 8beta^2 omega_0^2 - 16beta^6}$$



But at this point I feel I have lost the plot. Going through this the whole thing struck me as more complicated than it needs to be. My text says showing this should be "an easy exercise." So I am turning to people here to see where I messed up.



Best to you all, and thanks.










share|cite|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.



















    up vote
    11
    down vote

    favorite
    5












    This is another one of those questions that I feel like I am almost there, but not quite, and it's the math that gets me. But here goes:



    For a driven damped harmonic oscillator, show that the full width at half maximum of the response function $| R(omega)|^2$ is $gamma$. Where $gamma $ is the damping factor. So we start off with: $$ddot x + gamma dot x + omega_0x = frac{F_{ext}(t)}{m} = f(t)$$



    And I move to solve this. I know that the solution will be $x_0 e^{iomega t}$ and that I should get the following:
    $$-omega^2 x_0 e^{iomega t} + (iomega)x_0 e^{iomega t}gamma+ omega_0^2x_0e^{iomega t} = frac{F_0 e^{iomega t}}{m}$$
    which turns into $$x_0 (omega_0^2 -omega^2 + (iomega) gamma ) = frac{F_0}{m}= f_0$$ which then becomes $$x_0 = frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 + (iomega) gamma }$$
    The denominator should give me the response function $R(omega)$. So I take the absolute value and square it and I get: $$|R(omega^2)| = frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 t + (iomega) gamma } frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 t - (iomega) gamma } = frac{f_0}{(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + gamma^2 omega^2 }$$



    So far so good. I want to find the maximum of this function and that means I want to know where the derivative of the denominator is zero. Taking that derivative: $$frac{d}{domega}(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + gamma^2 omega^2) = 2((omega_0^2 -omega^2)(2omega) + 2gamma^2 omega = 0$$ and since it = 0 we can divide thru by $2omega$ and we are left with $$-2(omega_0^2 - omega^2) + gamma^2 = 0$$ and solving for $omega$: $omega = sqrt{omega_0^2 - frac{gamma^2}{2}} $. We will replace $gamma$ with $2beta$, leaving us $omega = sqrt{omega_0^2 - 2 beta^2} $



    we know where the maximum is, but now we want to find the half-maximum. Plugging my $omega$ back into my $|R(omega)|^2$ expression, I have $$frac{1}{(omega_0^2 - omega_0^2 + 2 beta^2)^2 + 4beta^4 (omega_0^2 - 2beta^2)}=frac{1}{(2 beta^2)^2 + 4beta^4 (omega_0^2 - 2beta^2)}=frac{1}{4 beta^4 + 4beta^2 omega_0^2 - 8beta^6}$$



    which shows me the maximum of $|R(omega)|^2$. At 1/2 that is the half maximum and I want to know what $omega$ is at that point. So going back to my original equation I posit: $$|R(omega^2)| = frac{1}{(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + 4beta^2 omega^2 }=frac{1}{8 beta^4 + 8beta^2 omega_0^2 - 16beta^6}$$



    But at this point I feel I have lost the plot. Going through this the whole thing struck me as more complicated than it needs to be. My text says showing this should be "an easy exercise." So I am turning to people here to see where I messed up.



    Best to you all, and thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question
















    bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

















      up vote
      11
      down vote

      favorite
      5









      up vote
      11
      down vote

      favorite
      5






      5





      This is another one of those questions that I feel like I am almost there, but not quite, and it's the math that gets me. But here goes:



      For a driven damped harmonic oscillator, show that the full width at half maximum of the response function $| R(omega)|^2$ is $gamma$. Where $gamma $ is the damping factor. So we start off with: $$ddot x + gamma dot x + omega_0x = frac{F_{ext}(t)}{m} = f(t)$$



      And I move to solve this. I know that the solution will be $x_0 e^{iomega t}$ and that I should get the following:
      $$-omega^2 x_0 e^{iomega t} + (iomega)x_0 e^{iomega t}gamma+ omega_0^2x_0e^{iomega t} = frac{F_0 e^{iomega t}}{m}$$
      which turns into $$x_0 (omega_0^2 -omega^2 + (iomega) gamma ) = frac{F_0}{m}= f_0$$ which then becomes $$x_0 = frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 + (iomega) gamma }$$
      The denominator should give me the response function $R(omega)$. So I take the absolute value and square it and I get: $$|R(omega^2)| = frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 t + (iomega) gamma } frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 t - (iomega) gamma } = frac{f_0}{(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + gamma^2 omega^2 }$$



      So far so good. I want to find the maximum of this function and that means I want to know where the derivative of the denominator is zero. Taking that derivative: $$frac{d}{domega}(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + gamma^2 omega^2) = 2((omega_0^2 -omega^2)(2omega) + 2gamma^2 omega = 0$$ and since it = 0 we can divide thru by $2omega$ and we are left with $$-2(omega_0^2 - omega^2) + gamma^2 = 0$$ and solving for $omega$: $omega = sqrt{omega_0^2 - frac{gamma^2}{2}} $. We will replace $gamma$ with $2beta$, leaving us $omega = sqrt{omega_0^2 - 2 beta^2} $



      we know where the maximum is, but now we want to find the half-maximum. Plugging my $omega$ back into my $|R(omega)|^2$ expression, I have $$frac{1}{(omega_0^2 - omega_0^2 + 2 beta^2)^2 + 4beta^4 (omega_0^2 - 2beta^2)}=frac{1}{(2 beta^2)^2 + 4beta^4 (omega_0^2 - 2beta^2)}=frac{1}{4 beta^4 + 4beta^2 omega_0^2 - 8beta^6}$$



      which shows me the maximum of $|R(omega)|^2$. At 1/2 that is the half maximum and I want to know what $omega$ is at that point. So going back to my original equation I posit: $$|R(omega^2)| = frac{1}{(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + 4beta^2 omega^2 }=frac{1}{8 beta^4 + 8beta^2 omega_0^2 - 16beta^6}$$



      But at this point I feel I have lost the plot. Going through this the whole thing struck me as more complicated than it needs to be. My text says showing this should be "an easy exercise." So I am turning to people here to see where I messed up.



      Best to you all, and thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question















      This is another one of those questions that I feel like I am almost there, but not quite, and it's the math that gets me. But here goes:



      For a driven damped harmonic oscillator, show that the full width at half maximum of the response function $| R(omega)|^2$ is $gamma$. Where $gamma $ is the damping factor. So we start off with: $$ddot x + gamma dot x + omega_0x = frac{F_{ext}(t)}{m} = f(t)$$



      And I move to solve this. I know that the solution will be $x_0 e^{iomega t}$ and that I should get the following:
      $$-omega^2 x_0 e^{iomega t} + (iomega)x_0 e^{iomega t}gamma+ omega_0^2x_0e^{iomega t} = frac{F_0 e^{iomega t}}{m}$$
      which turns into $$x_0 (omega_0^2 -omega^2 + (iomega) gamma ) = frac{F_0}{m}= f_0$$ which then becomes $$x_0 = frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 + (iomega) gamma }$$
      The denominator should give me the response function $R(omega)$. So I take the absolute value and square it and I get: $$|R(omega^2)| = frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 t + (iomega) gamma } frac{f_0}{omega_0^2 -omega^2 t - (iomega) gamma } = frac{f_0}{(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + gamma^2 omega^2 }$$



      So far so good. I want to find the maximum of this function and that means I want to know where the derivative of the denominator is zero. Taking that derivative: $$frac{d}{domega}(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + gamma^2 omega^2) = 2((omega_0^2 -omega^2)(2omega) + 2gamma^2 omega = 0$$ and since it = 0 we can divide thru by $2omega$ and we are left with $$-2(omega_0^2 - omega^2) + gamma^2 = 0$$ and solving for $omega$: $omega = sqrt{omega_0^2 - frac{gamma^2}{2}} $. We will replace $gamma$ with $2beta$, leaving us $omega = sqrt{omega_0^2 - 2 beta^2} $



      we know where the maximum is, but now we want to find the half-maximum. Plugging my $omega$ back into my $|R(omega)|^2$ expression, I have $$frac{1}{(omega_0^2 - omega_0^2 + 2 beta^2)^2 + 4beta^4 (omega_0^2 - 2beta^2)}=frac{1}{(2 beta^2)^2 + 4beta^4 (omega_0^2 - 2beta^2)}=frac{1}{4 beta^4 + 4beta^2 omega_0^2 - 8beta^6}$$



      which shows me the maximum of $|R(omega)|^2$. At 1/2 that is the half maximum and I want to know what $omega$ is at that point. So going back to my original equation I posit: $$|R(omega^2)| = frac{1}{(omega_0^2 -omega^2)^2 + 4beta^2 omega^2 }=frac{1}{8 beta^4 + 8beta^2 omega_0^2 - 16beta^6}$$



      But at this point I feel I have lost the plot. Going through this the whole thing struck me as more complicated than it needs to be. My text says showing this should be "an easy exercise." So I am turning to people here to see where I messed up.



      Best to you all, and thanks.







      differential-equations physics






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Oct 4 '13 at 7:39









      Willie Wong

      54.9k9108209




      54.9k9108209










      asked Oct 2 '13 at 21:17









      Jesse

      1,11822135




      1,11822135





      bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          I believe that some approximations are in order here. This seems like the kind of question where we assume damping is relatively small. Note that the response function isn't even symmetric about $omega_0$. There may be some fancy way to define FWHM here, but if we just take the limit where $gamma$ is small, and the peak value occurs at about $omega_0$, then it is simple:



          $omega = omega_0 + deltaomega$



          Expand $(omega_0^2 - omega^2)$ to first order in $deltaomega$, and we get
          $-2omega_0deltaomega $. Then:



          $(2omega_0deltaomega)^2 = gamma^2(2omega_0^2-(omega_0 + deltaomega)^2)$



          $omega_0 >> deltaomega$, so $omega_0^2$ dominates the RHS.



          The full width half max is then twice $deltaomega$. A simple calculation shows this is $gamma$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The problem is not so much the calculation, as that is all about quadratic functions, but to select suitable auxiliary variables so that the calculation gets a readable and thus verifiable organization.



            I'll interpret the task, as did @Aurey, that the task asks for the lowest order terms of the answer assuming $0<γll ω_0$.





            Set $x=ω^2−ω_0^2$, then the denominator is a quadratic form in $x$,
            begin{align}
            (ω_0^2−ω^2)^2+4β^2ω^2
            &=x^2+4β^2x+4β^2ω_0^2
            \
            &=(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
            end{align}
            which shows the minimum value and thus the maximum of the frequency response at $x=-2β^2$. Now we want to find the positions $x_pm$ where the parabola has twice the minimum value, i.e.,
            begin{align}
            &&(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)&=2·4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
            \ iff&&
            (x+2β^2)^2&=4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
            \ iff&&x_pm&=-2β^2pm2βsqrt{ω_0^2-β^2}
            \
            &&&=pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
            end{align}
            or
            $$
            ω_pm^2=ω_0^2pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
            $$
            of which the positive square roots are, at the same order in $β$,
            $$
            ω_pm=ω_0pmβ-frac{3β^2}{2ω_0}+O(β^3)=ω_0pmfrac{γ}2-frac{3γ^2}{8ω_0}+O(γ^3)
            $$
            Thus the distance between these points is not influenced by the asymmetry, as both roots are shifted, in the lowest terms, by the same amount. The searched for width is
            $$
            ω_+-ω_-=γ+O(γ^3).
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              I've only read the first part of your question and recognize it as nearly a problem in Thornton|Marion 5th ed. {3-19} The solutions manual is freely or nominally priced available on the internet.



              You want the particular solution. T|M use $A cos(omega +t)$ for the RHS explicitly and use the substitution X sub $p(t) = D cos (omega t + delta)$ to obtain:
              $$
              D = frac{A}{ sqrt{left(omega_0^2 - omega^2right)^2 + 4omega^2beta^2}}
              $$
              $omega$ is the driving frequency and $omega_0$ is the natural frequency of the osc. e.g. sqrt. (k/m or g/l)





              sorry if you want the answer for a general driver this isn't it, and I believe not easily found (if at all) i.e. must use Green's fcns. or Dirac delta methods. See "The Pendulum / a case study in physics" Baker and Blackburn in addition to T|M. Many intermediate physics mechanics texts also show these methods.



              bc unfortunately, maths. declined






              share|cite|improve this answer



















              • 3




                Welcome to math.SE! For some basic information about writing math at this site see e.g. here, here, here and here. Please try to avoid linguistic abbreviations (like fcns. or bc), as many of our users are not native English speakers, and this may serve to confuse.
                – Cameron Buie
                Oct 20 '13 at 16:42













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f512625%2fdamped-harmonic-oscillator-and-response-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              0
              down vote













              I believe that some approximations are in order here. This seems like the kind of question where we assume damping is relatively small. Note that the response function isn't even symmetric about $omega_0$. There may be some fancy way to define FWHM here, but if we just take the limit where $gamma$ is small, and the peak value occurs at about $omega_0$, then it is simple:



              $omega = omega_0 + deltaomega$



              Expand $(omega_0^2 - omega^2)$ to first order in $deltaomega$, and we get
              $-2omega_0deltaomega $. Then:



              $(2omega_0deltaomega)^2 = gamma^2(2omega_0^2-(omega_0 + deltaomega)^2)$



              $omega_0 >> deltaomega$, so $omega_0^2$ dominates the RHS.



              The full width half max is then twice $deltaomega$. A simple calculation shows this is $gamma$.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                I believe that some approximations are in order here. This seems like the kind of question where we assume damping is relatively small. Note that the response function isn't even symmetric about $omega_0$. There may be some fancy way to define FWHM here, but if we just take the limit where $gamma$ is small, and the peak value occurs at about $omega_0$, then it is simple:



                $omega = omega_0 + deltaomega$



                Expand $(omega_0^2 - omega^2)$ to first order in $deltaomega$, and we get
                $-2omega_0deltaomega $. Then:



                $(2omega_0deltaomega)^2 = gamma^2(2omega_0^2-(omega_0 + deltaomega)^2)$



                $omega_0 >> deltaomega$, so $omega_0^2$ dominates the RHS.



                The full width half max is then twice $deltaomega$. A simple calculation shows this is $gamma$.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  I believe that some approximations are in order here. This seems like the kind of question where we assume damping is relatively small. Note that the response function isn't even symmetric about $omega_0$. There may be some fancy way to define FWHM here, but if we just take the limit where $gamma$ is small, and the peak value occurs at about $omega_0$, then it is simple:



                  $omega = omega_0 + deltaomega$



                  Expand $(omega_0^2 - omega^2)$ to first order in $deltaomega$, and we get
                  $-2omega_0deltaomega $. Then:



                  $(2omega_0deltaomega)^2 = gamma^2(2omega_0^2-(omega_0 + deltaomega)^2)$



                  $omega_0 >> deltaomega$, so $omega_0^2$ dominates the RHS.



                  The full width half max is then twice $deltaomega$. A simple calculation shows this is $gamma$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  I believe that some approximations are in order here. This seems like the kind of question where we assume damping is relatively small. Note that the response function isn't even symmetric about $omega_0$. There may be some fancy way to define FWHM here, but if we just take the limit where $gamma$ is small, and the peak value occurs at about $omega_0$, then it is simple:



                  $omega = omega_0 + deltaomega$



                  Expand $(omega_0^2 - omega^2)$ to first order in $deltaomega$, and we get
                  $-2omega_0deltaomega $. Then:



                  $(2omega_0deltaomega)^2 = gamma^2(2omega_0^2-(omega_0 + deltaomega)^2)$



                  $omega_0 >> deltaomega$, so $omega_0^2$ dominates the RHS.



                  The full width half max is then twice $deltaomega$. A simple calculation shows this is $gamma$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 20 '16 at 4:01

























                  answered Jul 20 '16 at 1:34









                  Aurey

                  1,097515




                  1,097515






















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      The problem is not so much the calculation, as that is all about quadratic functions, but to select suitable auxiliary variables so that the calculation gets a readable and thus verifiable organization.



                      I'll interpret the task, as did @Aurey, that the task asks for the lowest order terms of the answer assuming $0<γll ω_0$.





                      Set $x=ω^2−ω_0^2$, then the denominator is a quadratic form in $x$,
                      begin{align}
                      (ω_0^2−ω^2)^2+4β^2ω^2
                      &=x^2+4β^2x+4β^2ω_0^2
                      \
                      &=(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                      end{align}
                      which shows the minimum value and thus the maximum of the frequency response at $x=-2β^2$. Now we want to find the positions $x_pm$ where the parabola has twice the minimum value, i.e.,
                      begin{align}
                      &&(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)&=2·4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                      \ iff&&
                      (x+2β^2)^2&=4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                      \ iff&&x_pm&=-2β^2pm2βsqrt{ω_0^2-β^2}
                      \
                      &&&=pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
                      end{align}
                      or
                      $$
                      ω_pm^2=ω_0^2pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
                      $$
                      of which the positive square roots are, at the same order in $β$,
                      $$
                      ω_pm=ω_0pmβ-frac{3β^2}{2ω_0}+O(β^3)=ω_0pmfrac{γ}2-frac{3γ^2}{8ω_0}+O(γ^3)
                      $$
                      Thus the distance between these points is not influenced by the asymmetry, as both roots are shifted, in the lowest terms, by the same amount. The searched for width is
                      $$
                      ω_+-ω_-=γ+O(γ^3).
                      $$






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        The problem is not so much the calculation, as that is all about quadratic functions, but to select suitable auxiliary variables so that the calculation gets a readable and thus verifiable organization.



                        I'll interpret the task, as did @Aurey, that the task asks for the lowest order terms of the answer assuming $0<γll ω_0$.





                        Set $x=ω^2−ω_0^2$, then the denominator is a quadratic form in $x$,
                        begin{align}
                        (ω_0^2−ω^2)^2+4β^2ω^2
                        &=x^2+4β^2x+4β^2ω_0^2
                        \
                        &=(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                        end{align}
                        which shows the minimum value and thus the maximum of the frequency response at $x=-2β^2$. Now we want to find the positions $x_pm$ where the parabola has twice the minimum value, i.e.,
                        begin{align}
                        &&(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)&=2·4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                        \ iff&&
                        (x+2β^2)^2&=4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                        \ iff&&x_pm&=-2β^2pm2βsqrt{ω_0^2-β^2}
                        \
                        &&&=pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
                        end{align}
                        or
                        $$
                        ω_pm^2=ω_0^2pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
                        $$
                        of which the positive square roots are, at the same order in $β$,
                        $$
                        ω_pm=ω_0pmβ-frac{3β^2}{2ω_0}+O(β^3)=ω_0pmfrac{γ}2-frac{3γ^2}{8ω_0}+O(γ^3)
                        $$
                        Thus the distance between these points is not influenced by the asymmetry, as both roots are shifted, in the lowest terms, by the same amount. The searched for width is
                        $$
                        ω_+-ω_-=γ+O(γ^3).
                        $$






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          The problem is not so much the calculation, as that is all about quadratic functions, but to select suitable auxiliary variables so that the calculation gets a readable and thus verifiable organization.



                          I'll interpret the task, as did @Aurey, that the task asks for the lowest order terms of the answer assuming $0<γll ω_0$.





                          Set $x=ω^2−ω_0^2$, then the denominator is a quadratic form in $x$,
                          begin{align}
                          (ω_0^2−ω^2)^2+4β^2ω^2
                          &=x^2+4β^2x+4β^2ω_0^2
                          \
                          &=(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                          end{align}
                          which shows the minimum value and thus the maximum of the frequency response at $x=-2β^2$. Now we want to find the positions $x_pm$ where the parabola has twice the minimum value, i.e.,
                          begin{align}
                          &&(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)&=2·4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                          \ iff&&
                          (x+2β^2)^2&=4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                          \ iff&&x_pm&=-2β^2pm2βsqrt{ω_0^2-β^2}
                          \
                          &&&=pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
                          end{align}
                          or
                          $$
                          ω_pm^2=ω_0^2pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
                          $$
                          of which the positive square roots are, at the same order in $β$,
                          $$
                          ω_pm=ω_0pmβ-frac{3β^2}{2ω_0}+O(β^3)=ω_0pmfrac{γ}2-frac{3γ^2}{8ω_0}+O(γ^3)
                          $$
                          Thus the distance between these points is not influenced by the asymmetry, as both roots are shifted, in the lowest terms, by the same amount. The searched for width is
                          $$
                          ω_+-ω_-=γ+O(γ^3).
                          $$






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          The problem is not so much the calculation, as that is all about quadratic functions, but to select suitable auxiliary variables so that the calculation gets a readable and thus verifiable organization.



                          I'll interpret the task, as did @Aurey, that the task asks for the lowest order terms of the answer assuming $0<γll ω_0$.





                          Set $x=ω^2−ω_0^2$, then the denominator is a quadratic form in $x$,
                          begin{align}
                          (ω_0^2−ω^2)^2+4β^2ω^2
                          &=x^2+4β^2x+4β^2ω_0^2
                          \
                          &=(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                          end{align}
                          which shows the minimum value and thus the maximum of the frequency response at $x=-2β^2$. Now we want to find the positions $x_pm$ where the parabola has twice the minimum value, i.e.,
                          begin{align}
                          &&(x+2β^2)^2+4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)&=2·4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                          \ iff&&
                          (x+2β^2)^2&=4β^2(ω_0^2-β^2)
                          \ iff&&x_pm&=-2β^2pm2βsqrt{ω_0^2-β^2}
                          \
                          &&&=pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
                          end{align}
                          or
                          $$
                          ω_pm^2=ω_0^2pm2βω_0-2β^2+O(β^3)
                          $$
                          of which the positive square roots are, at the same order in $β$,
                          $$
                          ω_pm=ω_0pmβ-frac{3β^2}{2ω_0}+O(β^3)=ω_0pmfrac{γ}2-frac{3γ^2}{8ω_0}+O(γ^3)
                          $$
                          Thus the distance between these points is not influenced by the asymmetry, as both roots are shifted, in the lowest terms, by the same amount. The searched for width is
                          $$
                          ω_+-ω_-=γ+O(γ^3).
                          $$







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jun 12 '17 at 9:14









                          LutzL

                          53.4k41953




                          53.4k41953






















                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote













                              I've only read the first part of your question and recognize it as nearly a problem in Thornton|Marion 5th ed. {3-19} The solutions manual is freely or nominally priced available on the internet.



                              You want the particular solution. T|M use $A cos(omega +t)$ for the RHS explicitly and use the substitution X sub $p(t) = D cos (omega t + delta)$ to obtain:
                              $$
                              D = frac{A}{ sqrt{left(omega_0^2 - omega^2right)^2 + 4omega^2beta^2}}
                              $$
                              $omega$ is the driving frequency and $omega_0$ is the natural frequency of the osc. e.g. sqrt. (k/m or g/l)





                              sorry if you want the answer for a general driver this isn't it, and I believe not easily found (if at all) i.e. must use Green's fcns. or Dirac delta methods. See "The Pendulum / a case study in physics" Baker and Blackburn in addition to T|M. Many intermediate physics mechanics texts also show these methods.



                              bc unfortunately, maths. declined






                              share|cite|improve this answer



















                              • 3




                                Welcome to math.SE! For some basic information about writing math at this site see e.g. here, here, here and here. Please try to avoid linguistic abbreviations (like fcns. or bc), as many of our users are not native English speakers, and this may serve to confuse.
                                – Cameron Buie
                                Oct 20 '13 at 16:42

















                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote













                              I've only read the first part of your question and recognize it as nearly a problem in Thornton|Marion 5th ed. {3-19} The solutions manual is freely or nominally priced available on the internet.



                              You want the particular solution. T|M use $A cos(omega +t)$ for the RHS explicitly and use the substitution X sub $p(t) = D cos (omega t + delta)$ to obtain:
                              $$
                              D = frac{A}{ sqrt{left(omega_0^2 - omega^2right)^2 + 4omega^2beta^2}}
                              $$
                              $omega$ is the driving frequency and $omega_0$ is the natural frequency of the osc. e.g. sqrt. (k/m or g/l)





                              sorry if you want the answer for a general driver this isn't it, and I believe not easily found (if at all) i.e. must use Green's fcns. or Dirac delta methods. See "The Pendulum / a case study in physics" Baker and Blackburn in addition to T|M. Many intermediate physics mechanics texts also show these methods.



                              bc unfortunately, maths. declined






                              share|cite|improve this answer



















                              • 3




                                Welcome to math.SE! For some basic information about writing math at this site see e.g. here, here, here and here. Please try to avoid linguistic abbreviations (like fcns. or bc), as many of our users are not native English speakers, and this may serve to confuse.
                                – Cameron Buie
                                Oct 20 '13 at 16:42















                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote









                              I've only read the first part of your question and recognize it as nearly a problem in Thornton|Marion 5th ed. {3-19} The solutions manual is freely or nominally priced available on the internet.



                              You want the particular solution. T|M use $A cos(omega +t)$ for the RHS explicitly and use the substitution X sub $p(t) = D cos (omega t + delta)$ to obtain:
                              $$
                              D = frac{A}{ sqrt{left(omega_0^2 - omega^2right)^2 + 4omega^2beta^2}}
                              $$
                              $omega$ is the driving frequency and $omega_0$ is the natural frequency of the osc. e.g. sqrt. (k/m or g/l)





                              sorry if you want the answer for a general driver this isn't it, and I believe not easily found (if at all) i.e. must use Green's fcns. or Dirac delta methods. See "The Pendulum / a case study in physics" Baker and Blackburn in addition to T|M. Many intermediate physics mechanics texts also show these methods.



                              bc unfortunately, maths. declined






                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              I've only read the first part of your question and recognize it as nearly a problem in Thornton|Marion 5th ed. {3-19} The solutions manual is freely or nominally priced available on the internet.



                              You want the particular solution. T|M use $A cos(omega +t)$ for the RHS explicitly and use the substitution X sub $p(t) = D cos (omega t + delta)$ to obtain:
                              $$
                              D = frac{A}{ sqrt{left(omega_0^2 - omega^2right)^2 + 4omega^2beta^2}}
                              $$
                              $omega$ is the driving frequency and $omega_0$ is the natural frequency of the osc. e.g. sqrt. (k/m or g/l)





                              sorry if you want the answer for a general driver this isn't it, and I believe not easily found (if at all) i.e. must use Green's fcns. or Dirac delta methods. See "The Pendulum / a case study in physics" Baker and Blackburn in addition to T|M. Many intermediate physics mechanics texts also show these methods.



                              bc unfortunately, maths. declined







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Jun 12 '17 at 11:40









                              LutzL

                              53.4k41953




                              53.4k41953










                              answered Oct 20 '13 at 16:18









                              user102111

                              62




                              62








                              • 3




                                Welcome to math.SE! For some basic information about writing math at this site see e.g. here, here, here and here. Please try to avoid linguistic abbreviations (like fcns. or bc), as many of our users are not native English speakers, and this may serve to confuse.
                                – Cameron Buie
                                Oct 20 '13 at 16:42
















                              • 3




                                Welcome to math.SE! For some basic information about writing math at this site see e.g. here, here, here and here. Please try to avoid linguistic abbreviations (like fcns. or bc), as many of our users are not native English speakers, and this may serve to confuse.
                                – Cameron Buie
                                Oct 20 '13 at 16:42










                              3




                              3




                              Welcome to math.SE! For some basic information about writing math at this site see e.g. here, here, here and here. Please try to avoid linguistic abbreviations (like fcns. or bc), as many of our users are not native English speakers, and this may serve to confuse.
                              – Cameron Buie
                              Oct 20 '13 at 16:42






                              Welcome to math.SE! For some basic information about writing math at this site see e.g. here, here, here and here. Please try to avoid linguistic abbreviations (like fcns. or bc), as many of our users are not native English speakers, and this may serve to confuse.
                              – Cameron Buie
                              Oct 20 '13 at 16:42




















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded



















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f512625%2fdamped-harmonic-oscillator-and-response-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Plaza Victoria

                              In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                              How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...