Find coordinates that straightens the vector field (Cauchy's problem












1














Find coordinates that straightens the vector field $X(x_1,x_2)=x_1frac{partial}{partial x_1}+x_2frac{partial}{partial x_2}$.



Suppose that $(y_1, y_2)$ are the coordinates we seek. We have that $$frac{partial}{partial x_1}=frac{partial y_1}{partial x_1} frac{partial}{partial y_1} + frac{partial y_2}{partial x_1} frac{partial}{partial y_2} $$ and $$frac{partial}{partial x_1}=frac{partial y_1}{partial x_2} frac{partial}{partial y_1} + frac{partial y_2}{partial x_2} frac{partial}{partial y_2} $$



I substitute those to $X$ and after some implications we got



$(1); x_1u_{x_1} + x_2u_{x_2}=1$



$(2); x_1u_{x_1} + x_2u_{x_2}=0$



Now I got to find a Cauchy problem for those equations, to find solutions not in the implicit form, but I don't know how to do so. Please help me with the above.






differential-equations pde







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Hint: think geometrically. The vector field points in the radial direction. Try polar coordinates.
    – Matthew Kvalheim
    Nov 25 '18 at 9:32










  • For the first one $(1)$ my guess was like: $u(s,0)=h(s)$, but I'm completely not sure.
    – MacAbra
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:02
















1














Find coordinates that straightens the vector field $X(x_1,x_2)=x_1frac{partial}{partial x_1}+x_2frac{partial}{partial x_2}$.



Suppose that $(y_1, y_2)$ are the coordinates we seek. We have that $$frac{partial}{partial x_1}=frac{partial y_1}{partial x_1} frac{partial}{partial y_1} + frac{partial y_2}{partial x_1} frac{partial}{partial y_2} $$ and $$frac{partial}{partial x_1}=frac{partial y_1}{partial x_2} frac{partial}{partial y_1} + frac{partial y_2}{partial x_2} frac{partial}{partial y_2} $$



I substitute those to $X$ and after some implications we got



$(1); x_1u_{x_1} + x_2u_{x_2}=1$



$(2); x_1u_{x_1} + x_2u_{x_2}=0$



Now I got to find a Cauchy problem for those equations, to find solutions not in the implicit form, but I don't know how to do so. Please help me with the above.






differential-equations pde







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Hint: think geometrically. The vector field points in the radial direction. Try polar coordinates.
    – Matthew Kvalheim
    Nov 25 '18 at 9:32










  • For the first one $(1)$ my guess was like: $u(s,0)=h(s)$, but I'm completely not sure.
    – MacAbra
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:02














1












1








1







Find coordinates that straightens the vector field $X(x_1,x_2)=x_1frac{partial}{partial x_1}+x_2frac{partial}{partial x_2}$.



Suppose that $(y_1, y_2)$ are the coordinates we seek. We have that $$frac{partial}{partial x_1}=frac{partial y_1}{partial x_1} frac{partial}{partial y_1} + frac{partial y_2}{partial x_1} frac{partial}{partial y_2} $$ and $$frac{partial}{partial x_1}=frac{partial y_1}{partial x_2} frac{partial}{partial y_1} + frac{partial y_2}{partial x_2} frac{partial}{partial y_2} $$



I substitute those to $X$ and after some implications we got



$(1); x_1u_{x_1} + x_2u_{x_2}=1$



$(2); x_1u_{x_1} + x_2u_{x_2}=0$



Now I got to find a Cauchy problem for those equations, to find solutions not in the implicit form, but I don't know how to do so. Please help me with the above.






differential-equations pde







share|cite|improve this question













Find coordinates that straightens the vector field $X(x_1,x_2)=x_1frac{partial}{partial x_1}+x_2frac{partial}{partial x_2}$.



Suppose that $(y_1, y_2)$ are the coordinates we seek. We have that $$frac{partial}{partial x_1}=frac{partial y_1}{partial x_1} frac{partial}{partial y_1} + frac{partial y_2}{partial x_1} frac{partial}{partial y_2} $$ and $$frac{partial}{partial x_1}=frac{partial y_1}{partial x_2} frac{partial}{partial y_1} + frac{partial y_2}{partial x_2} frac{partial}{partial y_2} $$



I substitute those to $X$ and after some implications we got



$(1); x_1u_{x_1} + x_2u_{x_2}=1$



$(2); x_1u_{x_1} + x_2u_{x_2}=0$



Now I got to find a Cauchy problem for those equations, to find solutions not in the implicit form, but I don't know how to do so. Please help me with the above.






differential-equations pde




differential-equations pde






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 25 '18 at 9:20









MacAbra

17719




17719












  • Hint: think geometrically. The vector field points in the radial direction. Try polar coordinates.
    – Matthew Kvalheim
    Nov 25 '18 at 9:32










  • For the first one $(1)$ my guess was like: $u(s,0)=h(s)$, but I'm completely not sure.
    – MacAbra
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:02


















  • Hint: think geometrically. The vector field points in the radial direction. Try polar coordinates.
    – Matthew Kvalheim
    Nov 25 '18 at 9:32










  • For the first one $(1)$ my guess was like: $u(s,0)=h(s)$, but I'm completely not sure.
    – MacAbra
    Nov 25 '18 at 17:02
















Hint: think geometrically. The vector field points in the radial direction. Try polar coordinates.
– Matthew Kvalheim
Nov 25 '18 at 9:32




Hint: think geometrically. The vector field points in the radial direction. Try polar coordinates.
– Matthew Kvalheim
Nov 25 '18 at 9:32












For the first one $(1)$ my guess was like: $u(s,0)=h(s)$, but I'm completely not sure.
– MacAbra
Nov 25 '18 at 17:02




For the first one $(1)$ my guess was like: $u(s,0)=h(s)$, but I'm completely not sure.
– MacAbra
Nov 25 '18 at 17:02










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Using polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ on $mathbb{R}^2setminus {0}$ defined by $x_1 = rcos(theta)$, $x_2 = rsin(theta)$, we have



$X = r frac{partial}{partial r}$



on $Bbb{R}^2 setminus {0}$. (This is obvious from inspection. But you should work through the definitions to convince yourself that this is true.)
Hence the vector field is "straightened."



If you would like coordinates which additionally have the property that the vector field's components become $(1,0,ldots,0)$, define the variable $scolon Bbb{R}^2 to Bbb{R}$ via



$s := ln(r).$



In the coordinates $(s,theta)$, the vector field then takes the form



$X = 1 frac{partial}{partial s}$



as claimed. (You could also discover this additional change of coordinates by inspection, but I figured this out by thinking about the proof of the "flowbox"/"flow straightening"/"rectification" theorem. In fact, you could have discovered this final change of coordinates using the latter method directly from the beginning, which is -- sort of tautologically -- the only general method for doing this.)






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012616%2ffind-coordinates-that-straightens-the-vector-field-cauchys-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Using polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ on $mathbb{R}^2setminus {0}$ defined by $x_1 = rcos(theta)$, $x_2 = rsin(theta)$, we have



    $X = r frac{partial}{partial r}$



    on $Bbb{R}^2 setminus {0}$. (This is obvious from inspection. But you should work through the definitions to convince yourself that this is true.)
    Hence the vector field is "straightened."



    If you would like coordinates which additionally have the property that the vector field's components become $(1,0,ldots,0)$, define the variable $scolon Bbb{R}^2 to Bbb{R}$ via



    $s := ln(r).$



    In the coordinates $(s,theta)$, the vector field then takes the form



    $X = 1 frac{partial}{partial s}$



    as claimed. (You could also discover this additional change of coordinates by inspection, but I figured this out by thinking about the proof of the "flowbox"/"flow straightening"/"rectification" theorem. In fact, you could have discovered this final change of coordinates using the latter method directly from the beginning, which is -- sort of tautologically -- the only general method for doing this.)






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      1














      Using polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ on $mathbb{R}^2setminus {0}$ defined by $x_1 = rcos(theta)$, $x_2 = rsin(theta)$, we have



      $X = r frac{partial}{partial r}$



      on $Bbb{R}^2 setminus {0}$. (This is obvious from inspection. But you should work through the definitions to convince yourself that this is true.)
      Hence the vector field is "straightened."



      If you would like coordinates which additionally have the property that the vector field's components become $(1,0,ldots,0)$, define the variable $scolon Bbb{R}^2 to Bbb{R}$ via



      $s := ln(r).$



      In the coordinates $(s,theta)$, the vector field then takes the form



      $X = 1 frac{partial}{partial s}$



      as claimed. (You could also discover this additional change of coordinates by inspection, but I figured this out by thinking about the proof of the "flowbox"/"flow straightening"/"rectification" theorem. In fact, you could have discovered this final change of coordinates using the latter method directly from the beginning, which is -- sort of tautologically -- the only general method for doing this.)






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        Using polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ on $mathbb{R}^2setminus {0}$ defined by $x_1 = rcos(theta)$, $x_2 = rsin(theta)$, we have



        $X = r frac{partial}{partial r}$



        on $Bbb{R}^2 setminus {0}$. (This is obvious from inspection. But you should work through the definitions to convince yourself that this is true.)
        Hence the vector field is "straightened."



        If you would like coordinates which additionally have the property that the vector field's components become $(1,0,ldots,0)$, define the variable $scolon Bbb{R}^2 to Bbb{R}$ via



        $s := ln(r).$



        In the coordinates $(s,theta)$, the vector field then takes the form



        $X = 1 frac{partial}{partial s}$



        as claimed. (You could also discover this additional change of coordinates by inspection, but I figured this out by thinking about the proof of the "flowbox"/"flow straightening"/"rectification" theorem. In fact, you could have discovered this final change of coordinates using the latter method directly from the beginning, which is -- sort of tautologically -- the only general method for doing this.)






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Using polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ on $mathbb{R}^2setminus {0}$ defined by $x_1 = rcos(theta)$, $x_2 = rsin(theta)$, we have



        $X = r frac{partial}{partial r}$



        on $Bbb{R}^2 setminus {0}$. (This is obvious from inspection. But you should work through the definitions to convince yourself that this is true.)
        Hence the vector field is "straightened."



        If you would like coordinates which additionally have the property that the vector field's components become $(1,0,ldots,0)$, define the variable $scolon Bbb{R}^2 to Bbb{R}$ via



        $s := ln(r).$



        In the coordinates $(s,theta)$, the vector field then takes the form



        $X = 1 frac{partial}{partial s}$



        as claimed. (You could also discover this additional change of coordinates by inspection, but I figured this out by thinking about the proof of the "flowbox"/"flow straightening"/"rectification" theorem. In fact, you could have discovered this final change of coordinates using the latter method directly from the beginning, which is -- sort of tautologically -- the only general method for doing this.)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 25 '18 at 21:08









        Matthew Kvalheim

        661416




        661416






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012616%2ffind-coordinates-that-straightens-the-vector-field-cauchys-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Image
            Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
            Read more

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
            Read more

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

            Image
            1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
            Read more