Hard Brexit and travel for UK citizens into Schengen countries in 2019
up vote
34
down vote
favorite
I am a British citizen and US permanent resident. I rarely need visas. However, I am considering a Mediterranean cruise in the spring or summer of 2019.
Unlike British politicians, I like to plan ahead and be prepared. If I am going to need a Schengen visa, I want to assemble the documentation early next year, so I can apply to the appropriate country as soon as I have an itinerary and it is at most 90 days before travel. Given how things are going, I am preparing for a hard, no-agreement, Brexit.
For trade, that would mean WTO rules. For personal travel, is there a similar fall-back that would allow me visa-free visits to the Schengen countries?
visas schengen-visa uk-citizens event-based-effects brexit
|
show 11 more comments
up vote
34
down vote
favorite
I am a British citizen and US permanent resident. I rarely need visas. However, I am considering a Mediterranean cruise in the spring or summer of 2019.
Unlike British politicians, I like to plan ahead and be prepared. If I am going to need a Schengen visa, I want to assemble the documentation early next year, so I can apply to the appropriate country as soon as I have an itinerary and it is at most 90 days before travel. Given how things are going, I am preparing for a hard, no-agreement, Brexit.
For trade, that would mean WTO rules. For personal travel, is there a similar fall-back that would allow me visa-free visits to the Schengen countries?
visas schengen-visa uk-citizens event-based-effects brexit
7
I guess a valid question that I'd be curious to know out of this nobody knows situation could be, though Brits don't need a Schengen visa...are they allowed to apply for one anyway? can they get one?
– the other one
yesterday
5
It is, but delaying the vote on the agreement to January, just a couple of months before the Article 50 deadline, makes a hard Brexit much, much more likely. As noted in the question, I am more into long term planning than the UK government seems to be.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
3
I would be particularly worried if I planned travel to Europe in April 2019.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
1
@PatriciaShanahan I agree with Honorary World Citizen: with Brexit unresolved, the future legal relationships between the EU and the UK (and their citizens) are only guessable. I have two suggestions: a) gather every possible document now, so you're prepared to apply when the rules coalesce, and b) consider if you can join and leave the cruise in a non-EU country, which would render any Brexit changes unlikely to affect your trip.
– David
yesterday
5
The default situation is that you need a visa. Being able to travel without a visa is the exception. It is widely expected that the EU will grant visa-free travel to UK citizens (and vice-versa), but no one can know what will happen. In the meantime, you can't get a visa. Plan for an itinerary that does not involve the EU :-/
– jcaron
yesterday
|
show 11 more comments
up vote
34
down vote
favorite
up vote
34
down vote
favorite
I am a British citizen and US permanent resident. I rarely need visas. However, I am considering a Mediterranean cruise in the spring or summer of 2019.
Unlike British politicians, I like to plan ahead and be prepared. If I am going to need a Schengen visa, I want to assemble the documentation early next year, so I can apply to the appropriate country as soon as I have an itinerary and it is at most 90 days before travel. Given how things are going, I am preparing for a hard, no-agreement, Brexit.
For trade, that would mean WTO rules. For personal travel, is there a similar fall-back that would allow me visa-free visits to the Schengen countries?
visas schengen-visa uk-citizens event-based-effects brexit
I am a British citizen and US permanent resident. I rarely need visas. However, I am considering a Mediterranean cruise in the spring or summer of 2019.
Unlike British politicians, I like to plan ahead and be prepared. If I am going to need a Schengen visa, I want to assemble the documentation early next year, so I can apply to the appropriate country as soon as I have an itinerary and it is at most 90 days before travel. Given how things are going, I am preparing for a hard, no-agreement, Brexit.
For trade, that would mean WTO rules. For personal travel, is there a similar fall-back that would allow me visa-free visits to the Schengen countries?
visas schengen-visa uk-citizens event-based-effects brexit
visas schengen-visa uk-citizens event-based-effects brexit
edited yesterday
smci
1,106912
1,106912
asked yesterday
Patricia Shanahan
6,36622445
6,36622445
7
I guess a valid question that I'd be curious to know out of this nobody knows situation could be, though Brits don't need a Schengen visa...are they allowed to apply for one anyway? can they get one?
– the other one
yesterday
5
It is, but delaying the vote on the agreement to January, just a couple of months before the Article 50 deadline, makes a hard Brexit much, much more likely. As noted in the question, I am more into long term planning than the UK government seems to be.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
3
I would be particularly worried if I planned travel to Europe in April 2019.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
1
@PatriciaShanahan I agree with Honorary World Citizen: with Brexit unresolved, the future legal relationships between the EU and the UK (and their citizens) are only guessable. I have two suggestions: a) gather every possible document now, so you're prepared to apply when the rules coalesce, and b) consider if you can join and leave the cruise in a non-EU country, which would render any Brexit changes unlikely to affect your trip.
– David
yesterday
5
The default situation is that you need a visa. Being able to travel without a visa is the exception. It is widely expected that the EU will grant visa-free travel to UK citizens (and vice-versa), but no one can know what will happen. In the meantime, you can't get a visa. Plan for an itinerary that does not involve the EU :-/
– jcaron
yesterday
|
show 11 more comments
7
I guess a valid question that I'd be curious to know out of this nobody knows situation could be, though Brits don't need a Schengen visa...are they allowed to apply for one anyway? can they get one?
– the other one
yesterday
5
It is, but delaying the vote on the agreement to January, just a couple of months before the Article 50 deadline, makes a hard Brexit much, much more likely. As noted in the question, I am more into long term planning than the UK government seems to be.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
3
I would be particularly worried if I planned travel to Europe in April 2019.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
1
@PatriciaShanahan I agree with Honorary World Citizen: with Brexit unresolved, the future legal relationships between the EU and the UK (and their citizens) are only guessable. I have two suggestions: a) gather every possible document now, so you're prepared to apply when the rules coalesce, and b) consider if you can join and leave the cruise in a non-EU country, which would render any Brexit changes unlikely to affect your trip.
– David
yesterday
5
The default situation is that you need a visa. Being able to travel without a visa is the exception. It is widely expected that the EU will grant visa-free travel to UK citizens (and vice-versa), but no one can know what will happen. In the meantime, you can't get a visa. Plan for an itinerary that does not involve the EU :-/
– jcaron
yesterday
7
7
I guess a valid question that I'd be curious to know out of this nobody knows situation could be, though Brits don't need a Schengen visa...are they allowed to apply for one anyway? can they get one?
– the other one
yesterday
I guess a valid question that I'd be curious to know out of this nobody knows situation could be, though Brits don't need a Schengen visa...are they allowed to apply for one anyway? can they get one?
– the other one
yesterday
5
5
It is, but delaying the vote on the agreement to January, just a couple of months before the Article 50 deadline, makes a hard Brexit much, much more likely. As noted in the question, I am more into long term planning than the UK government seems to be.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
It is, but delaying the vote on the agreement to January, just a couple of months before the Article 50 deadline, makes a hard Brexit much, much more likely. As noted in the question, I am more into long term planning than the UK government seems to be.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
3
3
I would be particularly worried if I planned travel to Europe in April 2019.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
I would be particularly worried if I planned travel to Europe in April 2019.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
1
1
@PatriciaShanahan I agree with Honorary World Citizen: with Brexit unresolved, the future legal relationships between the EU and the UK (and their citizens) are only guessable. I have two suggestions: a) gather every possible document now, so you're prepared to apply when the rules coalesce, and b) consider if you can join and leave the cruise in a non-EU country, which would render any Brexit changes unlikely to affect your trip.
– David
yesterday
@PatriciaShanahan I agree with Honorary World Citizen: with Brexit unresolved, the future legal relationships between the EU and the UK (and their citizens) are only guessable. I have two suggestions: a) gather every possible document now, so you're prepared to apply when the rules coalesce, and b) consider if you can join and leave the cruise in a non-EU country, which would render any Brexit changes unlikely to affect your trip.
– David
yesterday
5
5
The default situation is that you need a visa. Being able to travel without a visa is the exception. It is widely expected that the EU will grant visa-free travel to UK citizens (and vice-versa), but no one can know what will happen. In the meantime, you can't get a visa. Plan for an itinerary that does not involve the EU :-/
– jcaron
yesterday
The default situation is that you need a visa. Being able to travel without a visa is the exception. It is widely expected that the EU will grant visa-free travel to UK citizens (and vice-versa), but no one can know what will happen. In the meantime, you can't get a visa. Plan for an itinerary that does not involve the EU :-/
– jcaron
yesterday
|
show 11 more comments
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
You will certainly¹ not need a visa. The UK has declared it will not require visas for any EU nationals for short stays, and the EU has declared the same for the UK (see European Commission press release and Brexit preparedness document). However, from 2021 you will most likely need to apply for ETIAS (an electronic authorisation similar to US ESTA). This is likely true even if there is a Brexit agreement and possibly even if there is no Brexit.
The UK Government has issued a series of notices on the impact of a no-deal Brexit. One such notice issues specific guidance for Travelling to the EU with a UK passport if there's no Brexit deal (checked 13 December 2018). This confirms the guidance quoted in legoscias answer, but does not address a system known as ETIAS.
Once it enters into force (expected 2021), UK citizens will most likely need to apply for ETIAS, a Schengen electronic system similar to the more famous US ESTA system. See ETIAS VISA: how will it affect UK citizens:
Firstly, anytime a British citizen visiting Europe with a valid passport wishes to travel to continental Europe, prior to leaving home, they will have to apply via an online platform for an ETIAS visa-waiver.
After the UK leaves the EU, britons will be exempt from obtaining a visa, but will not be exempt from the ETIAS visa waiver.
This travel authorisation, once accepted, will be binding for 3 years for multiple visits with no limit and will become a mandatory requirement for all travelers from elegible ETIAS visa waiver countries from 2021.
UK citizens and all eligible travellers who wish to visit the Schengen Zone will need to answer a series of health and security questions when completing the ETIAS online form. It’s extremely important to answer honestly, as all the data provided in the ETIAS application will be checked against a series of databases including Europol or Interpol.
This statement from the European Commission (which the same website cites) confirms that according to stated policy, travel in both directions will remain visa free:
It would mean that UK citizens would not need a visa when travelling to the Schengen area for short stays of up to 90 days in any 180-day period. In the scenario where the UK leaves the EU without a deal, this would apply as of 30 March 2019.
(...)
This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity. The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
So, unless either party changes its mind and breaks with stated policy intentions, you will not need a visa. However, from 2021 you will need ETIAS.
¹Of course, in theory, any government can change any policy at any time, reasonably or not, legally or not. This answer is accurate at the time of writing. Any country might suddenly close their borders after you book but before you travel. That is a risk that always exists for future travel.
6
Upvote for actually quoting facts/references, but I don't think it's necessarily safe to assume the UK will continue to offer reciprocal visa-free access to European Union citizens in the event of a hard Brexit. I mean, it's probably 98% likely but if there's a snap general election before March and we somehow end up with an ultra-euroskeptic prime minister then all bets are off.
– Bob
12 hours ago
1
Upvoted and accepted for highly relevant quotes, though I agree with @Bob that things could change rapidly over the next few months.
– Patricia Shanahan
12 hours ago
1
I've added a footnote that in theory, any policy can change at any time. You might book a holiday to country X but political turmoil leads to country X closing the border. Such risks can never be ruled out completely.
– gerrit
12 hours ago
@PatriciaShanahan The source is unofficial, one of the many deceptively official-looking sites that have sprung up around electronic travel authorizations. That the site "confirms that travel in both directions between UK and EU/Schengen will remain visa free" should carry very little weight indeed.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog My answer is also backed up with links to the European Parliament and the UK Government website. I have now also added a direct link to the European Commission website rather than only relying on the 3rd party website etiasvisa.com, to verify their quoting is accurate.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
Strictly speaking, this is in the hands of the EU, which maintains two lists, Annex I (countries whose nationals requiring a visa for a short stay, labelled A in the link above) and Annex II (countries whose nationals do not require a visa, labelled B). As a member state, the UK is not on either list, and it falls between two stools in terms of automatically being added to one or the other, so will require EU action fairly soon, otherwise it will be legally impossible to visit under either set of terms.
It's very widely expected that the UK will be added to Annex II regardless of whether a formal exit agreement is reached, and you should expect a decision on that well before March 29th 2019, but as to when it will happen, that's rather a victim of circumstance.
1
This is not widely expected. It is already confirmed (see my answer).
– gerrit
13 hours ago
@gerrit You have more confidence in the European Parliament than I do.
– origimbo
12 hours ago
@origimbo I don't think it is the Parliament that will decide which list to add the UK to.
– Martin Bonner
10 hours ago
@gerrit your source is entirely unofficial and even the passages you have selected to quote note that the EU has confirmed its intention to grant visa free access, not that it will actually do so, and that even the intention is conditional on the UK's grant of nondiscriminatory visa free access to all EU citizens. In sorry, your source does not support the strength of your conclusion.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog The statement from the European Commission states that EU/Schengen will not require visas from UK citizens and that the UK will not require visas from EU citizens.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
11
down vote
The only thing you can know for sure right now is that you currently can't get a Schengen visa. There is no point in applying for one to be on the safe side. Schengen visas are only issued to nationals, who actually require a visa to enter. Visas are not issued to EEA citizens and citizens of visa exempt countries.
On the list of visa exempt countries, you find since May 2014 the following category:
British citizens who are not nationals of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland for the purposes of union law:
- British nationals (Overseas)
- British overseas territories citizens (BOTC)
- British overseas citizens (BOC)
- British protected persons (BPP)
- British subjects (BS)
All British nationals who are currently not EU citizens are already now entitled to enter the Schengen area without a visa. If we should get a new category of non-EU British nationals on March 30th next year, I don't see why they should not already be covered by this exemption.
3
"you currently can't get a Schengen visa" Exactly. Should you try to get one anyway, you can expect a letter of refusal. Now I wonder whether you'd get registered as being refused a visa should you apply for it anyway, that would be an unfortunate side-effect...
– Mast
yesterday
3
@Mast it seems to me far more likely that the application would be rejected (that is, not considered at all) rather than refused.
– phoog
18 hours ago
4
The problem with your reasoning is that the regulation doesn't talk about "British nationals who aren't EU citizens," it talks about "British nationals who aren't citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law." Those who are citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law will continue to be so after Brexit.
– phoog
18 hours ago
@Mast No. In most situations, Schengen visa applications are handed in through private contractors, which verify the formal requirements. If they are not met, the application is not even accepted. Even if the application should get through to a consulate, it will there be deemed inadmissible, not processed and therefore also not refused.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
16 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
Edited to include link and quote of EC press release on the topic.
The problem with visa policies is that they are very often governed by reciprocity: if you don't let my citizens come to your country visa-free, I won't let yours come to mine visa-free (of course this usually does not apply to countries which depend on tourists, for instance).
So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens.
Actually, they did say exactly that here:
European Commission proposes visa-free travel to the EU for UK nationals in a no deal scenario – if the UK also grants reciprocal visa-free travel to all EU citizens
(...)This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity.(...)
(thanks @gerrit for the link)
And that's where the problem may arise.
As soon as those Brexiter hardliners manage to have the government say "sorry, but citizens of (pick any of the poorest EU countries with a history of economic migration to the UK) can no longer come to the UK visa-free", the EU will probably reply "sorry, no UK citizen can come to the EU visa-free" (note that this does not apply for existing relationships, like EU-US, but as a matter of principle, I'm pretty sure they will have a hard time accepting it in this case). Then it's a matter of deciding whether principles or the economic impact matter most, and who will chicken out first.
The same release says:
The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
Now, between "declaring its intention" and actually implementing this into regulations, we have a few obstacles. We can hope reason will prevail and this will actually happen, but at the moment it's not a done deal.
So you may need a visa. Or you may not. Nobody knows. And in the meantime, you can't get a visa. Sorry to say so, but pick a destination outside of the EU if you want to be safe.
2
"So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens. And that's where the problem may arise." Sorry, but they're simply not gonna slap the UK on Annex I no matter what, or else they would^ve already done so to the US. Threatening with it as a means of blackmail is another thing.
– Crazydre
yesterday
9
@Crazydre As I wrote, the case of the US is different (because visa policies between the US and the various EU countries often predate their entry in the EU). In the case of the UK, principles may have a much higher value, as has been seen during all the Brexit negotiations. It's a lot of all-or-nothing, no cherry-picking, and I'm pretty sure they would be inclined to do the same in this case, and see who chickens out first.
– jcaron
yesterday
2
When Canada introduced visas for the citizens of Czech Republic, EU didn't do much. Czech Republic was part of Schengen already so it could not intoduce visas for Canadian nationals in reciprocity.
– Vladimir F
17 hours ago
4
@jcaron The original visa requirements were lifted after the Czech Republic joined the Schengen zone. However, they were subsequently reinstated in 2009, which lasted until 2013. This was not a pre-EU policy.
– Emil Jeřábek
17 hours ago
3
@EmilJeřábek Ah indeed, I had missed that part. However, if you check the Sixth Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on certain third countries' maintenance of visa requirements in breach of the principle of reciprocity (and the seventh) you'll see the EU actually did much, and actually threatened Canada with restrictions to visa-free travel for Canadians, and worked with them to restore the situation. Took a while, though.
– jcaron
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
I don't think anyone knows how yet how this will all work out. One link suggests that there will be free-movement transition period until 2021
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-visas-travel-free-movement-eu-commission-france-schengen-a8595991.html
On the other hand, some British airlines are nervous and Ryan Air has already warned of significant impact on stock price
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/brexit-flights-29-march-2019-flights-passport-customs-uk-eu-roaming-ehic-a8531866.html
I doubt there is anything pro-active you can do at the moment. Even if you apply for a Visa, the issuer wouldn't know what to do with your application since the rules aren't clear yet.
Other reading
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/no-visa-free-traveling-brits-if-they-exit-the-eu-without-an-agreement/
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/likelihood-of-post-brexit-uk-falling-under-etias-program-sparks-fury-among-britons/
1
If there is an agreement, there will be a two year transition period to work all this out. I am asking specifically about the no-agreement case.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
We don't know that for sure. At the moment it's at least theoretically possible that EU and UK reaches another agreement than what is currently known (although the EU has clearly stated that won't happen), and that might not include a two year transition period.
– Henrik
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
You'll be able to visit without a visa for up to 90 days within a 180-day period.
Can't prove it in the strictest sense, but although the EU may threaten with something else as part of the political game (the US has done this to the EU as well) there's simply no way it's actually going to happen when other low-risk nationalities are visa-exempt. It would be the highest degree of political idiocy.
15
Political idiocy has never, unfortunately, been a disqualifying condition.
– David
yesterday
2
@David There are limits for everything, and no one with half a braincell will seriously slap the UK (or the US) on Annex I.
– Crazydre
yesterday
5
@Crazydre Given the current political situation, there's arguably a lack of brain cells going around.
– Mast
yesterday
3
The second paragraph is seriously unlikely. The sticking points are freedom of trade/services and mobility of workers, not tourists or visitors.
– smci
yesterday
1
@smci I definitely would not bet on that. The UK saying "we don't want visitors from (insert poor EU country here) because we fear they may overstay" is quite a possibility.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
The UK passport office has published a document titled Passport rules for travel to Europe after Brexit. It suggests two things:
After 29 March 2019:
You should have at least 6 months left on your passport from your date of arrival. This applies to adult and child passports.
If you renewed a 10 year adult passport before it expired, extra months may have been added to your new passport’s expiry date, making it valid for more than 10 years. Any extra months on your passport over 10 years may not count towards the 6 months that should be remaining for travel to most countries in Europe.
Those points apply to Schengen countries only. For non-Schengen countries:
The new rules do not apply when travelling to Ireland.
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania are not in the Schengen area. You should check the entry requirements for these countries.
The word "visa" does not appear in that document, so it appears that the UK government believes that the EU will let UK citizens visit the Schengen area for up to 90 days visa-free.
6 months? Haha, talk about being misinformed. Schengen regulations require 3 months beyond the period of intended stay
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
This document explains why they say 6 months: "at least 3 months’ validity remaining on the date of intended departure from the last country visited in the Schengen area. Because third country nationals can remain in the Schengen area for 90 days (approximately 3 months), the actual check carried out could be that the passport has at least 6 months validity remaining on the date of arrival."
– legoscia
11 hours ago
1
If you can document that you're not wishing to stay for the full 90 days, are they really allowed to refuse entry on these grounds?
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
@Crazydre indeed. Or better still, if one is reentering for 1 day only after having used 89 of the 90 days, there should be no argument that the passport requires 6 months' validity.
– phoog
10 hours ago
Them not mentioning visas does not really make it very comforting, it's more like they don't know. And indeed, they can't know, because the EU hasn't yet said they will let UK nationals in without a visa. They have said they will do so if the UK does the same, and the UK apparently said they would, but that has not yet been confirmed.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127194%2fhard-brexit-and-travel-for-uk-citizens-into-schengen-countries-in-2019%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
You will certainly¹ not need a visa. The UK has declared it will not require visas for any EU nationals for short stays, and the EU has declared the same for the UK (see European Commission press release and Brexit preparedness document). However, from 2021 you will most likely need to apply for ETIAS (an electronic authorisation similar to US ESTA). This is likely true even if there is a Brexit agreement and possibly even if there is no Brexit.
The UK Government has issued a series of notices on the impact of a no-deal Brexit. One such notice issues specific guidance for Travelling to the EU with a UK passport if there's no Brexit deal (checked 13 December 2018). This confirms the guidance quoted in legoscias answer, but does not address a system known as ETIAS.
Once it enters into force (expected 2021), UK citizens will most likely need to apply for ETIAS, a Schengen electronic system similar to the more famous US ESTA system. See ETIAS VISA: how will it affect UK citizens:
Firstly, anytime a British citizen visiting Europe with a valid passport wishes to travel to continental Europe, prior to leaving home, they will have to apply via an online platform for an ETIAS visa-waiver.
After the UK leaves the EU, britons will be exempt from obtaining a visa, but will not be exempt from the ETIAS visa waiver.
This travel authorisation, once accepted, will be binding for 3 years for multiple visits with no limit and will become a mandatory requirement for all travelers from elegible ETIAS visa waiver countries from 2021.
UK citizens and all eligible travellers who wish to visit the Schengen Zone will need to answer a series of health and security questions when completing the ETIAS online form. It’s extremely important to answer honestly, as all the data provided in the ETIAS application will be checked against a series of databases including Europol or Interpol.
This statement from the European Commission (which the same website cites) confirms that according to stated policy, travel in both directions will remain visa free:
It would mean that UK citizens would not need a visa when travelling to the Schengen area for short stays of up to 90 days in any 180-day period. In the scenario where the UK leaves the EU without a deal, this would apply as of 30 March 2019.
(...)
This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity. The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
So, unless either party changes its mind and breaks with stated policy intentions, you will not need a visa. However, from 2021 you will need ETIAS.
¹Of course, in theory, any government can change any policy at any time, reasonably or not, legally or not. This answer is accurate at the time of writing. Any country might suddenly close their borders after you book but before you travel. That is a risk that always exists for future travel.
6
Upvote for actually quoting facts/references, but I don't think it's necessarily safe to assume the UK will continue to offer reciprocal visa-free access to European Union citizens in the event of a hard Brexit. I mean, it's probably 98% likely but if there's a snap general election before March and we somehow end up with an ultra-euroskeptic prime minister then all bets are off.
– Bob
12 hours ago
1
Upvoted and accepted for highly relevant quotes, though I agree with @Bob that things could change rapidly over the next few months.
– Patricia Shanahan
12 hours ago
1
I've added a footnote that in theory, any policy can change at any time. You might book a holiday to country X but political turmoil leads to country X closing the border. Such risks can never be ruled out completely.
– gerrit
12 hours ago
@PatriciaShanahan The source is unofficial, one of the many deceptively official-looking sites that have sprung up around electronic travel authorizations. That the site "confirms that travel in both directions between UK and EU/Schengen will remain visa free" should carry very little weight indeed.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog My answer is also backed up with links to the European Parliament and the UK Government website. I have now also added a direct link to the European Commission website rather than only relying on the 3rd party website etiasvisa.com, to verify their quoting is accurate.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
You will certainly¹ not need a visa. The UK has declared it will not require visas for any EU nationals for short stays, and the EU has declared the same for the UK (see European Commission press release and Brexit preparedness document). However, from 2021 you will most likely need to apply for ETIAS (an electronic authorisation similar to US ESTA). This is likely true even if there is a Brexit agreement and possibly even if there is no Brexit.
The UK Government has issued a series of notices on the impact of a no-deal Brexit. One such notice issues specific guidance for Travelling to the EU with a UK passport if there's no Brexit deal (checked 13 December 2018). This confirms the guidance quoted in legoscias answer, but does not address a system known as ETIAS.
Once it enters into force (expected 2021), UK citizens will most likely need to apply for ETIAS, a Schengen electronic system similar to the more famous US ESTA system. See ETIAS VISA: how will it affect UK citizens:
Firstly, anytime a British citizen visiting Europe with a valid passport wishes to travel to continental Europe, prior to leaving home, they will have to apply via an online platform for an ETIAS visa-waiver.
After the UK leaves the EU, britons will be exempt from obtaining a visa, but will not be exempt from the ETIAS visa waiver.
This travel authorisation, once accepted, will be binding for 3 years for multiple visits with no limit and will become a mandatory requirement for all travelers from elegible ETIAS visa waiver countries from 2021.
UK citizens and all eligible travellers who wish to visit the Schengen Zone will need to answer a series of health and security questions when completing the ETIAS online form. It’s extremely important to answer honestly, as all the data provided in the ETIAS application will be checked against a series of databases including Europol or Interpol.
This statement from the European Commission (which the same website cites) confirms that according to stated policy, travel in both directions will remain visa free:
It would mean that UK citizens would not need a visa when travelling to the Schengen area for short stays of up to 90 days in any 180-day period. In the scenario where the UK leaves the EU without a deal, this would apply as of 30 March 2019.
(...)
This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity. The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
So, unless either party changes its mind and breaks with stated policy intentions, you will not need a visa. However, from 2021 you will need ETIAS.
¹Of course, in theory, any government can change any policy at any time, reasonably or not, legally or not. This answer is accurate at the time of writing. Any country might suddenly close their borders after you book but before you travel. That is a risk that always exists for future travel.
6
Upvote for actually quoting facts/references, but I don't think it's necessarily safe to assume the UK will continue to offer reciprocal visa-free access to European Union citizens in the event of a hard Brexit. I mean, it's probably 98% likely but if there's a snap general election before March and we somehow end up with an ultra-euroskeptic prime minister then all bets are off.
– Bob
12 hours ago
1
Upvoted and accepted for highly relevant quotes, though I agree with @Bob that things could change rapidly over the next few months.
– Patricia Shanahan
12 hours ago
1
I've added a footnote that in theory, any policy can change at any time. You might book a holiday to country X but political turmoil leads to country X closing the border. Such risks can never be ruled out completely.
– gerrit
12 hours ago
@PatriciaShanahan The source is unofficial, one of the many deceptively official-looking sites that have sprung up around electronic travel authorizations. That the site "confirms that travel in both directions between UK and EU/Schengen will remain visa free" should carry very little weight indeed.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog My answer is also backed up with links to the European Parliament and the UK Government website. I have now also added a direct link to the European Commission website rather than only relying on the 3rd party website etiasvisa.com, to verify their quoting is accurate.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
You will certainly¹ not need a visa. The UK has declared it will not require visas for any EU nationals for short stays, and the EU has declared the same for the UK (see European Commission press release and Brexit preparedness document). However, from 2021 you will most likely need to apply for ETIAS (an electronic authorisation similar to US ESTA). This is likely true even if there is a Brexit agreement and possibly even if there is no Brexit.
The UK Government has issued a series of notices on the impact of a no-deal Brexit. One such notice issues specific guidance for Travelling to the EU with a UK passport if there's no Brexit deal (checked 13 December 2018). This confirms the guidance quoted in legoscias answer, but does not address a system known as ETIAS.
Once it enters into force (expected 2021), UK citizens will most likely need to apply for ETIAS, a Schengen electronic system similar to the more famous US ESTA system. See ETIAS VISA: how will it affect UK citizens:
Firstly, anytime a British citizen visiting Europe with a valid passport wishes to travel to continental Europe, prior to leaving home, they will have to apply via an online platform for an ETIAS visa-waiver.
After the UK leaves the EU, britons will be exempt from obtaining a visa, but will not be exempt from the ETIAS visa waiver.
This travel authorisation, once accepted, will be binding for 3 years for multiple visits with no limit and will become a mandatory requirement for all travelers from elegible ETIAS visa waiver countries from 2021.
UK citizens and all eligible travellers who wish to visit the Schengen Zone will need to answer a series of health and security questions when completing the ETIAS online form. It’s extremely important to answer honestly, as all the data provided in the ETIAS application will be checked against a series of databases including Europol or Interpol.
This statement from the European Commission (which the same website cites) confirms that according to stated policy, travel in both directions will remain visa free:
It would mean that UK citizens would not need a visa when travelling to the Schengen area for short stays of up to 90 days in any 180-day period. In the scenario where the UK leaves the EU without a deal, this would apply as of 30 March 2019.
(...)
This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity. The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
So, unless either party changes its mind and breaks with stated policy intentions, you will not need a visa. However, from 2021 you will need ETIAS.
¹Of course, in theory, any government can change any policy at any time, reasonably or not, legally or not. This answer is accurate at the time of writing. Any country might suddenly close their borders after you book but before you travel. That is a risk that always exists for future travel.
You will certainly¹ not need a visa. The UK has declared it will not require visas for any EU nationals for short stays, and the EU has declared the same for the UK (see European Commission press release and Brexit preparedness document). However, from 2021 you will most likely need to apply for ETIAS (an electronic authorisation similar to US ESTA). This is likely true even if there is a Brexit agreement and possibly even if there is no Brexit.
The UK Government has issued a series of notices on the impact of a no-deal Brexit. One such notice issues specific guidance for Travelling to the EU with a UK passport if there's no Brexit deal (checked 13 December 2018). This confirms the guidance quoted in legoscias answer, but does not address a system known as ETIAS.
Once it enters into force (expected 2021), UK citizens will most likely need to apply for ETIAS, a Schengen electronic system similar to the more famous US ESTA system. See ETIAS VISA: how will it affect UK citizens:
Firstly, anytime a British citizen visiting Europe with a valid passport wishes to travel to continental Europe, prior to leaving home, they will have to apply via an online platform for an ETIAS visa-waiver.
After the UK leaves the EU, britons will be exempt from obtaining a visa, but will not be exempt from the ETIAS visa waiver.
This travel authorisation, once accepted, will be binding for 3 years for multiple visits with no limit and will become a mandatory requirement for all travelers from elegible ETIAS visa waiver countries from 2021.
UK citizens and all eligible travellers who wish to visit the Schengen Zone will need to answer a series of health and security questions when completing the ETIAS online form. It’s extremely important to answer honestly, as all the data provided in the ETIAS application will be checked against a series of databases including Europol or Interpol.
This statement from the European Commission (which the same website cites) confirms that according to stated policy, travel in both directions will remain visa free:
It would mean that UK citizens would not need a visa when travelling to the Schengen area for short stays of up to 90 days in any 180-day period. In the scenario where the UK leaves the EU without a deal, this would apply as of 30 March 2019.
(...)
This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity. The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
So, unless either party changes its mind and breaks with stated policy intentions, you will not need a visa. However, from 2021 you will need ETIAS.
¹Of course, in theory, any government can change any policy at any time, reasonably or not, legally or not. This answer is accurate at the time of writing. Any country might suddenly close their borders after you book but before you travel. That is a risk that always exists for future travel.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
gerrit
26.5k986210
26.5k986210
6
Upvote for actually quoting facts/references, but I don't think it's necessarily safe to assume the UK will continue to offer reciprocal visa-free access to European Union citizens in the event of a hard Brexit. I mean, it's probably 98% likely but if there's a snap general election before March and we somehow end up with an ultra-euroskeptic prime minister then all bets are off.
– Bob
12 hours ago
1
Upvoted and accepted for highly relevant quotes, though I agree with @Bob that things could change rapidly over the next few months.
– Patricia Shanahan
12 hours ago
1
I've added a footnote that in theory, any policy can change at any time. You might book a holiday to country X but political turmoil leads to country X closing the border. Such risks can never be ruled out completely.
– gerrit
12 hours ago
@PatriciaShanahan The source is unofficial, one of the many deceptively official-looking sites that have sprung up around electronic travel authorizations. That the site "confirms that travel in both directions between UK and EU/Schengen will remain visa free" should carry very little weight indeed.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog My answer is also backed up with links to the European Parliament and the UK Government website. I have now also added a direct link to the European Commission website rather than only relying on the 3rd party website etiasvisa.com, to verify their quoting is accurate.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
6
Upvote for actually quoting facts/references, but I don't think it's necessarily safe to assume the UK will continue to offer reciprocal visa-free access to European Union citizens in the event of a hard Brexit. I mean, it's probably 98% likely but if there's a snap general election before March and we somehow end up with an ultra-euroskeptic prime minister then all bets are off.
– Bob
12 hours ago
1
Upvoted and accepted for highly relevant quotes, though I agree with @Bob that things could change rapidly over the next few months.
– Patricia Shanahan
12 hours ago
1
I've added a footnote that in theory, any policy can change at any time. You might book a holiday to country X but political turmoil leads to country X closing the border. Such risks can never be ruled out completely.
– gerrit
12 hours ago
@PatriciaShanahan The source is unofficial, one of the many deceptively official-looking sites that have sprung up around electronic travel authorizations. That the site "confirms that travel in both directions between UK and EU/Schengen will remain visa free" should carry very little weight indeed.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog My answer is also backed up with links to the European Parliament and the UK Government website. I have now also added a direct link to the European Commission website rather than only relying on the 3rd party website etiasvisa.com, to verify their quoting is accurate.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
6
6
Upvote for actually quoting facts/references, but I don't think it's necessarily safe to assume the UK will continue to offer reciprocal visa-free access to European Union citizens in the event of a hard Brexit. I mean, it's probably 98% likely but if there's a snap general election before March and we somehow end up with an ultra-euroskeptic prime minister then all bets are off.
– Bob
12 hours ago
Upvote for actually quoting facts/references, but I don't think it's necessarily safe to assume the UK will continue to offer reciprocal visa-free access to European Union citizens in the event of a hard Brexit. I mean, it's probably 98% likely but if there's a snap general election before March and we somehow end up with an ultra-euroskeptic prime minister then all bets are off.
– Bob
12 hours ago
1
1
Upvoted and accepted for highly relevant quotes, though I agree with @Bob that things could change rapidly over the next few months.
– Patricia Shanahan
12 hours ago
Upvoted and accepted for highly relevant quotes, though I agree with @Bob that things could change rapidly over the next few months.
– Patricia Shanahan
12 hours ago
1
1
I've added a footnote that in theory, any policy can change at any time. You might book a holiday to country X but political turmoil leads to country X closing the border. Such risks can never be ruled out completely.
– gerrit
12 hours ago
I've added a footnote that in theory, any policy can change at any time. You might book a holiday to country X but political turmoil leads to country X closing the border. Such risks can never be ruled out completely.
– gerrit
12 hours ago
@PatriciaShanahan The source is unofficial, one of the many deceptively official-looking sites that have sprung up around electronic travel authorizations. That the site "confirms that travel in both directions between UK and EU/Schengen will remain visa free" should carry very little weight indeed.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@PatriciaShanahan The source is unofficial, one of the many deceptively official-looking sites that have sprung up around electronic travel authorizations. That the site "confirms that travel in both directions between UK and EU/Schengen will remain visa free" should carry very little weight indeed.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog My answer is also backed up with links to the European Parliament and the UK Government website. I have now also added a direct link to the European Commission website rather than only relying on the 3rd party website etiasvisa.com, to verify their quoting is accurate.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
@phoog My answer is also backed up with links to the European Parliament and the UK Government website. I have now also added a direct link to the European Commission website rather than only relying on the 3rd party website etiasvisa.com, to verify their quoting is accurate.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
Strictly speaking, this is in the hands of the EU, which maintains two lists, Annex I (countries whose nationals requiring a visa for a short stay, labelled A in the link above) and Annex II (countries whose nationals do not require a visa, labelled B). As a member state, the UK is not on either list, and it falls between two stools in terms of automatically being added to one or the other, so will require EU action fairly soon, otherwise it will be legally impossible to visit under either set of terms.
It's very widely expected that the UK will be added to Annex II regardless of whether a formal exit agreement is reached, and you should expect a decision on that well before March 29th 2019, but as to when it will happen, that's rather a victim of circumstance.
1
This is not widely expected. It is already confirmed (see my answer).
– gerrit
13 hours ago
@gerrit You have more confidence in the European Parliament than I do.
– origimbo
12 hours ago
@origimbo I don't think it is the Parliament that will decide which list to add the UK to.
– Martin Bonner
10 hours ago
@gerrit your source is entirely unofficial and even the passages you have selected to quote note that the EU has confirmed its intention to grant visa free access, not that it will actually do so, and that even the intention is conditional on the UK's grant of nondiscriminatory visa free access to all EU citizens. In sorry, your source does not support the strength of your conclusion.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog The statement from the European Commission states that EU/Schengen will not require visas from UK citizens and that the UK will not require visas from EU citizens.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
Strictly speaking, this is in the hands of the EU, which maintains two lists, Annex I (countries whose nationals requiring a visa for a short stay, labelled A in the link above) and Annex II (countries whose nationals do not require a visa, labelled B). As a member state, the UK is not on either list, and it falls between two stools in terms of automatically being added to one or the other, so will require EU action fairly soon, otherwise it will be legally impossible to visit under either set of terms.
It's very widely expected that the UK will be added to Annex II regardless of whether a formal exit agreement is reached, and you should expect a decision on that well before March 29th 2019, but as to when it will happen, that's rather a victim of circumstance.
1
This is not widely expected. It is already confirmed (see my answer).
– gerrit
13 hours ago
@gerrit You have more confidence in the European Parliament than I do.
– origimbo
12 hours ago
@origimbo I don't think it is the Parliament that will decide which list to add the UK to.
– Martin Bonner
10 hours ago
@gerrit your source is entirely unofficial and even the passages you have selected to quote note that the EU has confirmed its intention to grant visa free access, not that it will actually do so, and that even the intention is conditional on the UK's grant of nondiscriminatory visa free access to all EU citizens. In sorry, your source does not support the strength of your conclusion.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog The statement from the European Commission states that EU/Schengen will not require visas from UK citizens and that the UK will not require visas from EU citizens.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
up vote
29
down vote
Strictly speaking, this is in the hands of the EU, which maintains two lists, Annex I (countries whose nationals requiring a visa for a short stay, labelled A in the link above) and Annex II (countries whose nationals do not require a visa, labelled B). As a member state, the UK is not on either list, and it falls between two stools in terms of automatically being added to one or the other, so will require EU action fairly soon, otherwise it will be legally impossible to visit under either set of terms.
It's very widely expected that the UK will be added to Annex II regardless of whether a formal exit agreement is reached, and you should expect a decision on that well before March 29th 2019, but as to when it will happen, that's rather a victim of circumstance.
Strictly speaking, this is in the hands of the EU, which maintains two lists, Annex I (countries whose nationals requiring a visa for a short stay, labelled A in the link above) and Annex II (countries whose nationals do not require a visa, labelled B). As a member state, the UK is not on either list, and it falls between two stools in terms of automatically being added to one or the other, so will require EU action fairly soon, otherwise it will be legally impossible to visit under either set of terms.
It's very widely expected that the UK will be added to Annex II regardless of whether a formal exit agreement is reached, and you should expect a decision on that well before March 29th 2019, but as to when it will happen, that's rather a victim of circumstance.
answered yesterday
origimbo
1,674169
1,674169
1
This is not widely expected. It is already confirmed (see my answer).
– gerrit
13 hours ago
@gerrit You have more confidence in the European Parliament than I do.
– origimbo
12 hours ago
@origimbo I don't think it is the Parliament that will decide which list to add the UK to.
– Martin Bonner
10 hours ago
@gerrit your source is entirely unofficial and even the passages you have selected to quote note that the EU has confirmed its intention to grant visa free access, not that it will actually do so, and that even the intention is conditional on the UK's grant of nondiscriminatory visa free access to all EU citizens. In sorry, your source does not support the strength of your conclusion.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog The statement from the European Commission states that EU/Schengen will not require visas from UK citizens and that the UK will not require visas from EU citizens.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
1
This is not widely expected. It is already confirmed (see my answer).
– gerrit
13 hours ago
@gerrit You have more confidence in the European Parliament than I do.
– origimbo
12 hours ago
@origimbo I don't think it is the Parliament that will decide which list to add the UK to.
– Martin Bonner
10 hours ago
@gerrit your source is entirely unofficial and even the passages you have selected to quote note that the EU has confirmed its intention to grant visa free access, not that it will actually do so, and that even the intention is conditional on the UK's grant of nondiscriminatory visa free access to all EU citizens. In sorry, your source does not support the strength of your conclusion.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog The statement from the European Commission states that EU/Schengen will not require visas from UK citizens and that the UK will not require visas from EU citizens.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
1
1
This is not widely expected. It is already confirmed (see my answer).
– gerrit
13 hours ago
This is not widely expected. It is already confirmed (see my answer).
– gerrit
13 hours ago
@gerrit You have more confidence in the European Parliament than I do.
– origimbo
12 hours ago
@gerrit You have more confidence in the European Parliament than I do.
– origimbo
12 hours ago
@origimbo I don't think it is the Parliament that will decide which list to add the UK to.
– Martin Bonner
10 hours ago
@origimbo I don't think it is the Parliament that will decide which list to add the UK to.
– Martin Bonner
10 hours ago
@gerrit your source is entirely unofficial and even the passages you have selected to quote note that the EU has confirmed its intention to grant visa free access, not that it will actually do so, and that even the intention is conditional on the UK's grant of nondiscriminatory visa free access to all EU citizens. In sorry, your source does not support the strength of your conclusion.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@gerrit your source is entirely unofficial and even the passages you have selected to quote note that the EU has confirmed its intention to grant visa free access, not that it will actually do so, and that even the intention is conditional on the UK's grant of nondiscriminatory visa free access to all EU citizens. In sorry, your source does not support the strength of your conclusion.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@phoog The statement from the European Commission states that EU/Schengen will not require visas from UK citizens and that the UK will not require visas from EU citizens.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
@phoog The statement from the European Commission states that EU/Schengen will not require visas from UK citizens and that the UK will not require visas from EU citizens.
– gerrit
10 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
11
down vote
The only thing you can know for sure right now is that you currently can't get a Schengen visa. There is no point in applying for one to be on the safe side. Schengen visas are only issued to nationals, who actually require a visa to enter. Visas are not issued to EEA citizens and citizens of visa exempt countries.
On the list of visa exempt countries, you find since May 2014 the following category:
British citizens who are not nationals of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland for the purposes of union law:
- British nationals (Overseas)
- British overseas territories citizens (BOTC)
- British overseas citizens (BOC)
- British protected persons (BPP)
- British subjects (BS)
All British nationals who are currently not EU citizens are already now entitled to enter the Schengen area without a visa. If we should get a new category of non-EU British nationals on March 30th next year, I don't see why they should not already be covered by this exemption.
3
"you currently can't get a Schengen visa" Exactly. Should you try to get one anyway, you can expect a letter of refusal. Now I wonder whether you'd get registered as being refused a visa should you apply for it anyway, that would be an unfortunate side-effect...
– Mast
yesterday
3
@Mast it seems to me far more likely that the application would be rejected (that is, not considered at all) rather than refused.
– phoog
18 hours ago
4
The problem with your reasoning is that the regulation doesn't talk about "British nationals who aren't EU citizens," it talks about "British nationals who aren't citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law." Those who are citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law will continue to be so after Brexit.
– phoog
18 hours ago
@Mast No. In most situations, Schengen visa applications are handed in through private contractors, which verify the formal requirements. If they are not met, the application is not even accepted. Even if the application should get through to a consulate, it will there be deemed inadmissible, not processed and therefore also not refused.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
16 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
The only thing you can know for sure right now is that you currently can't get a Schengen visa. There is no point in applying for one to be on the safe side. Schengen visas are only issued to nationals, who actually require a visa to enter. Visas are not issued to EEA citizens and citizens of visa exempt countries.
On the list of visa exempt countries, you find since May 2014 the following category:
British citizens who are not nationals of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland for the purposes of union law:
- British nationals (Overseas)
- British overseas territories citizens (BOTC)
- British overseas citizens (BOC)
- British protected persons (BPP)
- British subjects (BS)
All British nationals who are currently not EU citizens are already now entitled to enter the Schengen area without a visa. If we should get a new category of non-EU British nationals on March 30th next year, I don't see why they should not already be covered by this exemption.
3
"you currently can't get a Schengen visa" Exactly. Should you try to get one anyway, you can expect a letter of refusal. Now I wonder whether you'd get registered as being refused a visa should you apply for it anyway, that would be an unfortunate side-effect...
– Mast
yesterday
3
@Mast it seems to me far more likely that the application would be rejected (that is, not considered at all) rather than refused.
– phoog
18 hours ago
4
The problem with your reasoning is that the regulation doesn't talk about "British nationals who aren't EU citizens," it talks about "British nationals who aren't citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law." Those who are citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law will continue to be so after Brexit.
– phoog
18 hours ago
@Mast No. In most situations, Schengen visa applications are handed in through private contractors, which verify the formal requirements. If they are not met, the application is not even accepted. Even if the application should get through to a consulate, it will there be deemed inadmissible, not processed and therefore also not refused.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
16 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
The only thing you can know for sure right now is that you currently can't get a Schengen visa. There is no point in applying for one to be on the safe side. Schengen visas are only issued to nationals, who actually require a visa to enter. Visas are not issued to EEA citizens and citizens of visa exempt countries.
On the list of visa exempt countries, you find since May 2014 the following category:
British citizens who are not nationals of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland for the purposes of union law:
- British nationals (Overseas)
- British overseas territories citizens (BOTC)
- British overseas citizens (BOC)
- British protected persons (BPP)
- British subjects (BS)
All British nationals who are currently not EU citizens are already now entitled to enter the Schengen area without a visa. If we should get a new category of non-EU British nationals on March 30th next year, I don't see why they should not already be covered by this exemption.
The only thing you can know for sure right now is that you currently can't get a Schengen visa. There is no point in applying for one to be on the safe side. Schengen visas are only issued to nationals, who actually require a visa to enter. Visas are not issued to EEA citizens and citizens of visa exempt countries.
On the list of visa exempt countries, you find since May 2014 the following category:
British citizens who are not nationals of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland for the purposes of union law:
- British nationals (Overseas)
- British overseas territories citizens (BOTC)
- British overseas citizens (BOC)
- British protected persons (BPP)
- British subjects (BS)
All British nationals who are currently not EU citizens are already now entitled to enter the Schengen area without a visa. If we should get a new category of non-EU British nationals on March 30th next year, I don't see why they should not already be covered by this exemption.
edited 18 hours ago
phoog
67.2k10147215
67.2k10147215
answered yesterday
Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
32.1k480119
32.1k480119
3
"you currently can't get a Schengen visa" Exactly. Should you try to get one anyway, you can expect a letter of refusal. Now I wonder whether you'd get registered as being refused a visa should you apply for it anyway, that would be an unfortunate side-effect...
– Mast
yesterday
3
@Mast it seems to me far more likely that the application would be rejected (that is, not considered at all) rather than refused.
– phoog
18 hours ago
4
The problem with your reasoning is that the regulation doesn't talk about "British nationals who aren't EU citizens," it talks about "British nationals who aren't citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law." Those who are citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law will continue to be so after Brexit.
– phoog
18 hours ago
@Mast No. In most situations, Schengen visa applications are handed in through private contractors, which verify the formal requirements. If they are not met, the application is not even accepted. Even if the application should get through to a consulate, it will there be deemed inadmissible, not processed and therefore also not refused.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
16 hours ago
add a comment |
3
"you currently can't get a Schengen visa" Exactly. Should you try to get one anyway, you can expect a letter of refusal. Now I wonder whether you'd get registered as being refused a visa should you apply for it anyway, that would be an unfortunate side-effect...
– Mast
yesterday
3
@Mast it seems to me far more likely that the application would be rejected (that is, not considered at all) rather than refused.
– phoog
18 hours ago
4
The problem with your reasoning is that the regulation doesn't talk about "British nationals who aren't EU citizens," it talks about "British nationals who aren't citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law." Those who are citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law will continue to be so after Brexit.
– phoog
18 hours ago
@Mast No. In most situations, Schengen visa applications are handed in through private contractors, which verify the formal requirements. If they are not met, the application is not even accepted. Even if the application should get through to a consulate, it will there be deemed inadmissible, not processed and therefore also not refused.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
16 hours ago
3
3
"you currently can't get a Schengen visa" Exactly. Should you try to get one anyway, you can expect a letter of refusal. Now I wonder whether you'd get registered as being refused a visa should you apply for it anyway, that would be an unfortunate side-effect...
– Mast
yesterday
"you currently can't get a Schengen visa" Exactly. Should you try to get one anyway, you can expect a letter of refusal. Now I wonder whether you'd get registered as being refused a visa should you apply for it anyway, that would be an unfortunate side-effect...
– Mast
yesterday
3
3
@Mast it seems to me far more likely that the application would be rejected (that is, not considered at all) rather than refused.
– phoog
18 hours ago
@Mast it seems to me far more likely that the application would be rejected (that is, not considered at all) rather than refused.
– phoog
18 hours ago
4
4
The problem with your reasoning is that the regulation doesn't talk about "British nationals who aren't EU citizens," it talks about "British nationals who aren't citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law." Those who are citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law will continue to be so after Brexit.
– phoog
18 hours ago
The problem with your reasoning is that the regulation doesn't talk about "British nationals who aren't EU citizens," it talks about "British nationals who aren't citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law." Those who are citizens of the UK for the purpose of union law will continue to be so after Brexit.
– phoog
18 hours ago
@Mast No. In most situations, Schengen visa applications are handed in through private contractors, which verify the formal requirements. If they are not met, the application is not even accepted. Even if the application should get through to a consulate, it will there be deemed inadmissible, not processed and therefore also not refused.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
16 hours ago
@Mast No. In most situations, Schengen visa applications are handed in through private contractors, which verify the formal requirements. If they are not met, the application is not even accepted. Even if the application should get through to a consulate, it will there be deemed inadmissible, not processed and therefore also not refused.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
16 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
Edited to include link and quote of EC press release on the topic.
The problem with visa policies is that they are very often governed by reciprocity: if you don't let my citizens come to your country visa-free, I won't let yours come to mine visa-free (of course this usually does not apply to countries which depend on tourists, for instance).
So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens.
Actually, they did say exactly that here:
European Commission proposes visa-free travel to the EU for UK nationals in a no deal scenario – if the UK also grants reciprocal visa-free travel to all EU citizens
(...)This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity.(...)
(thanks @gerrit for the link)
And that's where the problem may arise.
As soon as those Brexiter hardliners manage to have the government say "sorry, but citizens of (pick any of the poorest EU countries with a history of economic migration to the UK) can no longer come to the UK visa-free", the EU will probably reply "sorry, no UK citizen can come to the EU visa-free" (note that this does not apply for existing relationships, like EU-US, but as a matter of principle, I'm pretty sure they will have a hard time accepting it in this case). Then it's a matter of deciding whether principles or the economic impact matter most, and who will chicken out first.
The same release says:
The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
Now, between "declaring its intention" and actually implementing this into regulations, we have a few obstacles. We can hope reason will prevail and this will actually happen, but at the moment it's not a done deal.
So you may need a visa. Or you may not. Nobody knows. And in the meantime, you can't get a visa. Sorry to say so, but pick a destination outside of the EU if you want to be safe.
2
"So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens. And that's where the problem may arise." Sorry, but they're simply not gonna slap the UK on Annex I no matter what, or else they would^ve already done so to the US. Threatening with it as a means of blackmail is another thing.
– Crazydre
yesterday
9
@Crazydre As I wrote, the case of the US is different (because visa policies between the US and the various EU countries often predate their entry in the EU). In the case of the UK, principles may have a much higher value, as has been seen during all the Brexit negotiations. It's a lot of all-or-nothing, no cherry-picking, and I'm pretty sure they would be inclined to do the same in this case, and see who chickens out first.
– jcaron
yesterday
2
When Canada introduced visas for the citizens of Czech Republic, EU didn't do much. Czech Republic was part of Schengen already so it could not intoduce visas for Canadian nationals in reciprocity.
– Vladimir F
17 hours ago
4
@jcaron The original visa requirements were lifted after the Czech Republic joined the Schengen zone. However, they were subsequently reinstated in 2009, which lasted until 2013. This was not a pre-EU policy.
– Emil Jeřábek
17 hours ago
3
@EmilJeřábek Ah indeed, I had missed that part. However, if you check the Sixth Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on certain third countries' maintenance of visa requirements in breach of the principle of reciprocity (and the seventh) you'll see the EU actually did much, and actually threatened Canada with restrictions to visa-free travel for Canadians, and worked with them to restore the situation. Took a while, though.
– jcaron
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
Edited to include link and quote of EC press release on the topic.
The problem with visa policies is that they are very often governed by reciprocity: if you don't let my citizens come to your country visa-free, I won't let yours come to mine visa-free (of course this usually does not apply to countries which depend on tourists, for instance).
So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens.
Actually, they did say exactly that here:
European Commission proposes visa-free travel to the EU for UK nationals in a no deal scenario – if the UK also grants reciprocal visa-free travel to all EU citizens
(...)This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity.(...)
(thanks @gerrit for the link)
And that's where the problem may arise.
As soon as those Brexiter hardliners manage to have the government say "sorry, but citizens of (pick any of the poorest EU countries with a history of economic migration to the UK) can no longer come to the UK visa-free", the EU will probably reply "sorry, no UK citizen can come to the EU visa-free" (note that this does not apply for existing relationships, like EU-US, but as a matter of principle, I'm pretty sure they will have a hard time accepting it in this case). Then it's a matter of deciding whether principles or the economic impact matter most, and who will chicken out first.
The same release says:
The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
Now, between "declaring its intention" and actually implementing this into regulations, we have a few obstacles. We can hope reason will prevail and this will actually happen, but at the moment it's not a done deal.
So you may need a visa. Or you may not. Nobody knows. And in the meantime, you can't get a visa. Sorry to say so, but pick a destination outside of the EU if you want to be safe.
2
"So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens. And that's where the problem may arise." Sorry, but they're simply not gonna slap the UK on Annex I no matter what, or else they would^ve already done so to the US. Threatening with it as a means of blackmail is another thing.
– Crazydre
yesterday
9
@Crazydre As I wrote, the case of the US is different (because visa policies between the US and the various EU countries often predate their entry in the EU). In the case of the UK, principles may have a much higher value, as has been seen during all the Brexit negotiations. It's a lot of all-or-nothing, no cherry-picking, and I'm pretty sure they would be inclined to do the same in this case, and see who chickens out first.
– jcaron
yesterday
2
When Canada introduced visas for the citizens of Czech Republic, EU didn't do much. Czech Republic was part of Schengen already so it could not intoduce visas for Canadian nationals in reciprocity.
– Vladimir F
17 hours ago
4
@jcaron The original visa requirements were lifted after the Czech Republic joined the Schengen zone. However, they were subsequently reinstated in 2009, which lasted until 2013. This was not a pre-EU policy.
– Emil Jeřábek
17 hours ago
3
@EmilJeřábek Ah indeed, I had missed that part. However, if you check the Sixth Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on certain third countries' maintenance of visa requirements in breach of the principle of reciprocity (and the seventh) you'll see the EU actually did much, and actually threatened Canada with restrictions to visa-free travel for Canadians, and worked with them to restore the situation. Took a while, though.
– jcaron
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
Edited to include link and quote of EC press release on the topic.
The problem with visa policies is that they are very often governed by reciprocity: if you don't let my citizens come to your country visa-free, I won't let yours come to mine visa-free (of course this usually does not apply to countries which depend on tourists, for instance).
So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens.
Actually, they did say exactly that here:
European Commission proposes visa-free travel to the EU for UK nationals in a no deal scenario – if the UK also grants reciprocal visa-free travel to all EU citizens
(...)This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity.(...)
(thanks @gerrit for the link)
And that's where the problem may arise.
As soon as those Brexiter hardliners manage to have the government say "sorry, but citizens of (pick any of the poorest EU countries with a history of economic migration to the UK) can no longer come to the UK visa-free", the EU will probably reply "sorry, no UK citizen can come to the EU visa-free" (note that this does not apply for existing relationships, like EU-US, but as a matter of principle, I'm pretty sure they will have a hard time accepting it in this case). Then it's a matter of deciding whether principles or the economic impact matter most, and who will chicken out first.
The same release says:
The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
Now, between "declaring its intention" and actually implementing this into regulations, we have a few obstacles. We can hope reason will prevail and this will actually happen, but at the moment it's not a done deal.
So you may need a visa. Or you may not. Nobody knows. And in the meantime, you can't get a visa. Sorry to say so, but pick a destination outside of the EU if you want to be safe.
Edited to include link and quote of EC press release on the topic.
The problem with visa policies is that they are very often governed by reciprocity: if you don't let my citizens come to your country visa-free, I won't let yours come to mine visa-free (of course this usually does not apply to countries which depend on tourists, for instance).
So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens.
Actually, they did say exactly that here:
European Commission proposes visa-free travel to the EU for UK nationals in a no deal scenario – if the UK also grants reciprocal visa-free travel to all EU citizens
(...)This proposal is entirely conditional upon the UK also granting reciprocal and non-discriminatory visa-free travel for all EU Member States, in line with the principle of visa reciprocity.(...)
(thanks @gerrit for the link)
And that's where the problem may arise.
As soon as those Brexiter hardliners manage to have the government say "sorry, but citizens of (pick any of the poorest EU countries with a history of economic migration to the UK) can no longer come to the UK visa-free", the EU will probably reply "sorry, no UK citizen can come to the EU visa-free" (note that this does not apply for existing relationships, like EU-US, but as a matter of principle, I'm pretty sure they will have a hard time accepting it in this case). Then it's a matter of deciding whether principles or the economic impact matter most, and who will chicken out first.
The same release says:
The UK government has declared its intention not to require a visa from citizens of the EU27 Member States for shorts stays for the purposes of tourism and business.
Now, between "declaring its intention" and actually implementing this into regulations, we have a few obstacles. We can hope reason will prevail and this will actually happen, but at the moment it's not a done deal.
So you may need a visa. Or you may not. Nobody knows. And in the meantime, you can't get a visa. Sorry to say so, but pick a destination outside of the EU if you want to be safe.
edited 9 hours ago
answered yesterday
jcaron
9,94811949
9,94811949
2
"So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens. And that's where the problem may arise." Sorry, but they're simply not gonna slap the UK on Annex I no matter what, or else they would^ve already done so to the US. Threatening with it as a means of blackmail is another thing.
– Crazydre
yesterday
9
@Crazydre As I wrote, the case of the US is different (because visa policies between the US and the various EU countries often predate their entry in the EU). In the case of the UK, principles may have a much higher value, as has been seen during all the Brexit negotiations. It's a lot of all-or-nothing, no cherry-picking, and I'm pretty sure they would be inclined to do the same in this case, and see who chickens out first.
– jcaron
yesterday
2
When Canada introduced visas for the citizens of Czech Republic, EU didn't do much. Czech Republic was part of Schengen already so it could not intoduce visas for Canadian nationals in reciprocity.
– Vladimir F
17 hours ago
4
@jcaron The original visa requirements were lifted after the Czech Republic joined the Schengen zone. However, they were subsequently reinstated in 2009, which lasted until 2013. This was not a pre-EU policy.
– Emil Jeřábek
17 hours ago
3
@EmilJeřábek Ah indeed, I had missed that part. However, if you check the Sixth Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on certain third countries' maintenance of visa requirements in breach of the principle of reciprocity (and the seventh) you'll see the EU actually did much, and actually threatened Canada with restrictions to visa-free travel for Canadians, and worked with them to restore the situation. Took a while, though.
– jcaron
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
2
"So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens. And that's where the problem may arise." Sorry, but they're simply not gonna slap the UK on Annex I no matter what, or else they would^ve already done so to the US. Threatening with it as a means of blackmail is another thing.
– Crazydre
yesterday
9
@Crazydre As I wrote, the case of the US is different (because visa policies between the US and the various EU countries often predate their entry in the EU). In the case of the UK, principles may have a much higher value, as has been seen during all the Brexit negotiations. It's a lot of all-or-nothing, no cherry-picking, and I'm pretty sure they would be inclined to do the same in this case, and see who chickens out first.
– jcaron
yesterday
2
When Canada introduced visas for the citizens of Czech Republic, EU didn't do much. Czech Republic was part of Schengen already so it could not intoduce visas for Canadian nationals in reciprocity.
– Vladimir F
17 hours ago
4
@jcaron The original visa requirements were lifted after the Czech Republic joined the Schengen zone. However, they were subsequently reinstated in 2009, which lasted until 2013. This was not a pre-EU policy.
– Emil Jeřábek
17 hours ago
3
@EmilJeřábek Ah indeed, I had missed that part. However, if you check the Sixth Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on certain third countries' maintenance of visa requirements in breach of the principle of reciprocity (and the seventh) you'll see the EU actually did much, and actually threatened Canada with restrictions to visa-free travel for Canadians, and worked with them to restore the situation. Took a while, though.
– jcaron
16 hours ago
2
2
"So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens. And that's where the problem may arise." Sorry, but they're simply not gonna slap the UK on Annex I no matter what, or else they would^ve already done so to the US. Threatening with it as a means of blackmail is another thing.
– Crazydre
yesterday
"So, even though it is widely expected that the EU will add the UK to the visa-exempt list, they will not be very inclined to do so if the UK does not grant visa-free travel to all EU citizens. And that's where the problem may arise." Sorry, but they're simply not gonna slap the UK on Annex I no matter what, or else they would^ve already done so to the US. Threatening with it as a means of blackmail is another thing.
– Crazydre
yesterday
9
9
@Crazydre As I wrote, the case of the US is different (because visa policies between the US and the various EU countries often predate their entry in the EU). In the case of the UK, principles may have a much higher value, as has been seen during all the Brexit negotiations. It's a lot of all-or-nothing, no cherry-picking, and I'm pretty sure they would be inclined to do the same in this case, and see who chickens out first.
– jcaron
yesterday
@Crazydre As I wrote, the case of the US is different (because visa policies between the US and the various EU countries often predate their entry in the EU). In the case of the UK, principles may have a much higher value, as has been seen during all the Brexit negotiations. It's a lot of all-or-nothing, no cherry-picking, and I'm pretty sure they would be inclined to do the same in this case, and see who chickens out first.
– jcaron
yesterday
2
2
When Canada introduced visas for the citizens of Czech Republic, EU didn't do much. Czech Republic was part of Schengen already so it could not intoduce visas for Canadian nationals in reciprocity.
– Vladimir F
17 hours ago
When Canada introduced visas for the citizens of Czech Republic, EU didn't do much. Czech Republic was part of Schengen already so it could not intoduce visas for Canadian nationals in reciprocity.
– Vladimir F
17 hours ago
4
4
@jcaron The original visa requirements were lifted after the Czech Republic joined the Schengen zone. However, they were subsequently reinstated in 2009, which lasted until 2013. This was not a pre-EU policy.
– Emil Jeřábek
17 hours ago
@jcaron The original visa requirements were lifted after the Czech Republic joined the Schengen zone. However, they were subsequently reinstated in 2009, which lasted until 2013. This was not a pre-EU policy.
– Emil Jeřábek
17 hours ago
3
3
@EmilJeřábek Ah indeed, I had missed that part. However, if you check the Sixth Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on certain third countries' maintenance of visa requirements in breach of the principle of reciprocity (and the seventh) you'll see the EU actually did much, and actually threatened Canada with restrictions to visa-free travel for Canadians, and worked with them to restore the situation. Took a while, though.
– jcaron
16 hours ago
@EmilJeřábek Ah indeed, I had missed that part. However, if you check the Sixth Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on certain third countries' maintenance of visa requirements in breach of the principle of reciprocity (and the seventh) you'll see the EU actually did much, and actually threatened Canada with restrictions to visa-free travel for Canadians, and worked with them to restore the situation. Took a while, though.
– jcaron
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
I don't think anyone knows how yet how this will all work out. One link suggests that there will be free-movement transition period until 2021
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-visas-travel-free-movement-eu-commission-france-schengen-a8595991.html
On the other hand, some British airlines are nervous and Ryan Air has already warned of significant impact on stock price
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/brexit-flights-29-march-2019-flights-passport-customs-uk-eu-roaming-ehic-a8531866.html
I doubt there is anything pro-active you can do at the moment. Even if you apply for a Visa, the issuer wouldn't know what to do with your application since the rules aren't clear yet.
Other reading
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/no-visa-free-traveling-brits-if-they-exit-the-eu-without-an-agreement/
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/likelihood-of-post-brexit-uk-falling-under-etias-program-sparks-fury-among-britons/
1
If there is an agreement, there will be a two year transition period to work all this out. I am asking specifically about the no-agreement case.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
We don't know that for sure. At the moment it's at least theoretically possible that EU and UK reaches another agreement than what is currently known (although the EU has clearly stated that won't happen), and that might not include a two year transition period.
– Henrik
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
I don't think anyone knows how yet how this will all work out. One link suggests that there will be free-movement transition period until 2021
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-visas-travel-free-movement-eu-commission-france-schengen-a8595991.html
On the other hand, some British airlines are nervous and Ryan Air has already warned of significant impact on stock price
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/brexit-flights-29-march-2019-flights-passport-customs-uk-eu-roaming-ehic-a8531866.html
I doubt there is anything pro-active you can do at the moment. Even if you apply for a Visa, the issuer wouldn't know what to do with your application since the rules aren't clear yet.
Other reading
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/no-visa-free-traveling-brits-if-they-exit-the-eu-without-an-agreement/
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/likelihood-of-post-brexit-uk-falling-under-etias-program-sparks-fury-among-britons/
1
If there is an agreement, there will be a two year transition period to work all this out. I am asking specifically about the no-agreement case.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
We don't know that for sure. At the moment it's at least theoretically possible that EU and UK reaches another agreement than what is currently known (although the EU has clearly stated that won't happen), and that might not include a two year transition period.
– Henrik
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
I don't think anyone knows how yet how this will all work out. One link suggests that there will be free-movement transition period until 2021
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-visas-travel-free-movement-eu-commission-france-schengen-a8595991.html
On the other hand, some British airlines are nervous and Ryan Air has already warned of significant impact on stock price
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/brexit-flights-29-march-2019-flights-passport-customs-uk-eu-roaming-ehic-a8531866.html
I doubt there is anything pro-active you can do at the moment. Even if you apply for a Visa, the issuer wouldn't know what to do with your application since the rules aren't clear yet.
Other reading
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/no-visa-free-traveling-brits-if-they-exit-the-eu-without-an-agreement/
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/likelihood-of-post-brexit-uk-falling-under-etias-program-sparks-fury-among-britons/
I don't think anyone knows how yet how this will all work out. One link suggests that there will be free-movement transition period until 2021
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-visas-travel-free-movement-eu-commission-france-schengen-a8595991.html
On the other hand, some British airlines are nervous and Ryan Air has already warned of significant impact on stock price
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/brexit-flights-29-march-2019-flights-passport-customs-uk-eu-roaming-ehic-a8531866.html
I doubt there is anything pro-active you can do at the moment. Even if you apply for a Visa, the issuer wouldn't know what to do with your application since the rules aren't clear yet.
Other reading
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/no-visa-free-traveling-brits-if-they-exit-the-eu-without-an-agreement/
https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/likelihood-of-post-brexit-uk-falling-under-etias-program-sparks-fury-among-britons/
answered yesterday
Hilmar
18.9k13062
18.9k13062
1
If there is an agreement, there will be a two year transition period to work all this out. I am asking specifically about the no-agreement case.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
We don't know that for sure. At the moment it's at least theoretically possible that EU and UK reaches another agreement than what is currently known (although the EU has clearly stated that won't happen), and that might not include a two year transition period.
– Henrik
yesterday
add a comment |
1
If there is an agreement, there will be a two year transition period to work all this out. I am asking specifically about the no-agreement case.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
We don't know that for sure. At the moment it's at least theoretically possible that EU and UK reaches another agreement than what is currently known (although the EU has clearly stated that won't happen), and that might not include a two year transition period.
– Henrik
yesterday
1
1
If there is an agreement, there will be a two year transition period to work all this out. I am asking specifically about the no-agreement case.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
If there is an agreement, there will be a two year transition period to work all this out. I am asking specifically about the no-agreement case.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
We don't know that for sure. At the moment it's at least theoretically possible that EU and UK reaches another agreement than what is currently known (although the EU has clearly stated that won't happen), and that might not include a two year transition period.
– Henrik
yesterday
We don't know that for sure. At the moment it's at least theoretically possible that EU and UK reaches another agreement than what is currently known (although the EU has clearly stated that won't happen), and that might not include a two year transition period.
– Henrik
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
You'll be able to visit without a visa for up to 90 days within a 180-day period.
Can't prove it in the strictest sense, but although the EU may threaten with something else as part of the political game (the US has done this to the EU as well) there's simply no way it's actually going to happen when other low-risk nationalities are visa-exempt. It would be the highest degree of political idiocy.
15
Political idiocy has never, unfortunately, been a disqualifying condition.
– David
yesterday
2
@David There are limits for everything, and no one with half a braincell will seriously slap the UK (or the US) on Annex I.
– Crazydre
yesterday
5
@Crazydre Given the current political situation, there's arguably a lack of brain cells going around.
– Mast
yesterday
3
The second paragraph is seriously unlikely. The sticking points are freedom of trade/services and mobility of workers, not tourists or visitors.
– smci
yesterday
1
@smci I definitely would not bet on that. The UK saying "we don't want visitors from (insert poor EU country here) because we fear they may overstay" is quite a possibility.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
You'll be able to visit without a visa for up to 90 days within a 180-day period.
Can't prove it in the strictest sense, but although the EU may threaten with something else as part of the political game (the US has done this to the EU as well) there's simply no way it's actually going to happen when other low-risk nationalities are visa-exempt. It would be the highest degree of political idiocy.
15
Political idiocy has never, unfortunately, been a disqualifying condition.
– David
yesterday
2
@David There are limits for everything, and no one with half a braincell will seriously slap the UK (or the US) on Annex I.
– Crazydre
yesterday
5
@Crazydre Given the current political situation, there's arguably a lack of brain cells going around.
– Mast
yesterday
3
The second paragraph is seriously unlikely. The sticking points are freedom of trade/services and mobility of workers, not tourists or visitors.
– smci
yesterday
1
@smci I definitely would not bet on that. The UK saying "we don't want visitors from (insert poor EU country here) because we fear they may overstay" is quite a possibility.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
You'll be able to visit without a visa for up to 90 days within a 180-day period.
Can't prove it in the strictest sense, but although the EU may threaten with something else as part of the political game (the US has done this to the EU as well) there's simply no way it's actually going to happen when other low-risk nationalities are visa-exempt. It would be the highest degree of political idiocy.
You'll be able to visit without a visa for up to 90 days within a 180-day period.
Can't prove it in the strictest sense, but although the EU may threaten with something else as part of the political game (the US has done this to the EU as well) there's simply no way it's actually going to happen when other low-risk nationalities are visa-exempt. It would be the highest degree of political idiocy.
answered yesterday
Crazydre
51k990224
51k990224
15
Political idiocy has never, unfortunately, been a disqualifying condition.
– David
yesterday
2
@David There are limits for everything, and no one with half a braincell will seriously slap the UK (or the US) on Annex I.
– Crazydre
yesterday
5
@Crazydre Given the current political situation, there's arguably a lack of brain cells going around.
– Mast
yesterday
3
The second paragraph is seriously unlikely. The sticking points are freedom of trade/services and mobility of workers, not tourists or visitors.
– smci
yesterday
1
@smci I definitely would not bet on that. The UK saying "we don't want visitors from (insert poor EU country here) because we fear they may overstay" is quite a possibility.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
15
Political idiocy has never, unfortunately, been a disqualifying condition.
– David
yesterday
2
@David There are limits for everything, and no one with half a braincell will seriously slap the UK (or the US) on Annex I.
– Crazydre
yesterday
5
@Crazydre Given the current political situation, there's arguably a lack of brain cells going around.
– Mast
yesterday
3
The second paragraph is seriously unlikely. The sticking points are freedom of trade/services and mobility of workers, not tourists or visitors.
– smci
yesterday
1
@smci I definitely would not bet on that. The UK saying "we don't want visitors from (insert poor EU country here) because we fear they may overstay" is quite a possibility.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
15
15
Political idiocy has never, unfortunately, been a disqualifying condition.
– David
yesterday
Political idiocy has never, unfortunately, been a disqualifying condition.
– David
yesterday
2
2
@David There are limits for everything, and no one with half a braincell will seriously slap the UK (or the US) on Annex I.
– Crazydre
yesterday
@David There are limits for everything, and no one with half a braincell will seriously slap the UK (or the US) on Annex I.
– Crazydre
yesterday
5
5
@Crazydre Given the current political situation, there's arguably a lack of brain cells going around.
– Mast
yesterday
@Crazydre Given the current political situation, there's arguably a lack of brain cells going around.
– Mast
yesterday
3
3
The second paragraph is seriously unlikely. The sticking points are freedom of trade/services and mobility of workers, not tourists or visitors.
– smci
yesterday
The second paragraph is seriously unlikely. The sticking points are freedom of trade/services and mobility of workers, not tourists or visitors.
– smci
yesterday
1
1
@smci I definitely would not bet on that. The UK saying "we don't want visitors from (insert poor EU country here) because we fear they may overstay" is quite a possibility.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
@smci I definitely would not bet on that. The UK saying "we don't want visitors from (insert poor EU country here) because we fear they may overstay" is quite a possibility.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
The UK passport office has published a document titled Passport rules for travel to Europe after Brexit. It suggests two things:
After 29 March 2019:
You should have at least 6 months left on your passport from your date of arrival. This applies to adult and child passports.
If you renewed a 10 year adult passport before it expired, extra months may have been added to your new passport’s expiry date, making it valid for more than 10 years. Any extra months on your passport over 10 years may not count towards the 6 months that should be remaining for travel to most countries in Europe.
Those points apply to Schengen countries only. For non-Schengen countries:
The new rules do not apply when travelling to Ireland.
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania are not in the Schengen area. You should check the entry requirements for these countries.
The word "visa" does not appear in that document, so it appears that the UK government believes that the EU will let UK citizens visit the Schengen area for up to 90 days visa-free.
6 months? Haha, talk about being misinformed. Schengen regulations require 3 months beyond the period of intended stay
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
This document explains why they say 6 months: "at least 3 months’ validity remaining on the date of intended departure from the last country visited in the Schengen area. Because third country nationals can remain in the Schengen area for 90 days (approximately 3 months), the actual check carried out could be that the passport has at least 6 months validity remaining on the date of arrival."
– legoscia
11 hours ago
1
If you can document that you're not wishing to stay for the full 90 days, are they really allowed to refuse entry on these grounds?
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
@Crazydre indeed. Or better still, if one is reentering for 1 day only after having used 89 of the 90 days, there should be no argument that the passport requires 6 months' validity.
– phoog
10 hours ago
Them not mentioning visas does not really make it very comforting, it's more like they don't know. And indeed, they can't know, because the EU hasn't yet said they will let UK nationals in without a visa. They have said they will do so if the UK does the same, and the UK apparently said they would, but that has not yet been confirmed.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
The UK passport office has published a document titled Passport rules for travel to Europe after Brexit. It suggests two things:
After 29 March 2019:
You should have at least 6 months left on your passport from your date of arrival. This applies to adult and child passports.
If you renewed a 10 year adult passport before it expired, extra months may have been added to your new passport’s expiry date, making it valid for more than 10 years. Any extra months on your passport over 10 years may not count towards the 6 months that should be remaining for travel to most countries in Europe.
Those points apply to Schengen countries only. For non-Schengen countries:
The new rules do not apply when travelling to Ireland.
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania are not in the Schengen area. You should check the entry requirements for these countries.
The word "visa" does not appear in that document, so it appears that the UK government believes that the EU will let UK citizens visit the Schengen area for up to 90 days visa-free.
6 months? Haha, talk about being misinformed. Schengen regulations require 3 months beyond the period of intended stay
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
This document explains why they say 6 months: "at least 3 months’ validity remaining on the date of intended departure from the last country visited in the Schengen area. Because third country nationals can remain in the Schengen area for 90 days (approximately 3 months), the actual check carried out could be that the passport has at least 6 months validity remaining on the date of arrival."
– legoscia
11 hours ago
1
If you can document that you're not wishing to stay for the full 90 days, are they really allowed to refuse entry on these grounds?
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
@Crazydre indeed. Or better still, if one is reentering for 1 day only after having used 89 of the 90 days, there should be no argument that the passport requires 6 months' validity.
– phoog
10 hours ago
Them not mentioning visas does not really make it very comforting, it's more like they don't know. And indeed, they can't know, because the EU hasn't yet said they will let UK nationals in without a visa. They have said they will do so if the UK does the same, and the UK apparently said they would, but that has not yet been confirmed.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
The UK passport office has published a document titled Passport rules for travel to Europe after Brexit. It suggests two things:
After 29 March 2019:
You should have at least 6 months left on your passport from your date of arrival. This applies to adult and child passports.
If you renewed a 10 year adult passport before it expired, extra months may have been added to your new passport’s expiry date, making it valid for more than 10 years. Any extra months on your passport over 10 years may not count towards the 6 months that should be remaining for travel to most countries in Europe.
Those points apply to Schengen countries only. For non-Schengen countries:
The new rules do not apply when travelling to Ireland.
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania are not in the Schengen area. You should check the entry requirements for these countries.
The word "visa" does not appear in that document, so it appears that the UK government believes that the EU will let UK citizens visit the Schengen area for up to 90 days visa-free.
The UK passport office has published a document titled Passport rules for travel to Europe after Brexit. It suggests two things:
After 29 March 2019:
You should have at least 6 months left on your passport from your date of arrival. This applies to adult and child passports.
If you renewed a 10 year adult passport before it expired, extra months may have been added to your new passport’s expiry date, making it valid for more than 10 years. Any extra months on your passport over 10 years may not count towards the 6 months that should be remaining for travel to most countries in Europe.
Those points apply to Schengen countries only. For non-Schengen countries:
The new rules do not apply when travelling to Ireland.
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania are not in the Schengen area. You should check the entry requirements for these countries.
The word "visa" does not appear in that document, so it appears that the UK government believes that the EU will let UK citizens visit the Schengen area for up to 90 days visa-free.
answered 14 hours ago
legoscia
1713
1713
6 months? Haha, talk about being misinformed. Schengen regulations require 3 months beyond the period of intended stay
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
This document explains why they say 6 months: "at least 3 months’ validity remaining on the date of intended departure from the last country visited in the Schengen area. Because third country nationals can remain in the Schengen area for 90 days (approximately 3 months), the actual check carried out could be that the passport has at least 6 months validity remaining on the date of arrival."
– legoscia
11 hours ago
1
If you can document that you're not wishing to stay for the full 90 days, are they really allowed to refuse entry on these grounds?
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
@Crazydre indeed. Or better still, if one is reentering for 1 day only after having used 89 of the 90 days, there should be no argument that the passport requires 6 months' validity.
– phoog
10 hours ago
Them not mentioning visas does not really make it very comforting, it's more like they don't know. And indeed, they can't know, because the EU hasn't yet said they will let UK nationals in without a visa. They have said they will do so if the UK does the same, and the UK apparently said they would, but that has not yet been confirmed.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
add a comment |
6 months? Haha, talk about being misinformed. Schengen regulations require 3 months beyond the period of intended stay
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
This document explains why they say 6 months: "at least 3 months’ validity remaining on the date of intended departure from the last country visited in the Schengen area. Because third country nationals can remain in the Schengen area for 90 days (approximately 3 months), the actual check carried out could be that the passport has at least 6 months validity remaining on the date of arrival."
– legoscia
11 hours ago
1
If you can document that you're not wishing to stay for the full 90 days, are they really allowed to refuse entry on these grounds?
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
@Crazydre indeed. Or better still, if one is reentering for 1 day only after having used 89 of the 90 days, there should be no argument that the passport requires 6 months' validity.
– phoog
10 hours ago
Them not mentioning visas does not really make it very comforting, it's more like they don't know. And indeed, they can't know, because the EU hasn't yet said they will let UK nationals in without a visa. They have said they will do so if the UK does the same, and the UK apparently said they would, but that has not yet been confirmed.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
6 months? Haha, talk about being misinformed. Schengen regulations require 3 months beyond the period of intended stay
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
6 months? Haha, talk about being misinformed. Schengen regulations require 3 months beyond the period of intended stay
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
This document explains why they say 6 months: "at least 3 months’ validity remaining on the date of intended departure from the last country visited in the Schengen area. Because third country nationals can remain in the Schengen area for 90 days (approximately 3 months), the actual check carried out could be that the passport has at least 6 months validity remaining on the date of arrival."
– legoscia
11 hours ago
This document explains why they say 6 months: "at least 3 months’ validity remaining on the date of intended departure from the last country visited in the Schengen area. Because third country nationals can remain in the Schengen area for 90 days (approximately 3 months), the actual check carried out could be that the passport has at least 6 months validity remaining on the date of arrival."
– legoscia
11 hours ago
1
1
If you can document that you're not wishing to stay for the full 90 days, are they really allowed to refuse entry on these grounds?
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
If you can document that you're not wishing to stay for the full 90 days, are they really allowed to refuse entry on these grounds?
– Crazydre
11 hours ago
@Crazydre indeed. Or better still, if one is reentering for 1 day only after having used 89 of the 90 days, there should be no argument that the passport requires 6 months' validity.
– phoog
10 hours ago
@Crazydre indeed. Or better still, if one is reentering for 1 day only after having used 89 of the 90 days, there should be no argument that the passport requires 6 months' validity.
– phoog
10 hours ago
Them not mentioning visas does not really make it very comforting, it's more like they don't know. And indeed, they can't know, because the EU hasn't yet said they will let UK nationals in without a visa. They have said they will do so if the UK does the same, and the UK apparently said they would, but that has not yet been confirmed.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
Them not mentioning visas does not really make it very comforting, it's more like they don't know. And indeed, they can't know, because the EU hasn't yet said they will let UK nationals in without a visa. They have said they will do so if the UK does the same, and the UK apparently said they would, but that has not yet been confirmed.
– jcaron
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127194%2fhard-brexit-and-travel-for-uk-citizens-into-schengen-countries-in-2019%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
7
I guess a valid question that I'd be curious to know out of this nobody knows situation could be, though Brits don't need a Schengen visa...are they allowed to apply for one anyway? can they get one?
– the other one
yesterday
5
It is, but delaying the vote on the agreement to January, just a couple of months before the Article 50 deadline, makes a hard Brexit much, much more likely. As noted in the question, I am more into long term planning than the UK government seems to be.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
3
I would be particularly worried if I planned travel to Europe in April 2019.
– Patricia Shanahan
yesterday
1
@PatriciaShanahan I agree with Honorary World Citizen: with Brexit unresolved, the future legal relationships between the EU and the UK (and their citizens) are only guessable. I have two suggestions: a) gather every possible document now, so you're prepared to apply when the rules coalesce, and b) consider if you can join and leave the cruise in a non-EU country, which would render any Brexit changes unlikely to affect your trip.
– David
yesterday
5
The default situation is that you need a visa. Being able to travel without a visa is the exception. It is widely expected that the EU will grant visa-free travel to UK citizens (and vice-versa), but no one can know what will happen. In the meantime, you can't get a visa. Plan for an itinerary that does not involve the EU :-/
– jcaron
yesterday