Holomorphic function on an annulus
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Let $f$ be a holomorphic function on the set $U={z in mathbb{C}: 1 leq |z| leq pi }$. Assume that $max_{|z|=1}|f(z)| leq 1$ and $max_{|z|=pi}|f(z)| leq pi^{pi}$.
How to prove that $max_{|z|=e}|f(z)| leq e^{pi}$?
Usually in such exercises one considers $g(z)$ of the form $alpha z^nf(z)$ where $alpha$ and $n$ are such that our assumptions on $f$ gives $|g(z)| leq 1$ on both circles being the boundary of $U$. However it is not guarantedd that $n$ would be integer thus in general we don't get a holomorphic function $g$ for which we could apply the maximum principle. If $n$ happens to be rational one can overcome this difficulty by considering $(alpha z^n f(z))^q$ where $n=frac{p}{q}$. However in our example $n$ turns out to be $pi$ and by considering $g(z)=f(z)/z^{pi}$ we don't get holomorphic function. How to handle this case?
complex-analysis optimization holomorphic-functions maximum-principle
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Let $f$ be a holomorphic function on the set $U={z in mathbb{C}: 1 leq |z| leq pi }$. Assume that $max_{|z|=1}|f(z)| leq 1$ and $max_{|z|=pi}|f(z)| leq pi^{pi}$.
How to prove that $max_{|z|=e}|f(z)| leq e^{pi}$?
Usually in such exercises one considers $g(z)$ of the form $alpha z^nf(z)$ where $alpha$ and $n$ are such that our assumptions on $f$ gives $|g(z)| leq 1$ on both circles being the boundary of $U$. However it is not guarantedd that $n$ would be integer thus in general we don't get a holomorphic function $g$ for which we could apply the maximum principle. If $n$ happens to be rational one can overcome this difficulty by considering $(alpha z^n f(z))^q$ where $n=frac{p}{q}$. However in our example $n$ turns out to be $pi$ and by considering $g(z)=f(z)/z^{pi}$ we don't get holomorphic function. How to handle this case?
complex-analysis optimization holomorphic-functions maximum-principle
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Let $f$ be a holomorphic function on the set $U={z in mathbb{C}: 1 leq |z| leq pi }$. Assume that $max_{|z|=1}|f(z)| leq 1$ and $max_{|z|=pi}|f(z)| leq pi^{pi}$.
How to prove that $max_{|z|=e}|f(z)| leq e^{pi}$?
Usually in such exercises one considers $g(z)$ of the form $alpha z^nf(z)$ where $alpha$ and $n$ are such that our assumptions on $f$ gives $|g(z)| leq 1$ on both circles being the boundary of $U$. However it is not guarantedd that $n$ would be integer thus in general we don't get a holomorphic function $g$ for which we could apply the maximum principle. If $n$ happens to be rational one can overcome this difficulty by considering $(alpha z^n f(z))^q$ where $n=frac{p}{q}$. However in our example $n$ turns out to be $pi$ and by considering $g(z)=f(z)/z^{pi}$ we don't get holomorphic function. How to handle this case?
complex-analysis optimization holomorphic-functions maximum-principle
Let $f$ be a holomorphic function on the set $U={z in mathbb{C}: 1 leq |z| leq pi }$. Assume that $max_{|z|=1}|f(z)| leq 1$ and $max_{|z|=pi}|f(z)| leq pi^{pi}$.
How to prove that $max_{|z|=e}|f(z)| leq e^{pi}$?
Usually in such exercises one considers $g(z)$ of the form $alpha z^nf(z)$ where $alpha$ and $n$ are such that our assumptions on $f$ gives $|g(z)| leq 1$ on both circles being the boundary of $U$. However it is not guarantedd that $n$ would be integer thus in general we don't get a holomorphic function $g$ for which we could apply the maximum principle. If $n$ happens to be rational one can overcome this difficulty by considering $(alpha z^n f(z))^q$ where $n=frac{p}{q}$. However in our example $n$ turns out to be $pi$ and by considering $g(z)=f(z)/z^{pi}$ we don't get holomorphic function. How to handle this case?
complex-analysis optimization holomorphic-functions maximum-principle
complex-analysis optimization holomorphic-functions maximum-principle
asked 2 days ago
truebaran
2,1832723
2,1832723
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
$$
u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
$$ defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.
Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.
Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
– reuns
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
$$
u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
$$ defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.
Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.
Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
– reuns
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
$$
u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
$$ defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.
Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.
Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
– reuns
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
$$
u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
$$ defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.
Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.
As you pointed out, to define the function $zmapsto z^{-pi}$ holomorphically, a branch cut is necessary, and it cannot be defined properly on the whole of the domain. Hence, to avoid this technical issue, theory of subharmonic functions is used. To be specific, instead of considering $zmapsto z^{-pi}$, one considers a subharmonic function
$$
u(z) =-pilog|z| + log|f(z)| in[-infty, infty)
$$ defined on $1leq |z|leq pi$. Then, one can show that maximum principle applies to $u$, and one gets $$-pilog|z|+log|f(z)|leq 0, quadforall z,$$ as a consequence.
Note: A subharmonic function $u:Omega to [-infty,infty)$ is an upper-semicontinuous function such that $u(x)$ is less than or equal to the average of $u$ on $partial B(x,r)$ for every $r>0$ such that $overline{B(x,r)}subsetOmega$. We can see that $log|f|$ is subharmonic by Jensen's formula (and if $f$ does not vanish, it is harmonic.) By the definition of subharmonic function, if maximum of $u$ occurs at the interior point $x$, then $u$ is a constant on a component containing $x$.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Song
1,908112
1,908112
Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
– reuns
2 days ago
add a comment |
Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
– reuns
2 days ago
Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
– reuns
2 days ago
Being the real part of the locally holomorphic function $U(z)=-pi log(z)+log f(z)$ it is harmonic. Then the maximum modulus principle can be seen from that $U$ is locally analytic so $u(z) = u(z_0)+ Re(C(z-z_0)^n)+O(|z-z_0|^{n+1})$ which doesn't have a local maximum at $z_0$
– reuns
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031944%2fholomorphic-function-on-an-annulus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown