Show that $forall y in X$ the equation $x= y + Tx$ has a unique solution











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Exercise :




Let $X$ be a Banach space, $T in B(X)$ which means that $T$ is a bounded linear operator $T : X to X$. We suppose that for all $y in X$ the series
$$sum_{n=1}^infty|T^ny|$$
converges. Show that for all $y in X$, the equation $x = y + Tx$ has a unique solution.




Attempt/Thoughts :



Since $X$ is Banach then the space $B(X)$ of all the bounded operators from the Banach space $X$ to $X$, is also Banach. This means that $T_n to T$ as $nto infty$ over $B(X)$.



Since the given series is convergent, this means that :



$$Bigg|sum_{n=k+1}^infty|T^ny|Bigg| < epsilon $$



Also, since $T$ is a bounded operator, this means that :



$$|Ty| leq M |y|$$
I really do now know how to use the given facts to yield a result. Any given hints or elaborations will be greatly appreciated !










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Try to arrive at "$frac 1{1-T}=1+T+T^2+T^3+ldots$"
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 17 at 11:16












  • @HagenvonEitzen Hi, thanks a lot for your comment ! I see this is the geometric series in case of $|T| <1$. How would I get to a solution using this, though ?
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:23















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Exercise :




Let $X$ be a Banach space, $T in B(X)$ which means that $T$ is a bounded linear operator $T : X to X$. We suppose that for all $y in X$ the series
$$sum_{n=1}^infty|T^ny|$$
converges. Show that for all $y in X$, the equation $x = y + Tx$ has a unique solution.




Attempt/Thoughts :



Since $X$ is Banach then the space $B(X)$ of all the bounded operators from the Banach space $X$ to $X$, is also Banach. This means that $T_n to T$ as $nto infty$ over $B(X)$.



Since the given series is convergent, this means that :



$$Bigg|sum_{n=k+1}^infty|T^ny|Bigg| < epsilon $$



Also, since $T$ is a bounded operator, this means that :



$$|Ty| leq M |y|$$
I really do now know how to use the given facts to yield a result. Any given hints or elaborations will be greatly appreciated !










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Try to arrive at "$frac 1{1-T}=1+T+T^2+T^3+ldots$"
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 17 at 11:16












  • @HagenvonEitzen Hi, thanks a lot for your comment ! I see this is the geometric series in case of $|T| <1$. How would I get to a solution using this, though ?
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:23













up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





Exercise :




Let $X$ be a Banach space, $T in B(X)$ which means that $T$ is a bounded linear operator $T : X to X$. We suppose that for all $y in X$ the series
$$sum_{n=1}^infty|T^ny|$$
converges. Show that for all $y in X$, the equation $x = y + Tx$ has a unique solution.




Attempt/Thoughts :



Since $X$ is Banach then the space $B(X)$ of all the bounded operators from the Banach space $X$ to $X$, is also Banach. This means that $T_n to T$ as $nto infty$ over $B(X)$.



Since the given series is convergent, this means that :



$$Bigg|sum_{n=k+1}^infty|T^ny|Bigg| < epsilon $$



Also, since $T$ is a bounded operator, this means that :



$$|Ty| leq M |y|$$
I really do now know how to use the given facts to yield a result. Any given hints or elaborations will be greatly appreciated !










share|cite|improve this question















Exercise :




Let $X$ be a Banach space, $T in B(X)$ which means that $T$ is a bounded linear operator $T : X to X$. We suppose that for all $y in X$ the series
$$sum_{n=1}^infty|T^ny|$$
converges. Show that for all $y in X$, the equation $x = y + Tx$ has a unique solution.




Attempt/Thoughts :



Since $X$ is Banach then the space $B(X)$ of all the bounded operators from the Banach space $X$ to $X$, is also Banach. This means that $T_n to T$ as $nto infty$ over $B(X)$.



Since the given series is convergent, this means that :



$$Bigg|sum_{n=k+1}^infty|T^ny|Bigg| < epsilon $$



Also, since $T$ is a bounded operator, this means that :



$$|Ty| leq M |y|$$
I really do now know how to use the given facts to yield a result. Any given hints or elaborations will be greatly appreciated !







real-analysis sequences-and-series functional-analysis operator-theory banach-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 17 at 11:11

























asked Nov 17 at 10:58









Rebellos

12.9k21041




12.9k21041












  • Try to arrive at "$frac 1{1-T}=1+T+T^2+T^3+ldots$"
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 17 at 11:16












  • @HagenvonEitzen Hi, thanks a lot for your comment ! I see this is the geometric series in case of $|T| <1$. How would I get to a solution using this, though ?
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:23


















  • Try to arrive at "$frac 1{1-T}=1+T+T^2+T^3+ldots$"
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 17 at 11:16












  • @HagenvonEitzen Hi, thanks a lot for your comment ! I see this is the geometric series in case of $|T| <1$. How would I get to a solution using this, though ?
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:23
















Try to arrive at "$frac 1{1-T}=1+T+T^2+T^3+ldots$"
– Hagen von Eitzen
Nov 17 at 11:16






Try to arrive at "$frac 1{1-T}=1+T+T^2+T^3+ldots$"
– Hagen von Eitzen
Nov 17 at 11:16














@HagenvonEitzen Hi, thanks a lot for your comment ! I see this is the geometric series in case of $|T| <1$. How would I get to a solution using this, though ?
– Rebellos
Nov 17 at 11:23




@HagenvonEitzen Hi, thanks a lot for your comment ! I see this is the geometric series in case of $|T| <1$. How would I get to a solution using this, though ?
– Rebellos
Nov 17 at 11:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Formally, $x$ would be given by
$$ x "=" (1-T)^{-1} y$$
where by the formula for a geometric series, we should have
$$ (1-T)^{-1} "=" sum_{n=0}^infty T^n $$The content of the exercise is to prove that this makes sense. If we let $x_N := sum_{n=0}^N T^n y $ then the given assumption implies that $x_N$ converges in $X$ to some $x:=sum_0^infty T^n y$, and moreover
$$(1-T)^{-1}y := sum_{n=0}^infty T^n y$$
is a bounded map in $B(X)$. Then just compute (since $Tin B(X)$)
$$ (1-T) x = lim_{Ntoinfty }(1-T) x_N = lim_{Ntoinfty} y - T^{N+1}y = y$$
Its also the case (with a similar proof) that for any $y$ of the form $y=(1-T)x$,
$$(1-T)^{-1} y = x.$$
This proves that $1-T$ is invertible, and uniqueness follows.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • All in all it makes sense but, how do we think of $x$ as $x = (1-T)^{-1}y$ when $Tx$ is $T(x)$ ? Also, shouldn't it be $|T| <1$ or $|T|<1$ so that the geometric series hold ?
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:33












  • @Rebellos Sorry, I don't understand your first question, the fact that $Tx = T(x)$ is purely notation. Can you try to rephrase? The convergence of the series for every $y$ implies this inequality for the operator norm of $T$. (You may find the inequality $|T^n| le |T|^n$ useful)
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:40










  • The expression $Tx = T(x)$ means that $x$ is the argument of the operator $T$. How come you can "solve" for $x$ like it's an ordinary quation (as $Tcdot x$), this is what I am asking.
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:43






  • 1




    @Rebellos Well, you shouldn't be able to without proof. This is that proof.
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:44










  • I get the concept now. Sorry for the questions, but this is the first time during both our course and my self study, that I handle something like this, so it took me some time (and your explanation) to grasp over the though process !
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:47











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002213%2fshow-that-forall-y-in-x-the-equation-x-y-tx-has-a-unique-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Formally, $x$ would be given by
$$ x "=" (1-T)^{-1} y$$
where by the formula for a geometric series, we should have
$$ (1-T)^{-1} "=" sum_{n=0}^infty T^n $$The content of the exercise is to prove that this makes sense. If we let $x_N := sum_{n=0}^N T^n y $ then the given assumption implies that $x_N$ converges in $X$ to some $x:=sum_0^infty T^n y$, and moreover
$$(1-T)^{-1}y := sum_{n=0}^infty T^n y$$
is a bounded map in $B(X)$. Then just compute (since $Tin B(X)$)
$$ (1-T) x = lim_{Ntoinfty }(1-T) x_N = lim_{Ntoinfty} y - T^{N+1}y = y$$
Its also the case (with a similar proof) that for any $y$ of the form $y=(1-T)x$,
$$(1-T)^{-1} y = x.$$
This proves that $1-T$ is invertible, and uniqueness follows.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • All in all it makes sense but, how do we think of $x$ as $x = (1-T)^{-1}y$ when $Tx$ is $T(x)$ ? Also, shouldn't it be $|T| <1$ or $|T|<1$ so that the geometric series hold ?
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:33












  • @Rebellos Sorry, I don't understand your first question, the fact that $Tx = T(x)$ is purely notation. Can you try to rephrase? The convergence of the series for every $y$ implies this inequality for the operator norm of $T$. (You may find the inequality $|T^n| le |T|^n$ useful)
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:40










  • The expression $Tx = T(x)$ means that $x$ is the argument of the operator $T$. How come you can "solve" for $x$ like it's an ordinary quation (as $Tcdot x$), this is what I am asking.
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:43






  • 1




    @Rebellos Well, you shouldn't be able to without proof. This is that proof.
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:44










  • I get the concept now. Sorry for the questions, but this is the first time during both our course and my self study, that I handle something like this, so it took me some time (and your explanation) to grasp over the though process !
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:47















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Formally, $x$ would be given by
$$ x "=" (1-T)^{-1} y$$
where by the formula for a geometric series, we should have
$$ (1-T)^{-1} "=" sum_{n=0}^infty T^n $$The content of the exercise is to prove that this makes sense. If we let $x_N := sum_{n=0}^N T^n y $ then the given assumption implies that $x_N$ converges in $X$ to some $x:=sum_0^infty T^n y$, and moreover
$$(1-T)^{-1}y := sum_{n=0}^infty T^n y$$
is a bounded map in $B(X)$. Then just compute (since $Tin B(X)$)
$$ (1-T) x = lim_{Ntoinfty }(1-T) x_N = lim_{Ntoinfty} y - T^{N+1}y = y$$
Its also the case (with a similar proof) that for any $y$ of the form $y=(1-T)x$,
$$(1-T)^{-1} y = x.$$
This proves that $1-T$ is invertible, and uniqueness follows.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • All in all it makes sense but, how do we think of $x$ as $x = (1-T)^{-1}y$ when $Tx$ is $T(x)$ ? Also, shouldn't it be $|T| <1$ or $|T|<1$ so that the geometric series hold ?
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:33












  • @Rebellos Sorry, I don't understand your first question, the fact that $Tx = T(x)$ is purely notation. Can you try to rephrase? The convergence of the series for every $y$ implies this inequality for the operator norm of $T$. (You may find the inequality $|T^n| le |T|^n$ useful)
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:40










  • The expression $Tx = T(x)$ means that $x$ is the argument of the operator $T$. How come you can "solve" for $x$ like it's an ordinary quation (as $Tcdot x$), this is what I am asking.
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:43






  • 1




    @Rebellos Well, you shouldn't be able to without proof. This is that proof.
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:44










  • I get the concept now. Sorry for the questions, but this is the first time during both our course and my self study, that I handle something like this, so it took me some time (and your explanation) to grasp over the though process !
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:47













up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






Formally, $x$ would be given by
$$ x "=" (1-T)^{-1} y$$
where by the formula for a geometric series, we should have
$$ (1-T)^{-1} "=" sum_{n=0}^infty T^n $$The content of the exercise is to prove that this makes sense. If we let $x_N := sum_{n=0}^N T^n y $ then the given assumption implies that $x_N$ converges in $X$ to some $x:=sum_0^infty T^n y$, and moreover
$$(1-T)^{-1}y := sum_{n=0}^infty T^n y$$
is a bounded map in $B(X)$. Then just compute (since $Tin B(X)$)
$$ (1-T) x = lim_{Ntoinfty }(1-T) x_N = lim_{Ntoinfty} y - T^{N+1}y = y$$
Its also the case (with a similar proof) that for any $y$ of the form $y=(1-T)x$,
$$(1-T)^{-1} y = x.$$
This proves that $1-T$ is invertible, and uniqueness follows.






share|cite|improve this answer












Formally, $x$ would be given by
$$ x "=" (1-T)^{-1} y$$
where by the formula for a geometric series, we should have
$$ (1-T)^{-1} "=" sum_{n=0}^infty T^n $$The content of the exercise is to prove that this makes sense. If we let $x_N := sum_{n=0}^N T^n y $ then the given assumption implies that $x_N$ converges in $X$ to some $x:=sum_0^infty T^n y$, and moreover
$$(1-T)^{-1}y := sum_{n=0}^infty T^n y$$
is a bounded map in $B(X)$. Then just compute (since $Tin B(X)$)
$$ (1-T) x = lim_{Ntoinfty }(1-T) x_N = lim_{Ntoinfty} y - T^{N+1}y = y$$
Its also the case (with a similar proof) that for any $y$ of the form $y=(1-T)x$,
$$(1-T)^{-1} y = x.$$
This proves that $1-T$ is invertible, and uniqueness follows.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 17 at 11:29









Calvin Khor

10.9k21437




10.9k21437












  • All in all it makes sense but, how do we think of $x$ as $x = (1-T)^{-1}y$ when $Tx$ is $T(x)$ ? Also, shouldn't it be $|T| <1$ or $|T|<1$ so that the geometric series hold ?
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:33












  • @Rebellos Sorry, I don't understand your first question, the fact that $Tx = T(x)$ is purely notation. Can you try to rephrase? The convergence of the series for every $y$ implies this inequality for the operator norm of $T$. (You may find the inequality $|T^n| le |T|^n$ useful)
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:40










  • The expression $Tx = T(x)$ means that $x$ is the argument of the operator $T$. How come you can "solve" for $x$ like it's an ordinary quation (as $Tcdot x$), this is what I am asking.
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:43






  • 1




    @Rebellos Well, you shouldn't be able to without proof. This is that proof.
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:44










  • I get the concept now. Sorry for the questions, but this is the first time during both our course and my self study, that I handle something like this, so it took me some time (and your explanation) to grasp over the though process !
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:47


















  • All in all it makes sense but, how do we think of $x$ as $x = (1-T)^{-1}y$ when $Tx$ is $T(x)$ ? Also, shouldn't it be $|T| <1$ or $|T|<1$ so that the geometric series hold ?
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:33












  • @Rebellos Sorry, I don't understand your first question, the fact that $Tx = T(x)$ is purely notation. Can you try to rephrase? The convergence of the series for every $y$ implies this inequality for the operator norm of $T$. (You may find the inequality $|T^n| le |T|^n$ useful)
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:40










  • The expression $Tx = T(x)$ means that $x$ is the argument of the operator $T$. How come you can "solve" for $x$ like it's an ordinary quation (as $Tcdot x$), this is what I am asking.
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:43






  • 1




    @Rebellos Well, you shouldn't be able to without proof. This is that proof.
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 17 at 11:44










  • I get the concept now. Sorry for the questions, but this is the first time during both our course and my self study, that I handle something like this, so it took me some time (and your explanation) to grasp over the though process !
    – Rebellos
    Nov 17 at 11:47
















All in all it makes sense but, how do we think of $x$ as $x = (1-T)^{-1}y$ when $Tx$ is $T(x)$ ? Also, shouldn't it be $|T| <1$ or $|T|<1$ so that the geometric series hold ?
– Rebellos
Nov 17 at 11:33






All in all it makes sense but, how do we think of $x$ as $x = (1-T)^{-1}y$ when $Tx$ is $T(x)$ ? Also, shouldn't it be $|T| <1$ or $|T|<1$ so that the geometric series hold ?
– Rebellos
Nov 17 at 11:33














@Rebellos Sorry, I don't understand your first question, the fact that $Tx = T(x)$ is purely notation. Can you try to rephrase? The convergence of the series for every $y$ implies this inequality for the operator norm of $T$. (You may find the inequality $|T^n| le |T|^n$ useful)
– Calvin Khor
Nov 17 at 11:40




@Rebellos Sorry, I don't understand your first question, the fact that $Tx = T(x)$ is purely notation. Can you try to rephrase? The convergence of the series for every $y$ implies this inequality for the operator norm of $T$. (You may find the inequality $|T^n| le |T|^n$ useful)
– Calvin Khor
Nov 17 at 11:40












The expression $Tx = T(x)$ means that $x$ is the argument of the operator $T$. How come you can "solve" for $x$ like it's an ordinary quation (as $Tcdot x$), this is what I am asking.
– Rebellos
Nov 17 at 11:43




The expression $Tx = T(x)$ means that $x$ is the argument of the operator $T$. How come you can "solve" for $x$ like it's an ordinary quation (as $Tcdot x$), this is what I am asking.
– Rebellos
Nov 17 at 11:43




1




1




@Rebellos Well, you shouldn't be able to without proof. This is that proof.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 17 at 11:44




@Rebellos Well, you shouldn't be able to without proof. This is that proof.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 17 at 11:44












I get the concept now. Sorry for the questions, but this is the first time during both our course and my self study, that I handle something like this, so it took me some time (and your explanation) to grasp over the though process !
– Rebellos
Nov 17 at 11:47




I get the concept now. Sorry for the questions, but this is the first time during both our course and my self study, that I handle something like this, so it took me some time (and your explanation) to grasp over the though process !
– Rebellos
Nov 17 at 11:47


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002213%2fshow-that-forall-y-in-x-the-equation-x-y-tx-has-a-unique-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...