A ring without identity: deny the hypothesis












0












$begingroup$


Let $R$ a ring without identity. So, $$(Rquadtext{does not have the identity})Rightarrow (nexists;ein R;text{such that};ea=a;forall ain R)[text{It's correct?}].$$



Now, if I found an element $ein R$ and an element $ain R$ such that $ea=a$, can I conclude that this contradicts the hypothesis according to which $R$ not have identity?






abstract-algebra ring-theory







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For $e$ to be an identity we need $ea = a$ for all $a$, not just one single $a$. So you can‘t conclude what you said.
    $endgroup$
    – Lukas Kofler
    Dec 3 '18 at 14:25
















0












$begingroup$


Let $R$ a ring without identity. So, $$(Rquadtext{does not have the identity})Rightarrow (nexists;ein R;text{such that};ea=a;forall ain R)[text{It's correct?}].$$



Now, if I found an element $ein R$ and an element $ain R$ such that $ea=a$, can I conclude that this contradicts the hypothesis according to which $R$ not have identity?






abstract-algebra ring-theory







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For $e$ to be an identity we need $ea = a$ for all $a$, not just one single $a$. So you can‘t conclude what you said.
    $endgroup$
    – Lukas Kofler
    Dec 3 '18 at 14:25














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $R$ a ring without identity. So, $$(Rquadtext{does not have the identity})Rightarrow (nexists;ein R;text{such that};ea=a;forall ain R)[text{It's correct?}].$$



Now, if I found an element $ein R$ and an element $ain R$ such that $ea=a$, can I conclude that this contradicts the hypothesis according to which $R$ not have identity?






abstract-algebra ring-theory







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $R$ a ring without identity. So, $$(Rquadtext{does not have the identity})Rightarrow (nexists;ein R;text{such that};ea=a;forall ain R)[text{It's correct?}].$$



Now, if I found an element $ein R$ and an element $ain R$ such that $ea=a$, can I conclude that this contradicts the hypothesis according to which $R$ not have identity?






abstract-algebra ring-theory




abstract-algebra ring-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 3 '18 at 14:39









José Carlos Santos

157k22126227




157k22126227










asked Dec 3 '18 at 14:23









Jack J.Jack J.

4292419




4292419












  • $begingroup$
    For $e$ to be an identity we need $ea = a$ for all $a$, not just one single $a$. So you can‘t conclude what you said.
    $endgroup$
    – Lukas Kofler
    Dec 3 '18 at 14:25


















  • $begingroup$
    For $e$ to be an identity we need $ea = a$ for all $a$, not just one single $a$. So you can‘t conclude what you said.
    $endgroup$
    – Lukas Kofler
    Dec 3 '18 at 14:25
















$begingroup$
For $e$ to be an identity we need $ea = a$ for all $a$, not just one single $a$. So you can‘t conclude what you said.
$endgroup$
– Lukas Kofler
Dec 3 '18 at 14:25




$begingroup$
For $e$ to be an identity we need $ea = a$ for all $a$, not just one single $a$. So you can‘t conclude what you said.
$endgroup$
– Lukas Kofler
Dec 3 '18 at 14:25










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

First of all, we write quantifiers before statements they are referring. The notation



$$notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=aforall ain R$$



is invalid, simply because it is unclear. We don't know if it means



$$forall ain R:notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=a$$
or
$$notexists ein R: forall ain R: text{ such that }ea=a.$$



The two statements above are not equivalent, and are in fact very much different. The second statement is much stronger.




Second of all, the negation of the statement "$R$ has an identity" is the negation of the statement



$$exists ein R: forall ain R: ae=e$$



and the negation of this statement is the second of the two statements above.



Your argument that if you find some $e,a$ such that $ea=a$, is not enough to prove that $R$ has no identity, since even in rings without an identity, we can set $a=e=0$ and have $ea=a$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for this. You said what I wanted to, and probably better.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:24



















2












$begingroup$

No, you cannot. In any ring (with or without identity) such elements exist: just take $e=a=0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024114%2fa-ring-without-identity-deny-the-hypothesis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    First of all, we write quantifiers before statements they are referring. The notation



    $$notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=aforall ain R$$



    is invalid, simply because it is unclear. We don't know if it means



    $$forall ain R:notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=a$$
    or
    $$notexists ein R: forall ain R: text{ such that }ea=a.$$



    The two statements above are not equivalent, and are in fact very much different. The second statement is much stronger.




    Second of all, the negation of the statement "$R$ has an identity" is the negation of the statement



    $$exists ein R: forall ain R: ae=e$$



    and the negation of this statement is the second of the two statements above.



    Your argument that if you find some $e,a$ such that $ea=a$, is not enough to prove that $R$ has no identity, since even in rings without an identity, we can set $a=e=0$ and have $ea=a$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for this. You said what I wanted to, and probably better.
      $endgroup$
      – Lubin
      Dec 3 '18 at 21:24
















    2












    $begingroup$

    First of all, we write quantifiers before statements they are referring. The notation



    $$notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=aforall ain R$$



    is invalid, simply because it is unclear. We don't know if it means



    $$forall ain R:notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=a$$
    or
    $$notexists ein R: forall ain R: text{ such that }ea=a.$$



    The two statements above are not equivalent, and are in fact very much different. The second statement is much stronger.




    Second of all, the negation of the statement "$R$ has an identity" is the negation of the statement



    $$exists ein R: forall ain R: ae=e$$



    and the negation of this statement is the second of the two statements above.



    Your argument that if you find some $e,a$ such that $ea=a$, is not enough to prove that $R$ has no identity, since even in rings without an identity, we can set $a=e=0$ and have $ea=a$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for this. You said what I wanted to, and probably better.
      $endgroup$
      – Lubin
      Dec 3 '18 at 21:24














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    First of all, we write quantifiers before statements they are referring. The notation



    $$notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=aforall ain R$$



    is invalid, simply because it is unclear. We don't know if it means



    $$forall ain R:notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=a$$
    or
    $$notexists ein R: forall ain R: text{ such that }ea=a.$$



    The two statements above are not equivalent, and are in fact very much different. The second statement is much stronger.




    Second of all, the negation of the statement "$R$ has an identity" is the negation of the statement



    $$exists ein R: forall ain R: ae=e$$



    and the negation of this statement is the second of the two statements above.



    Your argument that if you find some $e,a$ such that $ea=a$, is not enough to prove that $R$ has no identity, since even in rings without an identity, we can set $a=e=0$ and have $ea=a$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    First of all, we write quantifiers before statements they are referring. The notation



    $$notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=aforall ain R$$



    is invalid, simply because it is unclear. We don't know if it means



    $$forall ain R:notexists ein R text{ such that }ea=a$$
    or
    $$notexists ein R: forall ain R: text{ such that }ea=a.$$



    The two statements above are not equivalent, and are in fact very much different. The second statement is much stronger.




    Second of all, the negation of the statement "$R$ has an identity" is the negation of the statement



    $$exists ein R: forall ain R: ae=e$$



    and the negation of this statement is the second of the two statements above.



    Your argument that if you find some $e,a$ such that $ea=a$, is not enough to prove that $R$ has no identity, since even in rings without an identity, we can set $a=e=0$ and have $ea=a$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 3 '18 at 14:34









    5xum5xum

    90.3k394161




    90.3k394161












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for this. You said what I wanted to, and probably better.
      $endgroup$
      – Lubin
      Dec 3 '18 at 21:24


















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for this. You said what I wanted to, and probably better.
      $endgroup$
      – Lubin
      Dec 3 '18 at 21:24
















    $begingroup$
    Thanks for this. You said what I wanted to, and probably better.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:24




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for this. You said what I wanted to, and probably better.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:24











    2












    $begingroup$

    No, you cannot. In any ring (with or without identity) such elements exist: just take $e=a=0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      No, you cannot. In any ring (with or without identity) such elements exist: just take $e=a=0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        No, you cannot. In any ring (with or without identity) such elements exist: just take $e=a=0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        No, you cannot. In any ring (with or without identity) such elements exist: just take $e=a=0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 3 '18 at 14:25









        José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

        157k22126227




        157k22126227






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024114%2fa-ring-without-identity-deny-the-hypothesis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Image
            Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
            Read more

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Image
            Para otros usos de este término, véase Puebla (desambiguación). Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localidad De arriba a abajo de izquierda a derecha: Estrella de Puebla, Volcán Popocatépetl, Catedral de Puebla, Monumento a Ignacio Zaragoza, Estadio Cuauhtémoc, Angelópolis y Vista panorámica de la ciudad. Escudo Otros nombres: El relicario de América/ La ciudad de los Ángeles/ La Angelópolis Lema: Muy noble y muy leal ciudad de Puebla de los Ángeles Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en México Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en Puebla Mapa interactivo Coordenadas 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Coordenadas: 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Idioma oficial Español Entidad Localidad  • País   México  • Estado Puebla  • Municipio Puebla Presidente municipal Claudia Rivera Vivanc
            Read more

            Musa

            Image
            Para el género de plantas, véase Musa (planta). Apolo y la Nueve Musas En la mitología griega, las musas (en griego antiguo μοῦσαι « mousai» ) son, según los escritores más antiguos, las divinidades inspiradoras de las Artes: cada una de ellas está relacionada con ramas artísticas y del conocimiento. Son hijas de Zeus y de Mnemósine, compañeras del séquito de Apolo, dios olímpico de la música y patrón de las bellas artes, quien tuvo romances con cada una de ellas, dejando descendientes. Bajaban a la tierra a susurrar ideas e inspirar a aquellos mortales que las invocaran. En la época más arcaica eran las ninfas inspiradoras de las fuentes, en las cuales eran adoradas. Finalmente, alrededor de los siglos VIII-VII a. C. [ 1 ] ​ prevaleció en todo el territorio de la Hélade la adoración de las nueve Musas, que son Calíope, Clío, Erato, Euterpe, Melpómene, Polimnia, Talía, Terpsícore y Urania. El culto a las musas era originalmente de Tracia y Beocia, y fueron de vital impo
            Read more