Dedekind cut for 1/x












0














I’m kind of new to this concept and trying to get my head over it.



How do you construct a dedekind cut for $frac{1}{x}$ where $x$ is a positive real number?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    I’m kind of new to this concept and trying to get my head over it.



    How do you construct a dedekind cut for $frac{1}{x}$ where $x$ is a positive real number?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I’m kind of new to this concept and trying to get my head over it.



      How do you construct a dedekind cut for $frac{1}{x}$ where $x$ is a positive real number?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I’m kind of new to this concept and trying to get my head over it.



      How do you construct a dedekind cut for $frac{1}{x}$ where $x$ is a positive real number?







      elementary-number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 27 '18 at 21:54









      sdkvsdkv

      31




      31






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          $newcommand{Q}{mathbb{Q}}$ A Dedekind cut is a partition of $Q$ satisfying certain additional nice properties. So, one way you could do this (somewhat trivially) is by taking $A = {a in Q mid a < frac{1}{x} }$ and $B = {b in Q mid b geq frac{1}{x} }$. Of course, this relies on the assumption that you already have $x$ defined.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Okay, I think I get this! But what if I have a DC for x (something like $S= { r in mathbb{Q} |r<x }$, I guess?) and then try to construct a DC using $S$? I thought of something like $S'= { r in mathbb{Q} |rle 0$ or $frac{1}{r}<frac{1}{x}}$ but I'm not sure whether it works
            – sdkv
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:00










          • Sure, if you wanted to use $S$, I think $S' = { r in mathbb{Q} mid r leq 0 text{ or } forall s in S, s > 0 implies r < frac{1}{s}}$ should work.
            – platty
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:08













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016351%2fdedekind-cut-for-1-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          $newcommand{Q}{mathbb{Q}}$ A Dedekind cut is a partition of $Q$ satisfying certain additional nice properties. So, one way you could do this (somewhat trivially) is by taking $A = {a in Q mid a < frac{1}{x} }$ and $B = {b in Q mid b geq frac{1}{x} }$. Of course, this relies on the assumption that you already have $x$ defined.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Okay, I think I get this! But what if I have a DC for x (something like $S= { r in mathbb{Q} |r<x }$, I guess?) and then try to construct a DC using $S$? I thought of something like $S'= { r in mathbb{Q} |rle 0$ or $frac{1}{r}<frac{1}{x}}$ but I'm not sure whether it works
            – sdkv
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:00










          • Sure, if you wanted to use $S$, I think $S' = { r in mathbb{Q} mid r leq 0 text{ or } forall s in S, s > 0 implies r < frac{1}{s}}$ should work.
            – platty
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:08


















          0














          $newcommand{Q}{mathbb{Q}}$ A Dedekind cut is a partition of $Q$ satisfying certain additional nice properties. So, one way you could do this (somewhat trivially) is by taking $A = {a in Q mid a < frac{1}{x} }$ and $B = {b in Q mid b geq frac{1}{x} }$. Of course, this relies on the assumption that you already have $x$ defined.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Okay, I think I get this! But what if I have a DC for x (something like $S= { r in mathbb{Q} |r<x }$, I guess?) and then try to construct a DC using $S$? I thought of something like $S'= { r in mathbb{Q} |rle 0$ or $frac{1}{r}<frac{1}{x}}$ but I'm not sure whether it works
            – sdkv
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:00










          • Sure, if you wanted to use $S$, I think $S' = { r in mathbb{Q} mid r leq 0 text{ or } forall s in S, s > 0 implies r < frac{1}{s}}$ should work.
            – platty
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:08
















          0












          0








          0






          $newcommand{Q}{mathbb{Q}}$ A Dedekind cut is a partition of $Q$ satisfying certain additional nice properties. So, one way you could do this (somewhat trivially) is by taking $A = {a in Q mid a < frac{1}{x} }$ and $B = {b in Q mid b geq frac{1}{x} }$. Of course, this relies on the assumption that you already have $x$ defined.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          $newcommand{Q}{mathbb{Q}}$ A Dedekind cut is a partition of $Q$ satisfying certain additional nice properties. So, one way you could do this (somewhat trivially) is by taking $A = {a in Q mid a < frac{1}{x} }$ and $B = {b in Q mid b geq frac{1}{x} }$. Of course, this relies on the assumption that you already have $x$ defined.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:09









          plattyplatty

          3,370320




          3,370320












          • Okay, I think I get this! But what if I have a DC for x (something like $S= { r in mathbb{Q} |r<x }$, I guess?) and then try to construct a DC using $S$? I thought of something like $S'= { r in mathbb{Q} |rle 0$ or $frac{1}{r}<frac{1}{x}}$ but I'm not sure whether it works
            – sdkv
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:00










          • Sure, if you wanted to use $S$, I think $S' = { r in mathbb{Q} mid r leq 0 text{ or } forall s in S, s > 0 implies r < frac{1}{s}}$ should work.
            – platty
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:08




















          • Okay, I think I get this! But what if I have a DC for x (something like $S= { r in mathbb{Q} |r<x }$, I guess?) and then try to construct a DC using $S$? I thought of something like $S'= { r in mathbb{Q} |rle 0$ or $frac{1}{r}<frac{1}{x}}$ but I'm not sure whether it works
            – sdkv
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:00










          • Sure, if you wanted to use $S$, I think $S' = { r in mathbb{Q} mid r leq 0 text{ or } forall s in S, s > 0 implies r < frac{1}{s}}$ should work.
            – platty
            Nov 28 '18 at 7:08


















          Okay, I think I get this! But what if I have a DC for x (something like $S= { r in mathbb{Q} |r<x }$, I guess?) and then try to construct a DC using $S$? I thought of something like $S'= { r in mathbb{Q} |rle 0$ or $frac{1}{r}<frac{1}{x}}$ but I'm not sure whether it works
          – sdkv
          Nov 28 '18 at 7:00




          Okay, I think I get this! But what if I have a DC for x (something like $S= { r in mathbb{Q} |r<x }$, I guess?) and then try to construct a DC using $S$? I thought of something like $S'= { r in mathbb{Q} |rle 0$ or $frac{1}{r}<frac{1}{x}}$ but I'm not sure whether it works
          – sdkv
          Nov 28 '18 at 7:00












          Sure, if you wanted to use $S$, I think $S' = { r in mathbb{Q} mid r leq 0 text{ or } forall s in S, s > 0 implies r < frac{1}{s}}$ should work.
          – platty
          Nov 28 '18 at 7:08






          Sure, if you wanted to use $S$, I think $S' = { r in mathbb{Q} mid r leq 0 text{ or } forall s in S, s > 0 implies r < frac{1}{s}}$ should work.
          – platty
          Nov 28 '18 at 7:08




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016351%2fdedekind-cut-for-1-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa