Show that $x^{3}-3$ irreducible over $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$












9














Is there a slick way to show that $x^{3}-3$ is irreducible over $F= mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$? What I did seems kind of convoluted (showing directly that there is no root in F).



Thanks










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Leaving this as a comment because I'm not 100% sure whether this is the right way... I guess you could start by saying that, if $x^3-3$ were reducible, it would be expressed as $(x+A)(x^2+Bx+C)$, where $A$ is a rational number. Then that would mean that there exists a fraction $frac{p}{q}$ with $p$ and $q$ being coprime such that $frac{p^3}{q^3}-3 = 0$. Then that would mean that $p^3 = 3q^3$, which would mean that $p$ is divisible by 3. Let $p = 3r$, and we get $9r^3 = q^3$, which again means that $q$ is divisible by 3. Contradiction.
    – 2012ssohn
    May 29 '15 at 2:45








  • 1




    @2012ssohn How do you know $A$ is a rational number?
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:47








  • 1




    this answer would land you a downvote....since its "cumbersome"....and not giving a good insight into the problem.
    – DeepSea
    May 29 '15 at 2:47






  • 1




    Sorry guys, it appears that I have a clear misunderstanding in this field... what exactly does $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ mean?
    – 2012ssohn
    May 29 '15 at 2:51






  • 1




    @2012ssohn It all things of the form $a+bsqrt{-3}$ where $a,binBbb Q$.
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:53


















9














Is there a slick way to show that $x^{3}-3$ is irreducible over $F= mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$? What I did seems kind of convoluted (showing directly that there is no root in F).



Thanks










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Leaving this as a comment because I'm not 100% sure whether this is the right way... I guess you could start by saying that, if $x^3-3$ were reducible, it would be expressed as $(x+A)(x^2+Bx+C)$, where $A$ is a rational number. Then that would mean that there exists a fraction $frac{p}{q}$ with $p$ and $q$ being coprime such that $frac{p^3}{q^3}-3 = 0$. Then that would mean that $p^3 = 3q^3$, which would mean that $p$ is divisible by 3. Let $p = 3r$, and we get $9r^3 = q^3$, which again means that $q$ is divisible by 3. Contradiction.
    – 2012ssohn
    May 29 '15 at 2:45








  • 1




    @2012ssohn How do you know $A$ is a rational number?
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:47








  • 1




    this answer would land you a downvote....since its "cumbersome"....and not giving a good insight into the problem.
    – DeepSea
    May 29 '15 at 2:47






  • 1




    Sorry guys, it appears that I have a clear misunderstanding in this field... what exactly does $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ mean?
    – 2012ssohn
    May 29 '15 at 2:51






  • 1




    @2012ssohn It all things of the form $a+bsqrt{-3}$ where $a,binBbb Q$.
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:53
















9












9








9


3





Is there a slick way to show that $x^{3}-3$ is irreducible over $F= mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$? What I did seems kind of convoluted (showing directly that there is no root in F).



Thanks










share|cite|improve this question















Is there a slick way to show that $x^{3}-3$ is irreducible over $F= mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$? What I did seems kind of convoluted (showing directly that there is no root in F).



Thanks







abstract-algebra irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 3 '15 at 16:41









Martin Sleziak

44.6k8115271




44.6k8115271










asked May 29 '15 at 2:40









TuoTuoTuoTuo

1,748516




1,748516












  • Leaving this as a comment because I'm not 100% sure whether this is the right way... I guess you could start by saying that, if $x^3-3$ were reducible, it would be expressed as $(x+A)(x^2+Bx+C)$, where $A$ is a rational number. Then that would mean that there exists a fraction $frac{p}{q}$ with $p$ and $q$ being coprime such that $frac{p^3}{q^3}-3 = 0$. Then that would mean that $p^3 = 3q^3$, which would mean that $p$ is divisible by 3. Let $p = 3r$, and we get $9r^3 = q^3$, which again means that $q$ is divisible by 3. Contradiction.
    – 2012ssohn
    May 29 '15 at 2:45








  • 1




    @2012ssohn How do you know $A$ is a rational number?
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:47








  • 1




    this answer would land you a downvote....since its "cumbersome"....and not giving a good insight into the problem.
    – DeepSea
    May 29 '15 at 2:47






  • 1




    Sorry guys, it appears that I have a clear misunderstanding in this field... what exactly does $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ mean?
    – 2012ssohn
    May 29 '15 at 2:51






  • 1




    @2012ssohn It all things of the form $a+bsqrt{-3}$ where $a,binBbb Q$.
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:53




















  • Leaving this as a comment because I'm not 100% sure whether this is the right way... I guess you could start by saying that, if $x^3-3$ were reducible, it would be expressed as $(x+A)(x^2+Bx+C)$, where $A$ is a rational number. Then that would mean that there exists a fraction $frac{p}{q}$ with $p$ and $q$ being coprime such that $frac{p^3}{q^3}-3 = 0$. Then that would mean that $p^3 = 3q^3$, which would mean that $p$ is divisible by 3. Let $p = 3r$, and we get $9r^3 = q^3$, which again means that $q$ is divisible by 3. Contradiction.
    – 2012ssohn
    May 29 '15 at 2:45








  • 1




    @2012ssohn How do you know $A$ is a rational number?
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:47








  • 1




    this answer would land you a downvote....since its "cumbersome"....and not giving a good insight into the problem.
    – DeepSea
    May 29 '15 at 2:47






  • 1




    Sorry guys, it appears that I have a clear misunderstanding in this field... what exactly does $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ mean?
    – 2012ssohn
    May 29 '15 at 2:51






  • 1




    @2012ssohn It all things of the form $a+bsqrt{-3}$ where $a,binBbb Q$.
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:53


















Leaving this as a comment because I'm not 100% sure whether this is the right way... I guess you could start by saying that, if $x^3-3$ were reducible, it would be expressed as $(x+A)(x^2+Bx+C)$, where $A$ is a rational number. Then that would mean that there exists a fraction $frac{p}{q}$ with $p$ and $q$ being coprime such that $frac{p^3}{q^3}-3 = 0$. Then that would mean that $p^3 = 3q^3$, which would mean that $p$ is divisible by 3. Let $p = 3r$, and we get $9r^3 = q^3$, which again means that $q$ is divisible by 3. Contradiction.
– 2012ssohn
May 29 '15 at 2:45






Leaving this as a comment because I'm not 100% sure whether this is the right way... I guess you could start by saying that, if $x^3-3$ were reducible, it would be expressed as $(x+A)(x^2+Bx+C)$, where $A$ is a rational number. Then that would mean that there exists a fraction $frac{p}{q}$ with $p$ and $q$ being coprime such that $frac{p^3}{q^3}-3 = 0$. Then that would mean that $p^3 = 3q^3$, which would mean that $p$ is divisible by 3. Let $p = 3r$, and we get $9r^3 = q^3$, which again means that $q$ is divisible by 3. Contradiction.
– 2012ssohn
May 29 '15 at 2:45






1




1




@2012ssohn How do you know $A$ is a rational number?
– Gregory Grant
May 29 '15 at 2:47






@2012ssohn How do you know $A$ is a rational number?
– Gregory Grant
May 29 '15 at 2:47






1




1




this answer would land you a downvote....since its "cumbersome"....and not giving a good insight into the problem.
– DeepSea
May 29 '15 at 2:47




this answer would land you a downvote....since its "cumbersome"....and not giving a good insight into the problem.
– DeepSea
May 29 '15 at 2:47




1




1




Sorry guys, it appears that I have a clear misunderstanding in this field... what exactly does $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ mean?
– 2012ssohn
May 29 '15 at 2:51




Sorry guys, it appears that I have a clear misunderstanding in this field... what exactly does $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ mean?
– 2012ssohn
May 29 '15 at 2:51




1




1




@2012ssohn It all things of the form $a+bsqrt{-3}$ where $a,binBbb Q$.
– Gregory Grant
May 29 '15 at 2:53






@2012ssohn It all things of the form $a+bsqrt{-3}$ where $a,binBbb Q$.
– Gregory Grant
May 29 '15 at 2:53












6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















12














There's a number of ways of attacking this problem. Here's but one way of going about this that requires a little less calculation:



Since $deg(f) leq 3$, we know $f(x) = x^3 - 3$ is reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}) iff$ a root of $f$ is contained in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



Let $alpha$ be a root of $f$. If $alpha in mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, then we must have $mathbb{Q}(alpha) subset mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



Given that multiplicativity of degrees gives $Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q} Big] = Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q}(alpha) Big] cdot Big[ mathbb{Q}(alpha): mathbb{Q} Big]$, think about the degrees of these extensions over $mathbb{Q}$ to arrive at a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    ...Why was I downvoted?
    – Kaj Hansen
    May 29 '15 at 2:45






  • 1




    your answer seems to be pretty much the same as mine, so not sure why somebody down-voted it.
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:45






  • 2




    There are some trigger happy downvoters, happens to me too all the time. I think if somebody is going to downvote you they should at least give a reason.
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:46






  • 2




    I usually make a few typos that I catch and edit out over the first few minutes after I post. Perhaps someone viewed one of them as particularly egregious.
    – Kaj Hansen
    May 29 '15 at 2:47








  • 1




    I gave you an up-vote
    – Gregory Grant
    May 29 '15 at 2:50



















10














Suppose it was reducible. Then it would have a root in $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$. But it is irreducible over $Bbb Q$, so that would mean $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ would contain an element of degree three over $Bbb Q$. But it is an extension of degree two so that is impossible.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    4














    There are so many ways of proving this!



    Consider $f(X)=X^3-3$,over $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3},)$. Now, $f$ is irreducible if and only if $f(sqrt{-3}X)=g(X)=-3sqrt{-3}X^3-3$ is irreducible, if and only if $-g(X)/3=sqrt{-3}X^3+1$ is irreducible, if and only if the reverse of the last, namely $X^3+sqrt{-3}$, is irreducible, and it is so by Eisenstein.






    share|cite|improve this answer





























      4














      One way may be to using the counting theorem?



      The degree of $sqrt{-3}$ over $mathbb{Q}$ is 2.



      Since $x^3-3$ is of degree 3, if it was reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, it would have a root $alpha$ in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



      But by Eisenstein we also know that $x^3-3$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$. So assume for contradiction that it was reducible over $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, and that $alpha$ existed. Then we would have:



      $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}]=2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)][mathbb{Q}(a):mathbb{Q}]=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] cdot 3$.



      But $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]$ must be an integer, so we have our contradiction from $2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]cdot3$.



      In order to use this we also must have that $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $Q(alpha)$. But since $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}$, we have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ is a basis for $Q(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}$. If $sqrt{-3}$ should happen to be in $Q(alpha)$ they must be the same, if not, we then have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ over $Q(alpha)$ span $Q(sqrt{-3})$, but we also must have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ must be linearly independent when having coefficients in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$, if not $g_1+q_2sqrt{-3}=0$, where not both coefficients in $Q(alpha)$ is zero. But then it is easy to see that $sqrt{-3}$ must be in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.



      This last fact that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$ actually also follows from the fact that every simple extension when considering an element algebraic over another field is a finite extension, and $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] $ is the degree of $(mathbb{Q}(alpha))(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$. And we know that since $sqrt{-3}$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$, it must also be algebraic over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer































        2














        Hint: The norm squared any root of $X^3 - 3$ is $3^{2/3}$, irrational, while the norm squared of every element in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is rational, so $X^3 - 3$ has no root in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.






        share|cite|improve this answer





























          2














          Hint: $f$ in $K[x]$ irreducible of degree $m$, $K subset L$ of degree $n$, $(m,n)=1$, implies $f$ stays irreducible in $L[x]$.



          $bf{Added:}$



          Let $alpha$ a root of $f$. We have
          $$[L(alpha) colon K]= [L(alpha) colon L]cdot [Lcolon K] le m cdot n$$



          But $[L(alpha) colon K]$ is divisible by both $[K(alpha) colon K]=m$ and $[Lcolon K]=n$ and so by $mcdot n$. Therefore, we must have equality, $[L(alpha) colon L] = m$, and thus $f$ is irreducible in $L[x]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1303417%2fshow-that-x3-3-irreducible-over-mathbbq-sqrt-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes








            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            12














            There's a number of ways of attacking this problem. Here's but one way of going about this that requires a little less calculation:



            Since $deg(f) leq 3$, we know $f(x) = x^3 - 3$ is reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}) iff$ a root of $f$ is contained in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



            Let $alpha$ be a root of $f$. If $alpha in mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, then we must have $mathbb{Q}(alpha) subset mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



            Given that multiplicativity of degrees gives $Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q} Big] = Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q}(alpha) Big] cdot Big[ mathbb{Q}(alpha): mathbb{Q} Big]$, think about the degrees of these extensions over $mathbb{Q}$ to arrive at a contradiction.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              ...Why was I downvoted?
              – Kaj Hansen
              May 29 '15 at 2:45






            • 1




              your answer seems to be pretty much the same as mine, so not sure why somebody down-voted it.
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:45






            • 2




              There are some trigger happy downvoters, happens to me too all the time. I think if somebody is going to downvote you they should at least give a reason.
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:46






            • 2




              I usually make a few typos that I catch and edit out over the first few minutes after I post. Perhaps someone viewed one of them as particularly egregious.
              – Kaj Hansen
              May 29 '15 at 2:47








            • 1




              I gave you an up-vote
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:50
















            12














            There's a number of ways of attacking this problem. Here's but one way of going about this that requires a little less calculation:



            Since $deg(f) leq 3$, we know $f(x) = x^3 - 3$ is reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}) iff$ a root of $f$ is contained in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



            Let $alpha$ be a root of $f$. If $alpha in mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, then we must have $mathbb{Q}(alpha) subset mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



            Given that multiplicativity of degrees gives $Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q} Big] = Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q}(alpha) Big] cdot Big[ mathbb{Q}(alpha): mathbb{Q} Big]$, think about the degrees of these extensions over $mathbb{Q}$ to arrive at a contradiction.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              ...Why was I downvoted?
              – Kaj Hansen
              May 29 '15 at 2:45






            • 1




              your answer seems to be pretty much the same as mine, so not sure why somebody down-voted it.
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:45






            • 2




              There are some trigger happy downvoters, happens to me too all the time. I think if somebody is going to downvote you they should at least give a reason.
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:46






            • 2




              I usually make a few typos that I catch and edit out over the first few minutes after I post. Perhaps someone viewed one of them as particularly egregious.
              – Kaj Hansen
              May 29 '15 at 2:47








            • 1




              I gave you an up-vote
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:50














            12












            12








            12






            There's a number of ways of attacking this problem. Here's but one way of going about this that requires a little less calculation:



            Since $deg(f) leq 3$, we know $f(x) = x^3 - 3$ is reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}) iff$ a root of $f$ is contained in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



            Let $alpha$ be a root of $f$. If $alpha in mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, then we must have $mathbb{Q}(alpha) subset mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



            Given that multiplicativity of degrees gives $Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q} Big] = Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q}(alpha) Big] cdot Big[ mathbb{Q}(alpha): mathbb{Q} Big]$, think about the degrees of these extensions over $mathbb{Q}$ to arrive at a contradiction.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            There's a number of ways of attacking this problem. Here's but one way of going about this that requires a little less calculation:



            Since $deg(f) leq 3$, we know $f(x) = x^3 - 3$ is reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}) iff$ a root of $f$ is contained in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



            Let $alpha$ be a root of $f$. If $alpha in mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, then we must have $mathbb{Q}(alpha) subset mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



            Given that multiplicativity of degrees gives $Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q} Big] = Big[ mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}): mathbb{Q}(alpha) Big] cdot Big[ mathbb{Q}(alpha): mathbb{Q} Big]$, think about the degrees of these extensions over $mathbb{Q}$ to arrive at a contradiction.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 8 '16 at 9:53

























            answered May 29 '15 at 2:43









            Kaj HansenKaj Hansen

            27.2k43779




            27.2k43779








            • 1




              ...Why was I downvoted?
              – Kaj Hansen
              May 29 '15 at 2:45






            • 1




              your answer seems to be pretty much the same as mine, so not sure why somebody down-voted it.
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:45






            • 2




              There are some trigger happy downvoters, happens to me too all the time. I think if somebody is going to downvote you they should at least give a reason.
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:46






            • 2




              I usually make a few typos that I catch and edit out over the first few minutes after I post. Perhaps someone viewed one of them as particularly egregious.
              – Kaj Hansen
              May 29 '15 at 2:47








            • 1




              I gave you an up-vote
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:50














            • 1




              ...Why was I downvoted?
              – Kaj Hansen
              May 29 '15 at 2:45






            • 1




              your answer seems to be pretty much the same as mine, so not sure why somebody down-voted it.
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:45






            • 2




              There are some trigger happy downvoters, happens to me too all the time. I think if somebody is going to downvote you they should at least give a reason.
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:46






            • 2




              I usually make a few typos that I catch and edit out over the first few minutes after I post. Perhaps someone viewed one of them as particularly egregious.
              – Kaj Hansen
              May 29 '15 at 2:47








            • 1




              I gave you an up-vote
              – Gregory Grant
              May 29 '15 at 2:50








            1




            1




            ...Why was I downvoted?
            – Kaj Hansen
            May 29 '15 at 2:45




            ...Why was I downvoted?
            – Kaj Hansen
            May 29 '15 at 2:45




            1




            1




            your answer seems to be pretty much the same as mine, so not sure why somebody down-voted it.
            – Gregory Grant
            May 29 '15 at 2:45




            your answer seems to be pretty much the same as mine, so not sure why somebody down-voted it.
            – Gregory Grant
            May 29 '15 at 2:45




            2




            2




            There are some trigger happy downvoters, happens to me too all the time. I think if somebody is going to downvote you they should at least give a reason.
            – Gregory Grant
            May 29 '15 at 2:46




            There are some trigger happy downvoters, happens to me too all the time. I think if somebody is going to downvote you they should at least give a reason.
            – Gregory Grant
            May 29 '15 at 2:46




            2




            2




            I usually make a few typos that I catch and edit out over the first few minutes after I post. Perhaps someone viewed one of them as particularly egregious.
            – Kaj Hansen
            May 29 '15 at 2:47






            I usually make a few typos that I catch and edit out over the first few minutes after I post. Perhaps someone viewed one of them as particularly egregious.
            – Kaj Hansen
            May 29 '15 at 2:47






            1




            1




            I gave you an up-vote
            – Gregory Grant
            May 29 '15 at 2:50




            I gave you an up-vote
            – Gregory Grant
            May 29 '15 at 2:50











            10














            Suppose it was reducible. Then it would have a root in $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$. But it is irreducible over $Bbb Q$, so that would mean $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ would contain an element of degree three over $Bbb Q$. But it is an extension of degree two so that is impossible.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              10














              Suppose it was reducible. Then it would have a root in $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$. But it is irreducible over $Bbb Q$, so that would mean $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ would contain an element of degree three over $Bbb Q$. But it is an extension of degree two so that is impossible.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                10












                10








                10






                Suppose it was reducible. Then it would have a root in $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$. But it is irreducible over $Bbb Q$, so that would mean $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ would contain an element of degree three over $Bbb Q$. But it is an extension of degree two so that is impossible.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Suppose it was reducible. Then it would have a root in $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$. But it is irreducible over $Bbb Q$, so that would mean $mathbb Q(sqrt{-3})$ would contain an element of degree three over $Bbb Q$. But it is an extension of degree two so that is impossible.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered May 29 '15 at 2:42









                Gregory GrantGregory Grant

                12.3k42449




                12.3k42449























                    4














                    There are so many ways of proving this!



                    Consider $f(X)=X^3-3$,over $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3},)$. Now, $f$ is irreducible if and only if $f(sqrt{-3}X)=g(X)=-3sqrt{-3}X^3-3$ is irreducible, if and only if $-g(X)/3=sqrt{-3}X^3+1$ is irreducible, if and only if the reverse of the last, namely $X^3+sqrt{-3}$, is irreducible, and it is so by Eisenstein.






                    share|cite|improve this answer


























                      4














                      There are so many ways of proving this!



                      Consider $f(X)=X^3-3$,over $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3},)$. Now, $f$ is irreducible if and only if $f(sqrt{-3}X)=g(X)=-3sqrt{-3}X^3-3$ is irreducible, if and only if $-g(X)/3=sqrt{-3}X^3+1$ is irreducible, if and only if the reverse of the last, namely $X^3+sqrt{-3}$, is irreducible, and it is so by Eisenstein.






                      share|cite|improve this answer
























                        4












                        4








                        4






                        There are so many ways of proving this!



                        Consider $f(X)=X^3-3$,over $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3},)$. Now, $f$ is irreducible if and only if $f(sqrt{-3}X)=g(X)=-3sqrt{-3}X^3-3$ is irreducible, if and only if $-g(X)/3=sqrt{-3}X^3+1$ is irreducible, if and only if the reverse of the last, namely $X^3+sqrt{-3}$, is irreducible, and it is so by Eisenstein.






                        share|cite|improve this answer












                        There are so many ways of proving this!



                        Consider $f(X)=X^3-3$,over $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3},)$. Now, $f$ is irreducible if and only if $f(sqrt{-3}X)=g(X)=-3sqrt{-3}X^3-3$ is irreducible, if and only if $-g(X)/3=sqrt{-3}X^3+1$ is irreducible, if and only if the reverse of the last, namely $X^3+sqrt{-3}$, is irreducible, and it is so by Eisenstein.







                        share|cite|improve this answer












                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        answered May 29 '15 at 4:17









                        LubinLubin

                        43.8k44585




                        43.8k44585























                            4














                            One way may be to using the counting theorem?



                            The degree of $sqrt{-3}$ over $mathbb{Q}$ is 2.



                            Since $x^3-3$ is of degree 3, if it was reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, it would have a root $alpha$ in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



                            But by Eisenstein we also know that $x^3-3$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$. So assume for contradiction that it was reducible over $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, and that $alpha$ existed. Then we would have:



                            $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}]=2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)][mathbb{Q}(a):mathbb{Q}]=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] cdot 3$.



                            But $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]$ must be an integer, so we have our contradiction from $2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]cdot3$.



                            In order to use this we also must have that $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $Q(alpha)$. But since $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}$, we have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ is a basis for $Q(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}$. If $sqrt{-3}$ should happen to be in $Q(alpha)$ they must be the same, if not, we then have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ over $Q(alpha)$ span $Q(sqrt{-3})$, but we also must have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ must be linearly independent when having coefficients in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$, if not $g_1+q_2sqrt{-3}=0$, where not both coefficients in $Q(alpha)$ is zero. But then it is easy to see that $sqrt{-3}$ must be in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.



                            This last fact that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$ actually also follows from the fact that every simple extension when considering an element algebraic over another field is a finite extension, and $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] $ is the degree of $(mathbb{Q}(alpha))(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$. And we know that since $sqrt{-3}$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$, it must also be algebraic over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer




























                              4














                              One way may be to using the counting theorem?



                              The degree of $sqrt{-3}$ over $mathbb{Q}$ is 2.



                              Since $x^3-3$ is of degree 3, if it was reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, it would have a root $alpha$ in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



                              But by Eisenstein we also know that $x^3-3$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$. So assume for contradiction that it was reducible over $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, and that $alpha$ existed. Then we would have:



                              $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}]=2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)][mathbb{Q}(a):mathbb{Q}]=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] cdot 3$.



                              But $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]$ must be an integer, so we have our contradiction from $2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]cdot3$.



                              In order to use this we also must have that $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $Q(alpha)$. But since $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}$, we have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ is a basis for $Q(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}$. If $sqrt{-3}$ should happen to be in $Q(alpha)$ they must be the same, if not, we then have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ over $Q(alpha)$ span $Q(sqrt{-3})$, but we also must have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ must be linearly independent when having coefficients in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$, if not $g_1+q_2sqrt{-3}=0$, where not both coefficients in $Q(alpha)$ is zero. But then it is easy to see that $sqrt{-3}$ must be in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.



                              This last fact that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$ actually also follows from the fact that every simple extension when considering an element algebraic over another field is a finite extension, and $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] $ is the degree of $(mathbb{Q}(alpha))(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$. And we know that since $sqrt{-3}$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$, it must also be algebraic over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer


























                                4












                                4








                                4






                                One way may be to using the counting theorem?



                                The degree of $sqrt{-3}$ over $mathbb{Q}$ is 2.



                                Since $x^3-3$ is of degree 3, if it was reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, it would have a root $alpha$ in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



                                But by Eisenstein we also know that $x^3-3$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$. So assume for contradiction that it was reducible over $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, and that $alpha$ existed. Then we would have:



                                $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}]=2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)][mathbb{Q}(a):mathbb{Q}]=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] cdot 3$.



                                But $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]$ must be an integer, so we have our contradiction from $2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]cdot3$.



                                In order to use this we also must have that $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $Q(alpha)$. But since $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}$, we have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ is a basis for $Q(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}$. If $sqrt{-3}$ should happen to be in $Q(alpha)$ they must be the same, if not, we then have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ over $Q(alpha)$ span $Q(sqrt{-3})$, but we also must have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ must be linearly independent when having coefficients in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$, if not $g_1+q_2sqrt{-3}=0$, where not both coefficients in $Q(alpha)$ is zero. But then it is easy to see that $sqrt{-3}$ must be in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.



                                This last fact that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$ actually also follows from the fact that every simple extension when considering an element algebraic over another field is a finite extension, and $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] $ is the degree of $(mathbb{Q}(alpha))(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$. And we know that since $sqrt{-3}$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$, it must also be algebraic over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.






                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                One way may be to using the counting theorem?



                                The degree of $sqrt{-3}$ over $mathbb{Q}$ is 2.



                                Since $x^3-3$ is of degree 3, if it was reducible in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, it would have a root $alpha$ in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.



                                But by Eisenstein we also know that $x^3-3$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$. So assume for contradiction that it was reducible over $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$, and that $alpha$ existed. Then we would have:



                                $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}]=2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)][mathbb{Q}(a):mathbb{Q}]=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] cdot 3$.



                                But $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]$ must be an integer, so we have our contradiction from $2=[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)]cdot3$.



                                In order to use this we also must have that $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $Q(alpha)$. But since $Q(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}$, we have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ is a basis for $Q(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}$. If $sqrt{-3}$ should happen to be in $Q(alpha)$ they must be the same, if not, we then have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ over $Q(alpha)$ span $Q(sqrt{-3})$, but we also must have that $1, sqrt{-3}$ must be linearly independent when having coefficients in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$, if not $g_1+q_2sqrt{-3}=0$, where not both coefficients in $Q(alpha)$ is zero. But then it is easy to see that $sqrt{-3}$ must be in $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.



                                This last fact that $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is a finite extension of $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$ actually also follows from the fact that every simple extension when considering an element algebraic over another field is a finite extension, and $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3}):mathbb{Q}(alpha)] $ is the degree of $(mathbb{Q}(alpha))(sqrt{-3})$ over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$. And we know that since $sqrt{-3}$ is algebraic over $mathbb{Q}$, it must also be algebraic over $mathbb{Q}(alpha)$.







                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                edited Nov 27 '18 at 20:27









                                rae306

                                5,51831134




                                5,51831134










                                answered May 29 '15 at 3:03









                                user119615user119615

                                3,86531745




                                3,86531745























                                    2














                                    Hint: The norm squared any root of $X^3 - 3$ is $3^{2/3}$, irrational, while the norm squared of every element in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is rational, so $X^3 - 3$ has no root in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer


























                                      2














                                      Hint: The norm squared any root of $X^3 - 3$ is $3^{2/3}$, irrational, while the norm squared of every element in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is rational, so $X^3 - 3$ has no root in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer
























                                        2












                                        2








                                        2






                                        Hint: The norm squared any root of $X^3 - 3$ is $3^{2/3}$, irrational, while the norm squared of every element in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is rational, so $X^3 - 3$ has no root in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer












                                        Hint: The norm squared any root of $X^3 - 3$ is $3^{2/3}$, irrational, while the norm squared of every element in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$ is rational, so $X^3 - 3$ has no root in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{-3})$.







                                        share|cite|improve this answer












                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer










                                        answered May 29 '15 at 4:47









                                        Orest BucicovschiOrest Bucicovschi

                                        28.4k31746




                                        28.4k31746























                                            2














                                            Hint: $f$ in $K[x]$ irreducible of degree $m$, $K subset L$ of degree $n$, $(m,n)=1$, implies $f$ stays irreducible in $L[x]$.



                                            $bf{Added:}$



                                            Let $alpha$ a root of $f$. We have
                                            $$[L(alpha) colon K]= [L(alpha) colon L]cdot [Lcolon K] le m cdot n$$



                                            But $[L(alpha) colon K]$ is divisible by both $[K(alpha) colon K]=m$ and $[Lcolon K]=n$ and so by $mcdot n$. Therefore, we must have equality, $[L(alpha) colon L] = m$, and thus $f$ is irreducible in $L[x]$.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer




























                                              2














                                              Hint: $f$ in $K[x]$ irreducible of degree $m$, $K subset L$ of degree $n$, $(m,n)=1$, implies $f$ stays irreducible in $L[x]$.



                                              $bf{Added:}$



                                              Let $alpha$ a root of $f$. We have
                                              $$[L(alpha) colon K]= [L(alpha) colon L]cdot [Lcolon K] le m cdot n$$



                                              But $[L(alpha) colon K]$ is divisible by both $[K(alpha) colon K]=m$ and $[Lcolon K]=n$ and so by $mcdot n$. Therefore, we must have equality, $[L(alpha) colon L] = m$, and thus $f$ is irreducible in $L[x]$.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer


























                                                2












                                                2








                                                2






                                                Hint: $f$ in $K[x]$ irreducible of degree $m$, $K subset L$ of degree $n$, $(m,n)=1$, implies $f$ stays irreducible in $L[x]$.



                                                $bf{Added:}$



                                                Let $alpha$ a root of $f$. We have
                                                $$[L(alpha) colon K]= [L(alpha) colon L]cdot [Lcolon K] le m cdot n$$



                                                But $[L(alpha) colon K]$ is divisible by both $[K(alpha) colon K]=m$ and $[Lcolon K]=n$ and so by $mcdot n$. Therefore, we must have equality, $[L(alpha) colon L] = m$, and thus $f$ is irreducible in $L[x]$.






                                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                                Hint: $f$ in $K[x]$ irreducible of degree $m$, $K subset L$ of degree $n$, $(m,n)=1$, implies $f$ stays irreducible in $L[x]$.



                                                $bf{Added:}$



                                                Let $alpha$ a root of $f$. We have
                                                $$[L(alpha) colon K]= [L(alpha) colon L]cdot [Lcolon K] le m cdot n$$



                                                But $[L(alpha) colon K]$ is divisible by both $[K(alpha) colon K]=m$ and $[Lcolon K]=n$ and so by $mcdot n$. Therefore, we must have equality, $[L(alpha) colon L] = m$, and thus $f$ is irreducible in $L[x]$.







                                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                                edited May 29 '15 at 8:06

























                                                answered May 29 '15 at 4:51









                                                Orest BucicovschiOrest Bucicovschi

                                                28.4k31746




                                                28.4k31746






























                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded




















































                                                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid



                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid



                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function () {
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1303417%2fshow-that-x3-3-irreducible-over-mathbbq-sqrt-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                    }
                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    Plaza Victoria

                                                    Puebla de Zaragoza

                                                    Musa