How to see that $forall tinmathbb{R} quadfrac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}(t+frac{1}{t})e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2}$?...












0














How to prove the following inequality $forall tinmathbb{R}$:$$frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}(t+frac{1}{t})e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2}$$










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by TheSimpliFire, user21820, Saad, Vidyanshu Mishra, Trevor Gunn Dec 1 at 16:40


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – TheSimpliFire, user21820, Saad, Vidyanshu Mishra, Trevor Gunn

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • It looks like rewriting with log might help.
    – Mark
    Nov 24 at 9:28






  • 3




    Please write down what you have tried to solve this problem to avoid closure. Don't you think that $frac{expleft(-frac{t^2}2right)}{sqrt{2pi}}$ looks like a density function?
    – TheSimpliFire
    Nov 24 at 9:40
















0














How to prove the following inequality $forall tinmathbb{R}$:$$frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}(t+frac{1}{t})e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2}$$










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by TheSimpliFire, user21820, Saad, Vidyanshu Mishra, Trevor Gunn Dec 1 at 16:40


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – TheSimpliFire, user21820, Saad, Vidyanshu Mishra, Trevor Gunn

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • It looks like rewriting with log might help.
    – Mark
    Nov 24 at 9:28






  • 3




    Please write down what you have tried to solve this problem to avoid closure. Don't you think that $frac{expleft(-frac{t^2}2right)}{sqrt{2pi}}$ looks like a density function?
    – TheSimpliFire
    Nov 24 at 9:40














0












0








0


1





How to prove the following inequality $forall tinmathbb{R}$:$$frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}(t+frac{1}{t})e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2}$$










share|cite|improve this question















How to prove the following inequality $forall tinmathbb{R}$:$$frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}(t+frac{1}{t})e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2}$$







calculus derivatives inequality






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 24 at 9:59









gimusi

1




1










asked Nov 24 at 9:24









ShaoyuPei

1657




1657




closed as off-topic by TheSimpliFire, user21820, Saad, Vidyanshu Mishra, Trevor Gunn Dec 1 at 16:40


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – TheSimpliFire, user21820, Saad, Vidyanshu Mishra, Trevor Gunn

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by TheSimpliFire, user21820, Saad, Vidyanshu Mishra, Trevor Gunn Dec 1 at 16:40


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – TheSimpliFire, user21820, Saad, Vidyanshu Mishra, Trevor Gunn

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • It looks like rewriting with log might help.
    – Mark
    Nov 24 at 9:28






  • 3




    Please write down what you have tried to solve this problem to avoid closure. Don't you think that $frac{expleft(-frac{t^2}2right)}{sqrt{2pi}}$ looks like a density function?
    – TheSimpliFire
    Nov 24 at 9:40


















  • It looks like rewriting with log might help.
    – Mark
    Nov 24 at 9:28






  • 3




    Please write down what you have tried to solve this problem to avoid closure. Don't you think that $frac{expleft(-frac{t^2}2right)}{sqrt{2pi}}$ looks like a density function?
    – TheSimpliFire
    Nov 24 at 9:40
















It looks like rewriting with log might help.
– Mark
Nov 24 at 9:28




It looks like rewriting with log might help.
– Mark
Nov 24 at 9:28




3




3




Please write down what you have tried to solve this problem to avoid closure. Don't you think that $frac{expleft(-frac{t^2}2right)}{sqrt{2pi}}$ looks like a density function?
– TheSimpliFire
Nov 24 at 9:40




Please write down what you have tried to solve this problem to avoid closure. Don't you think that $frac{expleft(-frac{t^2}2right)}{sqrt{2pi}}$ looks like a density function?
– TheSimpliFire
Nov 24 at 9:40










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














HINT



We have that



$$frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}left(t+frac{1}{t}right)e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2} iff e^{t^2/2} geq frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)$$



and then consider $f(t)=e^{t^2/2} -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$, indeed we have




  • $f'(t)=te^{t^2/2}-frac{3t^2+1}{2sqrt{2pi}}$

  • $f''(t)=t^2e^{t^2/2}+e^{t^2/2}-frac{3t}{sqrt{2pi}}$


and we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root at $x_0$ which is a positive minimum poinf for $f(t)$.



As an alternative, we can also use that $e^xge 1+x+frac12 x^2$ and consider the simpler



$$g(t)=1+frac12t^2+frac18t^4 -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • show the function is increasing when t>0?
    – ShaoyuPei
    Nov 24 at 9:40










  • @ShaoyuPei We can show that $f(t) ge 0$ by its derivatives. Indeed we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root and $f(t)$ has a positive absolute minimum here.
    – gimusi
    Nov 24 at 9:41












  • @ShaoyuPei To do that we can consider $f''(t)$ and show in a similar way that it is positive and then $f'(t)$ is strictly increasing.
    – gimusi
    Nov 24 at 9:45










  • thanks learn a lot
    – ShaoyuPei
    Nov 24 at 10:10










  • @ShaoyuPei That's really the most important things! You are welcome, Bye
    – gimusi
    Nov 24 at 10:11



















1














(Since there are a powers of $2$)



Taking $log_2$ on both sides



$1-dfrac12-log_2 sqrt{pi}+log_2left(t+dfrac1tright)-dfrac{t^2}{2}leq2-2log_2t $ $implies dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0$



We show $f(t)=dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0 $. $f'(t)=t-dfrac{3t^2+1}{t^3+t}=0implies t^4-2t^2-1=0implies t^2-1=pmsqrt{2}implies t=pmsqrt{1pmsqrt{2}}.$



(We do not consider $pmsqrt{1-sqrt{2}}$ as t does not belong to $mathbb{R}$ and $-sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}:$ since $log_2$ cannot take negative values).



$f''(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}=dfrac{t^6+5t^4+t^2+1}{(t^3+t)^2}>0$ and $f(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}>0$. So the root is a point of positive minimum.
Hence the inequality holds.






share|cite|improve this answer































    0














    We have $2sqrt{2pi} > 2sqrt{6.25} = 5$, so it is enough to prove
    $5e^{t^2/2} > t + t^3$ (for all real $t$ - including $0$, for
    which the original inequality doesn't make sense). This is obvious
    if $t leqslant 0$, because the LHS is $> 0$ and the RHS is
    $leqslant 0$. If $0 < t leqslant sqrt{2}$, then the LHS is $> 5$
    and the RHS is $leqslant 3sqrt{2} < 5$, so the inequality is true. If
    $sqrt{2} < t leqslant 2$, then $e^{t^2/2} > e > 2$, therefore
    $5e^{t^2/2} > 10 geqslant t + t^3$, so the inequality is true
    again. If $t > 2$, then from the series for $e^x$, $e^{t^2/2} > 1 + t^2/2 + t^4/8$, therefore $5e^{t^2/2} > t^2 + t^4/2 > t + t^3$. So the inequality holds
    in all cases (and equality never holds).






    share|cite|improve this answer






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      HINT



      We have that



      $$frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}left(t+frac{1}{t}right)e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2} iff e^{t^2/2} geq frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)$$



      and then consider $f(t)=e^{t^2/2} -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$, indeed we have




      • $f'(t)=te^{t^2/2}-frac{3t^2+1}{2sqrt{2pi}}$

      • $f''(t)=t^2e^{t^2/2}+e^{t^2/2}-frac{3t}{sqrt{2pi}}$


      and we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root at $x_0$ which is a positive minimum poinf for $f(t)$.



      As an alternative, we can also use that $e^xge 1+x+frac12 x^2$ and consider the simpler



      $$g(t)=1+frac12t^2+frac18t^4 -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$$






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • show the function is increasing when t>0?
        – ShaoyuPei
        Nov 24 at 9:40










      • @ShaoyuPei We can show that $f(t) ge 0$ by its derivatives. Indeed we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root and $f(t)$ has a positive absolute minimum here.
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 9:41












      • @ShaoyuPei To do that we can consider $f''(t)$ and show in a similar way that it is positive and then $f'(t)$ is strictly increasing.
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 9:45










      • thanks learn a lot
        – ShaoyuPei
        Nov 24 at 10:10










      • @ShaoyuPei That's really the most important things! You are welcome, Bye
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 10:11
















      2














      HINT



      We have that



      $$frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}left(t+frac{1}{t}right)e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2} iff e^{t^2/2} geq frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)$$



      and then consider $f(t)=e^{t^2/2} -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$, indeed we have




      • $f'(t)=te^{t^2/2}-frac{3t^2+1}{2sqrt{2pi}}$

      • $f''(t)=t^2e^{t^2/2}+e^{t^2/2}-frac{3t}{sqrt{2pi}}$


      and we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root at $x_0$ which is a positive minimum poinf for $f(t)$.



      As an alternative, we can also use that $e^xge 1+x+frac12 x^2$ and consider the simpler



      $$g(t)=1+frac12t^2+frac18t^4 -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$$






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • show the function is increasing when t>0?
        – ShaoyuPei
        Nov 24 at 9:40










      • @ShaoyuPei We can show that $f(t) ge 0$ by its derivatives. Indeed we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root and $f(t)$ has a positive absolute minimum here.
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 9:41












      • @ShaoyuPei To do that we can consider $f''(t)$ and show in a similar way that it is positive and then $f'(t)$ is strictly increasing.
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 9:45










      • thanks learn a lot
        – ShaoyuPei
        Nov 24 at 10:10










      • @ShaoyuPei That's really the most important things! You are welcome, Bye
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 10:11














      2












      2








      2






      HINT



      We have that



      $$frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}left(t+frac{1}{t}right)e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2} iff e^{t^2/2} geq frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)$$



      and then consider $f(t)=e^{t^2/2} -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$, indeed we have




      • $f'(t)=te^{t^2/2}-frac{3t^2+1}{2sqrt{2pi}}$

      • $f''(t)=t^2e^{t^2/2}+e^{t^2/2}-frac{3t}{sqrt{2pi}}$


      and we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root at $x_0$ which is a positive minimum poinf for $f(t)$.



      As an alternative, we can also use that $e^xge 1+x+frac12 x^2$ and consider the simpler



      $$g(t)=1+frac12t^2+frac18t^4 -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$$






      share|cite|improve this answer














      HINT



      We have that



      $$frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}left(t+frac{1}{t}right)e^{-t^2/2} leq frac{4}{t^2} iff e^{t^2/2} geq frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)$$



      and then consider $f(t)=e^{t^2/2} -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$, indeed we have




      • $f'(t)=te^{t^2/2}-frac{3t^2+1}{2sqrt{2pi}}$

      • $f''(t)=t^2e^{t^2/2}+e^{t^2/2}-frac{3t}{sqrt{2pi}}$


      and we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root at $x_0$ which is a positive minimum poinf for $f(t)$.



      As an alternative, we can also use that $e^xge 1+x+frac12 x^2$ and consider the simpler



      $$g(t)=1+frac12t^2+frac18t^4 -frac{1}{2sqrt{2pi}}(t^3+t)ge 0$$







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Nov 24 at 9:55

























      answered Nov 24 at 9:33









      gimusi

      1




      1












      • show the function is increasing when t>0?
        – ShaoyuPei
        Nov 24 at 9:40










      • @ShaoyuPei We can show that $f(t) ge 0$ by its derivatives. Indeed we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root and $f(t)$ has a positive absolute minimum here.
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 9:41












      • @ShaoyuPei To do that we can consider $f''(t)$ and show in a similar way that it is positive and then $f'(t)$ is strictly increasing.
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 9:45










      • thanks learn a lot
        – ShaoyuPei
        Nov 24 at 10:10










      • @ShaoyuPei That's really the most important things! You are welcome, Bye
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 10:11


















      • show the function is increasing when t>0?
        – ShaoyuPei
        Nov 24 at 9:40










      • @ShaoyuPei We can show that $f(t) ge 0$ by its derivatives. Indeed we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root and $f(t)$ has a positive absolute minimum here.
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 9:41












      • @ShaoyuPei To do that we can consider $f''(t)$ and show in a similar way that it is positive and then $f'(t)$ is strictly increasing.
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 9:45










      • thanks learn a lot
        – ShaoyuPei
        Nov 24 at 10:10










      • @ShaoyuPei That's really the most important things! You are welcome, Bye
        – gimusi
        Nov 24 at 10:11
















      show the function is increasing when t>0?
      – ShaoyuPei
      Nov 24 at 9:40




      show the function is increasing when t>0?
      – ShaoyuPei
      Nov 24 at 9:40












      @ShaoyuPei We can show that $f(t) ge 0$ by its derivatives. Indeed we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root and $f(t)$ has a positive absolute minimum here.
      – gimusi
      Nov 24 at 9:41






      @ShaoyuPei We can show that $f(t) ge 0$ by its derivatives. Indeed we can show that $f'(t)$ has exactly one root and $f(t)$ has a positive absolute minimum here.
      – gimusi
      Nov 24 at 9:41














      @ShaoyuPei To do that we can consider $f''(t)$ and show in a similar way that it is positive and then $f'(t)$ is strictly increasing.
      – gimusi
      Nov 24 at 9:45




      @ShaoyuPei To do that we can consider $f''(t)$ and show in a similar way that it is positive and then $f'(t)$ is strictly increasing.
      – gimusi
      Nov 24 at 9:45












      thanks learn a lot
      – ShaoyuPei
      Nov 24 at 10:10




      thanks learn a lot
      – ShaoyuPei
      Nov 24 at 10:10












      @ShaoyuPei That's really the most important things! You are welcome, Bye
      – gimusi
      Nov 24 at 10:11




      @ShaoyuPei That's really the most important things! You are welcome, Bye
      – gimusi
      Nov 24 at 10:11











      1














      (Since there are a powers of $2$)



      Taking $log_2$ on both sides



      $1-dfrac12-log_2 sqrt{pi}+log_2left(t+dfrac1tright)-dfrac{t^2}{2}leq2-2log_2t $ $implies dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0$



      We show $f(t)=dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0 $. $f'(t)=t-dfrac{3t^2+1}{t^3+t}=0implies t^4-2t^2-1=0implies t^2-1=pmsqrt{2}implies t=pmsqrt{1pmsqrt{2}}.$



      (We do not consider $pmsqrt{1-sqrt{2}}$ as t does not belong to $mathbb{R}$ and $-sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}:$ since $log_2$ cannot take negative values).



      $f''(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}=dfrac{t^6+5t^4+t^2+1}{(t^3+t)^2}>0$ and $f(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}>0$. So the root is a point of positive minimum.
      Hence the inequality holds.






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        1














        (Since there are a powers of $2$)



        Taking $log_2$ on both sides



        $1-dfrac12-log_2 sqrt{pi}+log_2left(t+dfrac1tright)-dfrac{t^2}{2}leq2-2log_2t $ $implies dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0$



        We show $f(t)=dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0 $. $f'(t)=t-dfrac{3t^2+1}{t^3+t}=0implies t^4-2t^2-1=0implies t^2-1=pmsqrt{2}implies t=pmsqrt{1pmsqrt{2}}.$



        (We do not consider $pmsqrt{1-sqrt{2}}$ as t does not belong to $mathbb{R}$ and $-sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}:$ since $log_2$ cannot take negative values).



        $f''(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}=dfrac{t^6+5t^4+t^2+1}{(t^3+t)^2}>0$ and $f(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}>0$. So the root is a point of positive minimum.
        Hence the inequality holds.






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1






          (Since there are a powers of $2$)



          Taking $log_2$ on both sides



          $1-dfrac12-log_2 sqrt{pi}+log_2left(t+dfrac1tright)-dfrac{t^2}{2}leq2-2log_2t $ $implies dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0$



          We show $f(t)=dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0 $. $f'(t)=t-dfrac{3t^2+1}{t^3+t}=0implies t^4-2t^2-1=0implies t^2-1=pmsqrt{2}implies t=pmsqrt{1pmsqrt{2}}.$



          (We do not consider $pmsqrt{1-sqrt{2}}$ as t does not belong to $mathbb{R}$ and $-sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}:$ since $log_2$ cannot take negative values).



          $f''(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}=dfrac{t^6+5t^4+t^2+1}{(t^3+t)^2}>0$ and $f(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}>0$. So the root is a point of positive minimum.
          Hence the inequality holds.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          (Since there are a powers of $2$)



          Taking $log_2$ on both sides



          $1-dfrac12-log_2 sqrt{pi}+log_2left(t+dfrac1tright)-dfrac{t^2}{2}leq2-2log_2t $ $implies dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0$



          We show $f(t)=dfrac{t^2}{2}-log_2left(t^3+tright)+log_2 sqrt{pi}+dfrac32geq0 $. $f'(t)=t-dfrac{3t^2+1}{t^3+t}=0implies t^4-2t^2-1=0implies t^2-1=pmsqrt{2}implies t=pmsqrt{1pmsqrt{2}}.$



          (We do not consider $pmsqrt{1-sqrt{2}}$ as t does not belong to $mathbb{R}$ and $-sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}:$ since $log_2$ cannot take negative values).



          $f''(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}=dfrac{t^6+5t^4+t^2+1}{(t^3+t)^2}>0$ and $f(t)|_{t=sqrt{1+sqrt{2}}}>0$. So the root is a point of positive minimum.
          Hence the inequality holds.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 22 at 6:43

























          answered Nov 24 at 10:42









          Yadati Kiran

          1,702519




          1,702519























              0














              We have $2sqrt{2pi} > 2sqrt{6.25} = 5$, so it is enough to prove
              $5e^{t^2/2} > t + t^3$ (for all real $t$ - including $0$, for
              which the original inequality doesn't make sense). This is obvious
              if $t leqslant 0$, because the LHS is $> 0$ and the RHS is
              $leqslant 0$. If $0 < t leqslant sqrt{2}$, then the LHS is $> 5$
              and the RHS is $leqslant 3sqrt{2} < 5$, so the inequality is true. If
              $sqrt{2} < t leqslant 2$, then $e^{t^2/2} > e > 2$, therefore
              $5e^{t^2/2} > 10 geqslant t + t^3$, so the inequality is true
              again. If $t > 2$, then from the series for $e^x$, $e^{t^2/2} > 1 + t^2/2 + t^4/8$, therefore $5e^{t^2/2} > t^2 + t^4/2 > t + t^3$. So the inequality holds
              in all cases (and equality never holds).






              share|cite|improve this answer




























                0














                We have $2sqrt{2pi} > 2sqrt{6.25} = 5$, so it is enough to prove
                $5e^{t^2/2} > t + t^3$ (for all real $t$ - including $0$, for
                which the original inequality doesn't make sense). This is obvious
                if $t leqslant 0$, because the LHS is $> 0$ and the RHS is
                $leqslant 0$. If $0 < t leqslant sqrt{2}$, then the LHS is $> 5$
                and the RHS is $leqslant 3sqrt{2} < 5$, so the inequality is true. If
                $sqrt{2} < t leqslant 2$, then $e^{t^2/2} > e > 2$, therefore
                $5e^{t^2/2} > 10 geqslant t + t^3$, so the inequality is true
                again. If $t > 2$, then from the series for $e^x$, $e^{t^2/2} > 1 + t^2/2 + t^4/8$, therefore $5e^{t^2/2} > t^2 + t^4/2 > t + t^3$. So the inequality holds
                in all cases (and equality never holds).






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  We have $2sqrt{2pi} > 2sqrt{6.25} = 5$, so it is enough to prove
                  $5e^{t^2/2} > t + t^3$ (for all real $t$ - including $0$, for
                  which the original inequality doesn't make sense). This is obvious
                  if $t leqslant 0$, because the LHS is $> 0$ and the RHS is
                  $leqslant 0$. If $0 < t leqslant sqrt{2}$, then the LHS is $> 5$
                  and the RHS is $leqslant 3sqrt{2} < 5$, so the inequality is true. If
                  $sqrt{2} < t leqslant 2$, then $e^{t^2/2} > e > 2$, therefore
                  $5e^{t^2/2} > 10 geqslant t + t^3$, so the inequality is true
                  again. If $t > 2$, then from the series for $e^x$, $e^{t^2/2} > 1 + t^2/2 + t^4/8$, therefore $5e^{t^2/2} > t^2 + t^4/2 > t + t^3$. So the inequality holds
                  in all cases (and equality never holds).






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  We have $2sqrt{2pi} > 2sqrt{6.25} = 5$, so it is enough to prove
                  $5e^{t^2/2} > t + t^3$ (for all real $t$ - including $0$, for
                  which the original inequality doesn't make sense). This is obvious
                  if $t leqslant 0$, because the LHS is $> 0$ and the RHS is
                  $leqslant 0$. If $0 < t leqslant sqrt{2}$, then the LHS is $> 5$
                  and the RHS is $leqslant 3sqrt{2} < 5$, so the inequality is true. If
                  $sqrt{2} < t leqslant 2$, then $e^{t^2/2} > e > 2$, therefore
                  $5e^{t^2/2} > 10 geqslant t + t^3$, so the inequality is true
                  again. If $t > 2$, then from the series for $e^x$, $e^{t^2/2} > 1 + t^2/2 + t^4/8$, therefore $5e^{t^2/2} > t^2 + t^4/2 > t + t^3$. So the inequality holds
                  in all cases (and equality never holds).







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 24 at 13:28

























                  answered Nov 24 at 12:53









                  Calum Gilhooley

                  4,107529




                  4,107529















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Brian Clough

                      Cáceres