Let $R$ be an idempotent semiring and $ax=y$ and $by=x~forall ~x,yin R$, then show that $x=y$












1












$begingroup$


Here, a semiring $(R, +, .)$ is an idempotent in the sense that $x+x=x$ and $x.x=x~forall~xin R$. Let $R$ be an idempotent semiring and $ax=y$ and $by=x~text{if }xleq y~text{and }yleq x,~text{respectively }forall ~x,yin R$ and some $a, b$ in $R$, then show that $x=y$.
Note: Here, i am actually trying to show that the relation $leq$ on $R$ is an anti-symmetric relation with respect to the multiplicative operation on $R$. Further i have seen that if $R$ is a multiplicatively cancellative then $x=y$ can be easily verified but i don't need the $R$ to be cancellative.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So you define $x le y$ if there exists $a$ such that $ax = y$? And what does it mean when you write $ax=y$ and $by=x~forall ~x,yin R$?
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Paul Frost $leq $ is a relation defined on $R$ such that $ forall~x, yin R,$ $ax=y $ whever $xleq y$ for some $ain R$. Now, to prove that the relation $leq$ is anti-symmetric, we have to assume that $xleq y$ and $yleq x$ and we need to show that $x=y$ using the relation as defined.
    $endgroup$
    – gete
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:32
















1












$begingroup$


Here, a semiring $(R, +, .)$ is an idempotent in the sense that $x+x=x$ and $x.x=x~forall~xin R$. Let $R$ be an idempotent semiring and $ax=y$ and $by=x~text{if }xleq y~text{and }yleq x,~text{respectively }forall ~x,yin R$ and some $a, b$ in $R$, then show that $x=y$.
Note: Here, i am actually trying to show that the relation $leq$ on $R$ is an anti-symmetric relation with respect to the multiplicative operation on $R$. Further i have seen that if $R$ is a multiplicatively cancellative then $x=y$ can be easily verified but i don't need the $R$ to be cancellative.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So you define $x le y$ if there exists $a$ such that $ax = y$? And what does it mean when you write $ax=y$ and $by=x~forall ~x,yin R$?
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Paul Frost $leq $ is a relation defined on $R$ such that $ forall~x, yin R,$ $ax=y $ whever $xleq y$ for some $ain R$. Now, to prove that the relation $leq$ is anti-symmetric, we have to assume that $xleq y$ and $yleq x$ and we need to show that $x=y$ using the relation as defined.
    $endgroup$
    – gete
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:32














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Here, a semiring $(R, +, .)$ is an idempotent in the sense that $x+x=x$ and $x.x=x~forall~xin R$. Let $R$ be an idempotent semiring and $ax=y$ and $by=x~text{if }xleq y~text{and }yleq x,~text{respectively }forall ~x,yin R$ and some $a, b$ in $R$, then show that $x=y$.
Note: Here, i am actually trying to show that the relation $leq$ on $R$ is an anti-symmetric relation with respect to the multiplicative operation on $R$. Further i have seen that if $R$ is a multiplicatively cancellative then $x=y$ can be easily verified but i don't need the $R$ to be cancellative.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Here, a semiring $(R, +, .)$ is an idempotent in the sense that $x+x=x$ and $x.x=x~forall~xin R$. Let $R$ be an idempotent semiring and $ax=y$ and $by=x~text{if }xleq y~text{and }yleq x,~text{respectively }forall ~x,yin R$ and some $a, b$ in $R$, then show that $x=y$.
Note: Here, i am actually trying to show that the relation $leq$ on $R$ is an anti-symmetric relation with respect to the multiplicative operation on $R$. Further i have seen that if $R$ is a multiplicatively cancellative then $x=y$ can be easily verified but i don't need the $R$ to be cancellative.







semiring






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 30 '18 at 15:37







gete

















asked Nov 28 '18 at 18:23









getegete

747




747












  • $begingroup$
    So you define $x le y$ if there exists $a$ such that $ax = y$? And what does it mean when you write $ax=y$ and $by=x~forall ~x,yin R$?
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Paul Frost $leq $ is a relation defined on $R$ such that $ forall~x, yin R,$ $ax=y $ whever $xleq y$ for some $ain R$. Now, to prove that the relation $leq$ is anti-symmetric, we have to assume that $xleq y$ and $yleq x$ and we need to show that $x=y$ using the relation as defined.
    $endgroup$
    – gete
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:32


















  • $begingroup$
    So you define $x le y$ if there exists $a$ such that $ax = y$? And what does it mean when you write $ax=y$ and $by=x~forall ~x,yin R$?
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Paul Frost $leq $ is a relation defined on $R$ such that $ forall~x, yin R,$ $ax=y $ whever $xleq y$ for some $ain R$. Now, to prove that the relation $leq$ is anti-symmetric, we have to assume that $xleq y$ and $yleq x$ and we need to show that $x=y$ using the relation as defined.
    $endgroup$
    – gete
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:32
















$begingroup$
So you define $x le y$ if there exists $a$ such that $ax = y$? And what does it mean when you write $ax=y$ and $by=x~forall ~x,yin R$?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 30 '18 at 18:19




$begingroup$
So you define $x le y$ if there exists $a$ such that $ax = y$? And what does it mean when you write $ax=y$ and $by=x~forall ~x,yin R$?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 30 '18 at 18:19












$begingroup$
@Paul Frost $leq $ is a relation defined on $R$ such that $ forall~x, yin R,$ $ax=y $ whever $xleq y$ for some $ain R$. Now, to prove that the relation $leq$ is anti-symmetric, we have to assume that $xleq y$ and $yleq x$ and we need to show that $x=y$ using the relation as defined.
$endgroup$
– gete
Nov 30 '18 at 18:32




$begingroup$
@Paul Frost $leq $ is a relation defined on $R$ such that $ forall~x, yin R,$ $ax=y $ whever $xleq y$ for some $ain R$. Now, to prove that the relation $leq$ is anti-symmetric, we have to assume that $xleq y$ and $yleq x$ and we need to show that $x=y$ using the relation as defined.
$endgroup$
– gete
Nov 30 '18 at 18:32










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017510%2flet-r-be-an-idempotent-semiring-and-ax-y-and-by-x-forall-x-y-in-r-then%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017510%2flet-r-be-an-idempotent-semiring-and-ax-y-and-by-x-forall-x-y-in-r-then%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa