Random walk on infinite graph with zero probability of leaving subgraph
$begingroup$
Let $G = (V,E)$ be an graph which is locally finite (every vertex has only finitely many edges - but there may be infinitely many vertices), and connected. Let $X_n$ be a random walk on $G$ that follows the transition probabilities induced by the edge weights of $G$.
Is it possible to find a $G$ such that there exists a nonempty $U subseteq V$ such that if we let $W$ be the subgraph of $G$ induced by the vertices $V setminus U$, then $W$ is connected and we have that for any $w in W$, $lim_{n rightarrow infty}P_w(X_n in W | X_{n-1} in W) = 1$ ?
($P_w$ denotes that $X_0 = w$)
Edit: Made some mistakes earlier. Corrected to indicate that the walk starts in $W$ and that both $W$ and $G$ are connected.
probability graph-theory random-variables markov-chains random-walk
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $G = (V,E)$ be an graph which is locally finite (every vertex has only finitely many edges - but there may be infinitely many vertices), and connected. Let $X_n$ be a random walk on $G$ that follows the transition probabilities induced by the edge weights of $G$.
Is it possible to find a $G$ such that there exists a nonempty $U subseteq V$ such that if we let $W$ be the subgraph of $G$ induced by the vertices $V setminus U$, then $W$ is connected and we have that for any $w in W$, $lim_{n rightarrow infty}P_w(X_n in W | X_{n-1} in W) = 1$ ?
($P_w$ denotes that $X_0 = w$)
Edit: Made some mistakes earlier. Corrected to indicate that the walk starts in $W$ and that both $W$ and $G$ are connected.
probability graph-theory random-variables markov-chains random-walk
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Do you indicate by $P_u$ the stationary distribution? If not, that cannot hold for all $n$, right? (Consider $n^*$ to be the first time $X_n$ enters $W$. Then $X_{n^*+1}$ has by definition a non-zero chance to leave $W$, by "coming back whence it comes" -- or what did I miss?)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 22:58
$begingroup$
Sorry, I made a mistake $P_u$ is the probability with respect to starting the walk at $u in W$
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:03
$begingroup$
Then, you may require the graph to be connected, since otherwise the answer is trivially "yes" (take $U$ to be a non-empty connected component, and $W$ another.)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
Yes, made both edits just now. Thanks so much!
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
And if the graph is connected then the answer is trivially "no".
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 1 '18 at 23:05
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $G = (V,E)$ be an graph which is locally finite (every vertex has only finitely many edges - but there may be infinitely many vertices), and connected. Let $X_n$ be a random walk on $G$ that follows the transition probabilities induced by the edge weights of $G$.
Is it possible to find a $G$ such that there exists a nonempty $U subseteq V$ such that if we let $W$ be the subgraph of $G$ induced by the vertices $V setminus U$, then $W$ is connected and we have that for any $w in W$, $lim_{n rightarrow infty}P_w(X_n in W | X_{n-1} in W) = 1$ ?
($P_w$ denotes that $X_0 = w$)
Edit: Made some mistakes earlier. Corrected to indicate that the walk starts in $W$ and that both $W$ and $G$ are connected.
probability graph-theory random-variables markov-chains random-walk
$endgroup$
Let $G = (V,E)$ be an graph which is locally finite (every vertex has only finitely many edges - but there may be infinitely many vertices), and connected. Let $X_n$ be a random walk on $G$ that follows the transition probabilities induced by the edge weights of $G$.
Is it possible to find a $G$ such that there exists a nonempty $U subseteq V$ such that if we let $W$ be the subgraph of $G$ induced by the vertices $V setminus U$, then $W$ is connected and we have that for any $w in W$, $lim_{n rightarrow infty}P_w(X_n in W | X_{n-1} in W) = 1$ ?
($P_w$ denotes that $X_0 = w$)
Edit: Made some mistakes earlier. Corrected to indicate that the walk starts in $W$ and that both $W$ and $G$ are connected.
probability graph-theory random-variables markov-chains random-walk
probability graph-theory random-variables markov-chains random-walk
edited Dec 1 '18 at 23:12
jackson5
asked Dec 1 '18 at 22:49
jackson5jackson5
606512
606512
$begingroup$
Do you indicate by $P_u$ the stationary distribution? If not, that cannot hold for all $n$, right? (Consider $n^*$ to be the first time $X_n$ enters $W$. Then $X_{n^*+1}$ has by definition a non-zero chance to leave $W$, by "coming back whence it comes" -- or what did I miss?)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 22:58
$begingroup$
Sorry, I made a mistake $P_u$ is the probability with respect to starting the walk at $u in W$
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:03
$begingroup$
Then, you may require the graph to be connected, since otherwise the answer is trivially "yes" (take $U$ to be a non-empty connected component, and $W$ another.)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
Yes, made both edits just now. Thanks so much!
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
And if the graph is connected then the answer is trivially "no".
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 1 '18 at 23:05
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Do you indicate by $P_u$ the stationary distribution? If not, that cannot hold for all $n$, right? (Consider $n^*$ to be the first time $X_n$ enters $W$. Then $X_{n^*+1}$ has by definition a non-zero chance to leave $W$, by "coming back whence it comes" -- or what did I miss?)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 22:58
$begingroup$
Sorry, I made a mistake $P_u$ is the probability with respect to starting the walk at $u in W$
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:03
$begingroup$
Then, you may require the graph to be connected, since otherwise the answer is trivially "yes" (take $U$ to be a non-empty connected component, and $W$ another.)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
Yes, made both edits just now. Thanks so much!
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
And if the graph is connected then the answer is trivially "no".
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 1 '18 at 23:05
$begingroup$
Do you indicate by $P_u$ the stationary distribution? If not, that cannot hold for all $n$, right? (Consider $n^*$ to be the first time $X_n$ enters $W$. Then $X_{n^*+1}$ has by definition a non-zero chance to leave $W$, by "coming back whence it comes" -- or what did I miss?)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 22:58
$begingroup$
Do you indicate by $P_u$ the stationary distribution? If not, that cannot hold for all $n$, right? (Consider $n^*$ to be the first time $X_n$ enters $W$. Then $X_{n^*+1}$ has by definition a non-zero chance to leave $W$, by "coming back whence it comes" -- or what did I miss?)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 22:58
$begingroup$
Sorry, I made a mistake $P_u$ is the probability with respect to starting the walk at $u in W$
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:03
$begingroup$
Sorry, I made a mistake $P_u$ is the probability with respect to starting the walk at $u in W$
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:03
$begingroup$
Then, you may require the graph to be connected, since otherwise the answer is trivially "yes" (take $U$ to be a non-empty connected component, and $W$ another.)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
Then, you may require the graph to be connected, since otherwise the answer is trivially "yes" (take $U$ to be a non-empty connected component, and $W$ another.)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
Yes, made both edits just now. Thanks so much!
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
Yes, made both edits just now. Thanks so much!
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
And if the graph is connected then the answer is trivially "no".
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 1 '18 at 23:05
$begingroup$
And if the graph is connected then the answer is trivially "no".
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 1 '18 at 23:05
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One way to get
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty}P_w(X_n in W | X_{n-1} in W) = 1
$$
is to take a graph whose random walk Markov chain is transient.
For instance, let $G$ be an infinite binary tree, and let $W$ be one of the branches from the root. Then with probability $1$ the random walk only returns to the root a finite number of times, so in the limit as $n to infty$ the probability of the random walk leaving $W$ is $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021942%2frandom-walk-on-infinite-graph-with-zero-probability-of-leaving-subgraph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One way to get
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty}P_w(X_n in W | X_{n-1} in W) = 1
$$
is to take a graph whose random walk Markov chain is transient.
For instance, let $G$ be an infinite binary tree, and let $W$ be one of the branches from the root. Then with probability $1$ the random walk only returns to the root a finite number of times, so in the limit as $n to infty$ the probability of the random walk leaving $W$ is $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One way to get
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty}P_w(X_n in W | X_{n-1} in W) = 1
$$
is to take a graph whose random walk Markov chain is transient.
For instance, let $G$ be an infinite binary tree, and let $W$ be one of the branches from the root. Then with probability $1$ the random walk only returns to the root a finite number of times, so in the limit as $n to infty$ the probability of the random walk leaving $W$ is $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One way to get
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty}P_w(X_n in W | X_{n-1} in W) = 1
$$
is to take a graph whose random walk Markov chain is transient.
For instance, let $G$ be an infinite binary tree, and let $W$ be one of the branches from the root. Then with probability $1$ the random walk only returns to the root a finite number of times, so in the limit as $n to infty$ the probability of the random walk leaving $W$ is $0$.
$endgroup$
One way to get
$$
lim_{n rightarrow infty}P_w(X_n in W | X_{n-1} in W) = 1
$$
is to take a graph whose random walk Markov chain is transient.
For instance, let $G$ be an infinite binary tree, and let $W$ be one of the branches from the root. Then with probability $1$ the random walk only returns to the root a finite number of times, so in the limit as $n to infty$ the probability of the random walk leaving $W$ is $0$.
answered Dec 1 '18 at 23:30
Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov
45.1k656107
45.1k656107
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021942%2frandom-walk-on-infinite-graph-with-zero-probability-of-leaving-subgraph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Do you indicate by $P_u$ the stationary distribution? If not, that cannot hold for all $n$, right? (Consider $n^*$ to be the first time $X_n$ enters $W$. Then $X_{n^*+1}$ has by definition a non-zero chance to leave $W$, by "coming back whence it comes" -- or what did I miss?)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 22:58
$begingroup$
Sorry, I made a mistake $P_u$ is the probability with respect to starting the walk at $u in W$
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:03
$begingroup$
Then, you may require the graph to be connected, since otherwise the answer is trivially "yes" (take $U$ to be a non-empty connected component, and $W$ another.)
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
Yes, made both edits just now. Thanks so much!
$endgroup$
– jackson5
Dec 1 '18 at 23:04
$begingroup$
And if the graph is connected then the answer is trivially "no".
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 1 '18 at 23:05