Analytic function $f$ either constant or surjective on unit disk.












0












$begingroup$


Suppose $f$ is analytic on unit disk and continuous on it. Assume $|f(z)|=1$ on ${x;|x|=1}$. Then $f$ is constant or $f(U)=U$ where $U={x;|x|<1}$.



My attempt:



By maximum principle, $|f(z)|leq 1$ on $U$. Suppose $f(U)neq U$. Then there exists $z_0in U$ such that $z_0notin f(U)$. Then
$$
frac{1}{f(z)-z_0}
$$

is analytic on unit disk. By using maximum principle, then
$$
left|frac{1}{f(z)-z_0}right|leq frac{1}{1-z_0}
$$

on $U$. Thus,
$$
|f(z)-z_0|geq 1-|z_0|
$$

which implies that
$$
f(D)in Usetminus {z;|z-z_0|< 1-z_0}
$$

We can take $z_1in {z;|z-z_0|< 1-z_0}$ such that
$$
|z_1|<|z_0|.
$$

By same argument, on $U$,
$$
|f(z)-z_1|geq 1-|z_1|.
$$

Hence, we can find $|z_n|rightarrow 0$ such that on $U$
$$
|f(z)-z_n|geq 1-|z_n|.
$$

Then we have
$$
|f(z)|geq 1-2|z_n|rightarrow 1.
$$

Hence, $|f(z)|=1$ on $U$. $f$ is constant by using argument of open mapping theorem.



Is this approach correct? I am not sure about $z_n$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Although you have constructed a sequence $z_n$ that has strictly decreasing magnitude, as written you have not shown in converges to zero specifically.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:04










  • $begingroup$
    @eyeballfrog if i take $z_1=z_0-frac{1-|z_0|}{2}frac{z_0}{|z_0|}$, then $z_n$ should converges to $0$. Is that enough?
    $endgroup$
    – whereamI
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:06










  • $begingroup$
    See math.stackexchange.com/questions/116965/… for some solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:07












  • $begingroup$
    @MartinR thanks a lot
    $endgroup$
    – whereamI
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    @whereamI Yes. In fact, it reaches zero in a finite number of steps, since once $|z_n| < 1/2$ you can choose $z_{n+1} = 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:13


















0












$begingroup$


Suppose $f$ is analytic on unit disk and continuous on it. Assume $|f(z)|=1$ on ${x;|x|=1}$. Then $f$ is constant or $f(U)=U$ where $U={x;|x|<1}$.



My attempt:



By maximum principle, $|f(z)|leq 1$ on $U$. Suppose $f(U)neq U$. Then there exists $z_0in U$ such that $z_0notin f(U)$. Then
$$
frac{1}{f(z)-z_0}
$$

is analytic on unit disk. By using maximum principle, then
$$
left|frac{1}{f(z)-z_0}right|leq frac{1}{1-z_0}
$$

on $U$. Thus,
$$
|f(z)-z_0|geq 1-|z_0|
$$

which implies that
$$
f(D)in Usetminus {z;|z-z_0|< 1-z_0}
$$

We can take $z_1in {z;|z-z_0|< 1-z_0}$ such that
$$
|z_1|<|z_0|.
$$

By same argument, on $U$,
$$
|f(z)-z_1|geq 1-|z_1|.
$$

Hence, we can find $|z_n|rightarrow 0$ such that on $U$
$$
|f(z)-z_n|geq 1-|z_n|.
$$

Then we have
$$
|f(z)|geq 1-2|z_n|rightarrow 1.
$$

Hence, $|f(z)|=1$ on $U$. $f$ is constant by using argument of open mapping theorem.



Is this approach correct? I am not sure about $z_n$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Although you have constructed a sequence $z_n$ that has strictly decreasing magnitude, as written you have not shown in converges to zero specifically.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:04










  • $begingroup$
    @eyeballfrog if i take $z_1=z_0-frac{1-|z_0|}{2}frac{z_0}{|z_0|}$, then $z_n$ should converges to $0$. Is that enough?
    $endgroup$
    – whereamI
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:06










  • $begingroup$
    See math.stackexchange.com/questions/116965/… for some solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:07












  • $begingroup$
    @MartinR thanks a lot
    $endgroup$
    – whereamI
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    @whereamI Yes. In fact, it reaches zero in a finite number of steps, since once $|z_n| < 1/2$ you can choose $z_{n+1} = 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:13
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Suppose $f$ is analytic on unit disk and continuous on it. Assume $|f(z)|=1$ on ${x;|x|=1}$. Then $f$ is constant or $f(U)=U$ where $U={x;|x|<1}$.



My attempt:



By maximum principle, $|f(z)|leq 1$ on $U$. Suppose $f(U)neq U$. Then there exists $z_0in U$ such that $z_0notin f(U)$. Then
$$
frac{1}{f(z)-z_0}
$$

is analytic on unit disk. By using maximum principle, then
$$
left|frac{1}{f(z)-z_0}right|leq frac{1}{1-z_0}
$$

on $U$. Thus,
$$
|f(z)-z_0|geq 1-|z_0|
$$

which implies that
$$
f(D)in Usetminus {z;|z-z_0|< 1-z_0}
$$

We can take $z_1in {z;|z-z_0|< 1-z_0}$ such that
$$
|z_1|<|z_0|.
$$

By same argument, on $U$,
$$
|f(z)-z_1|geq 1-|z_1|.
$$

Hence, we can find $|z_n|rightarrow 0$ such that on $U$
$$
|f(z)-z_n|geq 1-|z_n|.
$$

Then we have
$$
|f(z)|geq 1-2|z_n|rightarrow 1.
$$

Hence, $|f(z)|=1$ on $U$. $f$ is constant by using argument of open mapping theorem.



Is this approach correct? I am not sure about $z_n$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose $f$ is analytic on unit disk and continuous on it. Assume $|f(z)|=1$ on ${x;|x|=1}$. Then $f$ is constant or $f(U)=U$ where $U={x;|x|<1}$.



My attempt:



By maximum principle, $|f(z)|leq 1$ on $U$. Suppose $f(U)neq U$. Then there exists $z_0in U$ such that $z_0notin f(U)$. Then
$$
frac{1}{f(z)-z_0}
$$

is analytic on unit disk. By using maximum principle, then
$$
left|frac{1}{f(z)-z_0}right|leq frac{1}{1-z_0}
$$

on $U$. Thus,
$$
|f(z)-z_0|geq 1-|z_0|
$$

which implies that
$$
f(D)in Usetminus {z;|z-z_0|< 1-z_0}
$$

We can take $z_1in {z;|z-z_0|< 1-z_0}$ such that
$$
|z_1|<|z_0|.
$$

By same argument, on $U$,
$$
|f(z)-z_1|geq 1-|z_1|.
$$

Hence, we can find $|z_n|rightarrow 0$ such that on $U$
$$
|f(z)-z_n|geq 1-|z_n|.
$$

Then we have
$$
|f(z)|geq 1-2|z_n|rightarrow 1.
$$

Hence, $|f(z)|=1$ on $U$. $f$ is constant by using argument of open mapping theorem.



Is this approach correct? I am not sure about $z_n$.







complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 9 '18 at 16:24









whereamIwhereamI

322115




322115












  • $begingroup$
    Although you have constructed a sequence $z_n$ that has strictly decreasing magnitude, as written you have not shown in converges to zero specifically.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:04










  • $begingroup$
    @eyeballfrog if i take $z_1=z_0-frac{1-|z_0|}{2}frac{z_0}{|z_0|}$, then $z_n$ should converges to $0$. Is that enough?
    $endgroup$
    – whereamI
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:06










  • $begingroup$
    See math.stackexchange.com/questions/116965/… for some solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:07












  • $begingroup$
    @MartinR thanks a lot
    $endgroup$
    – whereamI
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    @whereamI Yes. In fact, it reaches zero in a finite number of steps, since once $|z_n| < 1/2$ you can choose $z_{n+1} = 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:13




















  • $begingroup$
    Although you have constructed a sequence $z_n$ that has strictly decreasing magnitude, as written you have not shown in converges to zero specifically.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:04










  • $begingroup$
    @eyeballfrog if i take $z_1=z_0-frac{1-|z_0|}{2}frac{z_0}{|z_0|}$, then $z_n$ should converges to $0$. Is that enough?
    $endgroup$
    – whereamI
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:06










  • $begingroup$
    See math.stackexchange.com/questions/116965/… for some solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:07












  • $begingroup$
    @MartinR thanks a lot
    $endgroup$
    – whereamI
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    @whereamI Yes. In fact, it reaches zero in a finite number of steps, since once $|z_n| < 1/2$ you can choose $z_{n+1} = 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Dec 9 '18 at 17:13


















$begingroup$
Although you have constructed a sequence $z_n$ that has strictly decreasing magnitude, as written you have not shown in converges to zero specifically.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Dec 9 '18 at 17:04




$begingroup$
Although you have constructed a sequence $z_n$ that has strictly decreasing magnitude, as written you have not shown in converges to zero specifically.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Dec 9 '18 at 17:04












$begingroup$
@eyeballfrog if i take $z_1=z_0-frac{1-|z_0|}{2}frac{z_0}{|z_0|}$, then $z_n$ should converges to $0$. Is that enough?
$endgroup$
– whereamI
Dec 9 '18 at 17:06




$begingroup$
@eyeballfrog if i take $z_1=z_0-frac{1-|z_0|}{2}frac{z_0}{|z_0|}$, then $z_n$ should converges to $0$. Is that enough?
$endgroup$
– whereamI
Dec 9 '18 at 17:06












$begingroup$
See math.stackexchange.com/questions/116965/… for some solutions.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Dec 9 '18 at 17:07






$begingroup$
See math.stackexchange.com/questions/116965/… for some solutions.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Dec 9 '18 at 17:07














$begingroup$
@MartinR thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– whereamI
Dec 9 '18 at 17:08




$begingroup$
@MartinR thanks a lot
$endgroup$
– whereamI
Dec 9 '18 at 17:08












$begingroup$
@whereamI Yes. In fact, it reaches zero in a finite number of steps, since once $|z_n| < 1/2$ you can choose $z_{n+1} = 0$.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Dec 9 '18 at 17:13






$begingroup$
@whereamI Yes. In fact, it reaches zero in a finite number of steps, since once $|z_n| < 1/2$ you can choose $z_{n+1} = 0$.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Dec 9 '18 at 17:13












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032569%2fanalytic-function-f-either-constant-or-surjective-on-unit-disk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032569%2fanalytic-function-f-either-constant-or-surjective-on-unit-disk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...