LAN-to-WAN puzzle
I have as primary router an ASUS RT-AC51U (A) (where only 3-4 clients are connected via wifi with address reservation and / or static IP on the machine), as secondary one ASUS RT-AC1200G + (B) (here they are connected 10 clients via wifi and LAN port, including a NAS, Raspberry, etc. Also here there are clients with address reservation and other static IPs). It works perfectly but I have a problem: if I'm connected to router B, I can also access router A, on the contrary when I'm connected to router A, I can not connect either to router B or to NAS etc, obviously because I find on different LAN network classes right?
Router Configuration A
Static IP WAN (assigned by ISP) = 192.168.1.1
Subnet Mask WAN = 255.255.255.0
Gateway (assigned by ISP)
Public IP = (static)
IP LAN = 192.168.2.1
Subnet Mask LAN = 255.255.255.0
DHCP LAN = from 192.168.2.2 to 192.168.2.254
DNS = From ISP
IP LAN Router B (Assigned by me) = 192.168.2.2
Router Configuration B
IP WAN (automatic) = 192.168.2.2
Subnet Mask WAN (automatic) = 255.255.255.0
Gateway (automatic) = 192.168.2.1
DNS (automatic) = 192.168.2.1
IP LAN = 192.168.3.1
Subnet Mask LAN = 255.255.255.0
DHCP LAN = from 192.168.3.2 to 192.168.3.254
I state that I have a house on three floors and the primary router A is on the last floor above, the router B at the bottom below. Before I had chosen the LAN-to-LAN configuration but, being the router less efficient and without Gigabit ports than the router B, I wanted to try to manage most of the clients and streaming traffic etc, to the router B.
But now I have the problems explained at the beginning, does anyone have a solution?
Thanks everyone in advance guys
networking router lan wan
asked Jan 12 at 11:08
ShaneShane
11
add a comment |
I have as primary router an ASUS RT-AC51U (A) (where only 3-4 clients are connected via wifi with address reservation and / or static IP on the machine), as secondary one ASUS RT-AC1200G + (B) (here they are connected 10 clients via wifi and LAN port, including a NAS, Raspberry, etc. Also here there are clients with address reservation and other static IPs). It works perfectly but I have a problem: if I'm connected to router B, I can also access router A, on the contrary when I'm connected to router A, I can not connect either to router B or to NAS etc, obviously because I find on different LAN network classes right?
Router Configuration A
Static IP WAN (assigned by ISP) = 192.168.1.1
Subnet Mask WAN = 255.255.255.0
Gateway (assigned by ISP)
Public IP = (static)
IP LAN = 192.168.2.1
Subnet Mask LAN = 255.255.255.0
DHCP LAN = from 192.168.2.2 to 192.168.2.254
DNS = From ISP
IP LAN Router B (Assigned by me) = 192.168.2.2
Router Configuration B
IP WAN (automatic) = 192.168.2.2
Subnet Mask WAN (automatic) = 255.255.255.0
Gateway (automatic) = 192.168.2.1
DNS (automatic) = 192.168.2.1
IP LAN = 192.168.3.1
Subnet Mask LAN = 255.255.255.0
DHCP LAN = from 192.168.3.2 to 192.168.3.254
I state that I have a house on three floors and the primary router A is on the last floor above, the router B at the bottom below. Before I had chosen the LAN-to-LAN configuration but, being the router less efficient and without Gigabit ports than the router B, I wanted to try to manage most of the clients and streaming traffic etc, to the router B.
But now I have the problems explained at the beginning, does anyone have a solution?
Thanks everyone in advance guys
networking router lan wan
asked Jan 12 at 11:08
ShaneShane
11
1
Check out whether router B can be configured as an access point rather than a router. Currently router B puts a firewall and NAT between the two networks.
– MZB
Jan 12 at 12:20
Yes, the router B can be configured in Acces Point Mode, but I think I will return to the solution I have already tried, ie in LAN-to-LAN, simply extending the network from the top to the bottom and unfortunately managing everything to primary router A, which is less performing.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 17:41
I read a few days ago the answers given here superuser.com/questions/641036/…, I still have not tried though and I do not know if it's more or less like my problem.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 18:51
add a comment |
I have as primary router an ASUS RT-AC51U (A) (where only 3-4 clients are connected via wifi with address reservation and / or static IP on the machine), as secondary one ASUS RT-AC1200G + (B) (here they are connected 10 clients via wifi and LAN port, including a NAS, Raspberry, etc. Also here there are clients with address reservation and other static IPs). It works perfectly but I have a problem: if I'm connected to router B, I can also access router A, on the contrary when I'm connected to router A, I can not connect either to router B or to NAS etc, obviously because I find on different LAN network classes right?
Router Configuration A
Static IP WAN (assigned by ISP) = 192.168.1.1
Subnet Mask WAN = 255.255.255.0
Gateway (assigned by ISP)
Public IP = (static)
IP LAN = 192.168.2.1
Subnet Mask LAN = 255.255.255.0
DHCP LAN = from 192.168.2.2 to 192.168.2.254
DNS = From ISP
IP LAN Router B (Assigned by me) = 192.168.2.2
Router Configuration B
IP WAN (automatic) = 192.168.2.2
Subnet Mask WAN (automatic) = 255.255.255.0
Gateway (automatic) = 192.168.2.1
DNS (automatic) = 192.168.2.1
IP LAN = 192.168.3.1
Subnet Mask LAN = 255.255.255.0
DHCP LAN = from 192.168.3.2 to 192.168.3.254
I state that I have a house on three floors and the primary router A is on the last floor above, the router B at the bottom below. Before I had chosen the LAN-to-LAN configuration but, being the router less efficient and without Gigabit ports than the router B, I wanted to try to manage most of the clients and streaming traffic etc, to the router B.
But now I have the problems explained at the beginning, does anyone have a solution?
Thanks everyone in advance guys
networking router lan wan
asked Jan 12 at 11:08
ShaneShane
11
I have as primary router an ASUS RT-AC51U (A) (where only 3-4 clients are connected via wifi with address reservation and / or static IP on the machine), as secondary one ASUS RT-AC1200G + (B) (here they are connected 10 clients via wifi and LAN port, including a NAS, Raspberry, etc. Also here there are clients with address reservation and other static IPs). It works perfectly but I have a problem: if I'm connected to router B, I can also access router A, on the contrary when I'm connected to router A, I can not connect either to router B or to NAS etc, obviously because I find on different LAN network classes right?
Router Configuration A
Static IP WAN (assigned by ISP) = 192.168.1.1
Subnet Mask WAN = 255.255.255.0
Gateway (assigned by ISP)
Public IP = (static)
IP LAN = 192.168.2.1
Subnet Mask LAN = 255.255.255.0
DHCP LAN = from 192.168.2.2 to 192.168.2.254
DNS = From ISP
IP LAN Router B (Assigned by me) = 192.168.2.2
Router Configuration B
IP WAN (automatic) = 192.168.2.2
Subnet Mask WAN (automatic) = 255.255.255.0
Gateway (automatic) = 192.168.2.1
DNS (automatic) = 192.168.2.1
IP LAN = 192.168.3.1
Subnet Mask LAN = 255.255.255.0
DHCP LAN = from 192.168.3.2 to 192.168.3.254
I state that I have a house on three floors and the primary router A is on the last floor above, the router B at the bottom below. Before I had chosen the LAN-to-LAN configuration but, being the router less efficient and without Gigabit ports than the router B, I wanted to try to manage most of the clients and streaming traffic etc, to the router B.
But now I have the problems explained at the beginning, does anyone have a solution?
Thanks everyone in advance guys
networking router lan wan
networking router lan wan
asked Jan 12 at 11:08
ShaneShane
11
asked Jan 12 at 11:08
ShaneShane
11
asked Jan 12 at 11:08
ShaneShane
11
asked Jan 12 at 11:08
ShaneShane
11
asked Jan 12 at 11:08
ShaneShane
11
11
1
Check out whether router B can be configured as an access point rather than a router. Currently router B puts a firewall and NAT between the two networks.
– MZB
Jan 12 at 12:20
Yes, the router B can be configured in Acces Point Mode, but I think I will return to the solution I have already tried, ie in LAN-to-LAN, simply extending the network from the top to the bottom and unfortunately managing everything to primary router A, which is less performing.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 17:41
I read a few days ago the answers given here superuser.com/questions/641036/…, I still have not tried though and I do not know if it's more or less like my problem.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 18:51
add a comment |
1
Check out whether router B can be configured as an access point rather than a router. Currently router B puts a firewall and NAT between the two networks.
– MZB
Jan 12 at 12:20
Yes, the router B can be configured in Acces Point Mode, but I think I will return to the solution I have already tried, ie in LAN-to-LAN, simply extending the network from the top to the bottom and unfortunately managing everything to primary router A, which is less performing.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 17:41
I read a few days ago the answers given here superuser.com/questions/641036/…, I still have not tried though and I do not know if it's more or less like my problem.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 18:51
1
1
Check out whether router B can be configured as an access point rather than a router. Currently router B puts a firewall and NAT between the two networks.
– MZB
Jan 12 at 12:20
Check out whether router B can be configured as an access point rather than a router. Currently router B puts a firewall and NAT between the two networks.
– MZB
Jan 12 at 12:20
Yes, the router B can be configured in Acces Point Mode, but I think I will return to the solution I have already tried, ie in LAN-to-LAN, simply extending the network from the top to the bottom and unfortunately managing everything to primary router A, which is less performing.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 17:41
Yes, the router B can be configured in Acces Point Mode, but I think I will return to the solution I have already tried, ie in LAN-to-LAN, simply extending the network from the top to the bottom and unfortunately managing everything to primary router A, which is less performing.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 17:41
I read a few days ago the answers given here superuser.com/questions/641036/…, I still have not tried though and I do not know if it's more or less like my problem.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 18:51
I read a few days ago the answers given here superuser.com/questions/641036/…, I still have not tried though and I do not know if it's more or less like my problem.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 18:51
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1393479%2flan-to-wan-puzzle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1393479%2flan-to-wan-puzzle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Check out whether router B can be configured as an access point rather than a router. Currently router B puts a firewall and NAT between the two networks.
– MZB
Jan 12 at 12:20
Yes, the router B can be configured in Acces Point Mode, but I think I will return to the solution I have already tried, ie in LAN-to-LAN, simply extending the network from the top to the bottom and unfortunately managing everything to primary router A, which is less performing.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 17:41
I read a few days ago the answers given here superuser.com/questions/641036/…, I still have not tried though and I do not know if it's more or less like my problem.
– Shane
Jan 12 at 18:51